Experience with Alma at Northeastern University

undefined
 
Northeastern University
(Boston, Mass.) & Alma
 
Amira Aaron
Associate Dean, Scholarly Resources
IGELU Oxford, September 2014, Session 10
 
 
About Northeastern University
 
Global research university
Over 26,000 FTE in urban Boston location
Additional sites in Seattle & Charlotte, NC – will be others
Large online presence for courses & professional education
Main library (SNELL) & Law Library
Member of the Boston Library Consortium
Over 92% of purchases are electronic – Buy very little print
Former III Millennium user for many years
Heavy user of local and consortial demand-driven acquisitions
for e-books
 
 
 
 
Alma Early Adopter
 
Contract signed December 2011 – Went live July 2013
Alma benefits that we considered:
Cloud system – no local maintenance, upgrades, etc.
Open, modern platform – flexible, service-oriented architecture
Reporting and analysis tools, including usage information
Do away with print and electronic silos – wanted concentration on
electronic processes
Separate back-end and discovery layers
Promise of cooperative efforts & sharing of data with others
Promise of better workflows and integration with vendors
Difficult migration from Millennium (second customer with
very little documentation or detailed knowledge)
 
THE REALITY - Positive
 
General:
System in the cloud, and being able to access Alma from
anywhere, is a definite positive!
“Real-time” information for allocations, expenditures,
encumbrances & available balances – fiscal functionality
Automated processes & workflows
Alma/Banner connection works well – eliminates manual keying
Managing funds – ease of use;  add/update allocations to funds is
streamlined, ability to identify records to disencumber
Set functionality – copying and sharing sets, new functionality of
turning a logical set into an itemized set for updating
Ability to apply custom normalization rules for batch record
enhancement and import
Analytics is powerful and has the potential to be an excellent tool.
 
THE REALITY - Positive
 
Some specifics:
Link to LC MARC format documentation within Metadata editor
Alma maintains a record of the notices sent to patrons
Simple process for adding a proxy borrower to a patron’s account
Easy access navigation buttons for circulation transactions
Linking functionality in Alma – e.g., linking orders, portfolios and
licenses
New ability to display licensing terms in Primo
Ability to export lists from the system
Ability to run jobs on large batches of records for updating
EDI invoicing works well
Simple to input a manual invoice
Usage statistics – SUSHI or import – promised Analytics report on
cost per use (almost there)
 
THE REALITY – Less Positive
 
General
Integration of various formats (URM) not yet realized; silos still
exist – inability to reach all data from all functions of Alma
Electronic resource functionality not yet fully developed
(disappointing that SFX functionality was not replicated) –
licensing functionality is especially weak
Authorizations are not granular enough and often not logical –
need a read-only authorization!
System is still very rigid as to making changes, corrections or
editing records
Inconsistency in necessary actions, terms and data presented
across the system
Material types are still confusing and too many different lists!
Limits of 5000 for export & loading to create sets are not adequate
Documentation is still often incomplete, confusing or inaccurate
Need a list of known issues to save everyone’s time!
 
THE REALITY – Less Positive
 
Some specifics:
Batch processes, such as Patron User loads, too brittle – one error
aborts the load – should just get reported out
Reliance on MarcEdit and Excel to perform tasks previously done
in ILS – additional time and staff training
Analytics -  not reliable - still can’t report consistently on some
important fields (e.g. “reporting code”) or combine
print/electronic;  problem with various counts
Audit trail is harmed by data, such as receipt date and original
location, being deleted when an item is deleted
Course reserves – entire workflow is daunting – easy to miss
steps and make mistakes!  Suppressed records still show as on
reserve.
Not able to customize notices at Library or Desk levels.
Order record data sets functionality is lacking
Unable to link at article level for local/standalone portfolios
Title searching via “Search External Resources” is difficult
 
 
Conclusions Thus Far
 
Moving to Alma as an early adopter has ultimately put the
Northeastern University libraries in a very good place
After a difficult two years, we are starting to realize the potential
of Alma in many areas, including staff savings
Both Alma and Primo are improving rapidly – sometimes almost
too rapidly for us to keep up with!
It has been a definite learning process, both for us as a customer
and for Ex Libris
We are somewhat concerned about support issues and the
ability of Ex Libris to keep up with the tremendous growth of
Alma, both staff support and the technical infrastructure
It will be exciting to see where we go from here and if the
promise of cooperative use of Alma and sharing of data can be
realized in the future
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts, shares its experience with adopting Alma, focusing on the benefits, challenges, and outcomes of migrating from the III Millennium system. The transition to Alma brought advantages such as cloud-based operations, improved reporting tools, and enhanced workflows, despite the complexities of migration. The post-implementation feedback highlights positive aspects of real-time information access, automated processes, and advanced analytics capabilities.

  • Northeastern University
  • Alma
  • Library System
  • Migration Challenges
  • Cloud-Based Operations

Uploaded on Sep 16, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. + Northeastern University (Boston, Mass.) & Alma Amira Aaron Associate Dean, Scholarly Resources IGELU Oxford, September 2014, Session 10

  2. +About Northeastern University Global research university Over 26,000 FTE in urban Boston location Additional sites in Seattle & Charlotte, NC will be others Large online presence for courses & professional education Main library (SNELL) & Law Library Member of the Boston Library Consortium Over 92% of purchases are electronic Buy very little print Former III Millennium user for many years Heavy user of local and consortial demand-driven acquisitions for e-books

  3. +Alma Early Adopter Contract signed December 2011 Went live July 2013 Alma benefits that we considered: Cloud system no local maintenance, upgrades, etc. Open, modern platform flexible, service-oriented architecture Reporting and analysis tools, including usage information Do away with print and electronic silos wanted concentration on electronic processes Separate back-end and discovery layers Promise of cooperative efforts & sharing of data with others Promise of better workflows and integration with vendors Difficult migration from Millennium (second customer with very little documentation or detailed knowledge)

  4. +THE REALITY - Positive General: System in the cloud, and being able to access Alma from anywhere, is a definite positive! Real-time information for allocations, expenditures, encumbrances & available balances fiscal functionality Automated processes & workflows Alma/Banner connection works well eliminates manual keying Managing funds ease of use; add/update allocations to funds is streamlined, ability to identify records to disencumber Set functionality copying and sharing sets, new functionality of turning a logical set into an itemized set for updating Ability to apply custom normalization rules for batch record enhancement and import Analytics is powerful and has the potential to be an excellent tool.

  5. +THE REALITY - Positive Some specifics: Link to LC MARC format documentation within Metadata editor Alma maintains a record of the notices sent to patrons Simple process for adding a proxy borrower to a patron s account Easy access navigation buttons for circulation transactions Linking functionality in Alma e.g., linking orders, portfolios and licenses New ability to display licensing terms in Primo Ability to export lists from the system Ability to run jobs on large batches of records for updating EDI invoicing works well Simple to input a manual invoice Usage statistics SUSHI or import promised Analytics report on cost per use (almost there)

  6. +THE REALITY Less Positive General Integration of various formats (URM) not yet realized; silos still exist inability to reach all data from all functions of Alma Electronic resource functionality not yet fully developed (disappointing that SFX functionality was not replicated) licensing functionality is especially weak Authorizations are not granular enough and often not logical need a read-only authorization! System is still very rigid as to making changes, corrections or editing records Inconsistency in necessary actions, terms and data presented across the system Material types are still confusing and too many different lists! Limits of 5000 for export & loading to create sets are not adequate Documentation is still often incomplete, confusing or inaccurate Need a list of known issues to save everyone s time!

  7. +THE REALITY Less Positive Some specifics: Batch processes, such as Patron User loads, too brittle one error aborts the load should just get reported out Reliance on MarcEdit and Excel to perform tasks previously done in ILS additional time and staff training Analytics - not reliable - still can t report consistently on some important fields (e.g. reporting code ) or combine print/electronic; problem with various counts Audit trail is harmed by data, such as receipt date and original location, being deleted when an item is deleted Course reserves entire workflow is daunting easy to miss steps and make mistakes! Suppressed records still show as on reserve. Not able to customize notices at Library or Desk levels. Order record data sets functionality is lacking Unable to link at article level for local/standalone portfolios Title searching via Search External Resources is difficult

  8. +Conclusions Thus Far Moving to Alma as an early adopter has ultimately put the Northeastern University libraries in a very good place After a difficult two years, we are starting to realize the potential of Alma in many areas, including staff savings Both Alma and Primo are improving rapidly sometimes almost too rapidly for us to keep up with! It has been a definite learning process, both for us as a customer and for Ex Libris We are somewhat concerned about support issues and the ability of Ex Libris to keep up with the tremendous growth of Alma, both staff support and the technical infrastructure It will be exciting to see where we go from here and if the promise of cooperative use of Alma and sharing of data can be realized in the future

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#