Discussion and Overview of Tdocs Presentation on Lenovo, Motorola, and Ericsson Procedures
Minutes from a meeting discussing presentations on Lenovo, Motorola, and Ericsson procedures in the context of Tdocs. Agenda included discussions on smartwatch implementation, S-CSCF functionality, RFC-related topics, feature tags, and identity management. Attendees from various companies shared insights and raised questions regarding the presented papers.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
MuDE 11thAugust 2020
Tdocs in order of presentation TS 24.174 Discussion TS 24.174?? TS 24.174 Overview Discussion paper Lenovo / Motorola Mobility Procedures? Lenovo / Motorola Mobility Procedures Ericsson vivo General location of all tdocs https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ct/WG1_mm-cc-sm_ex- CN1/TSGC1_125e/Inbox/drafts
Minutes Attendees Ly Thanh Phan Rob Edwards (Matrixx) Mariusz Skrocki (Orange) Jorgen Axell Martin Dolly ATT Shahram Nevenka (Ericsson) Peter Yi Nancy Greene (Ericsson)
Minutes Adrian gave overview of the agenda and presented the vivo paper Roozbeh wants to change to agenda around. Jorgen User subscriber to the MiD service can indicate to the federated UE. Shahram Is there another section that describes messages? Roozbeh His discussion paper might address this Shahram User that multiple UEs can get into conversation both messaging and and voice calls. Roozbeh presented his discussion paper Adrian asked if the solution supports smartwatch to control the identities on smartphone. Roozbeh gave a response, indicated might be implementation issue. Jorgen Your using S-CSCF based forking. That is disconnected from 24.174 as the functionality is AS based. Roozbeh 24.174 there is some S-CSCF stuff (p-Called Party ID) (Brings up 24.174 call flows) Jorgen Don t think there is S-CSCF in 24.174 Jorgen are call flows specify anything specific in 24.174 or more targeting 24.229? If later really don t want to add them into 24.174 Roozbeh what the end use is trying to achieve with these RFCs. Thinks it is more RFC related RFC 3841 and GRUU RFC.
Minutes Jorgen presented his CR Roozbeh You activating / deactivating capabilities? Roozbeh When you do this you deactive an identity that maybe used for other applications. Little baised towards this application. Nancy Gave a response to Roozbeh, values of the feature tag are identities. Roozbeh You don t know what identities you have at time of registration, in 200ok you get them. You are removing an identity with the feature tag. Jorgen feature tags have been used for many things Adrian I don t think the feature allows an identity to be used for some apps and not for others Orange you need to register again to change the status of identity. Is it needed Disclaimer: Notes are captured for informative purposes only and it does not capture any formal agreement nor any conclusion. It is captured to author s best of ability. There may be inaccuracies and missing parts.
