Upgrade of Rural Roads Maintenance Process through eMARG Implementation

Implementation of the eMARG system for rural road maintenance has streamlined the process by digitizing bill submission, inspections, and record-keeping. It has enhanced accountability, quality monitoring, and timely maintenance activities through evidence-based assessments and defect liability period adherence. The transition to performance-based maintenance contracts ensures improved road outcomes and efficient utilization of resources.

• Rural Roads
• eMARG System
• Maintenance Contracts
• Defect Liability Period
• Performance Monitoring

lai_m Follow

Uploaded on Oct 09, 2024 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Presentation Transcript

1. MAINTENANCE OF RURAL ROADS THROUGH eMARG DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD POST-DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD eMARG

2. BILL OF QUANTITIES (BOQ) MECHANISM IN PRACTICE BEFORE eMARG The cycle of payment started from Contractor submitting the bill PIU inspects the road Contractor submits the Physical bill for maintenance of road The Bill is based on quantity of material PIU receives the bill Payments to contractors based on quantity of work executed and not on quality of road Routine Maintenance of roads missing from workflow PIU verifies if the bill is genuine Labor Intensive manual processes (Bill generation, taxes, approvals, payments) Paper based system and tedious record keeping Record of payment is updated manually The Account Officer adds Taxes to the bill manually Bill gets approved A cheque is sent to contractor

3. SWITCHING TO PERFORMANCE BASED MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS EVIDENCE BASED ASSESSMENT OF ROAD OUTCOMES BASED MONITORING NO QUALITY IN CONSTRUCTION IS REWARDED REQUIREMENT FOR DETAILED MEASUREMENT

4. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) PMGSY, for the first time brought in the concept of Defects Liability Period, where the contractor is obligated to carry out maintenance of the road constructed by him/her for the first Five years and also rectify any deficiencies noticed during this period. Objectives of the Standard Operating Procedure(SOP) The large network of increasing maintenance as well as proper effective monitoring system. The system shall be a web based digital platform. GOVERNENCE Track on funds allotment, utilization EVIDENCE BASED SOLUTION Monitoring mechanism EFFECTIVE MAIINTENANCE The SoP defines the guidelines for carrying out the DLP Maintenance of PMGSY roads through eMARG

5. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) Process Before After Bills submitted manually based on labour/ material involved in maintenance No control / record of date or frequency of Bill submission eBill submitted in one click online with fixed maximum monthly amount Monthly alerts for bill submission No dispute around date of submission of bill Bill Submission Inspection triggered by bill submission. A bad road without bill submitted will not be inspected No permanent record or evidence of routine inspection Bi-monthly Inspections done through eMARG mobile app with geo-tagged photos Routine Inspections Mobile notifications for reminders Primarily on the basis of volume /labour/material of work executed ie based on inputs Done Manually by Engineers against the bill raised by contractor Bill amount calculated by system based on marks awarded in Performance Evaluation ie outcomes Photographs clicked in RI are used as base for this evaluation Verification of Work & Bill

6. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) Voucher Generation Done Manually by Account Officer after deducting taxes manually from the approved Bill Amount System generated with automatic tax deductions etc under Account Officer Login & DSC for digital signing of vouchers Directly into contractors account; single account per contractor. Transaction sent to accounting software automatically by API Payment only based on months where minimum serviceability or performance is ensured Payments Done manually by Cheque Payment and then entered into online accounting software Cost Saving Payments made for periods where road was not maintained because of lack of routine evidence Process level monitoring: Reports, reviews, photographs and GIS Data Analytics Only limited to total expenditure against roads

7. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) Payments are based on how well the contractor manages to comply with the performance standards or service levels defined in the contract, and not on piece work. In PBMC the contractor has to keep road in good riding condition throughout the year. No separate measurements are required and PERFORMANCE BASED MAINTENANCE CONTRACT (PBMC) only routine inspection has to be done bimonthly. Any deficiency found during inspection is to be attended by the contractor. The payments are based on predefined performance matrix. Execution of PBMC: Every 2 Month During PE, Maintenance condition of road evaluated by PE If PE<80 for any segment or entire road, no payment should be made PE along with RI If PE<80 for 3rd time, action against contractor should be taken For PE, road divided in to km wise segments

8. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) Routine maintenance consist of following activities Restoration of rain cuts and dressing of berms as per clause 1902 of the Specifications. Once generally after rains White washing guard stones Twice in a year Re-fixing displaced guard stones Once in a year Making up of shoulders as per clause 1903 of the Specifications. As and when required White washing parapets of C.D. Works Once in a year Maintenance of Bituminous surface road and / or gravel road and/or WBM road including filling pot holes and patch repairs e As and when required Maintenance of 200 m and Kilo Meter stones as per clause 1912 of the Specifications. Repairing once in every two years Maintenance of drains as per clause 1907 of the Specifications. Twice Maintenance of culverts and cause ways as per clause 1908 and 1909 of the Specifications. Twice Maintenance of road signs as per clause 1910 of the Specifications. Repairing once in every two years Maintenance of guard rails and parapet Rails as per clause 1911 of the Specifications Repairing once in every two years

9. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) Budgeting Execution Planning Assessment of Performance of Roads Involvement of Contractors Monitoring of large number of roads This software will provide the inspection details as well as payment details of each and every road. The software will be used by all SRRDAs. Keeping evidence of same for monitoring at senior level Scrutiny of bills

10. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) The relevant clauses in SBD for maintenance during DLP are reproduced below Clause 32. Correction of Defects noticed during the Defects Liability Period and Routine Maintenance of Roads for five years. The Engineer shall give notice to the Contractor for any Defects before the end of the Defects Liability Period, which begins from the Completion Date and ends after five years. The Defects Liability Period shall be extended for as long as the Defects remain to be corrected. 32.1 Every time notice of Defect/Defects is given, the Contractor shall correct the notified Defect/Defects within the duration of time specified by the Engineer s notice. 32.2 The Contractor shall do the routine maintenance of roads, including pavement, road sides and cross drains including surface drains to the required standards and in the manner as defined in clause 1.1 and keep the entire road surface and structure in Defect free condition during the entire maintenance period which begins from the Completion Date and ends after five years. 32.3

11. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) The relevant clauses in SBD for maintenance during DLP are reproduced below Clause 32. Correction of Defects noticed during the Defects Liability Period and Routine Maintenance of Roads for five years. 32.4 The routine maintenance standards shall meet the following minimum requirements:- I. Potholes on the road surface to be repaired soon after these appear or brought to his notice either during the Contractor s monthly inspection or by the Engineer. Road shoulders to be maintained in proper condition to make them free from excessive edge drop offs, roughness, scouring or potholes. III. Cleaning of surface drains including reshaping to maintain free flow of water. IV. Cleaning of culverts and pits for free flow of water. V. Maintenance of road signs, pavement markings and other traffic control devices VI. Any other maintenance operation required to keep the road traffic worthy at all times during the maintenance period. II.

12. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) The relevant clauses in SBD for maintenance during DLP are reproduced below Clause 32. Correction of Defects noticed during the Defects Liability Period and Routine Maintenance of Roads for five years. To fulfill the objectives laid down in sub clauses 32.3 and 32.4 above, the Contractor shall undertake detailed inspection of the roads at least once in a month. The Engineer can increase this frequency in case of emergency. The Contractor shall forward to the Engineer, the record of inspection and rectification each month. The Contractor shall pay particular attention on those road sections which are likely to be damaged or inundated during rainy season. 32.5 The Engineer may issue notice to the Contractor to carry out maintenance of defects, if any, noticed in his inspection, or brought to his notice. The Contractor shall remove the defects within the period specified in the notice and submit to the Engineer a compliance report. 32.6 Clause 33 : Uncorrected Defects If the contractor has not corrected a defect pertaining to Defect Liability Period under clause 32.1 and clause 32.2 of these Conditions of Contract, to the satisfaction of the engineer, within the time specified in the engineer s notice, the engineer will assess the cost of having the defect corrected, and the contractor will pay this amount, on correction of the Defect. 33.1

13. DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) The relevant clauses in SBD for maintenance during DLP are reproduced below Clause 38 (a) & (c): The provision of submission of bills by contractor is as per condition in : The Contractor shall submit to the Engineer a bill every month for the routine maintenance of the roads from the date the maintenance period starts i.e. from completion date as defined in Clause 1.1, it will be supported with a copy of the record of the Contractor s monthly inspection and other instructions received from the Engineer. 38 (a) If the bill for a month is not received from the Contractor by the 10th day of the succeeding month or/ and if the Engineer has not certified that the Contractor has carried out the maintenance work for defects brought to his notice under clause 32.6 within specified period, no payment will become due to the Contractor for that month. 38 (C) In case the contractor fails in keeping road in good and serviceable condition and does not attend defects, strict action will be taken against the defaulting contractor as per SBD.

14. eMARG (electronics Maintenance of Rural Roads through PMGSY) PACKAGE FREEZING PACKAGE FREEZING CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION MANUAL EXPENDITURE NIT CREATION BILL SUBMISSION ROUTINE INSPECTION (RI) BILL VERIFICATION & FORWARD ROAD REGISTRATION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (PE) PACKAGE COMPLETION VOUCHER GENERATION SCROLL GENERATION BILL PROCESSING

15. eMARG (electronics Maintenance of Rural Roads through PMGSY) 7,59,844 km Road Length Constructed 6,24,129 km Road Length 12% India s overall Road Network 48,874 km Road Length PMGSY 1 PMGSY 2 7,59,844 km Rural Road Network under PMGSY 5 Years 77,879 km Road Length PMGSY 3 Defect Liability Period for a Road 85,123 km ~Current Length of road in Post DLP 2,27,753 km ~Current Length of road in DLP 3,19,552 km ~Total Length of road in DLP since inception

16. eMARG (electronics Maintenance of Rural Roads through PMGSY) A GIS-based enterprise and e-governance solution to assist the officials and contractors in carrying out and monitoring maintenance of road works under PMGSY Start* Online Generation of eBills by software Submission of eBills by contractor on click of a button Registration of Contractor Direct Payment to contractor in his account Start* Processing of Bills based on Marks obtained in Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation of Road based on Inspections conducted Inspections done through Mobile App by uploading photos *Parallel Entry points : 1. Bill submission by contractor and 2. Inspections by engineers

17. eMARG (electronics Maintenance of Rural Roads through PMGSY) eMARG Mobile Apps District photographs of the roads as part of routine inspections of roads done every two months engineers to take geo-tagged

18. eMARG Status of FY 2023-2024

19. eMARG Status of FY 2023-24 Total number of Roads in DLP States/UTs Name Length (Km) Liability (Cr) Expenditure (Cr) Saving (Cr) Expenditure +Saving (Cr) Andhra Pradesh 593 3285.32 13.32 10.06 1.75 11.81 Arunachal Pradesh 351 3977.91 49.68 22.47 3.48 25.95 Assam 3,679 12936.4 118.19 72.51 13.51 86.02 Bihar 4,028 12972.6 111.78 65.68 19.35 85.03 Chhattisgarh Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jammu And Kashmir Jharkhand 1,680 12353.4 89.42 56.79 10.07 66.86 224 235 2003.11 2236.13 8.72 9.25 5.37 4.54 1.01 0.68 6.38 5.22 946 6212.36 56.32 30.29 15.53 45.82 1,059 6493.3 57.99 23.68 10.84 34.52 2,380 8604.47 87.69 21.58 7.39 28.97 Karnataka 647 4359.22 27.92 22.91 1.6 24.51 Kerala Ladakh 242 865.195 12.39 8.69 0.91 9.6 44 495.967 5.01 2.5 0.42 2.92 Madhya Pradesh 3,119 19146.4 101.58 84.49 20.81 105.3 Maharashtra 340 2065.48 11.45 6.16 2.54 8.7

20. eMARG Status of FY 2023-24 Expenditure (Cr) Total number of Roads in DLP Expenditure +Savings (Cr) States/UTs Name Length (Km) Liability (Cr) Savings (Cr) Manipur 262 1729.6 17.92 25.32 3.02 3.45 186 9.82 53.71 7.59 50.17 7.4 13.64 120.01 44.91 138.07 1,442 6.43 14.65 1.63 0.92 92.05 14.66 56.68 3 37.42 5.45 8.11 96.76 27.6 93.02 896 0.67 2.38 0.38 0.36 34.75 0.66 5.25 0.23 13.75 2.38 3.38 2.6 11.81 32.12 221 7.1 17.03 2.01 1.28 126.8 15.32 61.93 3.23 51.17 7.83 11.49 99.36 39.41 125.14 1117 Meghalaya 475 2198.21 Mizoram 80 796.181 Nagaland 38 578.19 Odisha 5,400 23753.7 Punjab 199 2063.12 Rajasthan 1,100 9419.74 Sikkim 144 641.787 Tamilnadu 2,359 7671.48 Telangana 359 1391.03 Tripura 181 941.368 Uttar Pradesh 2,336 17274.3 Uttarakhand 784 6603.46 West Bengal Total 2,386 35,670 11937.5 1,85,007

21. Savings through eMARG Savings Savings Total Saving Amount (Cr) Total Saving Amount (Cr) Saving by Partial Payment of PE in between (80-100) where PE<80 & RI Missed Delayed Bills Saving by Partial Payment of PE in between (80-100) States/UTs Name States/UTs Name where PE<80 & RI Missed Delayed Bills (J1+L1+N1) Number of bills Amount (Cr) Number of Bills Amoun t (Cr) Number of Bills Amount (Cr) *As on 17.05.2024 (J1+L1+N1) Number of bills Amount (Cr) Number of Bills Amount (Cr) Number of Bills Amount (Cr) Andhra Pradesh 498 0.81 94 0.24 3387 0.7 1.75 Manipur 64 0.42 6 0.03 295 0.22 0.67 Arunachal Pradesh 225 2.91 3 0.06 601 0.51 3.48 Meghalaya 232 0.93 85 0.29 2082 1.16 2.38 Assam 2579 7.27 371 1.26 13192 4.98 13.51 Mizoram 81 0.25 16 0.05 191 0.08 0.38 Bihar 6214 14.77 531 1.35 8185 3.23 19.35 Nagaland 21 0.22 8 0.05 81 0.09 0.36 Chhattisgarh 507 3.11 168 1.66 4532 5.3 10.07 Odisha 7388 24.27 1452 4.48 13471 6 34.75 Gujarat 102 0.37 39 0.17 965 0.47 1.01 Punjab 71 0.41 0 0.00 420 0.25 0.66 Haryana 103 0.2 80 0.22 697 0.26 0.68 Rajasthan 359 2.09 101 0.70 3568 2.46 5.25 Himachal Pradesh 1091 5.07 1374 7.61 3228 2.85 15.53 Sikkim 16 0.1 1 0.01 133 0.12 0.23 Jammu And Kashmir Tamilnadu 3007 6.64 938 2.63 13701 4.48 13.75 1186 4.63 691 3.35 3197 2.86 10.84 Telangana 855 1.61 381 0.44 1472 0.33 2.38 Jharkhand 714 5.59 56 0.35 1536 1.45 7.39 Tripura 229 1.6 135 1.30 414 0.48 3.38 Karnataka 226 1 4 0.02 2886 0.58 1.6 Uttar Pradesh 93 0.54 53 0.51 3592 1.55 2.6 Kerala 52 0.24 11 0.02 1231 0.65 0.91 Uttarakhand 1130 4.87 703 4.05 3641 2.89 11.81 Ladakh 18 0.12 6.72 1.66 Cr 15 514 197 0.13 3.77 0.60 Cr 106 10014 418 0.17 10.32 0.28 Cr 0.42 20.81 2.54 Cr West Bengal 2569 11.87 1939 10.42 13820 9.83 32.12 Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra 1286 377 65 Cr Total 31,293 110 Cr 9,966 46 Cr 1,11,056 221 Cr

22. Bills Pending at AM/ME , PIU & AO Level No. of Bills Pending at PIU Incharge (B) Percentage No. of Bills Pending at PIU Incharge (B) Percentage No. of Bills Pending at AM/AE (A) Perentage No. of Bills Pending at AO (C) No. of Bills Pending at AM/AE (A) Perentage No. of Bills Pending at AO (C) Bills Pending Bills Pending States/UTs Name States/UTs Name Number of Bills Amount (Cr) Amount (Cr) 15.66 Number of Bills Andhra Pradesh 2573 6.45 Manipur 2572 43% 31% 26% 63% 27% 10% Meghalaya 3090 14.14 Arunachal Pradesh 3257 39.21 15% 62% 23% 18% 61% 20% Mizoram 628 2.03 29% 45% 26% Assam 24443 69.13 27% 55% 18% Nagaland 269 2.36 41% 35% 24% Bihar 23349 66.34 27% 27% 45% Odisha 34361 110.76 29% 15% 56% Chhattisgarh 6068 43.32 25% 43% 33% Punjab 992 6.16 26% 55% 19% Gujarat 677 3.59 31% 35% 34% Rajasthan 4546 26.99 22% 52% 26% Haryana 1740 6.36 11% 72% 17% Sikkim 1354 6.74 24% 55% 21% Himachal Pradesh 4957 26.22 25% 38% 38% Tamilnadu 5364 12.1 23% 49% 28% Jammu And Kashmir 6532 33.18 Telangana 1195 3.08 16% 61% 23% 32% 33% 35% Jharkhand 19240 70 Tripura 1121 7.48 40% 30% 30% 17% 58% 26% Karnataka 4012 15.65 Uttar Pradesh 16710 97.76 12% 39% 49% 10% 28% 62% Uttarakhand 3212 17.19 Kerala 1016 4.85 32% 31% 37% 21% 24% 55% Ladakh 344 4716 3.6 29.62 West Bengal 7806 42.08 12% 53% 68% 33% 20% 14% 36% 27% 37% Madhya Pradesh AVG.26% Total 1,87,902 790 42% 32% Maharashtra 1758 7.49 36% 26% 38%

23. Bills Pending at Contractor Level Bills Pending at Contractor Estimated Amount (in Cr) 1.0 0.8 0.1 0.4 9.6 0.3 0.6 0.3 1.3 Bills Pending at Contractor Estimated Amount State State (in Cr) Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Odisha Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Tamilnadu 136 172 35 29 2752 55 118 53 568 Andhra Pradesh 263 0.7 Arunachal Pradesh 185 2.3 Assam 1241 4.6 Bihar 1684 5.1 Chhattisgarh 361 1.7 Gujarat 28 0.2 Haryana 37 0.2 Himachal Pradesh 320 1.7 Jammu And Kashmir 394 1.8 Telangana 69 0.2 Jharkhand 824 4.7 Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West Bengal TOTAL 97 421 203 767 11447 0.4 2.2 1.0 4.2 Karnataka 169 1.0 Kerala 41 0.2 Ladakh 21 0.2 Madhya Pradesh 239 1.6 50.6 Cr Maharashtra 165 0.6

24. RI & PE Status Routine Inspection Performance Evaluation Routine Inspection Performance Evaluation States/UTs Name Not Done Not Done States/UTs Name Not Done Not Done Total Done Total Done Total Done Total Done NumberPercenta NumberPercen ge tage NumberPercenta NumberPercent ge age Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam 3269 3102 167 5.11% 3269 3010 259 7.92% Manipur 1477 319 1158 78.40% 1477 344 1133 76.71% 2048 1440 608 29.69% 2048 1569 479 23.39% Meghalaya 2767 2307 460 16.62% 2767 2463 304 10.99% 20970 15651 5319 25.36% 20970 17000 3970 18.93% Mizoram 461 343 118 25.60% 461 312 149 32.32% Bihar 19422 17082 2340 12.05% 19422 15221 4201 21.63% Nagaland 190 122 68 35.79% 190 116 74 38.95% Chhattisgarh 9563 8690 873 9.13% 9563 8840 723 7.56% Odisha 28564 21992 6572 23.01% 28564 25372 3192 11.17% Gujarat 1224 1110 114 9.31% 1224 1134 90 7.35% Punjab 738 596 142 19.24% 738 631 107 14.50% Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jammu And Kashmir Jharkhand 1299 1088 211 16.24% 1299 1225 74 5.70% Rajasthan 5800 5069 731 12.60% 5800 4920 880 15.17% 5406 4260 1146 21.20% 5406 4907 499 9.23% Sikkim 761 674 87 11.43% 761 670 91 11.96% Tamilnadu 12996 12582 414 3.19% 12996 12586 410 3.15% 5810 5475 335 5.77% 5810 5101 709 12.20% Telangana 1965 1493 472 24.02% 1965 1804 161 8.19% 12202 6670 5532 45.34% 12202 5626 6576 53.89% Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand 965 832 133 13.78% 965 839 126 13.06% Karnataka 3528 3060 468 13.27% 3528 3331 197 5.58% 10209 8867 1342 13.15% 10209 9440 769 7.53% Kerala 1168 1059 109 9.33% 1168 1070 98 8.39% Ladakh Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra 242 186 56 23.14% 242 210 32 13.22% 4412 3976 436 9.88% 4412 4071 341 7.73% West Bengal 13673 12568 1105 8.08% 13673 12351 1322 9.67% 15705 14322 1383 8.81% 15705 13404 2301 14.65% Total 1,88,275 1,55,798 32,477 17.25% 1,88,275 1,58,856 29,419 15.63% 1441 863 578 40.11% 1441 1289 152 10.55%

25. POST-DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) Types of Maintenance Activities covered in post DLP maintenance DLP (NOV 2019) Renewal (Part-III) Emergency/ Special Repair Works (Part-IV) Post DLP Routine Maintenance (Part-II) e-MARG as a web based solution POST DLP Data Exchange Between OMMAS and eMARG Initial Rehabilitati on (Part-I) POST DLP (NOV 2023)

26. POST-DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) BOQ METHOD PBMC METHOD This will consists of items required for improvement in road which may include:- Cyclic activities Are performed at a predetermined interval throughout the year purely as a preventive measure because of events that are known in prior to occur Up gradation/Replacement of existing structures Construction of left out portion of the roads (due to land (e.g. cleaning drains before and during seasonal rainfall), and are scheduled at fixed times during the year. dispute of any other reason). Construction of protection works etc. Reactive activities Conversion of existing BT pavement to CC pavement due to are performed in response to a triggering condition that requires action before the problem gets out of hand . extension of habitation area. The items pertaining to road safety if not provided earlier (e.g. blocked culvert, crack sealing and pothole patching) Any other improvement required for road users.

27. POST-DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) BOQ METHOD PBMC METHOD Periodic renewal is planned in segments of the road, in such a manner that BT surface of every road of the package can be renewed with same surfacing usually in first 3 or 4 years of completion of DLP. Special Repairs works may consist of following:- I. Clearing of landslides II. Repair/Reconstruction of damaged part of the road/ retaining/breast walls III. Repair/Reconstruction of damaged drains Such type of works shall be carried out from NDRF/SDRF. State may also allocate separate fund for this purpose. Lump sum provision for unforeseen works under maintenance during 5 years contract period 10-20% of total cost Payment of Emergency Work: Works shall be included item rate / (%) on SOR. Guidelines for Routine Maintenance: Stretch Selection The In-charge officer should visit all roads and depending on present surface condition, traffic and other aspects affecting maintenance condition The selected segment must be technically ready to accept new surface 10-20% of Total Cost Work is to be executed as per BoQ rates and measurements be Execution of Renewal Works Following IRC/IS codes and Manuals of PMGSY. Use of Plastic Waste, Cold Mix technology The renewal in any segment cannot be proposed till completion of five years after previous renewal/bitumen work entered in measurement book and accordingly bill is prepared and paid after due quality checks. financial evaluation process as per NRIDA standard Bid Document.

28. POST-DEFECT LIABILITY PERIOD States on Boarded Till Now Payment Disbursed (Cr.) 5.66 3.770 115.36 13.47 11.47 0 3.834 469.22 0 0 0 0 622.78 NUMBER OF ROADS ROAD LENGTH (Km) STATES ARUNACHAL PRADESH KARNATAKA Arunachal Pradesh Assam Chhattisgarh Haryana Jammu and Kashmir Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Meghalaya Odisha Tripura West Bengal TOTAL 47 643 4717 25 316 144 432 11576 28 4034 244 2209 24415 342.7 1665.8 16934.2 269 1304.1 880 1024.7 39708.9 99.65 15105.15 1017 9996.89 88348.09 ASSAM KERALA TRIPURA MADHYA PRADESH CHHATTISGARH WEST BENGAL HARYANA MEGHALAYA JAMMU AND KASHMIR ODISSA

29. eMARG National AI The PIU in-charge can either decide to: eMARG introduced a new alert system at the national level to help PIU in-charge (Executive Engineer) carefully approve the PE marks on eMARG. The portal will show an alert to the PIU in charge when it thinks the PE marks given by the PIU in-charge is not appropriate as per the road section quality. Reject the warning and proceed with his own marks Accept the warning and change the marks The alert might NOT always be right. The alert will NOT come in all cases. The alert only comes when the portal thinks the marks being approved by PIU in-charge is not appropriate with the section quality based on the images uploaded by the JE. The PIU in-charge should always consider the on ground condition of the road and their engineering judgement before finally submitting the PE score.

30. eMARG National AI Case 1 Road Condition Good But Marks on Lower Side

31. eMARG National AI Case 1 Road Condition Good But Marks on Lower Side

32. eMARG National AI Case 1 Road Condition Good But Marks on Lower Side

33. eMARG National AI Case I Road Condition Good But Marks on Lower Side EXAMPLE State -Andhra Pradesh District Anantapur, Package AP02PIII 24, Road Name - T10-Uravakonda to Vajrakarur via Rampuram,Tatrakal and Ganjikunta (10.89 km), Chainage 2 Shiaksanipalli,J PIU Comments - Grass on Shoulders and High berms. Hm, Km stones are not visible. Inspecting Officer Marks - 85 PE Marks before Warning - 79 PE Marks Post Warning - 80

34. eMARG National AI Case 2 Road Condition Poor But Higher Marks

35. eMARG National AI Case 2 Road Condition Poor But Higher Marks

36. eMARG National AI Case 2 Road Condition Poor But Higher Marks

37. eMARG National AI Case II Road Condition Poor But Marks on Higher Side EXAMPLE State -Meghalaya District West Khasi Hills, Package MG070304, Road Name (L032) L032- Malangkhona to Bamil (10.0 km), Chainage 1 PIU Comments - the contractor did not repaired the potholes Inspecting Officer Marks - 80 PE Marks before Warning - 80 PE Marks Post Warning - 64

38. eMARG National AI Case 3 One Image Good and One Image is Bad But Higher Marks EXAMPLE State -Madhya Pradesh District Ganjam, Package OR11273, Road Name - (L083) L083-NH-59 to Adipanka (13.765 km), Chainage 13 PIU Comments - Berm to be cleaned properly Inspecting Officer Marks - 97 PE Marks before Warning - 97 PE Marks Post Warning - 83

39. eMARG National AI State-wise Summary AI Based Warnings Number of PEs where PE Marks changed PEs ,Where Marks Increased One Image is Good and One is Bad but Marks are Greater Total No. of PEs with AI integration Both Images are Bad but Marks are Greater Both Images are Good but Marks are Lesser PEs ,Where Marks Decreased State Total Number Percentage Number Percentage ANDHRA PRADESH ARUNACHAL PRADESH ASSAM BIHAR 6673 393 127 368 61 19% 265 81% 326 7515 4074 7 1384 13 4% 346 96% 359 16570 16188 2742 2035 55 185 2106 2038 105 51 6% 4% 1788 1228 94% 96% 1893 1279 24588 834 259 1637 38 9% 365 91% 403 CHATTISGARH 4911 5513 276 192 66 386 364 231 3 28 2% 14% 167 169 98% 86% 170 197 GUJARAT HARYANA HIMACHAL PRADESH JAMMU AND KASHMIR 12117 562 1039 301 80 31% 178 69% 258 15270 1110 518 585 51 11% 393 89% 444 8097 11062 1908 887 1290 128 106 123 64 26 34 4 804 453 163 47 10 13 8 0 4% 4% 4% 0% 238 332 198 22 96% 96% 96% 100% 248 345 206 22 JHARKHAND KARNATAKA KERALA LADAKH MADHYA PRADESH 35417 1781 555 1289 121 10% 1033 90% 1154 2394 196 36 75 13 8% 153 92% 166 MAHARASHTRA 665 145 45 0 3 5% 61 95% 64 MANIPUR

40. eMARG National AI State-wise Summary AI Based Warnings Number of PEs where PE Marks changed PEs ,Where Marks Increased PEs ,Where Marks Decreased Total No. of PEs with AI integration One Image is Good and One is Bad but Marks are Greater Both Images are Bad but Marks are Greater Both Images are Good but Marks are Lesser State Total Number Percentage Number Percentage MEGHALAYA 6432 551 58 560 21 3% 598 97% 619 MIZORAM 866 426 80 0 1 3% 37 97% 38 NAGALAND 490 200 50 0 2 2% 106 98% 108 ODISHA 35661 3475 1030 2518 238 15% 1369 85% 1607 PUNJAB 3371 89 14 298 4 3% 119 97% 123 RAJASTHAN 14502 388 238 741 24 7% 305 93% 329 SIKKIM 1648 435 79 71 8 5% 153 95% 161 TAMIL NADU 19155 2240 461 923 68 7% 945 93% 1013 TELANGANA 2557 139 142 98 49 28% 127 72% 176 TRIPURA 2005 194 27 148 27 12% 194 88% 221 UTTAR PRADESH 34423 2171 173 4837 57 3% 1646 97% 1703 UTTARAKHAND 15846 1226 438 1011 95 14% 592 86% 687 WEST BENGAL TOTAL 24093 2682 377 1967 324 13% 2268 88% 2592 330824 30203 6573 25017 1516 9% 15395 91% 16911

41. JOURNEY OF IMPLEMENTATION April 2019- Oct 2019 Feb 2019- April 2019 1st Feb 2019 May 2019- Feb 2020 Oct 2019 Discussions with All stake holders for development of project First Payment done through eMARG Trainings conducted to all stake holders Development of product Official Start date of project More than 50+ (online & offline) training were given to States/UTs, where all States/UTs SRRDAs and approximately 8000+ contractors were trained

42. TRAINING & WORKSHOPS

43. THANK YOU