The MISO Survey: A Comprehensive Overview

 
An Introduction to the
MISO Survey
 
Joshua Wilson
 
Introduction:
What is the MISO Survey?
 
 
Web-based quantitative survey
Measures how faculty, students, and staff view
library and technology services in academia
A valid, reliable, and cross-institutional
assessment tool
Importance of technology and library services in
the same survey
 
MISO Team
 
Dave Consiglio (Director)
, Bryn Mawr College
Katherine Furlong (Associate Director)
, Susquehanna University
Gentry Lankewicz Holbert (Associate Director)
, Spring Hill College
Craig Milberg (Associate Director)
, Davidson College
Kevin Reynolds (Associate Director)
, Wofford College
Josh Wilson (Associate Director)
, Brandeis University
Jean Lacovara (MISO Survey Specialist)
 
History of the Survey
 
 
First developed in 2005
Originally rooted in liberal arts colleges
Variety of institutions participating
112 participating institutions
157,000 faculty, student, and staff responses
 
Measurements of Organizational
Effectiveness
 
 
Use, Importance, Satisfaction
Communication
Academic Impact
 
Constituent Behavior, Interests,
and Demographics
 
Which academic tools do our constituents use,
and how?
How skilled are our constituents in the use of
academic tools?
What additional skills do they wish to learn, and
how?
Constituent demographics
 
Local Needs and National
Benchmarking
 
Balance between the needs of local
customization and benchmarking
Large body of tested items
Few required items
Local items
Benchmark over time and against peers
 
Sampling and Response Rates
 
Campus Survey Administrator
Survey length
Sampling
Response Rates
 
Response Rates
 
Instrument Development
 
Knowledge of management
team/practitioners
Client feedback
Local items for inclusion
Questions and Items are rigorously tested
 
Delivering Results
 
Detailed Data for Institution
Results Workbooks
MISO Survey Results Website (coming soon)
 
Slide Note

We are doing three segments on the MISO Survey that build upon the information. Please hold questions until the end, when we’ve allotted time with Dave Consiglio, the founder of the survey, to answer questions along with the presenters.

Embed
Share

The MISO Survey is a web-based quantitative tool that assesses how faculty, students, and staff perceive library and technology services in academia. Developed in 2005, it measures organizational effectiveness, constituent behavior, interests, and demographics, and addresses local needs while benchmarking nationally. With a diverse history and rigorous methodology, the survey provides valuable insights into the academic community.

  • MISO Survey
  • Academic Assessment
  • Technology Services
  • Organizational Effectiveness
  • Survey History

Uploaded on Oct 08, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Introduction to the MISO Survey Joshua Wilson

  2. Introduction: What is the MISO Survey? Web-based quantitative survey Measures how faculty, students, and staff view library and technology services in academia A valid, reliable, and cross-institutional assessment tool Importance of technology and library services in the same survey

  3. MISO Team Dave Consiglio (Director), Bryn Mawr College Katherine Furlong (Associate Director), Susquehanna University Gentry Lankewicz Holbert (Associate Director), Spring Hill College Craig Milberg (Associate Director), Davidson College Kevin Reynolds (Associate Director), Wofford College Josh Wilson (Associate Director), Brandeis University Jean Lacovara (MISO Survey Specialist)

  4. History of the Survey First developed in 2005 Originally rooted in liberal arts colleges Variety of institutions participating 112 participating institutions 157,000 faculty, student, and staff responses

  5. Measurements of Organizational Effectiveness Use, Importance, Satisfaction Communication Academic Impact

  6. Constituent Behavior, Interests, and Demographics Which academic tools do our constituents use, and how? How skilled are our constituents in the use of academic tools? What additional skills do they wish to learn, and how? Constituent demographics

  7. Local Needs and National Benchmarking Balance between the needs of local customization and benchmarking Large body of tested items Few required items Local items Benchmark over time and against peers

  8. Sampling and Response Rates Campus Survey Administrator Survey length Sampling Response Rates

  9. Response Rates

  10. Instrument Development Knowledge of management team/practitioners Client feedback Local items for inclusion Questions and Items are rigorously tested

  11. Delivering Results Detailed Data for Institution Results Workbooks MISO Survey Results Website (coming soon)

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#