Overview of Planar Transmission Lines in Microwave Engineering

Slide Note
Embed
Share

This document details various types of planar transmission lines such as microstrip, stripline, coplanar waveguide, and slotline used in microwave engineering. It covers the characteristics, field structures for TEM mode, analysis methods, conformal mapping solutions, and considerations for effective width and attenuation in stripline design.


Uploaded on Jul 29, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adapted from notes by Prof. Jeffery T. Williams ECE 5317-6351 Microwave Engineering Fall 2018 Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Notes 11 Waveguiding Structures Part 6: Planar Transmission Lines w 0 r h 1

  2. Planar Transmission Lines w w b r h r Microstrip Stripline w w r r g g h g g h Coplanar Waveguide (CPW) Conductor-backed CPW s s r r h h Slotline Conductor-backed Slotline 2

  3. Planar Transmission Lines (cont.) w w w w r h r s h s Coplanar Strips (CPS) Conductor-backed CPS Stripline is a planar version of coax. Coplanar strips (CPS) is a planar version of twin lead. 3

  4. Stripline , , Common on circuit boards d b Fabricated with two circuit boards w Homogenous dielectric (perfect TEM mode) TEM mode (also TE & TM Modes) Field structure for TEM mode: Electric Field Magnetic Field 4

  5. Stripline (cont.) Analysis of stripline is not simple. TEM mode fields can be obtained from an electrostatic analysis (e.g., conformal mapping). A closed stripline structure is analyzed in the Pozar book by using an approximate numerical method: b w / 2 b , , d a a b 5

  6. Stripline (cont.) Conformal mapping solution (S. Cohn): Exact solution: K k 30 ( ) = Z K= complete elliptic integral of the first kind 0 ( ) K k /2 1 ( ) K k d 2 2 1 sin k 0 w b w b = sech k 2 = tanh k 2 6

  7. Stripline (cont.) Curve fitting this exact solution: b = Z ( ) 0 ln 4 ln(4) 0 = Note: 0.441 4 + w b r e Fringing term Effective width w b 0 ; 0.35 for w b w b = e 2 w b w b 0.35 ; 0.1 0.35 for 1 2 / 2 w b b b w Note: = = = ideal 0 The factor of 1/2 in front is from the parallel combination of two ideal PPWs. 0 Z 4 4 w r 7

  8. Stripline (cont.) Inverting this solutionto find w for given Z0: ; 120 X Z for 0 r w b = 0.85 0.6 ; 120 X Z for 0 r ln(4) X 0 4 Z 0 r 8

  9. Stripline (cont.) Attenuation Dielectric Loss: k k (TEM formula) = 0 r tan tan k d 2 2 j = = = = k k jk tan c d 0 c c c t sR b w , , d 9

  10. Stripline (cont.) Conductor Loss: 4 R Z (2.7 10 ) 3 ; 120 A Z 0 ) s r b t for 0 r ( 0 = c R Z b 0.16 ; 120 B Z s for 0 r 0 = sR 2 wher e + 1 2 w b t b t b t t 1 2 = + + ln A ( ) b t 1 2 1 b t w t = + + + + 1 0.414 ln 4 B w 2 w + 0.7 t 2 Note: We cannot let t 0 when we calculate the conductor loss. 10

  11. Microstrip w , , h d Inhomogeneous dielectric No TEM mode Note: Pozar uses (W, d) TEM mode would require kz = kin each region, but kz must be unique! Requires advanced analysis techniques Exact fields are hybrid modes (Ezand Hz) For h / 0 << 1, the dominant mode is quasi-TEM. 11

  12. Microstrip (cont.) Part of the field lines are in air, and part of the field lines are inside the substrate. Figure from Pozar book The flux lines get more concentrated in the substrate region as the frequency increases. 12

  13. Microstrip (cont.) Equivalent TEM problem: eff r k 0 Actual problem 0 w r h air eff r 0: 1 Z The effective permittivity gives the correct phase constant. r eff eff Z w The effective strip width gives the correct Z0. 0 h = air eff r 0/ Z Z 0 Equivalent TEM problem ( ) = since / Z L C 0 13

  14. Microstrip (cont.) Effective permittivity: This formula ignores dispersion , i.e., the fact that the effective permittivity is actually a function of frequency. + 1 1 1 = + eff r r r 2 2 h w 1 12 + Limiting cases: + 1 eff r / 0: w h r (narrow strip) 2 eff r / : w h (wide strip) r 0 w r h 14

  15. Microstrip (cont.) Characteristic Impedance: 60 8 w h w h w h + ln ; 1 for 4 eff r = Z w h 0 ; 1 0 for w h w h + 1.393 0.667ln + + eff r 1.444 This formula ignores the fact that the characteristic impedance is actually a function of frequency. 15

  16. Microstrip (cont.) Inverting this solution to find w for a given Z0: A 8 A e w h ; 2 for 2 2 e w h = 2 1 0.61 w h ( ) 1 ln(2 + + 1) ln 1 0.39 ; 2 B B B r for 2 r r where + + 1 1 1 0.11 Z = + + 0.33 A 0 r r 60 2 r r = B 0 2 Z 0 r 16

  17. Microstrip (cont.) Attenuation Dielectric loss: filling factor ( ) eff r 1 k 0 r tan r ( ) d eff r 2 1 r eff r 1: 0 d Conductor loss: k 0 r eff r : tan r d 2 R R s s h c Z w 0 very crude ( parallel-plate ) approximation (More accurate formulas are given later.) h Z 0 w 17

  18. Microstrip (cont.) More accurate formulas for characteristic impedance that account for dispersion (frequency variation) and conductor thickness: ( ) ( ) 0 ( ) ( ) f eff r eff r eff r eff r 1 1 0 f ( ) f ( ) 0 = Z Z 0 0 ( ) = 00 Z 0 w h ( / 1) ( ) ( ) ( 0 ) ( ) w h w h + 1.393 0.667ln + + eff r / / 1.444 2 t h t = + 1 ln + w w w t r h 18

  19. Microstrip (cont.) where 2 eff r (0) w h ( ) f ( / 1) = + r eff r eff r (0) 1.5 1 4 + F + 1 1 1 1 / t h w h ( ) 0 = + eff r r r r ( ) 2 2 4.6 1 12 + / / h w 0: f 2 As h w h = + 1 0.868ln 1 + + 1 0.5 4 F Note: ( ) ( ) 0 r eff r eff r f 0 : f As w t ( ) f eff r r r h 19

  20. Microstrip (cont.) 2 = eff r Effective dielectric constant k 12.0 0 r 11.0 c = v 10.0 p eff r 9.0 Frequency variation (dispersion) A frequency-dependent solution for microstrip transmission lines," E. J. Denlinger, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 19, pp. 30-39, Jan. 1971. 8.0 7.0 Frequency (GHz) Parameters: r = 11.7, w/h = 0.96, h = 0.317 cm Note: The flux lines get more concentrated in the substrate region as the frequency increases. Note: The phase velocity is a function of frequency, which causes pulse distortion. Quasi-TEM region 20

  21. Microstrip (cont.) More accurate formulas for conductor attenuation: 2 1 w h 1 2 R hZ w h w h w h t t h = + + 2 1 1 ln s c 2 4 h 2 0 ( ) 2 / w w h w h 2 2 R hZ w h w w h h w h w h t t h = + + + + + ln 2 0.94 1 ln e s 2 c 2 h + 0.94 0 2 h This is the number e = 2.71828 multiplying the term in parenthesis. 2 t h t = + 1 ln + w w w t r h 21

  22. Microstrip (cont.) Note about conductor attenuation: It is necessary to assume a nonzero conductor thickness in order to accurately calculate the conductor attenuation. The perturbational method predicts an infinite attenuation if a zero thickness is assumed. (0) 2 P P = l c 1 = 0 0: 0 t J s as sz s R 2 = (0) s P J d l s 2 + C C = 0 z 1 2 J sz Practical note: A standard metal thickness for PCBs is 0.7 [mils] (17.5 [ m]), called half-ounce copper . s w t 1 mil = 0.001 inch r h 22

  23. TXLINE This is a public-domain software for calculating the properties of some common planar transmission lines. http://www.awrcorp.com/products/optional-products/tx-line-transmission-line-calculator 23

  24. TXLINE (cont.) TX-LINE: Transmission Line Calculator TX-LINE* software is a FREE and easy-to-use Windows-based interactive transmission line calculator for the analysis and synthesis of transmission line structures. Register and Download Your FREE Copy of TX-LINE Software Today! TX-LINE software enables users to enter either physical or electrical characteristics for common transmission mediums: Microstrip Stripline Coplanar waveguide (WG) Grounded coplanar WG Slotline Learn more: TX-LINE Software Video Demonstration (3 minutes) *Note: TX-LINE software is embedded within NI AWR Design Environment and can be launched from the "Tools" menu. 24

  25. Microstrip (cont.) REFERENCES L. G. Maloratsky, Passive RF and Microwave Integrated Circuits, Elsevier, 2004. I. Bahl and P. Bhartia, Microwave Solid State Circuit Design, Wiley, 2003. R. A. Pucel, D. J. Masse, and C. P. Hartwig, Losses in Microstrip, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, pp. 342-350, June 1968. R. A. Pucel, D. J. Masse, and C. P. Hartwig, Corrections to Losses in Microstrip , IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, Dec. 1968, p. 1064. 25

More Related Content