Empowering Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Digital Libraries

 
Choosing a Digital Repository
 
 
What do we call 
It?
 
Digital Asset Management System (DAMS)
Institutional Repository (IR)
Repository Software
Content Management System (CMS)
Digital Library
Data repository
Electronic records systems
 
 
Who are your Audience/Users?
 
General public
Institutional
Support history and mission of your employer:
University Archives, Corporation, Government, Non-
profit
Museum
Collecting archives
Library
Research or lab
Learning Objects (educators)
Data repository (beyond scope of class)
 
 
 
Scholars
 
A 
digital library 
to publish an essay or digital
dissertation, share primary source collections,
and collaborate with others in the creation of
digital scholarship.
 
Museums
 
Use
 digital library to 
share collections and
build online exhibits with objects you cannot
display in the museum. Invite your visitors to
tag and mark items as favorites, or to
contribute content. Start a blog to publish
museum news and podcasts.
 
Librarians
 
Use a 
digital library
 as the publishing tool to
complement your online catalog or launch a
digital exhibit.
Academic librarians may publish open access
research publications and data
 
Archivists
 
Use a 
digital library
 to share your collections,
display documents and oral histories.
Preserve fragile materials
Rare or valuable item can be viewed with
greater eases.
 
Educators
 
Use a 
digital library 
to build inquiry-based
tasks for students, to create lesson plans with
accompanying primary sources, or build
learning modules with your team.
 
Special Interest/Enthusiasts
 
Use a 
digital library
 to share you personal
research or collections with the world, build
exhibits and write essays that showcase your
expertise.
 
What Assets do you Own?
 
What kind of objects do you want to store?
Photographs
Text documents
Databases
Movies
Audio
Web pages
Newspapers
Data
Your assets may dictate what system you choose
 
Use Cases or Stakeholders
 
Types of material may dictate the software
you choose
User’s expectations
Branding, mobile,
Sensitive and restricted data
Does the software need to integrate with
enterprise applications
Self submission or highly curated
 
 
Features/Ad-Ons
 
Can come already installed or be installed as
plugins, as needed basis
Examples
Bulk uploaded
CSV
Omeka’s Plugins 
https://omeka.org/add-
ons/plugins/
 
Metadata/Vocabularies/Authorities
 
What comes with it?:
Dublin Core
Thesauri
Metadata customizable?
Can you add your own
 
 
Platforms Optimized for Specific
Purposes or Users
 
Example we can place ContentDM and DSpace
on opposite ends of spectrum
 
Highly curated, no self
submission, rich user
experience
 
Less curation, self
submission, more utilitarian,
once size fits all.
 
DSpace
 
Digital repository designed to allow scholars
to share academic research
Turnkey solution or “repository in a box”
Open Source
Dublin Core metadata
Workflows that allow levels of administration
from library to scholar
Allows for “self submission” by scholar
 
ContentDM
 
Very library “biased”
Not very good at IR functions
Costly, but lots of functionality
Many institutions using
OCLC, will be around for awhile
Hosted or custom installed
Aging code base, so unlikely to see massive
changes
Lock-in
 
Omeka
 
Swahili word meaning “to display or layout
goods or wares; to speak out; to spread out;
to unpack.
Open source digital library
Developed by the late, Roy Rosenzweig at
George Mason University
Uses Dublin Core
Like Wordpress for exhibits and collections
 
Administrator and User Roles
 
Does the application allow for assigning
“roles” within the software?
User
Cataloger
Administrator
Student
Assistant
Can it be integrated to a directory service, like
Active Directory, LDAP or Shibboleth
 
File types/Asset Types
 
What files can you upload into the system?
Audio
Newspapers/Books
Video
Images
File Types
Tiff, Mov, Wav, Jpeg2000
 
 
 
Some Key Questions to Ask
 
What is your institutions long-term financial
commitment to the digital library?
What are your resources in staffing and
technology?
Is grant funded or line item in your yearly
budget?
What is the size of your collection?
Will the software scale?
 
Hosted DL
 
Hosted pushes technical oversight to vendor
Great for small institutions and big, too
Monthly or yearly fee, usually more costly
Lots of coordination
Phone calls and email
Tickets
Can’t customize, and if so, additional costs
Untimely downtime
The costs are more upfront
 
Locally Administered DL
 
Requires robust technology environment
Usually one dedicated web or server
administrator
Allows for most customization
Branding or look and feel
Integrate with other systems
Usually less yearly expense
Can hire technology consultant for install and
upgrades
 
Consortia Approach to DL
 
Inexpensive approach to entering the DL game
Technical help from consortia
Not a lot of customizations options
Updating the collection or configuration may require
a lot of coordination
Collections might get more exposures, but at the
same time lost with competing collections.
A few examples:
NY Heritage
California Digital Library
Ohio Digital Library
Minnesota Digital Library
 
Open Source vs. Proprietary
 
The term open source, “source” refers to
source code, the human-readable computer
code which is the origin, or source, of the
computer application. Open refers to the
terms of access to that computer source code.
So open source software is software for which
the source code is open for inspection,
changing, customization
 
Advantages of Open Source
 
Access to source code and ability and right to
modify it
Right to redistribute modifications to benefit
wider community
Free (not always)
Excellent support networks
Large and enthusiastic user base
Disadvantages
Limited or no accountability
Informal and unaccountable support channels
 
 
Types of Open Source
 
Operating System
Linux,
Server software
Apache, Tomcat,
Programming Language
PHP, Perl,
Building blocks
ImageMagick, LibXML, LibXSLT, Saxon, Blacklight,
Solr
 
Proprietary or Fee-based DL’s
 
ContentDM (OCLC)
LUNA Insight
Digital Commons (Bpress)
Past Perfect
DigiTool (Ex Libris)
 
***Only to name a few!***
 
Open Source DL’s
 
Fedora Commons
Hydra
Islandora
Dspace
ePrints
Greenstone
Omeka
 
Turnkey
 
Up in running quickly
Tried and true UI and settings, but can
become outdated
Less expertise and money
May not match look and feel of website
Lowest common denominator
Can’t customize, especially if it is proprietary
Difficult to experiment
High dissatisfaction over time
 
 
Customized
 
Customized
Most likely to meet you and your user’s needs
What most want, but not always practical
Up front investment in time and money
Potentially costly
Customized settings, means each upgrade more
times consuming, thus costly and risky to manage
over time
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the diverse user base of digital repositories, including scholars, museums, librarians, archivists, educators, and special interest enthusiasts. Learn how these users utilize digital libraries for research, preservation, collaboration, and dissemination of knowledge in various fields.

  • Knowledge sharing
  • Digital libraries
  • User engagement
  • Information preservation
  • Educational resources

Uploaded on Jul 16, 2024 | 2 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Choosing a Digital Repository

  2. What do we call It? Digital Asset Management System (DAMS) Institutional Repository (IR) Repository Software Content Management System (CMS) Digital Library Data repository Electronic records systems

  3. Who are your Audience/Users? General public Institutional Support history and mission of your employer: University Archives, Corporation, Government, Non- profit Museum Collecting archives Library Research or lab Learning Objects (educators) Data repository (beyond scope of class)

  4. Scholars A digital library to publish an essay or digital dissertation, share primary source collections, and collaborate with others in the creation of digital scholarship.

  5. Museums Use digital library to share collections and build online exhibits with objects you cannot display in the museum. Invite your visitors to tag and mark items as favorites, or to contribute content. Start a blog to publish museum news and podcasts.

  6. Librarians Use a digital library as the publishing tool to complement your online catalog or launch a digital exhibit. Academic librarians may publish open access research publications and data

  7. Archivists Use a digital library to share your collections, display documents and oral histories. Preserve fragile materials Rare or valuable item can be viewed with greater eases.

  8. Educators Use a digital library to build inquiry-based tasks for students, to create lesson plans with accompanying primary sources, or build learning modules with your team.

  9. Special Interest/Enthusiasts Use a digital library to share you personal research or collections with the world, build exhibits and write essays that showcase your expertise.

  10. What Assets do you Own? What kind of objects do you want to store? Photographs Text documents Databases Movies Audio Web pages Newspapers Data Your assets may dictate what system you choose

  11. Use Cases or Stakeholders Types of material may dictate the software you choose User s expectations Branding, mobile, Sensitive and restricted data Does the software need to integrate with enterprise applications Self submission or highly curated

  12. Features/Ad-Ons Can come already installed or be installed as plugins, as needed basis Examples Bulk uploaded CSV Omeka s Plugins https://omeka.org/add- ons/plugins/

  13. Metadata/Vocabularies/Authorities What comes with it?: Dublin Core Thesauri Metadata customizable? Can you add your own

  14. Platforms Optimized for Specific Purposes or Users Example we can place ContentDM and DSpace on opposite ends of spectrum Less curation, self submission, more utilitarian, once size fits all. Highly curated, no self submission, rich user experience

  15. DSpace Digital repository designed to allow scholars to share academic research Turnkey solution or repository in a box Open Source Dublin Core metadata Workflows that allow levels of administration from library to scholar Allows for self submission by scholar

  16. ContentDM Very library biased Not very good at IR functions Costly, but lots of functionality Many institutions using OCLC, will be around for awhile Hosted or custom installed Aging code base, so unlikely to see massive changes Lock-in

  17. Omeka Swahili word meaning to display or layout goods or wares; to speak out; to spread out; to unpack. Open source digital library Developed by the late, Roy Rosenzweig at George Mason University Uses Dublin Core Like Wordpress for exhibits and collections

  18. Administrator and User Roles Does the application allow for assigning roles within the software? User Cataloger Administrator Student Assistant Can it be integrated to a directory service, like Active Directory, LDAP or Shibboleth

  19. File types/Asset Types What files can you upload into the system? Audio Newspapers/Books Video Images File Types Tiff, Mov, Wav, Jpeg2000

  20. Some Key Questions to Ask What is your institutions long-term financial commitment to the digital library? What are your resources in staffing and technology? Is grant funded or line item in your yearly budget? What is the size of your collection? Will the software scale?

  21. Hosted DL Hosted pushes technical oversight to vendor Great for small institutions and big, too Monthly or yearly fee, usually more costly Lots of coordination Phone calls and email Tickets Can t customize, and if so, additional costs Untimely downtime The costs are more upfront

  22. Locally Administered DL Requires robust technology environment Usually one dedicated web or server administrator Allows for most customization Branding or look and feel Integrate with other systems Usually less yearly expense Can hire technology consultant for install and upgrades

  23. Consortia Approach to DL Inexpensive approach to entering the DL game Technical help from consortia Not a lot of customizations options Updating the collection or configuration may require a lot of coordination Collections might get more exposures, but at the same time lost with competing collections. A few examples: NY Heritage California Digital Library Ohio Digital Library Minnesota Digital Library

  24. Open Source vs. Proprietary The term open source, source refers to source code, the human-readable computer code which is the origin, or source, of the computer application. Open refers to the terms of access to that computer source code. So open source software is software for which the source code is open for inspection, changing, customization

  25. Advantages of Open Source Access to source code and ability and right to modify it Right to redistribute modifications to benefit wider community Free (not always) Excellent support networks Large and enthusiastic user base Disadvantages Limited or no accountability Informal and unaccountable support channels

  26. Types of Open Source Operating System Linux, Server software Apache, Tomcat, Programming Language PHP, Perl, Building blocks ImageMagick, LibXML, LibXSLT, Saxon, Blacklight, Solr

  27. Proprietary or Fee-based DLs ContentDM (OCLC) LUNA Insight Digital Commons (Bpress) Past Perfect DigiTool (Ex Libris) ***Only to name a few!***

  28. Open Source DLs Fedora Commons Hydra Islandora Dspace ePrints Greenstone Omeka

  29. Turnkey Up in running quickly Tried and true UI and settings, but can become outdated Less expertise and money May not match look and feel of website Lowest common denominator Can t customize, especially if it is proprietary Difficult to experiment High dissatisfaction over time

  30. Customized Customized Most likely to meet you and your user s needs What most want, but not always practical Up front investment in time and money Potentially costly Customized settings, means each upgrade more times consuming, thus costly and risky to manage over time

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#