Ammonia Reactor System Design and Optimization Study for High Efficiency

 
HW 3 Debriefing
 
Terry A. Ring
Chemical Engineering
University of Utah
 
 
Aspen File : Ammonia Synthesis Reactor Design-4.apwz
MathCad file: HW 3 Ammonia Reactor
 
Managing Heat Effects
 
Reaction Run Away
Exothermic
Reaction Dies
Endothermic
 
Preventing Explosions
Preventing Stalling
 
Most Conversion with least CAPEX Cost
 
Ground Work for Reactor
 
0.5 N
2
 + 1.5 H
2
 

 NH
3
 
Conversion
 
Temperature (K)
 
Rate=0.001,
                0.01,
                       0.1, 1
 
Ground Work for Reactor
 
0.5 N
2
 + 1.5 H
2
 

 NH
3
 
Conversion
 
Temperature (K)
 
Rate=0.001,
                0.01,
                       0.1, 1
 
Cooling
 
Ground Work for Reactor
 
0.5 N
2
 + 1.5 H
2
 

 NH
3
 
Conversion
 
Temperature (K)
 
Rate=0.001,
                0.01,
                       0.1, 1
 
Mixing
 
Ground Work for Reactor
 
Conversion
 
Temperature (K)
 
Cooling Profile
 
Feed Temperature
 
Aspen Simulation with F
NH3
 Maximization
 
Optimized Feed Temp for B8 and B3
 
Optimized Split to get highest F
NH3
 
Optimized Thermo Fluid T & P
 
Memo Questions
 
Description of the reactor system you think is best for this application.
Fired Heater then a single reactor with a jacket generating high pressure steam
Material of Construction for any or all Reactors, heat exchangers and Fired
Heaters
Carbon Steel Reactor, Stainless Steel Fired Heater
Reactor Feed Temperatures and Reactor Exit Temperatures
507C Feed T, 301C Exit T
Ammonia Flow in kmol/hr leaving your reactor system. This is related to the
single pass conversion, more ammonia flow = higher conversion.
13536.96 kmol/hr (X
N2
=50.5%)  This is also the case for the 3 reactor + interstage cooler
simulation
Total Bare Module Cost (C
BM­
) for your reactor system including fired heater(s),
S&T heat exchangers (if any), reactors and catalyst.
 $ 55,897,463 for the one jacketed reactor generating steam
Please submit your Excel files and your Aspen Files into Canvas.
 
CAPEX
 
Only One Reactor
 
Flow Sheet Improvements
RX
Fired
Heater
 
Steam
RX
Fired
Heater
 
Steam
HX
HX
 
Feed
 
Product
 
Feed
 
Product
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This material discusses the design and optimization of an ammonia synthesis reactor system for maximizing conversion efficiency while minimizing CAPEX costs. Various factors such as managing heat effects, reaction runaway prevention, and cooling profiles are explored. Recommendations include using a fired heater and a single jacketed reactor with high pressure steam generation. The analysis involves Aspen simulation with FNH3 maximization and considerations for material construction. The memo includes reactor feed and exit temperatures, ammonia flow rates, and total bare module costs. The goal is to achieve the highest NH3 yield efficiently.

  • Ammonia synthesis
  • Reactor design
  • Optimization
  • CAPEX costs
  • Heat management

Uploaded on Sep 12, 2024 | 3 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HW 3 Debriefing Terry A. Ring Chemical Engineering University of Utah Aspen File : Ammonia Synthesis Reactor Design-4.apwz MathCadfile: HW 3 Ammonia Reactor

  2. Managing Heat Effects Reaction Run Away Exothermic Reaction Dies Endothermic Preventing Explosions Preventing Stalling Most Conversion with least CAPEX Cost

  3. Ground Work for Reactor 0.5 N2 + 1.5 H2 NH3 Conversion Rate=0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 Temperature (K)

  4. Ground Work for Reactor 0.5 N2 + 1.5 H2 NH3 Conversion Cooling Rate=0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 Temperature (K)

  5. Ground Work for Reactor 0.5 N2 + 1.5 H2 NH3 Conversion Mixing Rate=0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 Temperature (K)

  6. Ground Work for Reactor Cooling Profile Conversion Feed Temperature Temperature (K)

  7. Aspen Simulation with FNH3 Maximization Optimized Thermo Fluid T & P Optimized Feed Temp for B8 and B3 Optimized Split to get highest FNH3

  8. Memo Questions Description of the reactor system you think is best for this application. Fired Heater then a single reactor with a jacket generating high pressure steam Material of Construction for any or all Reactors, heat exchangers and Fired Heaters Carbon Steel Reactor, Stainless Steel Fired Heater Reactor Feed Temperatures and Reactor Exit Temperatures 507C Feed T, 301C Exit T Ammonia Flow in kmol/hr leaving your reactor system. This is related to the single pass conversion, more ammonia flow = higher conversion. 13536.96 kmol/hr (XN2=50.5%) This is also the case for the 3 reactor + interstage cooler simulation Total Bare Module Cost (CBM) for your reactor system including fired heater(s), S&T heat exchangers (if any), reactors and catalyst. $ 55,897,463 for the one jacketed reactor generating steam Please submit your Excel files and your Aspen Files into Canvas.

  9. CAPEX Only One Reactor

  10. Flow Sheet Improvements Steam Product Feed Fired Heater RX Steam Feed Fired Heater RX HX HX Product

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#