DCAT-AP Revision Working Group Meeting Summary

Slide Note
Embed
Share

The DCAT-AP Revision Working Group Meeting held on September 4, 2015, covered various topics including public comments, agent roles, clarifications needed, and more. Metrics showed engagement from multiple countries and organizations. Discussions highlighted issues related to agent roles and areas needing clarifications to enhance the dataset standard. The meeting concluded with plans for future steps.


Uploaded on Oct 10, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DCAT-AP Revision WG meeting 4 September 2015

  2. Webinar Agenda Start Topic Speaker 10:30 - 10:40 Welcome introduction Willem 10:40 10:45 Report of the public comment period Makx 10:45 11:15 Issues related to Agent roles Makx 11:15 11:30 Issues needing clarifications Makx 11:30 - 11:40 Issues not to fix Makx 11:40 11:45 Editorial issues Makx 11:45 11:55 Implementation experience Nikos 11:55 12:00 Next steps, closing Willem 2

  3. Welcome introduction

  4. Report of the public comment period

  5. Metrics 27comments received from 8 people 4 countries (Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands) 4 public organisations (Publications Office, Joint research Centre, Finnish IT centre for science, Agenzia per l Italia Digitale) 1 private organisation (]init[ digital agency, Germany) 1 public university (Faculty of Sciences, University of Amsterdam)

  6. Issues related to Agent roles

  7. Issues related to Agent roles 1. Semantics of Authority 2. Clarification of Agent roles 3. Define new property for type of contributor 4. Add dct:contributor to Dataset 7

  8. Issues needing clarifications

  9. Issues needing clarifications (1/2) 5. Use of Checksum class 6. Recommended class: MUST or SHOULD 7. Licence types (mapping creating overhead) 8. Licence types (semantics) 9. Clarify target for dcat:landingPage 10.Drop maximum cardinality constraint on dcat:landingPage 11.Values for dct:language 12.Distinguish controlled vocabularies for dcat:theme and dcat:themeTaxonomy 13.Controlled vocabulary for type of adms:Identifier 9

  10. Issues needing clarifications (2/2) 14.Vocabularies with draft status 15.Publish and use publicly available vocabularies 16.Mandatory vocabularies 17.Add MDR Continents NAL to the recommended vocabularies for spatial coverage 10

  11. Issues not to fix

  12. Issues not to fix 18.Literal and Resource as Mandatory classes 19.Licence Documents and Rights Statements 20.Rights on Distribution, Access rights on Dataset 21.Licence on Distribution 22.Frequency vocabulary 23.Exclude Regions, cities from theme vocabulary 12

  13. Editorial issues

  14. Editorial issues 24.Naming Issue - Catalogue vs. Catalog 25.Proposal: No changeErrors in UML Class Diagram 26.Errors in Annex I Quick reference 27.Order of attributes in class diagram dct:PeriodOfTime 14

  15. Implementation experience

  16. Next steps, closing

  17. Next steps, closing 17

  18. DCAT-AP Revision Visit our initiatives Get involved ADMS. SW ADMS_logo.png DCAT application profile for data portals in Europe logo REGISTERED ORGANIZATION http://www.deviantart.com/download/306854489/new_twitter_logo_by_ockre-d52oyft.png Follow @SEMICeu on Twitter VOCABULARY SEMIC group on LinkedIn Join the SEMIC group on LinkedIn https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ckeditor_files/images/SEMIC_Community_Logo.png Join the SEMIC community on Joinup CORE PUBLIC SERVICE core_vocabularies_logo.png core_location_logo.png CorePerson_logo.png contact@semic.eu VOCABULARY

Related