The Emergence of Monetary Stability in a Changing Economic Landscape

 
A Presence of Absence: The 
Benign
Emergence of Monetary Stability
 
A.I.G. Rose (PIIE) and
A.K. Rose (ABFER, CEPR and NUS)
Motivation 1: Growing Monetary Stability
 
Diminishing Regime Churn
 
Growing Regime Stability
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
2
Motivation 2: Rising Cross-Country Effectiveness in
Hitting Key Monetary Policy Goals
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
3
Motivation 2, cont.: Crisis Avoidance,
Management across Countries
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
4
Growing Effectiveness Explains Rising
Durability
 
Countries are sticking with monetary regimes that work; “If it ain’t
broke, don’t fix it”
Inflation stabilizing at low rates
(Inevitable) business cycle volatility unchanged
Financial crises avoided, managed
1.
Rising monetary stability and efficacy: positive, under-appreciated
What’s missing is excitement: titular “presence of absence”
2.
What explains it?
a.
EMU, and more importantly
b.
Advent of Inflation Targeting
 
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
5
Three Stable Monetary Regimes
 
1.
(Old) Unilateral Fixed Exchange Rates
Ex: Bahamas, Djibouti, Micronesia, Denmark, Hong Kong
Mostly small
2.
(Old) Multilateral Currency Unions
Historically developing countries, Africa & Caribbean: CFA franc zones, ECCA
Used to be small, poor, but EMU (1999)
3.
New: Inflation Targeters
NZ in 1990; now 45 countries, >50% global output
Vary in size, higher income, good institutions
Resilient: Argentina only crasher
Retain sovereignty (unlike fixes, monetary union)
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
6
And a “Messy Middle” of Instability
 
Non-Durable Regimes still Pervasive
China, many Latins, Africans, … and Switzerland …
>50% countries … but ~20% output
Diminishing rapidly in numbers, importance
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
7
Implementing the Taxonomy
 
Straightforward
Fix/CU: IRR, LYS, 
AREAER 
usually
 
agree
IT: Gil Hammond “State of the Art of Inflation Targeting”
Update with 
AREAER …
Messy middle is leftover 
residual
 
Up to 212 “countries”, annual data 1990-2022 (with gaps)
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
8
Monetary Regimes over Time
 
Countries
 
GDP
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
9
A Different View
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
10
Declining Importance of Messy Middle
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
11
What Drives Choice of Monetary Regime?
 
Literature makes for Modesty
Mundell’s trilemma: consequences of different shocks should, in principle, depend
on monetary regime
Optimal policy implies regime choice 
to maximize insulating effects
O
pen economies with real shocks (financial) float (fix)
Stockman (2000) “the evidence supporting the predictions of these models is only slightly
better than the evidence for cold nuclear fusion.”
No strong reliable results
Klein and Shambaugh (2012)
We try to make progress with more 
monetary regime 
cells
Not just fix vs float … what does the monetary authority do?
MANY do not have well-defined strategies and disintegrate
Note: no exogenous variation, so causality questions linger
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
12
A few hints on regime determinants…
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
13
Often (Univariate) Data Unclear …
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
14
Capital Openness (Mundell’s Trilemma)
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
15
Institutions
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
16
Multivariate Statistical Evidence
 
Regressand: four-cell categorical variable: country-year observations:
Inflation Targeters
Multilateral Currency Union
Unilateral Fixers
Others (messy middle) – the omitted cell
Multinominal logit regressions on
Log-population
Log-real GDP per capita
Polity
Capital Account openness
Intercepts, year effects
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
17
Determinants of Monetary Regimes
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
18
 
Observations = 4,123.  Pseudo R
2
 = .19. Four-cell categorial variable regressand. M
ultinomial logit c
oefficients (and standard errors).
Annual data 1990-2022 with up to 212 countries
; regime intercepts and year effects included but not recorded.
Summary: Monetary Regime Determinants
 
Size, Income, Institutions
All evolve slowly, consistent with slow turnover
Does not explain 
trend towards stability
Lots of heterogeneity remains!
Models don’t work well
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
19
What About Regime Consequences?
 
Caveats
1.
No instrumental variables, so continuing questions about causality
2.
Literature delivers weak results
 
Hence low expectations
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
20
Regime Consequences: Inflation
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
21
Durable Regimes: Fewer (Bad) Outliers
 
Annual CPI inflation, 191 countries, 1990-2022:
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
22
 
No
 inflation targeters or 
currency union 
member had inflation >100%
1.2
% messy middle observations in 
hyper
-inflations (>500%)
Consequences cont.: Business Cycle Volatility
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
23
Formal Econometrics Delivers Same Results
 
Regression:
 
Y
it
 = β
IT
IT
it
 + β
CU
CU
it
 + β
FIX
FIX
it
 + {γ
i
} + {γ
t
} + ε
it
Time-, country-specific fixed effects
{
β
} are deviations from messy middle
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
24
Consequential Characteristics, 1
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
25
 
Coefficients (and standard errors) in each row estimated from a panel with least squares, fixed time- and country fixed effects. Annual
data 1990-2022 with up to 212 countries.
Consequential Characteristics, 2
Consequential Characteristics, 3
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
27
Monetary Regimes and Crisis Incidence
 
Updated annual panel, Nguyen et. al (2022)
199 countries, 1990-22
Four types of crises
1.
Currency
2.
Banking
3.
Sovereign Debt
4.
Twin/Triple Crises
Conventional probit, (necessarily) random country effects
 
Pr(CRISIS
it
) = β
IT
IT
it
 + β
CU
CU
it
 + β
FIX
FIX
it
 + {δ
i
} + {γ
t
} + ε
it
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
28
Crises and Monetary Regimes
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
29
 
Probit coefficients (and standard errors) in each row. Fixed time- and random country effects. Annual data 1990-2022 with up to 212
countries.
Effects of Monetary Stability: Good, Limited
 
1.
Messy middle: 
more outliers 
in inflation, business cycle volatility
2.
Striking similarities
: effects of stable regimes close to each other
3.
Stable regimes have 
limited benefits 
compared to messy middle
Effects on inflation, business cycles statistically insignificant
Consistent with weak literature results across monetary/exchange rate
regimes
4.
IT and fixers experience 
lower crisis incidence
EMU: more bank, debt crises … historically
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
30
Summary
 
Three distinct durable monetary regimes
Unilateral fixes
Multilateral currency unions
Inflation targeters
Weak results on causes, consequences
Consistent with literature
Much heterogeneity; weak statistical results
But … inflation targeting and EMU young
 
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
31
Durable Regimes
 
Distinct in 
determinants
Fixers: small, worse institutions
Inflation targeters: bigger, richer, better institutions
Currency unions in between (EMU mixed with CFA franc, ECCA)
Alike in 
goals
 of monetary policy
Inflation
Business cycle volatility
Mostly alike in crises (but EMU & banking, debt crises)
Fewer outliers 
than messy middle
Shouldn’t overstress monetary regime role (weak results)
Modest but enduring 
benefits of stability (like marriage)
Avoid truly terrible outcomes
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
32
Conclusion
 
Countries Reveal their Preference for Monetary Stability
Choose to stick with stable regimes
Continuing issue for academic economists, 
but not policy makers
Fast growth of 
inflation targeting
; survival of fit(test)
Underappreciated because quiet
Third stable alternative to fix/CU, retaining sovereignty
We do 
NOT 
live in interesting times, at least for monetary stability
Tragedy in economy elsewhere
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
33
 
Appendices
 
Data Sources
 
World Development Indicators: most macroeconomic series
Center for Systemic Peace: polity, state fragility, and executive
constraints
Nguyen et. al.: crisis indicators
Chinn Ito: financial openness
BIS: monthly effective exchange rates (nominal, real)
 
Data set freely available online
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
35
Regime Consequences: Univariate Evidence
by Regime
Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability
36
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Amidst global economic shifts, A.I.G. Rose and A.K. Rose explore the emergence of monetary stability in their publication "A Presence of Absence." They delve into the rise of effective monetary policies, the impact of inflation targeting, and the evolution of stable monetary regimes. Through insightful analysis and data, they highlight the importance of resilience and sustainability in monetary systems.

  • Monetary stability
  • Economic landscape
  • Inflation targeting
  • Global economy
  • Resilient regimes

Uploaded on Oct 07, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Presence of Absence: The Benign Emergence of Monetary Stability A.I.G. Rose (PIIE) and A.K. Rose (ABFER, CEPR and NUS)

  2. Motivation 1: Growing Monetary Stability Diminishing Regime Churn Growing Regime Stability Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 2

  3. Motivation 2: Rising Cross-Country Effectiveness in Hitting Key Monetary Policy Goals Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 3

  4. Motivation 2, cont.: Crisis Avoidance, Management across Countries Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 4

  5. Growing Effectiveness Explains Rising Durability Countries are sticking with monetary regimes that work; If it ain t broke, don t fix it Inflation stabilizing at low rates (Inevitable) business cycle volatility unchanged Financial crises avoided, managed 1. Rising monetary stability and efficacy: positive, under-appreciated What s missing is excitement: titular presence of absence 2. What explains it? a. EMU, and more importantly b. Advent of Inflation Targeting Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 5

  6. Three Stable Monetary Regimes 1. (Old) Unilateral Fixed Exchange Rates Ex: Bahamas, Djibouti, Micronesia, Denmark, Hong Kong Mostly small 2. (Old) Multilateral Currency Unions Historically developing countries, Africa & Caribbean: CFA franc zones, ECCA Used to be small, poor, but EMU (1999) 3. New: Inflation Targeters NZ in 1990; now 45 countries, >50% global output Vary in size, higher income, good institutions Resilient: Argentina only crasher Retain sovereignty (unlike fixes, monetary union) Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 6

  7. And a Messy Middle of Instability Non-Durable Regimes still Pervasive China, many Latins, Africans, and Switzerland >50% countries but ~20% output Diminishing rapidly in numbers, importance Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 7

  8. Implementing the Taxonomy Straightforward Fix/CU: IRR, LYS, AREAER usuallyagree IT: Gil Hammond State of the Art of Inflation Targeting Update with AREAER Messy middle is leftover residual Up to 212 countries , annual data 1990-2022 (with gaps) Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 8

  9. Monetary Regimes over Time Countries GDP Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 9

  10. A Different View Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 10

  11. Declining Importance of Messy Middle Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 11

  12. What Drives Choice of Monetary Regime? Literature makes for Modesty Mundell s trilemma: consequences of different shocks should, in principle, depend on monetary regime Optimal policy implies regime choice to maximize insulating effects Open economies with real shocks (financial) float (fix) Stockman (2000) the evidence supporting the predictions of these models is only slightly better than the evidence for cold nuclear fusion. No strong reliable results Klein and Shambaugh (2012) We try to make progress with more monetary regime cells Not just fix vs float what does the monetary authority do? MANY do not have well-defined strategies and disintegrate Note: no exogenous variation, so causality questions linger Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 12

  13. A few hints on regime determinants Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 13

  14. Often (Univariate) Data Unclear Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 14

  15. Capital Openness (Mundells Trilemma) Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 15

  16. Institutions Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 16

  17. Multivariate Statistical Evidence Regressand: four-cell categorical variable: country-year observations: Inflation Targeters Multilateral Currency Union Unilateral Fixers Others (messy middle) the omitted cell Multinominal logit regressions on Log-population Log-real GDP per capita Polity Capital Account openness Intercepts, year effects Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 17

  18. Determinants of Monetary Regimes Inflation Targeting Multilateral Currency Union -.21** (.03) .04 (.05) .01 (.01) .05 (.04) Unilateral Fix Log Population .29** (.04) .77** (.07) .12** (.01) .04 (.05) -.91** (.05) .32** (.06) -.09** (.01) .20** (.05) Log Real GDP per capita Polity Capital Account Openness Observations = 4,123. Pseudo R2 = .19. Four-cell categorial variable regressand. Multinomial logit coefficients (and standard errors). Annual data 1990-2022 with up to 212 countries; regime intercepts and year effects included but not recorded. Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 18

  19. Summary: Monetary Regime Determinants Size, Income, Institutions All evolve slowly, consistent with slow turnover Does not explain trend towards stability Lots of heterogeneity remains! Models don t work well Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 19

  20. What About Regime Consequences? Caveats 1. No instrumental variables, so continuing questions about causality 2. Literature delivers weak results Hence low expectations Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 20

  21. Regime Consequences: Inflation Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 21

  22. Durable Regimes: Fewer (Bad) Outliers Annual CPI inflation, 191 countries, 1990-2022: >10% 6.6% 5.0% 3.6% 33.6% >20% 0.6% 0.5% 1.4% 15.8% Observations with inflation Inflation Target Unilateral Fix Multilateral CU Other No inflation targeters or currency union member had inflation >100% 1.2% messy middle observations in hyper-inflations (>500%) Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 22

  23. Consequences cont.: Business Cycle Volatility Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 23

  24. Formal Econometrics Delivers Same Results Regression: Time-, country-specific fixed effects { } are deviations from messy middle Yit= ITITit+ CUCUit+ FIXFIXit + { i} + { t} + it Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 24

  25. Consequential Characteristics, 1 Inflation Targeting -25.1 (24.1) -49.9 (28.6) .15 (.75) 86.1 (115.0) Multilateral Currency Union 48.4 (32.4) 67.4 (38.6) 1.35 (1.03) 174.2 (157.3) Unilateral Fix -5.9 (94.7) 45.4 (101.8) -11.05** (2.87) -618.2 (440.4) Regressand Inflation, CPI Inflation, GDP Absolute Deviations of GDP Growth from Country-average GDP Growth Squared Deviations of GDP Growth from Country-average GDP Growth Coefficients (and standard errors) in each row estimated from a panel with least squares, fixed time- and country fixed effects. Annual data 1990-2022 with up to 212 countries. Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 25

  26. Consequential Characteristics, 2 Inflation Targeting Multilateral Currency Unilateral Fix Regressand GDP growth Union -1.12 (1.35) -.81** (.22) .14 (.30) .12 (.17) .73 (.94) -.91 (.98) .19 (.16) .89** (.24) -.20 (.16) -1.11 (.86) -3.30 (3.77) -.79 (.56) .09 (1.05) -8.46** (.70) -3.86 (3.84) Unemployment rate, ILO Unemployment rate, national Nominal Effective Exchange Rate Volatility Real Effective Exchange Rate Volatility

  27. Consequential Characteristics, 3 Inflation Targeting -1.44** (.11) .4 (.7) 3.8* (1.5) -.1 (.2) Multilateral Currency Union -.75** (.16) 2.6* (1.0) 29.6** (2.1) -4.5** (.3) Unilateral Fix -.05 (.44) .7 (2.7) -6.5 (5.3) .8 (.7) Regressand Measure of Aggregate Trade Restrictions Current Account (% GDP) Trade (% GDP) Reserves (% Imports) Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 27

  28. Monetary Regimes and Crisis Incidence Updated annual panel, Nguyen et. al (2022) 199 countries, 1990-22 Four types of crises 1. Currency 2. Banking 3. Sovereign Debt 4. Twin/Triple Crises Conventional probit, (necessarily) random country effects Pr(CRISISit) = ITITit+ CUCUit+ FIXFIXit + { i} + { t} + it Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 28

  29. Crises and Monetary Regimes Inflation Targeting Multilateral Currency Union -.80** (.21) .95** (.15) -.60* (.30) 1.02** (.33) Unilateral Fix Regressand Currency Crisis -.24 (.14) .04 (.15) -.20 (.21) -1.02** (.16) -1.28** (.23) -1.11** (.24) -.93** (.27) -1.87** (.29) Banking Crisis Twin/Triple Crises Sovereign Debt Crisis Probit coefficients (and standard errors) in each row. Fixed time- and random country effects. Annual data 1990-2022 with up to 212 countries. Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 29

  30. Effects of Monetary Stability: Good, Limited 1. Messy middle: more outliers in inflation, business cycle volatility 2. Striking similarities: effects of stable regimes close to each other 3. Stable regimes have limited benefits compared to messy middle Effects on inflation, business cycles statistically insignificant Consistent with weak literature results across monetary/exchange rate regimes 4. IT and fixers experience lower crisis incidence EMU: more bank, debt crises historically Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 30

  31. Summary Three distinct durable monetary regimes Unilateral fixes Multilateral currency unions Inflation targeters Weak results on causes, consequences Consistent with literature Much heterogeneity; weak statistical results But inflation targeting and EMU young Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 31

  32. Durable Regimes Distinct in determinants Fixers: small, worse institutions Inflation targeters: bigger, richer, better institutions Currency unions in between (EMU mixed with CFA franc, ECCA) Alike in goals of monetary policy Inflation Business cycle volatility Mostly alike in crises (but EMU & banking, debt crises) Fewer outliers than messy middle Shouldn t overstress monetary regime role (weak results) Modest but enduring benefits of stability (like marriage) Avoid truly terrible outcomes Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 32

  33. Conclusion Countries Reveal their Preference for Monetary Stability Choose to stick with stable regimes Continuing issue for academic economists, but not policy makers Fast growth of inflation targeting; survival of fit(test) Underappreciated because quiet Third stable alternative to fix/CU, retaining sovereignty We do NOT live in interesting times, at least for monetary stability Tragedy in economy elsewhere Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 33

  34. Appendices

  35. Data Sources World Development Indicators: most macroeconomic series Center for Systemic Peace: polity, state fragility, and executive constraints Nguyen et. al.: crisis indicators Chinn Ito: financial openness BIS: monthly effective exchange rates (nominal, real) Data set freely available online Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 35

  36. Regime Consequences: Univariate Evidence by Regime Rose and Rose: Emergency of Monetary Stability 36

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#