Resource Extraction and Market Dynamics

Chakravorty & Krulce.
Heterogenous demand and order
of resource extraction
Econometrica 62, 1445-1452
www.jstor.org
Earlier studies
Herfindahl (1967), Solow & Wan (1976) ja
Lewis (1982): use first resources which
have the lowest extraction costs
Two resources, two markets
Resources: Oil & Coal, extraction cost of
coal higher
Markets: Electricity & Transport
Electricity can be produced similarly with
both resources
Oil can be used in transport without
transformation costs
Results
Phase I: Only oil is used (in both markets)
Phase II: Oil for transport, coal for
electricity
Phase III: Only coal is used
Model
max
st
 
 
More resources
Chakravorty, Krulce & Roumasset (2005).
Specialization and non-renewable
resources: Ricardo meets Ricardo. Journal
of Economic Dynamics & Control 29,
1517-1545
Results
Allocate resources according to their
comparative advantage (difference in
costs is smaller)
Order of extraction according to their
absolute advantage (extraction cost
smaller)
m X n model, m resources, n markets
Results
If a resource has an absolute advantage
and there is enough of it only that resource
willbe used in phase I
If each resource has an absolute
advantage in at least one market, then all
resources are used at each point in time
Only inferior resources are used in the last
phase
Taxation
Hotelling 
 extraction smaller
In a two-sector model coal tax can lead to
increase in oil consumption
Fuel tax can lead to a switch from oil to
coal
Price dynamics
Hotelling 
 prices increase with the rate
of discount
In a two-sector model prices approach
each other in time
Chakravorty, Magne & Moreaux
A Hotelling model with a ceiling on the
stock of pollution
Journal of Economic Dynamics &
Control 30 (2006) 2875–2904
Background
Take into account environmental effects
Renewable energy is expensive to produce but
its cleaner
Exhaustible energy is dirty but cheap
Assume a stock constraint for environment, eg
a limit for carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
Results
Transition to renewable resources may be
temporary
Tuloksia
Hotelling: exhaustible resource price
increases, and at T there is a switch to the
backstop-technology
Environmental constraint: switch to
renewables before running out of eg oil
When atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are
fallen back below the constraint, it is optimal
to start using fossile fuels again
Assumptions
One market: energy
Two resources: Oil or solar
Model
Coal extraction x
Solar energy consumption y
Utility from energy consumption u(x+y)
Emissions z = bx
Equation of motion for carbon dioxide:
dZ/dt = bx - a - dZ
Optimal control model
Chakravorty, Moreaux, and Tidball:
Ordering the Extraction of Polluting
Nonrenewable Resources
American Economic Review 2008,
98:3, 1128–1144
 
Further readings (or articles for essay
and presentation)
Van der Werf, Edwin, and Sjak Smulders. “Climate
Policy and the Optimal Extraction of High and Low
Carbon Fossil Fuels
.” 
Canadian Journal of Economics.
flow constraint for the emissions (instead of stock)
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne
d'économique, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 1421-1444,
November/novembre 2008
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This study explores the allocation of resources based on comparative and absolute advantage in different markets, presenting phases of resource utilization and extraction order. Various scenarios highlight the use of oil and coal in electricity and transport sectors, reflecting the impact of extraction costs on resource selection.

  • Resource Extraction
  • Market Dynamics
  • Comparative Advantage
  • Absolute Advantage
  • Resource Allocation

Uploaded on Mar 03, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chakravorty & Krulce. Heterogenous demand and order of resource extraction Econometrica 62, 1445-1452 www.jstor.org

  2. Earlier studies Herfindahl (1967), Solow & Wan (1976) ja Lewis (1982): use first resources which have the lowest extraction costs

  3. Two resources, two markets Resources: Oil & Coal, extraction cost of coal higher Markets: Electricity & Transport Electricity can be produced similarly with both resources Oil can be used in transport without transformation costs

  4. Results Phase I: Only oil is used (in both markets) Phase II: Oil for transport, coal for electricity Phase III: Only coal is used

  5. Model max + + + rt [ ( ( ) t ( )) t ( ( ) t ( )) t ( ) t e p q q p q q zq E OE CE T OT CT CT 0 + + ( ( ) t ( )) t c ( ( ) t ( )) t c q q q q OE OT O CE CT C c c O C = ( ) ( ) t ( ) t x t q q st O OE OT = ( ) ( ) t ( ) t x t q q C CE CT

  6. red=oil for energy, magenta=oil for transport, blue=coal for energy, green=coal for transport 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

  7. More resources Chakravorty, Krulce & Roumasset (2005). Specialization and non-renewable resources: Ricardo meets Ricardo. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 29, 1517-1545

  8. Results Allocate resources according to their comparative advantage (difference in costs is smaller) Order of extraction according to their absolute advantage (extraction cost smaller) m X n model, m resources, n markets

  9. Results If a resource has an absolute advantage and there is enough of it only that resource willbe used in phase I If each resource has an absolute advantage in at least one market, then all resources are used at each point in time Only inferior resources are used in the last phase

  10. Taxation Hotelling extraction smaller In a two-sector model coal tax can lead to increase in oil consumption Fuel tax can lead to a switch from oil to coal

  11. Price dynamics Hotelling prices increase with the rate of discount In a two-sector model prices approach each other in time

  12. Chakravorty, Magne & Moreaux A Hotelling model with a ceiling on the stock of pollution Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 30 (2006) 2875 2904

  13. Background Take into account environmental effects Renewable energy is expensive to produce but its cleaner Exhaustible energy is dirty but cheap Assume a stock constraint for environment, eg a limit for carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

  14. Results Transition to renewable resources may be temporary

  15. Tuloksia Hotelling: exhaustible resource price increases, and at T there is a switch to the backstop-technology Environmental constraint: switch to renewables before running out of eg oil When atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are fallen back below the constraint, it is optimal to start using fossile fuels again

  16. Assumptions One market: energy Two resources: Oil or solar

  17. Model Coal extraction x Solar energy consumption y Utility from energy consumption u(x+y) Emissions z = bx Equation of motion for carbon dioxide: dZ/dt = bx - a - dZ

  18. Optimal control model + rt [ ( ( ) u x t ( )) y t ( ) ( ) ( )] e c x t c a t c y t c a s 0 c c c s = ( ) ( ) x t X t = ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Z t bx t a t dZ t

  19. Chakravorty, Moreaux, and Tidball: Ordering the Extraction of Polluting Nonrenewable Resources American Economic Review 2008, 98:3, 1128 1144

  20. Further readings (or articles for essay and presentation) Van der Werf, Edwin, and Sjak Smulders. Climate Policy and the Optimal Extraction of High and Low Carbon Fossil Fuels. Canadian Journal of Economics. flow constraint for the emissions (instead of stock) Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d' conomique, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 1421-1444, November/novembre 2008

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#