Regional Radiative Forcing and Feedbacks in Arctic Amplification

 
Is Arctic Amplification dominated by
regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks: Perspectives from the
World-Avoided scenario
*
 
John G. Virgin
1
 & Karen L. Smith
2,3
 
 
1
Department of Geography & Environmental Management
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
 
2
Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences
University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
 
3
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Palisades, New York, NY
 
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
*
Recently accepted to 
Geophysical Research Letters
 
Arctic Amplification
 
Typically associated with
meridionally varying radiative
feedbacks
The Planck and lapse rate
feedbacks dominate in the
winter
The surface albedo feedback
dominates in the summer
 
 
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction
 – Methods – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
Pithan & Mauritsen (2014)
 
Poleward Energy Transport
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction
 – Methods – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
Zelinka & Hartmann (2012)
 
Hwang, Frierson, and Kay (2011)
 
The role of poleward energy flux into in contributing to AA is not as well
understood…
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction
 – Methods – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
Radiative Forcing
 
AA is typically evaluated in response to a radiative forcing that is either
spatially homogenous or highly idealistic
 
 
 
Stuecker et al. (2018)
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – 
Methods
 – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
Model Integrations
 
The World Avoided (WAVD)
 
ODS emissions set to grow at
3.5% per year from 1985
onwards
 
Representative Concentration Pathway
4.5 (RCP45)
 
Greenhouse gas concentrations
rise to 538ppm and stabilize
after 2100
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – 
Methods
 – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate
Model (WACCM4)
 
“High-top” Chemistry-Climate
Model
Similar physical parametrizations
to the “low-top” CAM4
Chemistry component that
couples chemical, radiative, and
dynamical processes in the
stratosphere
66 vertical levels resolving up
into the lower thermosphere
 
WACCM4
 
POP
 
CLM
 
CICE
 
CPL
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – 
Methods
 – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
The Arctic Energy Budget
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – 
Methods
 – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
The Arctic Energy Budget
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – 
Methods
 – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
The Arctic Energy Budget
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – 
Methods
 – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
The Arctic Energy Budget
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – 
Methods
 – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
The Arctic Energy Budget
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – 
Methods
 – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
The Arctic Energy Budget
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – 
Methods
 – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
The Arctic Energy Budget
 
Radiative Forcing
 
The global mean net RF in the
WAVD is 3.76 Wm
-2
Combined result of both GHG’s
and ODS’s
 
Stratospheric ozone loss results
in a 
negative
 (-0.19 Wm
-2
) net
Arctic RF in the WAVD
Long-wave = -0.48 Wm
-2
Short-wave = 0.29 Wm
-2
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – Methods – 
Results
 – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
Arctic Energy Budget
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – Methods – 
Results
 – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
Arctic Energy Budget
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – Methods – 
Results
 – Limitations –
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
Statistically
Significant differences
between scenarios
for:
LW Cloud
feedback
PET by the
atmosphere
 
Contributions of Uncertainty
 
 
The stratosphere-adjusted radiative forcing, as opposed to the
effective radiative forcing
Cloud feedback quantification using the adjusted cloud radiative
effect
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – Methods – Results – 
Limitations
Conclusions - Acknowledgments
 
Concluding Remarks
 
Despite a negative net RF in the Arctic in the WAVD from ozone loss,
AA still occurred at a similar magnitude to RCP45
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – Methods – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions
 - Acknowledgments
 
Concluding Remarks
 
Despite a negative net RF in the Arctic in the WAVD from ozone loss,
AA still occurred at a similar magnitude to RCP45
In the WAVD, AA is maintained by greater energy flux convergence
into the Arctic by the atmosphere, and a stronger long-wave cloud
feedback
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – Methods – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions
 - Acknowledgments
 
Concluding Remarks
 
Despite a negative net RF in the Arctic in the WAVD from ozone loss,
AA still occurred at a similar magnitude to RCP45
In the WAVD, AA is maintained by greater energy flux convergence
into the Arctic by the atmosphere, and a stronger long-wave cloud
feedback
Arctic Amplification under the presence of a negative radiative forcing
highlights that its key drivers (forcing, feedbacks, or poleward energy
transport) may depend on the context of the evolving climate state &
experiment design
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – Methods – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions
 - Acknowledgments
 
FIN
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – Methods – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions
 - Acknowledgments
 
T
h
i
s
 
w
o
r
k
 
h
a
s
 
b
e
e
n
 
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
e
d
 
b
y
:
 
 
Department of Physical & Environmental Sciences,
University of Toronto Scarborough
 
NSF Division of Polar Programs award: PLR-
1603350
 
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
:
 
Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and
feedbacks?
 
27
th
 IUGG General
Assembly
 
Introduction – Methods – Results – Limitations –
Conclusions - 
Acknowledgments
 
D
a
t
a
 
A
c
c
e
s
s
:
 
 
Post-Processed Data files:
https://arcticdata.io/catalog/view/doi:10.1873
9/A2416SZ8Z
 
Plotting Scripts:
https://github.com/JohnVirgin/Perspectives-
From-World-Avoided
.
 
 
 
Hwang, Y.-T., Frierson, D. M., & Kay, J. E. (2011). Coupling
between arctic feedbacks and changes in poleward energy
transport. 
Geophysical Research Letters, 38
(17).
 
Pithan, F., & Mauritsen, T. (2014). Arctic amplification dominated
by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models.
Nature Geoscience
, 7 (3), 181.
 
Stuecker, M. F., Bitz, C. M., Armour, K. C., Proistosescu, C., Kang, S.
M., Xie, S.-P., . . . others (2018). Polar amplification dominated by
local forcing and feedbacks. 
Nature Climate Change
8
(12), 1076
 
Zelinka, M. D., & Hartmann, D. L. (2012). Climate feedbacks and
their implications for poleward energy flux changes in a warming
climate. 
Journal of Climate, 25 
(2), 608-624.
 
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
 
F
u
l
l
 
C
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
:
 
Virgin, J. G., & Smith, K. L. (2019). Is Arctic Amplification
dominated by regional radiative forcing and feedbacks:
Perspectives from the World-Avoided scenario. 
Geophysical
Research Letters, 46
(11). 
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082320
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Arctic Amplification (AA) is explored in the context of regional radiative forcing and feedbacks in the study by Virgin and Smith (2019). The research investigates the dominance of these factors in the meridional variations of AA, highlighting the contributions of different feedback mechanisms during winter and summer. The role of poleward energy transport and how AA is assessed in response to radiative forcing are also discussed. Model integrations under Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 provide insights into future scenarios. Overall, the study offers perspectives on the complex interactions driving Arctic climate change.

  • Arctic Amplification
  • Radiative Forcing
  • Feedback Mechanisms
  • Regional Climate
  • Climate Change

Uploaded on Sep 07, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Is Arctic Amplification dominated by regional radiative forcing and feedbacks: Perspectives from the World-Avoided scenario* John G. Virgin1& Karen L. Smith2,3 1Department of Geography & Environmental Management University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 2Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 3Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Palisades, New York, NY 27th IUGG General Assembly *Recently accepted to Geophysical Research Letters

  2. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Arctic Amplification Typically associated with meridionally varying radiative feedbacks The Planck and lapse rate feedbacks dominate in the winter The surface albedo feedback dominates in the summer Pithan & Mauritsen (2014) Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  3. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Poleward Energy Transport The role of poleward energy flux into in contributing to AA is not as well understood Zelinka & Hartmann (2012) Hwang, Frierson, and Kay (2011) Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  4. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Radiative Forcing AA is typically evaluated in response to a radiative forcing that is either spatially homogenous or highly idealistic Stuecker et al. (2018) Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  5. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Model Integrations Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 (RCP45) Greenhouse gas concentrations rise to 538ppm and stabilize after 2100 The World Avoided (WAVD) ODS emissions set to grow at 3.5% per year from 1985 onwards Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  6. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM4) High-top Chemistry-Climate Model Similar physical parametrizations to the low-top CAM4 Chemistry component that couples chemical, radiative, and dynamical processes in the stratosphere 66 vertical levels resolving up into the lower thermosphere WACCM4 CLM CPL POP CICE Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  7. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments The Arctic Energy Budget ????= ? ??+ ?????+ ? + ???? Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  8. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments The Arctic Energy Budget ????= ? ??+ ?????+ ? + ???? ????= change in net radiative flux at the TOA Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  9. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments The Arctic Energy Budget ????= ? ??+ ?????+ ? + ???? ????= change in net radiative flux at the TOA ? = the linear sum of all radiative feedbacks (Planck, Albedo, etc.) Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  10. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments The Arctic Energy Budget ????= ? ??+ ?????+ ? + ???? ????= change in net radiative flux at the TOA ? = the linear sum of all radiative feedbacks (Planck, Albedo, etc.) ?? = The change in Arctic mean surface temperature Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  11. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments The Arctic Energy Budget ????= ? ??+ ?????+ ? + ???? ????= change in net radiative flux at the TOA ? = the linear sum of all radiative feedbacks (Planck, Albedo, etc.) ?? = The change in Arctic mean surface temperature ?????= The stratosphere-adjusted radiative forcing Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  12. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments The Arctic Energy Budget ????= ? ??+ ?????+ ? + ???? ????= change in net radiative flux at the TOA ? = the linear sum of all radiative feedbacks (Planck, Albedo, etc.) ?? = The change in Arctic mean surface temperature ?????= The stratosphere-adjusted radiative forcing ?= The horizontal flux convergence into the Arctic Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  13. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments The Arctic Energy Budget ????= ? ??+ ?????+ ? + ???? ????= change in net radiative flux at the TOA ? = the linear sum of all radiative feedbacks (Planck, Albedo, etc.) ?? = The change in Arctic mean surface temperature ?????= The stratosphere-adjusted radiative forcing ?= The horizontal flux convergence into the Arctic ????= The change in ocean heat content Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  14. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Radiative Forcing The global mean net RF in the WAVD is 3.76 Wm-2 Combined result of both GHG s and ODS s Stratospheric ozone loss results in a negative (-0.19 Wm-2) net Arctic RF in the WAVD Long-wave = -0.48 Wm-2 Short-wave = 0.29 Wm-2 Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  15. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Arctic Energy Budget Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  16. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Arctic Energy Budget Statistically Significant differences between scenarios for: LW Cloud feedback PET by the atmosphere Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  17. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Contributions of Uncertainty The stratosphere-adjusted radiative forcing, as opposed to the effective radiative forcing Cloud feedback quantification using the adjusted cloud radiative effect Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  18. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Concluding Remarks Despite a negative net RF in the Arctic in the WAVD from ozone loss, AA still occurred at a similar magnitude to RCP45 Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  19. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Concluding Remarks Despite a negative net RF in the Arctic in the WAVD from ozone loss, AA still occurred at a similar magnitude to RCP45 In the WAVD, AA is maintained by greater energy flux convergence into the Arctic by the atmosphere, and a stronger long-wave cloud feedback Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  20. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments Concluding Remarks Despite a negative net RF in the Arctic in the WAVD from ozone loss, AA still occurred at a similar magnitude to RCP45 In the WAVD, AA is maintained by greater energy flux convergence into the Arctic by the atmosphere, and a stronger long-wave cloud feedback Arctic Amplification under the presence of a negative radiative forcing highlights that its key drivers (forcing, feedbacks, or poleward energy transport) may depend on the context of the evolving climate state & experiment design Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  21. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments FIN Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

  22. Introduction Methods Results Limitations Conclusions - Acknowledgments This work has been supported by: This work has been supported by: Article Full Citation: Article Full Citation: Virgin, J. G., & Smith, K. L. (2019). Is Arctic Amplification dominated by regional radiative forcing and feedbacks: Perspectives from the World-Avoided scenario. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082320 Department of Physical & Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough References: References: NSF Division of Polar Programs award: PLR-1603350 Hwang, Y.-T., Frierson, D. M., & Kay, J. E. (2011). Coupling between arctic feedbacks and changes in poleward energy transport. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(17). Data Access: Data Access: Pithan, F., & Mauritsen, T. (2014). Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models. Nature Geoscience, 7 (3), 181. Post-Processed Data files: https://arcticdata.io/catalog/view/doi:10.1873 9/A2416SZ8Z Stuecker, M. F., Bitz, C. M., Armour, K. C., Proistosescu, C., Kang, S. M., Xie, S.-P., . . . others (2018). Polar amplification dominated by local forcing and feedbacks. Nature Climate Change, 8(12), 1076 Plotting Scripts: https://github.com/JohnVirgin/Perspectives- From-World-Avoided. Zelinka, M. D., & Hartmann, D. L. (2012). Climate feedbacks and their implications for poleward energy flux changes in a warming climate. Journal of Climate, 25 (2), 608-624. Virgin & Smith (2019): Is AA dominated by regional radiative forcing and 27th IUGG General

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#