Mid-Course Feedback Using Qualtrics
Mid-Course
Feedback using
Qualtrics
Kim Kurz, Ph.D. & Matt Dye, Ph.D.
NTID Student Rating Advisory Group
Mid-Course Feedback (MCF)
A process initiated in response to students’
desire to see that their opinions are values
by teachers and can impact what happens in
their courses.
Link can be found here:
https://www.ntid.rit.edu/president/academic-affairs/mcf
What is MCF?
Why use Mid-Course Evaluation?
●
Show progress as a teacher when you go up for
promotion.
●
A more meaningful, mutually satisfying, and potentially
higher end-of-term student ratings while still in class
progress.
●
Improve
teaching effectiveness
and
student
satisfaction
while you still have a chance in the middle
of your course.
Why? Students’ Perspectives
In a 2009 attitudes survey about the former
course evaluations, students expressed that
they didn’t feel their ratings made any
difference for themselves, and they couldn’t
see any changes over time across the term.
Why? Instructors’ Perspectives
In a 2011 survey, the majority of
instructors expressed that they were
interested in soliciting and using mid-
course student feedback. The MCF is an
effort to facilitate that feedback.
Student feedback solicited several weeks into the
semester can lead to mid-course corrections related to:
●
Communication
●
Teaching Strategies
●
Materials
●
Assignments
●
Pace and rigor
Mid-course Feedback is a private process
conducted between teachers and students and
is not intended to be shared with anyone else
unless an instructor chooses to do so.
●
MCF is facilitated by the NTID Student
Rating advisory group but it is not part of
the student rating systems.
●
Unlike the SRS, MCF is an informal
evaluation process with no formal data
collection or reporting.
NTID Student Rating Advisory Group
●
Kim Kurz, Coordinator
●
Marianne Gustafson, Consultant
●
Karen Beiter
●
Ernest Roszkowski
●
Rich Dirmyer
●
Vicki Liggera
●
Jen Verbakel
●
Tom Weymann
●
Matthew Dye
How to use Mid-Course Evaluation?
There are three ways to use mid-course
evaluation…
1.
STRATE/SmartEvals system
2.
Qualtrics Survey
3.
Use your own paper surveys using MCF or
your own questions
RIT’s SmartEvals/STRATE MCF
Includes five Likert agreement-scale items, each paired
with an optional comment box for students to explain
their answers regarding these topics:
●
Communication between instructor and student
●
Communication among students
●
Materials
●
Difficulty level and pace
●
Homework and projects
RIT’s SmartEvals/STRATE MCF
Two comment boxes will allow
students to indicate what is “best”
and “worst” about the course.
STRATE MCF - When?
●
Wed. October 10th to Tues. October 16th .
●
It's approximately during week 7.
When?
Below is a list of some suggested timelines for
activities during Weeks 5 through 7 of a 14-
week semester- based term:
Week 5
If Qualtrics is used, instructor imports
survey to their site and edits according to
their needs.
Week 7
Instructor administers MCF survey
to students. Students complete MCF
through STRATE or Qualtrics.
Week 7
Instructor summarizes the results
and insights for the class, considers
how to respond to the feedback,
and makes a reasonable plan with
the student.
Week 8
Instructor follows up briefly with
students to see how the plan is
working.
NTID Student Rating Qualtrics
Matt Dye will do a demonstration of
Qualtrics created by the NTID
Student Rating (NSR) Advisory
Group in NTID Academic Affairs.
Thank you!!!
Any questions, contact
Kim.Kurz@rit.edu
and
Matt.Dye@rit.edu
Mid-Course Feedback (MCF) is a valuable process that allows students to provide feedback on their courses mid-semester, impacting teaching strategies, communication, materials, and more. This feedback benefits both students and instructors by improving teaching effectiveness, student satisfaction, and helping teachers track progress for promotions. MCF is a private process facilitated by the NTID Student Rating Advisory Group, focusing on soliciting student feedback without formal data collection or reporting.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Mid-Course Feedback using Qualtrics Kim Kurz, Ph.D. & Matt Dye, Ph.D. NTID Student Rating Advisory Group
Mid-Course Feedback (MCF) A process initiated in response to students desire to see that their opinions are values by teachers and can impact what happens in their courses. Link can be found here: https://www.ntid.rit.edu/president/academic-affairs/mcf
Why use Mid-Course Evaluation? Show progress as a teacher when you go up for promotion. A more meaningful, mutually satisfying, and potentially higher end-of-term student ratings while still in class progress. Improve teaching effectiveness and student satisfaction while you still have a chance in the middle of your course.
Why? Students Perspectives In a 2009 attitudes survey about the former course evaluations, students expressed that they didn t feel their ratings made any difference for themselves, and they couldn t see any changes over time across the term.
Why? Instructors Perspectives In a 2011 survey, the majority of instructors expressed that they were interested in soliciting and using mid- course student feedback. The MCF is an effort to facilitate that feedback.
Student feedback solicited several weeks into the semester can lead to mid-course corrections related to: Communication Teaching Strategies Materials Assignments Pace and rigor
Mid-course Feedback is a private process conducted between teachers and students and is not intended to be shared with anyone else unless an instructor chooses to do so.
MCF is facilitated by the NTID Student Rating advisory group but it is not part of the student rating systems. Unlike the SRS, MCF is an informal evaluation process with no formal data collection or reporting.
NTID Student Rating Advisory Group Kim Kurz, Coordinator Marianne Gustafson, Consultant Karen Beiter Ernest Roszkowski Rich Dirmyer Vicki Liggera Jen Verbakel Tom Weymann Matthew Dye
How to use Mid-Course Evaluation? There are three ways to use mid-course evaluation 1. STRATE/SmartEvals system 2. Qualtrics Survey 3. Use your own paper surveys using MCF or your own questions
RITs SmartEvals/STRATE MCF Includes five Likert agreement-scale items, each paired with an optional comment box for students to explain their answers regarding these topics: Communication between instructor and student Communication among students Materials Difficulty level and pace Homework and projects
RITs SmartEvals/STRATE MCF Two comment boxes will allow students to indicate what is best and worst about the course.
STRATE MCF - When? Wed. October 10th to Tues. October 16th . It's approximately during week 7.
When? Below is a list of some suggested timelines for activities during Weeks 5 through 7 of a 14- week semester- based term:
Week 5 If Qualtrics is used, instructor imports survey to their site and edits according to their needs.
Week 7 Instructor administers MCF survey to students. Students complete MCF through STRATE or Qualtrics.
Week 7 Instructor summarizes the results and insights for the class, considers how to respond to the feedback, and makes a reasonable plan with the student.
Week 8 Instructor follows up briefly with students to see how the plan is working.
NTID Student Rating Qualtrics Matt Dye will do a demonstration of Qualtrics created by the NTID Student Rating (NSR) Advisory Group in NTID Academic Affairs.
Thank you!!! Any questions, contact Kim.Kurz@rit.edu and Matt.Dye@rit.edu
