Federal Government Accounting and Auditing Conference Update

undefined
 
CliftonLarsonAllen
Federal Government
Accounting and Auditing
Conference
 
FASAB Update
Wendy Payne, CPA, CGFM
 
 
1
 
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
 
Disclaimer
 
 
Views expressed are those of the speaker.
 
The Board expresses its views in official
publications.
 
2
 
OVERVIEW
 
25 Years
Fiscal Sustainability
Our Annual Report and Three-Year Plan
Federal Reporting Entity
Review of Current Projects:
Reporting Model
Risk Assumed
Leases
Public-Private Partnerships
Department of Defense
 
 
3
 
Sustained Management Reform
 
 
 
“…legislators generally considered
management reform about as
exciting as sorting cranberries…”
 
Michael D. Serlin, Born-again financial management.
Government Executive (May 1996).
 
4
 
25 Years of Standards-Setting
 
5
 
Fiscal Sustainability
 
6
undefined
 
7
 
Source: Financial Report of the US Government FY2013
undefined
 
8
 
Source: Financial Report of the US Government FY2013
 
9
 
 
 
FEDERAL
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
ADVISORY BOARD
 
Annual Report
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2014
 
Three-Year Plan
Fiscal Years 2015-2017
 
 
 
 
Comments Requested by January 31, 2015
 
FASAB Annual Report
 
Beginning in 2010 FASAB was asked to
issue an annual report to facilitate
oversight.
http://www.fasab.gov/about/our-annual-reports/
Provides:
A progress update
Member feedback on continued conformance to
the criteria for a GAAP-standards setting body
Combined with our Three-year plan.
 
 
 
10
 
Three-Year Plan
 
We need your input!
We need your input!
 
11
 
Research Project –
Tax Expenditures
 
Tax provisions – obscure & complex
 
Decisions on tax expenditures are not
made annually – so the performance of
tax provisions is not monitored.
 
What provisions are like “foregone
revenue”? Equivalent to spending?
 
 
Research Project - 
Reconciling Budget
and Accrual Information
 
 
Government-wide Reconciliation:
Net Cost to the Surplus(Deficit)
 
Component Entity Reconciliation:
 ‘Net Cost’ to ‘Obligations Incurred and Other Resources’
 
 
13
 
Other Potential Projects
 
Electronic Reporting
Asset Retirement Obligations
Intangibles
Revenue
Summary or Popular Reporting
Research and Development
 
Federal Reporting Entity
– SFFAS 47 (effective FY2018) –
 
Include in General Purpose Federal Financial
Reports (GPFFR) all organizations:
budgeted for,
controlled with potential for risk or reward, or
owned
 
Does not specifically address particular entities.
Provides for judgment about:
Inclusion
Classification
Disclosure
 
15
 
Distinguish between consolidation entities
and disclosure organizations
 
Consolidation entities 
are:
supported by general taxes, and
on-going decision making, and
are more clearly linked to elected officials.
Information for consolidation entities is to
be consolidated in financial statements.
 
16
 
Federal Reporting Entity 
Federal Reporting Entity 
(CONT.)
(CONT.)
 
 
Disclosure organizations 
are:
somewhat independent from elected officials, and
may be financially self-sustaining.
 
Information regarding such organizations
is to be disclosed in notes with an
emphasis on risk.
 
17
 
Federal Reporting Entity 
Federal Reporting Entity 
(CONT.)
(CONT.)
 
Federal Reporting Entity 
(CONT.)
 
Also addresses:
What entities are subject to SFFAS 34 – the GAAP hierarchy
for federal entities
What organizations to include in component reporting entity
GPFFR
How to deal with:
 FASB-basis information for consolidation entities
Different year ends for disclosure organizations
Related parties
Amendments to SFFAC 2, 
Entity and Display
 
 
18
undefined
 
Current Projects
 
19
 
Reporting Model
 
Seeking to enhance the benefits of accrual basis
financial statements
 
Input to the Board:
User needs surveys, focus groups, and roundtables
FASAB Task Force on Government-wide Financial Reports 
(Dec 2010)
CFO Act 20-Year Report
Input from task forces focusing on agency level reporting on cost,
budget and performance
Statement of spending pilots
Study of other sovereign government practices
 
20
 
Participants want particular or 
specialized
information to meet their needs:
 
Understandability
 of financial information
 
Centralized source 
for obtaining data
Move toward real-time data
Address program managers needs
 
Integrated data
Financial and non-financial performance information
 
Program
 level cost information
 
Add 
forward-looking 
information in agency reports
 
 
21
 
Reporting Model 
Reporting Model 
(cont.)
(cont.)
– Research
– Research
 Results 
 Results 
 
Improvement Needed in the 
Statement of Net
Cost:
 
Now - cost by strategic goal
 
Some prefer to focus on “cost” by organizations,
programs, or projects
 
Matching cost and output (and eventually outcome)
is not so easy!
 
Same terms used differently by different disciplines
(cost per the budget versus cost per accrual
principles versus cost per program evaluators)
 
 
 
22
 
Reporting Model 
Reporting Model 
(cont.)
(cont.)
– Research
– Research
 Results 
 Results 
 
RISK ASSUMED
 
Current Standards are 
limited to insurance
contracts and explicit guarantees (other than
loan guarantees).
When implementing policy initiatives to stabilize financial
markets and the economy, the federal government explicitly
assumed risks previously considered by some to have implied
backing of the federal government.
In order to meet the stewardship and operating performance
objectives of federal financial reporting
 
It is important that the federal government 
report all
significant risks assumed
, not just risks related to
insurance contracts and explicit guarantees.
 
23
 
RISK ASSUMED (cont.)
- Three Phases -
 
Phase I: 
Insurance and [Non-Loan] Guarantees
 
Phase II: 
Entitlement Programs, including:
National Defense,
Security and Disaster response
Other potential effects on future outflows:
regulatory actions,
Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), etc.
 
Phase III:
Commitments
Obligations
Other risk areas
 
24
 
RISK ASSUMED 
(cont.)
- Insurance & Guarantee Phase -
 
Define federal Insurance and 
[Non-Loan] 
Guarantee programs
 
Improve terminology (“premium deficiency” and “subsidy”)
 
Address measurement uncertainty
 
Disclose risk assumed
 
25
 
Leases
 
Are all leases financings?
 
26
 
FASAB is partnering with GASB to develop standards for
governmental organizations.
 
Tentative decision to establish a single model (with exceptions for
short-term arrangements).
Leases create assets consisting of the “right to use” a resource.
Leases create liabilities consisting of the obligation to pay for the resource.
 
The focus may be on the interest cost associated with leases.
 
Leases 
(cont.)
 
27
 
Public-Private Partnerships
 
Due to budget pressures, federal agencies have
increasingly turned to public-private partnerships
(e.g., PPPs, P3s) to accomplish goals
 
Transparency of the full costs and risks of such
partnerships  is the overall objective
 
Specific objectives include:
Defining terms (e.g., service concession arrangements, P3s)
Providing guidance for the recognition and measurement of:
assets and liabilities
revenues and expenses
risks
Consider implications for other arrangements related to P3s (sale-
leaseback or other long-term arrangements).
 
28
 
DoD Implementation Guidance
 
 
SFFAS 3 – Are estimates for inventory and
related property permitted?
Research and development – when is it
capitalizable?
Internal Use Software
 
29
 
Questions?
 
30
 
Contact and Website Information
 
General inquiries can be directed to
fasab@fasab.gov
Phone: 202 512-7350
www.FASAB.gov
Listserv (sign up for emails)
Exposure Drafts
Active Projects 
– assigned staff
My contact info:
 
paynew@fasab.gov
 
(202) 512-7357
 
31
Slide Note
Embed
Share

CliftonLarsonAllen presents the Federal Government Accounting and Auditing Conference update, discussing topics such as fiscal sustainability, fiscal projections, social insurance, and standards-setting over the past 25 years. The event highlights important projects related to risk, assumed leases, public-private partnerships, and more.

  • Government
  • Accounting
  • Auditing
  • Fiscal Sustainability
  • Conferences

Uploaded on Sep 26, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CliftonLarsonAllen Federal Government Accounting and Auditing Conference FASAB Update Wendy Payne, CPA, CGFM Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1

  2. Disclaimer Views expressed are those of the speaker. The Board expresses its views in official publications. 2

  3. OVERVIEW 25 Years Fiscal Sustainability Our Annual Report and Three-Year Plan Federal Reporting Entity Review of Current Projects: Reporting Model Risk Assumed Leases Public-Private Partnerships Department of Defense 3

  4. legislators generally considered management reform about as exciting as sorting cranberries Michael D. Serlin, Born-again financial management. Government Executive (May 1996). Sustained Management Reform 4

  5. 25 Years of Standards-Setting 5

  6. Fiscal Sustainability 6

  7. Social Insurance Summary (in billions of $s) Participants who have attained eligibility age: Revenue Expenditures for scheduled benefits 2013 $ 2,101 (18,175) Present value of future expenditures in excess of future revenue (16,074) Participants who have not attained eligibility age: Revenue Expenditures for scheduled benefits 38,362 (76,262) Present value of future expenditures in excess of future revenue (37,900) (53,974) Closed Group - Total present value of future expenditures in excess of future revenue Future participants: Revenue Expenditures for scheduled benefits 32,851 (18,575) Present value of future expenditures in excess of future revenue 14,276 $ (39,698) Open Group - Total present value of future expenditures in excess of future revenue Source: Financial Report of the US Government FY2013 7

  8. Long-Term Fiscal Projections 2013 Dollars in Trillions % of GDP Receipts: Social Security Payroll Taxes Medicare Payroll Taxes Individual Income Taxes Other Receipts Total Receipts 46.1 15.4 113.2 41.5 216.2 4.2 1.4 10.4 3.9 19.7 Non-interest Spending: Social Security Medicare Part A Medicare Parts B & D Medicaid Defense Discretionary Non-defense Discretionary Other Mandatory Total Non-interest Spending 62.4 23.5 24.4 25.2 23.1 27.5 34.0 220.2 5.7 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.5 3.1 20.2 4.0 0.4 Non-interest Spending less Receipts 1.7 Fiscal Gap as a percent of GDP Source: Financial Report of the US Government FY2013 8

  9. FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD Annual Report Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2014 Three-Year Plan Fiscal Years 2015-2017 Comments Requested by January 31, 2015 9

  10. FASAB Annual Report Beginning in 2010 FASAB was asked to issue an annual report to facilitate oversight. http://www.fasab.gov/about/our-annual-reports/ Provides: A progress update Member feedback on continued conformance to the criteria for a GAAP-standards setting body Combined with our Three-year plan. 10

  11. Three-Year Plan We need your input! 11

  12. Research Project Tax Expenditures Tax provisions obscure & complex Decisions on tax expenditures are not made annually so the performance of tax provisions is not monitored. What provisions are like foregone revenue ? Equivalent to spending?

  13. Research Project - Reconciling Budget and Accrual Information Government-wide Reconciliation: Net Cost to the Surplus(Deficit) Component Entity Reconciliation: Net Cost to Obligations Incurred and Other Resources 13

  14. Other Potential Projects Electronic Reporting Asset Retirement Obligations Intangibles Revenue Summary or Popular Reporting Research and Development

  15. Federal Reporting Entity SFFAS 47 (effective FY2018) Include in General Purpose Federal Financial Reports (GPFFR) all organizations: budgeted for, controlled with potential for risk or reward, or owned Does not specifically address particular entities. Provides for judgment about: Inclusion Classification Disclosure 15

  16. Federal Reporting Entity (CONT.) Distinguish between consolidation entities and disclosure organizations Consolidation entities are: supported by general taxes, and on-going decision making, and are more clearly linked to elected officials. Information for consolidation entities is to be consolidated in financial statements. 16

  17. Federal Reporting Entity (CONT.) Disclosure organizations are: somewhat independent from elected officials, and may be financially self-sustaining. Information regarding such organizations is to be disclosed in notes with an emphasis on risk. 17

  18. Federal Reporting Entity (CONT.) Also addresses: What entities are subject to SFFAS 34 the GAAP hierarchy for federal entities What organizations to include in component reporting entity GPFFR How to deal with: FASB-basis information for consolidation entities Different year ends for disclosure organizations Related parties Amendments to SFFAC 2, Entity and Display 18

  19. Current Projects 19

  20. Reporting Model Seeking to enhance the benefits of accrual basis financial statements Input to the Board: User needs surveys, focus groups, and roundtables FASAB Task Force on Government-wide Financial Reports (Dec 2010) CFO Act 20-Year Report Input from task forces focusing on agency level reporting on cost, budget and performance Statement of spending pilots Study of other sovereign government practices 20

  21. Reporting Model (cont.) Research Results Participants want particular or specialized information to meet their needs: Understandability of financial information Centralized source for obtaining data Move toward real-time data Address program managers needs Integrated data Financial and non-financial performance information Program level cost information Add forward-looking information in agency reports 21

  22. Reporting Model (cont.) Research Results Improvement Needed in the Statement of Net Cost: Now - cost by strategic goal Some prefer to focus on cost by organizations, programs, or projects Matching cost and output (and eventually outcome) is not so easy! Same terms used differently by different disciplines (cost per the budget versus cost per accrual principles versus cost per program evaluators) 22

  23. RISK ASSUMED Current Standards are limited to insurance contracts and explicit guarantees (other than loan guarantees). When implementing policy initiatives to stabilize financial markets and the economy, the federal government explicitly assumed risks previously considered by some to have implied backing of the federal government. In order to meet the stewardship and operating performance objectives of federal financial reporting It is important that the federal government report all significant risks assumed, not just risks related to insurance contracts and explicit guarantees. 23

  24. RISK ASSUMED (cont.) - Three Phases - Phase I: Insurance and [Non-Loan] Guarantees Phase II: Entitlement Programs, including: National Defense, Security and Disaster response Other potential effects on future outflows: regulatory actions, Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), etc. Phase III: Commitments Obligations Other risk areas 24

  25. RISK ASSUMED (cont.) - Insurance & Guarantee Phase - Define federal Insurance and [Non-Loan] Guarantee programs Improve terminology ( premium deficiency and subsidy ) Address measurement uncertainty Disclose risk assumed 25

  26. Leases Are all leases financings? 26

  27. Leases (cont.) FASAB is partnering with GASB to develop standards for governmental organizations. Tentative decision to establish a single model (with exceptions for short-term arrangements). Leases create assets consisting of the right to use a resource. Leases create liabilities consisting of the obligation to pay for the resource. The focus may be on the interest cost associated with leases. 27

  28. Public-Private Partnerships Due to budget pressures, federal agencies have increasingly turned to public-private partnerships (e.g., PPPs, P3s) to accomplish goals Transparency of the full costs and risks of such partnerships is the overall objective Specific objectives include: Defining terms (e.g., service concession arrangements, P3s) Providing guidance for the recognition and measurement of: assets and liabilities revenues and expenses risks Consider implications for other arrangements related to P3s (sale- leaseback or other long-term arrangements). 28

  29. DoD Implementation Guidance SFFAS 3 Are estimates for inventory and related property permitted? Research and development when is it capitalizable? Internal Use Software 29

  30. Questions? 30

  31. Contact and Website Information General inquiries can be directed to fasab@fasab.gov Phone: 202 512-7350 www.FASAB.gov Listserv (sign up for emails) Exposure Drafts Active Projects assigned staff My contact info: paynew@fasab.gov (202) 512-7357 31

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#