Future Tasks in AV Certification and Harmonization Overview
Assessment of current achievements and future tasks in the certification of Automated Vehicles (AVs) is discussed by experts from CLEPA and OICA. The focus is on the ADS certification overview, potential improvements for harmonization, and the need for harmonized AV definitions to enhance regulatory frameworks. The outcome highlights addressing key topics for ADS regulation and potential areas for improvement in scenario databases and acceptance criteria.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
Presentation Transcript
Submitted by the experts from CLEPA and OICA Informal document GRVA-17-38 17th GRVA, 25-29 Sept 2023 Provisional agenda item 4(f) View on the Certification of AV s - Current achievements and future tasks -
Assessment of the expected deliveries OICA/CLEPA has developed an overview on how Automated Vehicles could be certified (=> agreement neutral approach) The aim was to identify missing elements required for certification of Automated Vehicles, requiring further consideration under GRVA During this exercise the content of the former informal document GRVA-09-10 (presentation on the Certification of Automated Vehicles) was confirmed, taking also into account the latest developments in FRAV, VMAD and the Integration Group
ADS certification overview: Big picture on how it works Manufacturer/ Organization Product ADS Internal and/or external Requirements / Processes ADS Feature(s) Use case ODD Audit (Internal and/or external) Use case specific Feature Requirements ODD specific Feature Requirements Filter Filter Functional Requirements Safety Management System Expected behavior competency, accidentology, ... Nominal, critical, failure condition Processes Processes Processes Scenario based assessment Non - scenario based assessment Manufacturers Declaration Identify scenarios Internal/external Final Final Develop new Scenario Database Acceptance criteria Acceptance confirmation Filter Documentation package Certification Confirmation Feature based Functional Scenarios (use case + ODD) Multi pillar testing Logical Scenarios Concrete Scenarios No unified / harmonized criteria available Test track Certified product No unified / harmonized Database available Real world test Virtual/Simulation Credibility assessment ISMR deployment Safety Assessment
Outcome of the assessment In principle all topics needed for an ADS Regulation (GTR or UN R) seem to be addressed by the outcome of FRAV and VMAD Potential for improvement/harmonization for future activity on the topics of 1. Scenario Database/catalog 2. Acceptance criteria => Even though these topics are not addressed in a harmonized way yet, it would be possible to use the concept for certification making use existing solutions (e.g. scenario database from research projects, manufacturer justified acceptance criteria, etc.)
Need for harmonized AV definitions DSSAD ALKS Future ADS Regulation non ADS Regulations Vehicle ADS Guideline Categorization Harmonized AV Terms & Definitions
Needs for certifications of AVs Still unclear how the work will continue after delivery of the FRAV/VMAD guidline doc Gtr (98A), UN R (58A) ADS Regulation Coordination important, incl. use of common definitions, etc. Work in GR TF s progressing Amended non ADS Regulations Joint Workshop/TF of GRVA and GRSG needed Revisions of R.E.3 & S.R.1 Vehicle Categorization
