Insights on Money, Gambling, and Decision-Making
Explore a collection of visual insights delving into themes of money, gambling, and decision-making. Topics include the impact of money on behavior, the complexities of gambling, the necessity of making tough choices, and the influence of outside perspectives. These thought-provoking images provoke reflection on personal values, ethical considerations, and societal dynamics.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Peter J. Adams School of Population Health
HEAPS ADDICTIVE P R O F I T NON-ADDICTIVE NOT MUCH LOW HIGH
Hard to resist Money exchange establishes expectations & obligations Reinforced by multiple exchanges
I didnt really see that! We ve done so much work already Let s just pretend See full size image
Maybe its not that bad Gambling has its positive sides Only a small number have problems
Money is sitting there This funding will save lives If we don t get it, somebody else less deserving will
Be realistic To get things done you need to make some unpopular choices You have to be in to win
Messages favoured my ambitions Ethical perspective minimised Need an outside reference point to gauge my views
FUNCTIONS IN A WIDER ARENA SIMPLE TRANSACTION
Political Chain of Engagement Tobacco Alcohol Gambling Industries POLICY MAKERS Lobbying & PR companies Public communication strategies Politicians Relationship building activities Producer & retail associations
Public Good Chain of Engagement Tobacco Alcohol Gambling Industries POLICY MAKERS Health & community programs Corporate social responsibility Public consultation Social aspects & public relations organisations Media coverage
Knowledge Chain of Engagement Tobacco Alcohol Gambling Industries POLICY MAKERS Researchers & research organizations Priority setting processes Government officials Funding & commissioning processes Communication & dissemination
Politicians Public Consultation Public Good Chain Tobacco Alcohol Gambling Industries Government Officials
2 1 Ethical Risks Contributory Risks 3 Reputational Receiving Industry Funds? Risks 4 5 Governance Risks Relationship Risks
Trying to do Good from sources that do Harm 1 Ethical Risks Exploiting Vulnerable Groups Benefiting from Deprived & Addicted Money Derived From Harm
How Industry Benefits from the Relationship 2 Contributory Risk Improving Public Profile Contributing to Sales Positive view of Policy Makers
How Others will Judge the Relationship 3 Reputational Risks Judgement of Funders Judgement of Colleagues Judgement of Stakeholders
Threats to Independence & Sovereignty 4 Governance Risks Perceived Dependence Creeping Funding Reliance Increasing Silence & Compliance
Conflict from Differences in Viewpoint 5 Relationship Risks Conflict between Sections Conflict between Colleagues Silencing & Leaving
Continuum of Moral Jeopardy Intensity of Relationship
PHARMACEUTICALS ALCOHOL OIL PORN ARMAMENTS SLOTS LOTTERIES TOBACCO
Primary Concern Moderate Risk Extremely High Risk High Risk Low Risk
Purpose Extent Relevant-harm Identifiers Link
Degree to which purposes between funder and recipient diverge How do purposes match? E.g. smoking cessation researcher funded by tobacco company
Degree to which the recipient is reliant on this source What percentage of funding? E.g. Genetics researcher unwilling to question source when funding increases
Degree of harm associated with this form of consumption Some products are less harmful than others E.g. researcher accepts money from lotteries but not slots
Degree to which the recipient is visibly identified with the funder Branding using names, logos, advertising & other promotional linkages E.g. new laboratory with sign acknowledging brewery funding
Nature and directness of the link between recipient & funder Use of mediating bodies or contracts? E.g. Earmarked alcohol funding channelled through government departmen
Purpose Extent Relevant-harm Identifiers Links Group 1: A public health researcher receiving funds directly from a tobacco company in publicly visible way Group 2: A genetics project receiving half its funds from a brewery Group 3: Research equipment funded partially from donations from a gambling machine trust Group 4: A symposium funded by a small grant anonymously from lotteries MOD RISK HIGH RISK EXTR. H. RISK LOW RISK
Class A https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSdKei7IK_x39XdabvgNK9H4ztvyrlhcP9HlwuTXrUkji4WfAvZMg Tobacco, Armaments, Slots, Alcohol Class B Psychotropics, Lotteries, Fast Food Class C Pornography, Plastic Surgery, Oil
Learnt much from tobacco Easy to plug-in without realizing wider consequences Promoting open dialogue about sources is key Need ethical benchmarks & codes of practice
