The Impact of Intangibles in Global Economic Measurement

 
Towards 
an Update of the
Balance of Payments and
 
System
of National Accounts
 
Manuals
 
by Francien 
Berry, 
Michael 
Connolly, 
Padma Hurree-Gobin,
Jennifer 
Ribarsky, 
and Paul
 
Roberts
 
Comments: Samuel
 
Kortum
 
Overview
 
Overview
 
How 
does globalization 
affect 
our 
measurement 
of 
the
 
economy?
 
Overview
 
How 
does globalization 
affect 
our 
measurement 
of 
the
 
economy?
This paper takes 
a 
broad look at that
 
question
tractable issues: remember 
GNI not 
just
 
GDP
less tractable issues: complications 
from 
MNE’s 
and
 
SPE’s
 
Overview
 
How 
does globalization 
affect 
our 
measurement 
of 
the
 
economy?
This paper takes 
a 
broad look at that
 
question
tractable issues: remember 
GNI not 
just
 
GDP
less tractable issues: complications 
from 
MNE’s 
and
 
SPE’s
My 
discussion will focus 
on
 
intangibles
a 
common thread through the less tractable
 
issues
 
Intangibles
 
Intangibles
 
Intangibles 
show up 
in the accounts
 
as:
assets: patents, trade secrets
investments: intellectual property
 
products
returns:
 
royalties
 
Intangibles
 
Intangibles 
show up 
in the accounts
 
as:
assets: patents, trade secrets
investments: intellectual property
 
products
returns:
 
royalties
Intangibles create challenging measurement
 
issues
they’ll come back to bite 
us 
if 
we 
don’t 
treat them
 
right!
 
Intangibles
 
Intangibles 
show up 
in the accounts
 
as:
assets: patents, trade secrets
investments: intellectual property
 
products
returns:
 
royalties
Intangibles create challenging measurement
 
issues
they’ll come back to bite 
us 
if 
we 
don’t 
treat them
 
right!
 
Intangibles are central to 
MNE’s, 
but 
also have 
a 
life 
of 
their
 
own
 
Hill
 
(1999)
 
Hill
 
(1999)
 
 
They are the 
originals created 
by 
authors, 
…, 
engineers, 
…, 
film
studios 
These 
originals 
are 
intangibles 
that 
have 
no 
physical
dimensions or 
spatial 
co-ordinates 
of 
their 
own 
They can be
transmitted electronically 
(pg
 
427)
 
 
lack 
of a 
spatial 
coordinate means they may be
 
footloose
 
not easy 
to 
assign 
to 
a 
particular
 
country
 
Hill
 
(1999)
 
 
They are the 
originals created 
by 
authors, 
…, 
engineers, 
…, 
film
studios 
These 
originals 
are 
intangibles 
that 
have 
no 
physical
dimensions or 
spatial 
co-ordinates 
of 
their 
own 
They can be
transmitted electronically 
(pg
 
427)
 
 
lack 
of a 
spatial 
coordinate means they may be
 
footloose
 
not easy 
to 
assign 
to 
a 
particular
 
country
 
 
Hill insists that 
we 
distinguish 
intangibles 
from
 
services
 
 
yet the two get lumped 
together in services
 
trade
 
intangibles 
do 
provide a 
service, 
perhaps long 
after
 
creation
 
Hill
 
(1999)
 
 
They are the 
originals created 
by 
authors, 
…, 
engineers, 
…, 
film
studios 
These 
originals 
are 
intangibles 
that 
have 
no 
physical
dimensions or 
spatial 
co-ordinates 
of 
their 
own 
They can be
transmitted electronically 
(pg
 
427)
 
 
lack 
of a 
spatial 
coordinate means they may be
 
footloose
 
not easy 
to 
assign 
to 
a 
particular
 
country
 
 
Hill insists that 
we 
distinguish 
intangibles 
from
 
services
 
 
yet the two get lumped 
together in services
 
trade
 
intangibles 
do 
provide a 
service, 
perhaps long 
after
 
creation
 
 
Hill 
advocates a 
three-part 
scheme: goods, 
services,
 
intangibles
 
Ro
me
r
 
(1990)
 
Ro
me
r
 
(1990)
 
How 
to bring 
technology 
(key to growth) into economic
 
analysis
could just as well have been about
 
intangibles
 
Ro
me
r
 
(1990)
 
How 
to bring 
technology 
(key to growth) into economic
 
analysis
could just as well have been about
 
intangibles
Technology 
is 
a 
non-rival 
good 
(can 
use 
it everywhere at the same
 
time)
 
Ro
me
r
 
(1990)
 
How 
to bring 
technology 
(key to growth) into economic
 
analysis
could just as well have been about
 
intangibles
Technology 
is 
a 
non-rival 
good 
(can 
use 
it everywhere at the same
 
time)
Rival factors generate constant
 
returns
technology generates 
increasing
 
returns
 
Ro
me
r
 
(1990)
 
How 
to bring 
technology 
(key to growth) into economic
 
analysis
could just as well have been about
 
intangibles
Technology 
is 
a 
non-rival 
good 
(can 
use 
it everywhere at the same
 
time)
Rival factors generate constant
 
returns
technology generates 
increasing
 
returns
Value 
of 
technology (incentive to invest) via
 
excludability
institutions like patent protection
imperfect competition 
and mark-up
 
pricing
 
Implications
 
Implications
 
Implication 
for 
economic theory:
to treat technology right, change modeling
 
fundamentals
constant returns in rival factors
 
only
imperfect competition to 
support
 innovation
in the past 
30 
years we’ve made substantial
 
progress
 
Implications
 
Implication 
for 
economic theory:
to treat technology right, change modeling
 
fundamentals
constant returns in rival factors
 
only
imperfect competition to 
support 
innovation
in the past 
30 
years we’ve made substantial
 
progress
Implications 
for 
economic measurement:
to treat intangibles right, change measurement
 
fundamentals
 
R
eca
p
 
SNA 2008 
contains 
a 
clear discussion 
of
 
intangibles
But, ducks the 
profound 
implications 
of
 
non-rivalry
I 
could find 
no 
reference to non-rivalry in 
SNA
 
2008
What’s 
gained 
by a 
more fundamental rethinking 
of
 
intangibles?
 
Suggestions
 
Suggestions
 
Treat 
intangibles as non-rival
 
technology
a 
source 
of 
TFP growth, 
not a 
factor 
of
 
production
 
Suggestions
 
Treat 
intangibles as non-rival
 
technology
a 
source 
of 
TFP growth, 
not a 
factor 
of
 
production
Consider imperfect competition
helps to integrate 
MNE 
data into national
 
accounts
justifies price exceeding 
marginal 
cost, and
 
profit
 
Suggestions
 
Treat 
intangibles as non-rival
 
technology
a 
source 
of 
TFP growth, 
not a 
factor 
of
 
production
Consider imperfect competition
helps to integrate 
MNE 
data into national
 
accounts
justifies price exceeding 
marginal 
cost, and
 
profit
Tie 
together investments in intangibles with returns to
 
intangibles
resolves 
who 
counts the returns as 
a 
services
 
export
 
Conclusions
 
Its easy to find fault in any measurement
 
system
Its 
not 
easy to to 
do
 
better
if 
you’re 
honest about the data constraint (Zvi
 
Griliches)
My 
comments may 
sound 
naive in this
 
sense
I hope 
they lead to 
a good
 discussion
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This paper discusses how globalization affects economic measurement, focusing on the challenges posed by intangibles such as patents, trade secrets, and intellectual property in national accounts. The handling of these assets is crucial for accurate economic analysis and reporting, especially in the context of multinational enterprises (MNEs).

  • Intangibles
  • Globalization
  • Economic Measurement
  • MNEs
  • Intellectual Property

Uploaded on Sep 26, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Towards an Update of the Balance of Payments and System of National Accounts Manuals by Francien Berry, Michael Connolly, Padma Hurree-Gobin, Jennifer Ribarsky, and Paul Roberts Comments: Samuel Kortum

  2. Overview

  3. Overview How does globalization affect our measurement of the economy?

  4. Overview How does globalization affect our measurement of the economy? This paper takes a broad look at that question tractable issues: remember GNI not just GDP less tractable issues: complications from MNE s and SPE s

  5. Overview How does globalization affect our measurement of the economy? This paper takes a broad look at that question tractable issues: remember GNI not just GDP less tractable issues: complications from MNE s and SPE s My discussion will focus on intangibles a common thread through the less tractable issues

  6. Intangibles

  7. Intangibles Intangibles show up in the accounts as: assets: patents, trade secrets investments: intellectual property products returns: royalties

  8. Intangibles Intangibles show up in the accounts as: assets: patents, trade secrets investments: intellectual property products returns: royalties Intangibles create challenging measurement issues they ll come back to bite us if we don t treat them right!

  9. Intangibles Intangibles show up in the accounts as: assets: patents, trade secrets investments: intellectual property products returns: royalties Intangibles create challenging measurement issues they ll come back to bite us if we don t treat them right! Intangibles are central to MNE s, but also have a life of their own

  10. Hill (1999)

  11. Hill (1999) They are the originals created by authors, , engineers, , film studios These originals are intangibles that have no physical dimensions or spatial co-ordinates of their own They can be transmitted electronically (pg 427) lack of a spatial coordinate means they may be footloose not easy to assign to a particular country

  12. Hill (1999) They are the originals created by authors, , engineers, , film studios These originals are intangibles that have no physical dimensions or spatial co-ordinates of their own They can be transmitted electronically (pg 427) lack of a spatial coordinate means they may be footloose not easy to assign to a particular country Hill insists that we distinguish intangibles from services yet the two get lumped together in services trade intangibles do provide a service, perhaps long after creation

  13. Hill (1999) They are the originals created by authors, , engineers, , film studios These originals are intangibles that have no physical dimensions or spatial co-ordinates of their own They can be transmitted electronically (pg 427) lack of a spatial coordinate means they may be footloose not easy to assign to a particular country Hill insists that we distinguish intangibles from services yet the two get lumped together in services trade intangibles do provide a service, perhaps long after creation Hill advocates a three-part scheme: goods, services, intangibles

  14. Romer (1990)

  15. Romer (1990) How to bring technology (key to growth) into economic analysis could just as well have been about intangibles

  16. Romer (1990) How to bring technology (key to growth) into economic analysis could just as well have been about intangibles Technology is a non-rival good (can use it everywhere at the same time)

  17. Romer (1990) How to bring technology (key to growth) into economic analysis could just as well have been about intangibles Technology is a non-rival good (can use it everywhere at the same time) Rival factors generate constant returns technology generates increasing returns

  18. Romer (1990) How to bring technology (key to growth) into economic analysis could just as well have been about intangibles Technology is a non-rival good (can use it everywhere at the same time) Rival factors generate constant returns technology generates increasing returns Value of technology (incentive to invest) via excludability institutions like patent protection imperfect competition and mark-up pricing

  19. Implications

  20. Implications Implication for economic theory: to treat technology right, change modeling fundamentals constant returns in rival factors only imperfect competition to support innovation in the past 30 years we ve made substantial progress

  21. Implications Implication for economic theory: to treat technology right, change modeling fundamentals constant returns in rival factors only imperfect competition to support innovation in the past 30 years we ve made substantial progress Implications for economic measurement: to treat intangibles right, change measurement fundamentals

  22. Recap SNA 2008 contains a clear discussion ofintangibles But, ducks the profound implications of non-rivalry I could find no reference to non-rivalry in SNA2008 What s gained by a more fundamental rethinking of intangibles?

  23. Suggestions

  24. Suggestions Treat intangibles as non-rival technology a source of TFP growth, not a factor ofproduction

  25. Suggestions Treat intangibles as non-rival technology a source of TFP growth, not a factor ofproduction Consider imperfect competition helps to integrate MNE data into national accounts justifies price exceeding marginal cost, and profit

  26. Suggestions Treat intangibles as non-rival technology a source of TFP growth, not a factor ofproduction Consider imperfect competition helps to integrate MNE data into national accounts justifies price exceeding marginal cost, and profit Tie together investments in intangibles with returns to intangibles resolves who counts the returns as a services export

  27. Conclusions Its easy to find fault in any measurement system Its not easy to to do better if you re honest about the data constraint (Zvi Griliches) My comments may sound naive in this sense I hope they lead to a good discussion

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#