Team T (#2) Tom Lastoskie Lead Workshop Feedback MRL WG 2018 Activities
Team T² (#2)
Tom Lastoskie
Lead
Team Members
•
Tom Lastoskie – AFIT
•
Dave Karr – USAF, AFLCMC
•
Mark Gordon – OSD ManTech
•
Nathan Braaten – Boeing
•
Brett Frack –BAE Systems
•
Marc Pepi – Army Research Laboratory
•
Tony Fowler – DCMA HQ
•
Loi Nguyen – SMC/ENE (BTAS)
•
Ming Liang – US Army, Picatinny Arsenal
•
Greg Krieger – BAE Systems
Workshop Feedback
MRL WG 2018 Activities
•
Team Recommendations (Strategic)
•
Assign an MRL Secretariat – we nominate Jordan
Masters
•
Manufacturing & Quality education of the
workforce – suggest an Ad Hoc Committee to
interact with PQM Career Field Survey team
•
Do we need a ‘marketing brochure’ or other
‘social media’ activity that captures our
successes?
•
Investigate the use of the MRL Process in DoD in
relation to congressional language (Rob Gold,
NDAA 2017 Section 906 & 907)
•
How do we handle industrial security (cyber)
considerations?
Workshop Feedback
MRL WG 2018 Activities
•
Team Recommendations (Body of Knowledge)
•
Objective Evidence/Artifact examples to satisfy MRL Criteria need
to be identified and put into the MRL Users Guide.
•
More industry terminology in Users Guide
•
“Predictive indicator” in MRL 7 & 8 (D.3) Criteria does not have
explanations nor examples in the MRL Users Guide. The
“definition” (A set of internal process metrics that can provide
quality and delivery forecasts, are actionable, and are indicative of
the overall “health” of the organization’s and suppliers’
performance.) provides no insight. We need examples.
•
“Availability” in MRL 8 & 9 (D.2) Criteria does not explicitly cover
obsolescence/DMSMS while obsolescence/DMSMS is explicitly
covered in MRL 6 & 7 Criteria. Obsolescence/DMSMS may be more
important in MRL 8 & 9 than MRL 6 & 7.
•
How do we handle and expand language for ‘counterfeit parts’?
Feedback on Proposed Matrix Change
MRL 1-3 Criteria additions/changes
•
Team Assessment of proposed additional criteria
•
Is this change value added: Yes
•
However, wording changes needed!
•
We trust you to “do the right thing”!!!
1)
MRL 2 B.1 Potential
characteristics of the concept (materials, processes,
capabilities, limitations, etc.) that impact producibility
identified
.
2)
MRL 3 G.1 “developmental”
workforce
3)
Use of “Identified” needs to be consistent
4)
MRL 3 E.1 Identification of process approaches. Remove “material
and/or” to be consistent with the rest of the thread.
5)
MRL 2 B.1 Identify potential
elements
of the concept
6)
MRL 3 B.1
…....
7)
MRL 3 D.4 Remove “
List of
” Reverse second and first sentence
8)
Our suggested changes are on a spreadsheet – to be provided by
Mark Gordon.
Feedback on Proposed Matrix Change
MRL 4 Criteria changes
•
Team Assessment of proposed additional criteria
•
Is this change value added: Yes. However, changes below must be
incorporated!
•
A.2 Advanced
m
anufacturing
t
echnology development
….
•
B.2 ...
function constraints
identified and (remove)
manufacturing
… Put second
statement in Users Guide
•
C.1 Change first statement to: Manufacturing, material and special requirement
cost drivers identified
and included in cost models
.
•
D.4 Remove “
List of
”
•
D.4 Special handling
items,
risks and issues identified. Reverse second and first
sentence
•
E.1 No to “Modeling and simulations of manufacturing concepts are finalized.”
Keep original.
•
H.2 Capability
,
and availability
…
•
We appreciated the change from SEP and AS to technology development and
systems engineering activities. Do this to
all
. Should we do to all of the matrix.?
•
I.1 and I.2
•
I.2
Developmental
materials and components
list developed
identified
based on
estimates of availability, lead time, handling, storage, etc.
•
Our suggested changes are on a spreadsheet – to be provided by Mark Gordon.
Feedback on Proposed AS6500/MRL
Integration to MRL Deskbook
•
Team Assessment of proposed Deskbook change
•
Is this change value added: Yes!
•
Suggested changes:
•
Add DI-MGMT-81889 (DID) to paragraph
6.7.2
Workshop Feedback
Environmental, Safety, and Health
•
Use ESH, (a.k.a., EHS)
•
Incorporation:
•
A separate thread
•
Sub-threads - 9
•
New wording in existing criteria (H.2 & D.4) - 1
•
Where for sub-threads?
•
Keep D.4, Rename to “ESH & Special Handling”
•
H.3 “ESH Management”
•
For H.3 we need to have SMEs in that field help
us address artifacts
•
Translate “Boeing Workplace Safety” questions
to put into Users Guide
Overall Feedback on Workshop
•
Team Assessment of workshop
(comments/suggestions)
•
Valuable
•
Networking within/outside DoD
•
Discussions between industry/DoD
•
Try to get more variety with industry
participation
•
Remember - this process is for all US industry
•
Editing of ideas at workshop is valuable
•
Synopsis of attendees provided before
Workshop
Summary
Team T (#2) Tom Lastoskie Lead Workshop Feedback MRL WG 2018 Activities - Recommendations for strategic assignments, workshop insights, and proposed matrix changes focusing on manufacturing and quality workforce education, internal process metrics, obsolescence management, and more.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Team T (#2) Tom Lastoskie Lead
Team Members Tom Lastoskie AFIT Dave Karr USAF, AFLCMC Mark Gordon OSD ManTech Nathan Braaten Boeing Brett Frack BAE Systems Marc Pepi Army Research Laboratory Tony Fowler DCMA HQ Loi Nguyen SMC/ENE (BTAS) Ming Liang US Army, Picatinny Arsenal Greg Krieger BAE Systems
Workshop Feedback MRL WG 2018 Activities Team Recommendations (Strategic) Assign an MRL Secretariat we nominate Jordan Masters Manufacturing & Quality education of the workforce suggest an Ad Hoc Committee to interact with PQM Career Field Survey team Do we need a marketing brochure or other social media activity that captures our successes? Investigate the use of the MRL Process in DoD in relation to congressional language (Rob Gold, NDAA 2017 Section 906 & 907) How do we handle industrial security (cyber) considerations?
Workshop Feedback MRL WG 2018 Activities Team Recommendations (Body of Knowledge) Objective Evidence/Artifact examples to satisfy MRL Criteria need to be identified and put into the MRL Users Guide. More industry terminology in Users Guide Predictive indicator in MRL 7 & 8 (D.3) Criteria does not have explanations nor examples in the MRL Users Guide. The definition (A set of internal process metrics that can provide quality and delivery forecasts, are actionable, and are indicative of the overall health of the organization s and suppliers performance.) provides no insight. We need examples. Availability in MRL 8 & 9 (D.2) Criteria does not explicitly cover obsolescence/DMSMS while obsolescence/DMSMS is explicitly covered in MRL 6 & 7 Criteria. Obsolescence/DMSMS may be more important in MRL 8 & 9 than MRL 6 & 7. How do we handle and expand language for counterfeit parts ?
Feedback on Proposed Matrix Change MRL 1-3 Criteria additions/changes Team Assessment of proposed additional criteria Is this change value added: Yes However, wording changes needed! We trust you to do the right thing !!! MRL 2 B.1 Potential characteristics of the concept (materials, processes, capabilities, limitations, etc.) that impact producibility identified. MRL 3 G.1 developmental workforce Use of Identified needs to be consistent MRL 3 E.1 Identification of process approaches. Remove material and/or to be consistent with the rest of the thread. MRL 2 B.1 Identify potential elements of the concept MRL 3 B.1 .... MRL 3 D.4 Remove List of Reverse second and first sentence Our suggested changes are on a spreadsheet to be provided by Mark Gordon. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8)
Feedback on Proposed Matrix Change MRL 4 Criteria changes Team Assessment of proposed additional criteria Is this change value added: Yes. However, changes below must be incorporated! A.2 Advanced manufacturing technology development . B.2 ...function constraints identified and (remove) manufacturing Put second statement in Users Guide C.1 Change first statement to: Manufacturing, material and special requirement cost drivers identified and included in cost models. D.4 Remove List of D.4 Special handling items, risks and issues identified. Reverse second and first sentence E.1 No to Modeling and simulations of manufacturing concepts are finalized. Keep original. H.2 Capability, and availability We appreciated the change from SEP and AS to technology development and systems engineering activities. Do this to all. Should we do to all of the matrix.? I.1 and I.2 I.2 Developmental materials and components list developed identified based on estimates of availability, lead time, handling, storage, etc. Our suggested changes are on a spreadsheet to be provided by Mark Gordon.
Feedback on Proposed AS6500/MRL Integration to MRL Deskbook Team Assessment of proposed Deskbook change Is this change value added: Yes! Suggested changes: Add DI-MGMT-81889 (DID) to paragraph 6.7.2
Workshop Feedback Environmental, Safety, and Health Use ESH, (a.k.a., EHS) Incorporation: A separate thread Sub-threads - 9 New wording in existing criteria (H.2 & D.4) - 1 Where for sub-threads? Keep D.4, Rename to ESH & Special Handling H.3 ESH Management For H.3 we need to have SMEs in that field help us address artifacts Translate Boeing Workplace Safety questions to put into Users Guide
Overall Feedback on Workshop Team Assessment of workshop (comments/suggestions) Valuable Networking within/outside DoD Discussions between industry/DoD Try to get more variety with industry participation Remember - this process is for all US industry Editing of ideas at workshop is valuable Synopsis of attendees provided before Workshop
