Surety Bonds: Importance, Issues, and Solutions

BONDS – SHOULD WE OR
SHOULD WE NOT
BONDS are 
SURETY CONTRACTS –
They offer SECURITY, ASSURANCE,
CERTAINTY, A PLEDGE etc
 
 
Founded or premised on KNOWLEDGE OR
APPRECIATION OF CAPACITY, CAPABILITY TO
PERFORM
 
 
SURETYSHIP is therefore the relationship
between the Surety, the Principal Debtor and
the Creditor.
 
Unlike Insurance Contracts, there are
invariably three parties.
OUR FAILURES
 
Lack of appreciation that suretyship contracts
are premised on:-
TRUST
KNOWLEDGE
CAPACITY
PERFORMANCE (PRIOR)
SHOULD WE OR SHOULD WE NOT
We definitely should!
THE REASONS WE SHOULD NOT GIVE
UP ARE:-
It is one of the fastest growing line of business
and income (Premium/commission) is good!
Demand would continue a northward growth
as the Ghanaian economy also grow
The Process (ie acceptance protocol) can be
better managed than we are doing now
The expensive cycle has matured
WHAT ARE THE
PROBLEMS/BOTTLENECKS
POOR
ASSESSMENT OF
RISK
appreciation of risk
                                                                 Strict Liability                                   No defined basis                                       Competition
                                                             (especially  for demand bonds)                                                                              enforcement
Weak assessment protocol                   No conditional provisions                 claims of fraud as basis for repudiation
                                                          (terms and conditions)
Assumption of counter                                   No exclusions                                            Capacity of staff                                     lack of regulatory
guarantees
Failure to follow                                             No endorsement                                                                                                             no penalties
processes and procedures
Breakdown of supervision
THE
CONTRACT
WORDING
CLAIMS
SETTLEMENT
PROTOCOL
OTHERS
RESULTS
Huge claims/ Interest
Litigation (and related cost)
Exposure of Capital
Erratic Response to Issues
TYPICAL BOND WORDING
(BOND/COUNTER GUARANTEE)
  “We ….. Insurance Co. Ltd. guarantee to pay
……… (BANK), upon your FIRST DEMAND and
WITHOUT CAVIL OR ARGUMENT, any sum or
sums up to the limit of ….. (amount) including
interests, commissions and charges as
aforesaid without your needing to prove or to
show grounds or reasons for your demand for
the sum specified therein and despite any
objection by the Customer.
 
The total liability of the GUARANTOR under
this Guarantee shall under no circumstances
exceed the said sum of amount …….. (amount)
inclusive of interest, bank charges and
commissions should …. (contractor) fail to
fulfil its obligation under the Bank Guarantee.”
BINDING CLAUSE FOR COUNTER
GUARANTEE CLAUSE
The wording for a Counter Guarantee is as
follows:-
 
The Contractor has undertaken in pursuance
of a Contract to DESIGN AND BUILD ……..
(hereinafter called “the contract”) for …… Co
Ltd. (hereinafter called “the Principal”)
The Principal has requested the Contractor to
provide an Advance Payment Guarantee
(hereinafter called “the Facility”) to guarantee
proper and loyal performance of the contract.
 
The Beneficiary has agreed to provide the Facility,
in the amount of ……. Subject to the Contractor
obtaining a Counter Guarantee from an Insurance
Company for the said ………(amount) as security
for compliance with the Contractor’s
performance obligations in accordance with the
Contract.
The Insurance Company has agreed to give the
Contractor such a Counter Guarantee…………………
 
NOW THEREFORE WE ……. Hereby affirm that we
are the Insurance Company and responsible to
you on behalf of the Contractor, up to a total
amount of …… such sum being payable in the
types and proportions of currencies in which the
Contract Price is payable, and we undertake to
pay you, upon first demand and without cavil or
argument, any sum or sums within the limits of
……. As aforesaid without needing to prove or to
show grounds or reason for your demand for the
sum specified therein and despite any objection
by the Contractor.
The following are noted:-
Payment is upon first demand by the Principal
There is no recourse to recompense from the
Guaranteed prior to settlement.
The most important words are “upon first
demand and without cavil or argument ….”
 
 The word “cavil” is defined by the Webster’s
Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary as “to
raise irritating and trivial objections “ or “to
oppose by inconsequential, frivolous or sham
objections”.
NOTE:-
The major problems are with
FINANCIAL/CREDIT/SUPPLIER GUARANTEES
CONSTRUCTION BONDS/ GUARANTEES are
relatively safe (Refer to cases in the courts)
-
ITAL
-
NDK
TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS:-
OPERATIONAL/TECHNICAL DEFECIENCIES NEED
TO BE ADDRESSED
Wordings                                  strict acceptance protocols                   Involvement
-(demand contracts)             - Protocols of Counter                             (Actual monitoring)
-fault based wordings             Guarantees
-
ICC wordings                        -Sanction                                  
 
           - Involvement of
       
professional
       
bodies
REGULATIONS
No clear regulatory framework
Regulations should cover:-
Capital/Acceptance                Reinsurance
   
    Sanctions
WORDINGS
International Chamber of Commerce
Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (URDG)
-
These reflect International standard practise in
the use of Demand Guarantees
-
They balance the legitimate interest of all parties.
-
URDG 758
-
URDG 357
FIDIC RULES
Note:- Nothing really prevents anyone from
introducing terms / conditions into Surety
Contracts.
 
However, introducing wordings that negates
the essence of surety contracts are
unacceptable especially where that is done on
the blind side of the Principal (Beneficiary)
 
Change
Brokers
Guarantors (Sureties)
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Surety bonds are essential contracts providing security and assurance, but common failures include lack of trust, knowledge, and capacity appreciation. Despite challenges in the industry, the reasons to persevere include growth potential and manageable processes. Problems such as poor risk assessment and competition require attention to prevent capital exposure and ensure smooth claims settlement protocols.

  • Surety Bonds
  • Security Contracts
  • Risk Assessment
  • Business Growth
  • Industry Challenges

Uploaded on Sep 07, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BONDS SHOULD WE OR SHOULD WE NOT BONDS are SURETY CONTRACTS They offer SECURITY, ASSURANCE, CERTAINTY, A PLEDGE etc

  2. Founded or premised on KNOWLEDGE OR APPRECIATION OF CAPACITY, CAPABILITY TO PERFORM

  3. SURETYSHIP is therefore the relationship between the Surety, the Principal Debtor and the Creditor. Unlike Insurance Contracts, there are invariably three parties.

  4. OUR FAILURES Lack of appreciation that suretyship contracts are premised on:- TRUST KNOWLEDGE CAPACITY PERFORMANCE (PRIOR)

  5. SHOULD WE OR SHOULD WE NOT We definitely should!

  6. THE REASONS WE SHOULD NOT GIVE UP ARE:- It is one of the fastest growing line of business and income (Premium/commission) is good! Demand would continue a northward growth as the Ghanaian economy also grow The Process (ie acceptance protocol) can be better managed than we are doing now The expensive cycle has matured

  7. WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS/BOTTLENECKS THE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PROTOCOL POOR ASSESSMENT OF RISK OTHERS CONTRACT WORDING appreciation of risk Strict Liability No defined basis Competition (especially for demand bonds) Weak assessment protocol No conditional provisions claims of fraud as basis for repudiation (terms and conditions) enforcement Assumption of counter No exclusions Capacity of staff lack of regulatory guarantees Failure to follow No endorsement processes and procedures no penalties Breakdown of supervision

  8. RESULTS Huge claims/ Interest Litigation (and related cost) Exposure of Capital Erratic Response to Issues

  9. TYPICAL BOND WORDING (BOND/COUNTER GUARANTEE) We .. Insurance Co. Ltd. guarantee to pay (BANK), upon your FIRST DEMAND and WITHOUT CAVIL OR ARGUMENT, any sum or sums up to the limit of .. (amount) including interests, commissions and charges as aforesaid without your needing to prove or to show grounds or reasons for your demand for the sum specified therein and despite any objection by the Customer.

  10. The total liability of the GUARANTOR under this Guarantee shall under no circumstances exceed the said sum of amount .. (amount) inclusive of interest, bank charges and commissions should . (contractor) fail to fulfil its obligation under the Bank Guarantee.

  11. BINDING CLAUSE FOR COUNTER GUARANTEE CLAUSE The wording for a Counter Guarantee is as follows:-

  12. The Contractor has undertaken in pursuance of a Contract to DESIGN AND BUILD .. (hereinafter called the contract ) for Co Ltd. (hereinafter called the Principal ) The Principal has requested the Contractor to provide an Advance Payment Guarantee (hereinafter called the Facility ) to guarantee proper and loyal performance of the contract.

  13. The Beneficiary has agreed to provide the Facility, in the amount of . Subject to the Contractor obtaining a Counter Guarantee from an Insurance Company for the said (amount) as security for compliance with the Contractor s performance obligations in accordance with the Contract. The Insurance Company has agreed to give the Contractor such a Counter Guarantee

  14. NOW THEREFORE WE . Hereby affirm that we are the Insurance Company and responsible to you on behalf of the Contractor, up to a total amount of such sum being payable in the types and proportions of currencies in which the Contract Price is payable, and we undertake to pay you, upon first demand and without cavil or argument, any sum or sums within the limits of . As aforesaid without needing to prove or to show grounds or reason for your demand for the sum specified therein and despite any objection by the Contractor.

  15. The following are noted:- Payment is upon first demand by the Principal There is no recourse to recompense from the Guaranteed prior to settlement. The most important words are upon first demand and without cavil or argument .

  16. The word cavil is defined by the Websters Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary as to raise irritating and trivial objections or to oppose by inconsequential, frivolous or sham objections .

  17. NOTE:- The major problems are with FINANCIAL/CREDIT/SUPPLIER GUARANTEES CONSTRUCTION BONDS/ GUARANTEES are relatively safe (Refer to cases in the courts) - ITAL - NDK

  18. TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS:- OPERATIONAL/TECHNICAL DEFECIENCIES NEED TO BE ADDRESSED Wordings strict acceptance protocols Involvement -(demand contracts) - Protocols of Counter (Actual monitoring) -fault based wordings Guarantees - ICC wordings -Sanction - Involvement of professional bodies

  19. REGULATIONS No clear regulatory framework Regulations should cover:- Capital/Acceptance Reinsurance Sanctions

  20. WORDINGS International Chamber of Commerce Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (URDG) - These reflect International standard practise in the use of Demand Guarantees - They balance the legitimate interest of all parties. - URDG 758 - URDG 357

  21. FIDIC RULES Note:- Nothing really prevents anyone from introducing terms / conditions into Surety Contracts. However, introducing wordings that negates the essence of surety contracts are unacceptable especially where that is done on the blind side of the Principal (Beneficiary)

  22. Change Brokers Guarantors (Sureties)

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#