Promoting Equity and Inclusive Excellence in Higher Education
Explore outcomes, recommendations, and challenges discussed at the April 19, 2016 ACES meeting regarding data, equity, and opportunities in education. Discussions include addressing disparities, improving decision-making with additional data, and dismantling biases for student success in college and beyond.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Outcomes Data and Equity April 19th, 2016 ACES meeting
Objective Provide recommendations to PBC: How will we act on this? What other data do we need to improve our decision making?
Our opportunity: How can we expect to challenge old mindsets and deconstruct implicit biases to reach new horizons for students success in college and beyond when only a portion of students and educators are engaging in the conversations necessary to do so? The Equity Imperative The Time Is Now: Committing to Equity and Inclusive Excellence By Tia Brown McNair, Association of American Colleges and Universities
Equity Minded look at Data Color-conscious (as opposed to color-blind) in a critical sense. [Can include criticality toward gender, age, and other socio-economic factors] Aware that beliefs, expectations, and practices assumed to be neutral can have outcomes that are racially disadvantageous. Willing to assume responsibility for the elimination of inequality. Aware that while racism is not always overt, racialized patterns nevertheless permeate policies and practices in higher education institutions. When policies have a disproportionate impact on students of color, they have the effect of maintaining racial hierarchies. From the Five Principles for Enacting Equity by Design: By: Estela Mara Bensimon, Alicia C. Dowd and Keith Witham
Looking at the ILO data What are the narratives we have to explain the disparities? What more information do we need to make sense of this? What can we recommend to PBC: a representative body of campus stakeholders?
Relevant Information about our students Course Success: Average is 62%, but closer to 50% for Black, Hispanic, Native and Pac Islander, Vet, FY, Low income. Transfer/Completion: how many students MAKE it to this level? Black Students are 3.4% of student body, but 1.7% of transfer cohort and 2% of degrees/certificates. Hispanic students are 40% of students, but only 11% of transfer and 16% of degrees/certificates.
From the ACES conversation 4/19 Data-set: Self-reporting data has limitations on its own Email survey introduces self-selection bias May not be representative / Small groups may skew certain results Scales Exaggerate differences: most fall between 3.05 and 3.9 All the averages are within agreement
From the ACES conversation 4/19 Narrative/Assumptions Women show less confidence with equations (but it s the least popular overall!) Black and Latino have lower success/retention, but report high confidence: Are these students trying to overcompensate (pp.16 - 17 black, latino, males as most confident) related to social/cultural pressures to be strong Stereotype threat: fear of confirming stereotypes (Steele, Shih, Pittinsky et al.)
Recommendations PBC could provide support for college-level discussions of data AND include more than just self-reporting Surface assumptions and narratives surrounding gaps PBC could request PD to address disparities Incorporate Equity-minded data discussions into Program Review and Planning
What Does It Mean to Be Equity-Minded? Equity-minded practices are created through 1. Willingness to look at student outcomes and disparities at all educational levels disaggregated by race and ethnicity as well as socioeconomic status. 2. Recognition that individual students are not responsible for the unequal outcomes of groups that have historically experienced discrimination and marginalization in the United States. 3. Respect for the aspirations and struggles of students who are not well served by the current educational system. 4. Belief in the fairness of allocating additional college and community resources to students who have greater needs due to the systemic shortcomings of our educational system in providing for them. 5. Recognition that the elimination of entrenched biases, stereotypes, and discrimination in institutions of higher education requires intentional critical deconstruction of structures, policies, practices, norms, and values assumed to be race neutral.
