Impact of Tutoring on Basic Skills Performance: A Study Overview
Exploring the impact of tutoring on basic skills in Math and English, this study by Dr. LeBaron Woodyard presents data on successful enrollment rates, cost savings potentials, and outcomes with or without concurrent enrollment in supervised tutoring. The analysis includes detailed insights into the effectiveness of tutoring programs and their implications for academic success.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Impact of Tutoring on Basic Skills Math and English ACTLA 44thAnnual Conference April 28, 2018 LeBaron Woodyard, Ph.D. Chancellor s Office, Dean, Academic Affairs
Overview Tutoring for Basic Skills Math Tutoring for Basic Skills English Title 5 Regulatory Process Form 299 to the Department of Finance Q & A Closing Remarks
Math with Concurrent Enrollment in Supervised Tutoring Successful Enrollment Percent One level below transfer Two levels below transfer Three levels below transfer Four levels below transfer Prior to College Level Unsuccessful Enrolment FTES Subsequent Enrolment FTES 58.09 391.99 319.81 53.92 434.02 299.93 57.06 300.09 176.85 58.67 157.49 91.05
Math without Concurrent Enrollment in Supervised Tutoring Successful Enrollment Percent Prior to College Level One level below transfer Two levels below transfer Three levels below transfer Four levels below transfer Unsuccessful Enrolment FTES Subsequent Enrolment FTES 55.27 2654.61 1822.48 51.53 3048.60 1822.03 55.68 1714.72 821.59 53.57 983.41 414.49 5
Potential Cost Savings of Tutoring in Math Percent Successful 56.94% 54.01% 2.93% 8,401.35 Tutoring Treatment W Tutoring W/O Tutoring % Difference Total Unsuccessful FTES W/O Subsequent Enrollment FTES W/O Cost of Subsequent Enrollment W/O Impact of Tutoring on Cost Savings Potential in Math 4,880.59 $24,402,967.61 $715,006.95 6
English with Concurrent Enrollment in Supervised Tutoring Successful Enrollment Percent Prior to College Level One level below transfer Two levels below transfer Three levels below transfer Four levels below transfer Unsuccessful Enrolment FTES Subsequent Enrolment FTES 73.66 288.99 148.71 72.37 254.53 122.88 66.60 129.19 47.58 65.41 26.44 10.39 8
English without Concurrent Enrollment in Supervised Tutoring Successful Enrollment Percent Prior to College Level One level below transfer Two levels below transfer Three levels below transfer Four levels below transfer Unsuccessful Enrolment FTES Subsequent Enrolment FTES 65.76 2366.13 1231.73 63.88 1768.91 790.41 61.62 757.55 277.52 60.43 283.59 126.82 9
Potential Cost Savings of Tutoring in English Tutoring Treatment Percent Successful 69.51 62.92 6.59 5,176.17 W W/O % Difference Total Unsuccessful FTES W/O Subsequent Enrollment FTES W/O Cost of Subsequent Enrollment W/O Impact of Tutoring on Cost Savings Potential in Math 2,426.47 $12,132,372.38 $799,523.34 10
California Code of Regulations title 5 Proposed Changes to Expand Tutoring Title 5, 58170. Apportionment for Tutoring. Student self-referrals for tutoring Consultation Council review (April 19, 2018) BOG 1st reading (May 2018) BOG 2nd reading (Jul 2018) If BOG approves -> Dept. of Finance -> Secretary of State (posted 30 days for public comment)
Form 299 to the Department of Finance Purpose Unfunded Mandate Commission on Unfunded Mandates Budget Cost Pressure Department of Finance as the Gate Keeper 12
Questions? 13
