Enhancing Environmental Protection with Public Interest Bonding Strategy

 
Engagement on the Public Interest
Bonding Strategy
 
Discussion paper
 
Public Engagement Sessions
 
April 20, 9:00 – 11:00
April 21, 9:00 – 11:00
April 28, 10:00 – 12:00
 
2
 
Outline
 
Project Overview
What is Financial Assurance
Discussion Paper Overview
How to Provide Feedback
Next Steps
 
 
 
 
3
 
Project Overview
 
Minister’s mandate commitment 2020 &
2022
“With support from the Minister of Energy, Mines
and Low Carbon Innovation, take steps to ensure
owners of large industrial projects are bonded
moving forward so that they – not British
Columbians – pay the full costs of environmental
cleanup if their projects are abandoned.”
 
4
 
What is the Public Interest Bonding
Strategy?
 
Created to address the mandate commitment
Two-phased comprehensive review of
financial assurance requirements across the
natural resource ministries
 
5
 
What is Financial Assurance?
 
The purpose of financial assurance is:
to promote forward-looking planning of environmental
clean-up and reclamation, and to encourage the
progressive implementation of those activities; and
to ensure timely clean-up and reclamation without
additional costs to the Province should an owner of an
industrial project be unable or unwilling to perform the
required actions themselves.
 
6
 
Discussion Paper
 
Purpose
o
Promote dialogue and gain feedback
o
Inform effective and efficient solutions to deliver
on the mandate commitment
Link to webpage
https://engage.gov.bc.ca/govtogetherbc/consultation/pu
blic-interest-bonding/
 
7
 
Guiding Principles
 
The ‘polluter pays’ is the overarching principle
A subset of principles include:
1.
Consistent with the Declaration Act
2.
Risk-based approach
3.
Maintain industry competitiveness and financial
viability
4.
Reduce and mitigate environmental risk
5.
Transparent and accountable decisions
6.
Consistent, compatible, and fair decision-making
 
8
 
Overview of Discussion Paper
 
Purpose
o
Overview of preliminary ideas on how to strengthen
BC’s approach to financial assurance
o
P
romote dialogue and gain feedback to help inform
solutions
Categories
A.
Legal Framework
B.
Statutory Liability Tools
C.
Financial Assurance Mechanisms
 
9
 
10
 
Category A. Legal Framework
 
Explores desired
outcomes and potential
opportunities to
strengthen the
overarching legal
framework for financial
assurance requirements
in British Columbia
 
11
 
Outcome One
 
Better environmental clean-up and reclamation
requirements regarding closure and
decommissioning of industrial projects.
Opportunities:
Clarify and define “environmental clean-up and
reclamation”
Improve plans for site decommissioning and
reclamation
 
12
 
Outcome Two
 
Better tools to support transparent and accountable
financial assurance decisions.
Opportunities:
Require financial assurance for specific types of
industrial projects
Set the appropriate amount and form of financial
assurance to require
Confirm the amount of liability against which financial
assurance is collected
 
13
 
Outcome Three
 
Additional types of financial assurance.
Opportunities:
Allow the use of pooled funds to support:
More efficient use of fees and interest
Additional payment options
More affordable payment options
 
14
 
Category B.
Statutory Liability Tools
 
H
old companies legally responsible
for the costs of cleaning up
environmental damage that has
happened or is imminent
Complement the use of financial
assurance
 
15
 
Outcome Four
 
Improved liability tools
.
Opportunities:
Create clear obligations for environmental clean-up and
reclamation
Develop consistent financial assurance requirements
Obtain, review, update, and spend financial assurance at
appropriate times
Strengthen the Province’s ability to
collect financial assurance that is required but has not been received
collect funds when the responsible parties are insolvent
collect monies owing
Create or expand the liability of directors, officers, and related
corporations
 
16
 
Category C. Financial Assurance
Mechanisms
 
Financial assurance
mechanisms support
liability rules. If the owner
of an industrial project is
unwilling or unable to
fulfill their environmental
clean-up and reclamation
obligations, the Province
can draw upon financial
assurance to fund
necessary mitigations
 
17
 
Outcome Five
 
Better risk-based decisions to prioritize financial
assurance requirements.
Opportunities:
Identify and prioritize industries and/or
projects with the highest potential risk
 
18
 
Outcome Six
 
Improvements to policies and procedures (or a
protocol) to guide transparent and accountable
financial assurance decisions.
Opportunities:
Support fair and consistent financial assurance
requirements
 
19
 
Outcome Seven
 
Better approaches to minimize financial burden
on industry while continuing to uphold and
strengthen the polluter pays principle.
Opportunities:
Flexible financial assurance options
Transition periods
Risk-based approach to determining financial
assurance amounts
 
20
 
Outcome Eight
 
Improved liability cost estimates.
Opportunities:
Revise and update environmental clean-up
and reclamation liability cost estimate
information requirements
Improve methods and tools for estimating
environmental clean-up and reclamation costs
 
 
 
21
 
Outcome Nine
 
Better data management systems and tools.
Opportunities:
Improve transparency with respect to how
environmental cleanup and reclamation liabilities
are determined
Improve how the Province manages
environmental cleanup and reclamation liabilities
and the required financial assurance to back
these liabilities
 
22
 
Next Steps
 
23
 
Attend engagement sessions
View the discussion paper online at
https://engage.gov.bc.ca/govtogetherbc/co
nsultation/public-interest-bonding
Provide feedback online by May 28, 2022
Feedback will inform a What We Heard
report
 
Discussion Paper Questions
 
Examples:
1.
In defining environmental clean-up and reclamation, what key
elements are most important to you, your industry or your
organization?
2.
What do you think are the most important considerations
when determining which industrial projects should require a
closure plan?
3.
What is your feedback on how to support transparent and
accountable financial assurance decisions?
4.
How could pooled funds be used as a tool to support the
Guiding Principles of the 
Public Interest
 Bonding Strategy?
 
 
24
 
25
 
 
 
 
Questions?
Comments?
 
26
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This document outlines the Public Interest Bonding Strategy aimed at ensuring proper financial assurance for large industrial projects in British Columbia. It covers the project overview, financial assurance concept, engagement sessions, guiding principles, and the purpose of the discussion paper. The strategy focuses on promoting forward-looking planning for environmental cleanup and reclamation while holding owners accountable for any potential environmental risks or cleanup costs. Public engagement is encouraged to provide feedback and ensure effective implementation of the mandate commitment, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and industry competitiveness.

  • Environmental protection
  • Public interest
  • Financial assurance
  • Engagement sessions
  • Guiding principles

Uploaded on Oct 03, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Engagement on the Public Interest Bonding Strategy Discussion paper

  2. Public Engagement Sessions April 20, 9:00 11:00 April 21, 9:00 11:00 April 28, 10:00 12:00 2

  3. Outline Project Overview What is Financial Assurance Discussion Paper Overview How to Provide Feedback Next Steps 3

  4. Project Overview Minister s mandate commitment 2020 & 2022 With support from the Minister of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation, take steps to ensure owners of large industrial projects are bonded moving forward so that they not British Columbians pay the full costs of environmental cleanup if their projects are abandoned. 4

  5. What is the Public Interest Bonding Strategy? Created to address the mandate commitment Two-phased comprehensive review of financial assurance requirements across the natural resource ministries 5

  6. What is Financial Assurance? The purpose of financial assurance is: to promote forward-looking planning of environmental clean-up and reclamation, and to encourage the progressive implementation of those activities; and to ensure timely clean-up and reclamation without additional costs to the Province should an owner of an industrial project be unable or unwilling to perform the required actions themselves. 6

  7. Discussion Paper Purpose o Promote dialogue and gain feedback o Inform effective and efficient solutions to deliver on the mandate commitment Link to webpage https://engage.gov.bc.ca/govtogetherbc/consultation/pu blic-interest-bonding/ 7

  8. Guiding Principles The polluter pays is the overarching principle A subset of principles include: 1. Consistent with the Declaration Act 2. Risk-based approach 3. Maintain industry competitiveness and financial viability 4. Reduce and mitigate environmental risk 5. Transparent and accountable decisions 6. Consistent, compatible, and fair decision-making 8

  9. Overview of Discussion Paper Purpose o Overview of preliminary ideas on how to strengthen BC s approach to financial assurance o Promote dialogue and gain feedback to help inform solutions Categories A. Legal Framework B. Statutory Liability Tools C. Financial Assurance Mechanisms 9

  10. 10

  11. Category A. Legal Framework Explores desired outcomes and potential opportunities to strengthen the overarching legal framework for financial assurance requirements in British Columbia 11

  12. Outcome One Better environmental clean-up and reclamation requirements regarding closure and decommissioning of industrial projects. Opportunities: Clarify and define environmental clean-up and reclamation Improve plans for site decommissioning and reclamation 12

  13. Outcome Two Better tools to support transparent and accountable financial assurance decisions. Opportunities: Require financial assurance for specific types of industrial projects Set the appropriate amount and form of financial assurance to require Confirm the amount of liability against which financial assurance is collected 13

  14. Outcome Three Additional types of financial assurance. Opportunities: Allow the use of pooled funds to support: More efficient use of fees and interest Additional payment options More affordable payment options 14

  15. Category B. Statutory Liability Tools Hold companies legally responsible for the costs of cleaning up environmental damage that has happened or is imminent Complement the use of financial assurance 15

  16. Outcome Four Improved liability tools. Opportunities: Create clear obligations for environmental clean-up and reclamation Develop consistent financial assurance requirements Obtain, review, update, and spend financial assurance at appropriate times Strengthen the Province s ability to collect financial assurance that is required but has not been received collect funds when the responsible parties are insolvent collect monies owing Create or expand the liability of directors, officers, and related corporations 16

  17. Category C. Financial Assurance Mechanisms Financial assurance mechanisms support liability rules. If the owner of an industrial project is unwilling or unable to fulfill their environmental clean-up and reclamation obligations, the Province can draw upon financial assurance to fund necessary mitigations 17

  18. Outcome Five Better risk-based decisions to prioritize financial assurance requirements. Opportunities: Identify and prioritize industries and/or projects with the highest potential risk 18

  19. Outcome Six Improvements to policies and procedures (or a protocol) to guide transparent and accountable financial assurance decisions. Opportunities: Support fair and consistent financial assurance requirements 19

  20. Outcome Seven Better approaches to minimize financial burden on industry while continuing to uphold and strengthen the polluter pays principle. Opportunities: Flexible financial assurance options Transition periods Risk-based approach to determining financial assurance amounts 20

  21. Outcome Eight Improved liability cost estimates. Opportunities: Revise and update environmental clean-up and reclamation liability cost estimate information requirements Improve methods and tools for estimating environmental clean-up and reclamation costs 21

  22. Outcome Nine Better data management systems and tools. Opportunities: Improve transparency with respect to how environmental cleanup and reclamation liabilities are determined Improve how the Province manages environmental cleanup and reclamation liabilities and the required financial assurance to back these liabilities 22

  23. Next Steps Attend engagement sessions View the discussion paper online at https://engage.gov.bc.ca/govtogetherbc/co nsultation/public-interest-bonding Provide feedback online by May 28, 2022 Feedback will inform a What We Heard report 23

  24. Discussion Paper Questions Examples: 1. In defining environmental clean-up and reclamation, what key elements are most important to you, your industry or your organization? 2. What do you think are the most important considerations when determining which industrial projects should require a closure plan? 3. What is your feedback on how to support transparent and accountable financial assurance decisions? 4. How could pooled funds be used as a tool to support the Guiding Principles of the Public Interest Bonding Strategy? 24

  25. 25

  26. Questions? Comments? 26

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#