Electronic Records Validation for IRP & IFTA Vision
This initiative aims to replace physical IRP cab cards and IFTA licenses with electronic records for enhanced compliance and enforcement in North America. The task force members, goals, objectives, and solution options are outlined to support IRP and IFTA enforcement, reduce fraud, and improve data quality and accessibility through a centralized database system.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Electronic Records Validation for IRP & IFTA VISION: Replace IRP cab cards and IFTA licenses and decals with verifiable Electronic IRP and IFTA records that improve compliance and enforcement in North America.
Task Force Current Membership Jeff Hood Chair (Indiana) Jay Sween Vice Chair (Wisconsin) Scott Greenawalt (Oklahoma) Garry Hinkley (Maine) Deann Williams (Kansas) Brian Beaven (Kentucky) Peter Hurst (Ontario) Mark Bell (University of Kentucky) Steven Haywood (British Columbia) Rob Ide (Vermont) Lonette Turner (IFTA, Inc.) Anne Ferro (AAMVA) Collin Mooney (CVSA) Bob Pitcher (ATA) Allison Fradette (CCMTA) Richard Harris (Penske) Lanny Gower (XPO Logistics Freight) Tom Kelly (FMCSA) Tim Adams (IRP, Inc.) Ken Carey (IRP, Inc.
Goals and Objectives Support IRP and IFTA enforcement Potential to eliminate paper (IRP cab card and IFTA license & decals) Improved compliance Positive revenue impact Reduced cost for both jurisdictions and industry overtime Leveling the playing field
Goals and Objectives Reduction in fraud Improved, complete data quality Improved accessibility to accurate data Improved efficiency Allow interfacing with existing systems Aid in enhancing roadside electronic inspections Flexible and scalable Inclusive
Solution Options Jurisdiction holding the credentials is known Option 1 No Central Database Option 2 Centralized Database Jurisdiction holding the credentials is unknown Option 3 Pointer System
Centralized Database Batch Files Batch Process eCredentials System Jurisdiction 1 Process LE inquiries Batch Process Batch Process Network Law Enforcement Network Law Enforcement User App Server Database Server Jurisdiction 2 IRP data Batch Process Jurisdiction 3 eCredentials stored in a central server Jurisdictions to update data in the central server regularly eCredentials System will consist of: A central database Set of batch programs to receive and process data from Jurisdictions An application to process inquiries from Law Enforcement
Centralized Database -Considerations Jurisdictions have to develop batch programs to send additions, deletions and modifications of the eCredentials to the central server Labor and data center cost to maintain the eCredentials System Data integrity between central database and Jurisdictions have to be maintained Batch introduces discrepancy which would need to be addressed regularly
No Central Database Batch Files Batch Process eCredentials System Jurisdiction 1 Process LE inquiries Batch Process Batch Process Network Law Enforcement Network Law Enforcement User App Server Database Server Jurisdiction 2 IRP data Batch Process Jurisdiction 3
No Central Database Process LE inquiries eCredentials System Jurisdiction 1 Process LE inquiries Routing Program Network Law Enforcement Network Law Enforcement User App Server Jurisdiction 2 Process LE inquiries Jurisdiction 3 eCredentials stored at the jurisdictions Routing program / Enterprise Service Bus to receive request from Law Enforcement and route the request to appropriate jurisdiction
No Central Database - Considerations Less development work for the Jurisdictions No need for a centralized database; no associated data storage costs Avoids data integrity issues Law enforcement receives data in real time
Pointer System Update Pointer eCredentials System Process inquiry Jurisdiction 1 App Server Receive and Update Pointer Database Update Pointer Process LE inquiries Network Law Enforcement Network Process inquiry Law Enforcement User Pointer Database Server Jurisdiction 2 Send inquiry to jurisdiction IRP data pointer Update Pointer Process inquiry Jurisdiction 3 Pointers to eCredentials stored in the Central Pointer Database Jurisdictions update pointer data real time eCredentials System will consist of: A pointer database Process to update the pointers An application to process inquiries from Law Enforcement
Pointer System - Considerations More development work for the Jurisdictions Need for a central pointer database and associated data storage cost Pointer system could keep history of the vehicle credential movement Law enforcement receives data in real time
Summary Centralized Database NO real time data exchange Incurs data storage costs Real time data exchange Does not incur data storage costs Use if LE user knows the Jurisdiction holding the credentials No Central Database Real time data exchange Incurs data storage costs Use if LE user does not know the Jurisdiction holding the credentials Pointer System
Expertise Needed IT Technical (various expertise levels) Regulatory and Legal Plan and Agreement changes Jurisdictional legislative changes Roadside enforcement Deskside administrative Deskside audit Industry (national and jurisdictional)
Challenges Privacy Buy in / benefits, etc. Financial Political Time and resource justification Connectivity
Challenges (continued) Organizational support (financial, politically) Managing expectation Data quality Level/even playing field Getting multiple levels of industry involved
Questions? Comments! It s coming, be a part of the solution!
