Electron-Phonon Interactions in Iron-Based Superconductors

 
鉄系超伝導体における電子格子相互作用の
軌道揺らぎへの影響
Effect of electron-phonon interactions on orbital
fluctuations in iron-based superconductors
 
野村悠祐、中村和磨
A
、有田亮太郎
東大工、九工大院
A
 
新学術領域「コンピューティクスによる物質デザイン:複合相関と非平衡ダイナミクス」
計画班「第一原理有効模型と相関科学のフロンティア」
 
YN, K. Nakamura, and R. Arita, arXiv:1305.2995
Ab initio 
downfolding for
electron-phonon coupled systems
Low-energy models for electron-phonon coupled systems:
i,j: orbital (Wannier) indices       (w):  Wannier gauge        

: spin index
O
(
p
)
: the quantity with constraint (partially screened) 
 
Q. How do we 
evalu
ate              ?
 
A. 
Constrained
 
random phase approximation (cRPA)
 
F. Aryasetiawan et al., Phys. Rev. B. 70 19514 (2004)
Constrained RPA
 
exclude the contribution from
T
T
 
scattering
This screening process should be
considered when we solve the
low-energy effective model
Independent particle polarizability(RPA)
F. Aryasetiawan et al., Phys. Rev. B. 70 19514 (2004)
V
:virtual
T
:target
Occupied
 (O)
V
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ab initio 
downfolding for
electron-phonon coupled systems
Low-energy models for electron-phonon coupled systems:
i,j: orbital (Wannier) indices       (w):  Wannier gauge        

: spin index
O
(
p
)
: the quantity with constraint (partially screened) 
 
Q. How do we 
evalu
ate                 and         ?
 
YN, K. Nakamura, and R. Arita, arXiv:1305.2995
cf.  Desity-functional perturbation theory (without constraint)
      S. Baroni 
et al
, Rev. Mod. Phys. 
73
, 515 (2001).
 
A. 
Constrained
 density-functional perturbation theory
Phonon frequency and electron-phonon coupling
Phonon frequencies          
and 
electron-phonon couplings                  
are given by 
(for simplicity we consider the case where there is one atom with mass 
M
 in the unit cell)
w
here
: characteristic 
  
length scale
Dynamical matrix
E 
: electron ground-state energy
α
: cartesian coordinates (
x,y,z
)
bare
Hartree + exchange correlation terms (screening) 
 
K
ey quantity
ν
:phonon mode
u
 : displacement of the ion
 S. Baroni 
et al
, Rev. Mod. Phys. 
73
, 515 (2001). 
 
 
Partially screened quantities such as                    and
In the metallic case,            is given by
Constrained density-functional perturbation theory
 
e
xclude the target-targe
t processes
n
,m
: band indices
V
:virtual
T
:target
 
 
 
 
YN, K. Nakamura, and R. Arita, arXiv:1305.2995
 
Iron-based superconductors
 
1111 system
 
111 system
 
122 system
 
11 system
 
Y. 
Kamiahara 
et al
., J. Am Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008).
 
G. R. Stewart, RMP 83, 1589 (2011).
I. R. Shein and A. L. Ivanovskii, Solid State Commun.
149,1860 (2009).
 
G. R. Stewart, RMP 83, 1589 (2011).
Z. Deng et al., Europhys. Lett. 87, 37004 (2009).
 
G. R. Stewart, RMP 83, 1589 (2011).
F.-C. Hsu et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 14262 (2008).
 
a
nd more…
Pairing symmetry: 
Iron pnictide
H. Kontani
 and S. 
Onari
, PRL 104, 157001 (2010).
T. Saito 
et al
., PRB 82, 144510 (2010). 
 
 
L
inearized Eliashberg equation:
 
 
 
 
 
H
ere spin and charge fluctuations are given by
 
a
nd                                (within RPA)
 
Without el-ph interactions
 
χ
s 
> χ
c 
 (
spin
 fluctuations are dominant)
W 
< 0 
 (
repulsive
)
sign change 
in gap functions (
s
±-state
)
 
χ
c 
> χ
s 
 (
charge
 fluctuations are dominant)
 
W 
> 0 
 (
attractive
)
no 
sign change 
(
s
++-state
)
 
With el-ph interactions such that
Band structure
Fermi surfaces
 
Q. Do el-ph interactions really enhance the orbital fluctuations?
Role of electron-phonon interactions
Phonon-mediated interactions
Effective on-site el-el interactions coming from the exchange of phonons: 
m
omentum-space average -> on-site quantity 
 
We get
 
cf.                                                                       
(Kontani & Onari)
 
 
J
ph
 is very small
 not negligible compared to Coulomb repulsion 
U
 ~ 2 eV
 
these frequency dependent interactions vanish around  
ω
l
 ~ 
ω
D
RPA analysis
 
T
 = 0.02 eV
n
(filling) = 6.1
5-orbitals model
 
s
±
-wave state is realized
 
Gap functions in band representation
 
the magnitude of 
J
ph
 is crucial to the enhancement of orbital fluctuations
 
 spin fluctuations are dominant (since 
J
ph
 is small in magnitude)  
 
Conclusion
 
developed a method for 
ab initio
 downfolding for el-ph
coupled systems
 
Effective parameters for LaFeAsO:
U
ph
(0) ~ 
U’
ph
(0) ~ -0.4 eV, 
J
ph
(0) ~ -0.02 eV
RPA analysis -> 
s
±
  (due to the smallness of 
J
ph
 )
 
YN, K. Nakamura, and R. Arita, arXiv:1305.2995
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This discussion explores the effects of electron-phonon interactions on orbital fluctuations in iron-based superconductors. Topics covered include ab initio downfolding for electron-phonon coupled systems, evaluation methods such as Constrained Random Phase Approximation (cRPA), Constrained Density-Functional Perturbation Theory, and more. The interplay between electron and phonon dynamics, screening processes, and low-energy models are examined to provide insights into the complex behavior of these materials.

  • Electron-Phonon Interactions
  • Iron-Based Superconductors
  • Ab Initio Downfolding
  • Constrained Random Phase Approximation
  • Density-Functional Perturbation Theory

Uploaded on Sep 11, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effect of electron-phonon interactions on orbital fluctuations in iron-based superconductors A A YN, K. Nakamura, and R. Arita, arXiv:1305.2995

  2. Ab initio downfolding for electron-phonon coupled systems Low-energy models for electron-phonon coupled systems: i,j: orbital (Wannier) indices (w): Wannier gauge : spin index O(p): the quantity with constraint (partially screened) Q. How do we evaluate ? A. Constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) F. Aryasetiawan et al., Phys. Rev. B. 70 19514 (2004)

  3. Constrained RPA F. Aryasetiawan et al., Phys. Rev. B. 70 19514 (2004) Independent particle polarizability(RPA) V EF exclude the contribution from T T scattering T This screening process should be considered when we solve the low-energy effective model Occupied (O) V:virtual T:target

  4. Ab initio downfolding for electron-phonon coupled systems Low-energy models for electron-phonon coupled systems: i,j: orbital (Wannier) indices (w): Wannier gauge : spin index O(p): the quantity with constraint (partially screened) Q. How do we evaluate and ? A. Constrained density-functional perturbation theory YN, K. Nakamura, and R. Arita, arXiv:1305.2995 cf. Desity-functional perturbation theory (without constraint) S. Baroni et al, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001).

  5. S. Baroni et al, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001). Phonon frequency and electron-phonon coupling Phonon frequencies and electron-phonon couplings are given by (for simplicity we consider the case where there is one atom with mass M in the unit cell) phonon mode u : displacement of the ion Dynamical matrix : characteristic length scale where E : electron ground-state energy : cartesian coordinates (x,y,z) Key quantity bare Hartree + exchange correlation terms (screening)

  6. Constrained density-functional perturbation theory YN, K. Nakamura, and R. Arita, arXiv:1305.2995 In the metallic case, is given by n,m: band indices V E F T exclude the target-target processes Occupied (O) Partially screened quantities such as and V:virtual T:target

  7. Iron-based superconductors 1111 system 122 system G. R. Stewart, RMP 83, 1589 (2011). I. R. Shein and A. L. Ivanovskii, Solid State Commun. 149,1860 (2009). Y. Kamiahara et al., J. Am Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008). 111 system 11 system and more G. R. Stewart, RMP 83, 1589 (2011). F.-C. Hsu et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 14262 (2008). G. R. Stewart, RMP 83, 1589 (2011). Z. Deng et al., Europhys. Lett. 87, 37004 (2009).

  8. H. Kontani and S. Onari, PRL 104, 157001 (2010). T. Saito et al., PRB 82, 144510 (2010). Pairing symmetry: Iron pnictide Linearized Eliashberg equation: Band structure Fermi surfaces Here spin and charge fluctuations are given by and (within RPA) Without el-ph interactions With el-ph interactions such that s> c(spin fluctuations are dominant) W < 0 (repulsive) sign change in gap functions (s -state) c> s(charge fluctuations are dominant) W > 0 (attractive) no sign change (s++-state)

  9. Role of electron-phonon interactions Spin fluctuations (enhanced by Hubbard U ) s -wave Orbital fluctuations (enhanced by el-ph interactions?) s++-wave Q. Do el-ph interactions really enhance the orbital fluctuations?

  10. Phonon-mediated interactions Effective on-site el-el interactions coming from the exchange of phonons: momentum-space average -> on-site quantity We get cf. (Kontani & Onari) Jphis very small not negligible compared to Coulomb repulsion U ~ 2 eV these frequency dependent interactions vanish around l~ D

  11. RPA analysis the magnitude of Jphis crucial to the enhancement of orbital fluctuations spin fluctuations are dominant (since Jphis small in magnitude) Gap functions in band representation T = 0.02 eV n(filling) = 6.1 5-orbitals model s -wave state is realized

  12. Conclusion developed a method for ab initio downfolding for el-ph coupled systems Effective parameters for LaFeAsO: Uph(0) ~ U ph(0) ~ -0.4 eV, Jph(0) ~ -0.02 eV RPA analysis -> s (due to the smallness of Jph) YN, K. Nakamura, and R. Arita, arXiv:1305.2995

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#