
Effective Experimental Plan and Study Design Strategies
Learn how to connect your experimental plan and study design to your research questions, justify your choice of study design, determine sample size, address sources of bias, and more to ensure valid and insightful results. Avoid common mistakes like unclear study designs and irrelevant sample size calculations.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Experimental Plan and Study Design Janice Weinberg ScD Professor of Biostatistics Boston University School of Public Health
What to do: 1) Connect the experimental plan / study design to the study question(s) / aims 2) Justify your choice of study design. Why is your study the best way to address your study question? 3) Use correct study design terminology. Observational, cohort, case-control, pilot, prospective, retrospective, matched, etc Clinical trial ? (parallel, cross-over, factorial, randomized, blinded, controlled, etc )
4) Justify your sample size. This may be a power analysis or based on practical considerations (depends on the study) 5) Make sure your unit of observation / sample size is clear. How many samples, animals, subjects, experiments? Number of measurements per animal or subject? 6) Explain how (if) you have access to all relevant data needed to answer your study question(s). Explain what information will be collected. If any important data isn t available explain why and discuss how your results could still be valid.
7) Consider sources of bias. Explain how you will control for these sources or explain why you will still get useful results in spite of them 8) Consider possible effect modification . Could results differ for subgroups of individuals? Possibly make this part of your plan 9) Address loss to follow-up in a prospective study. Explain how you will minimize loss to follow-up and missing data
10) Make a picture! Study design illustration Study flow chart Study evaluation chart
Pet Peeves 1) Obviously trying to sound smart . We know you are smart. Focus on being clear. 2) A list of study procedures over time in the text, instead of using a chart. At baseline we will collect A,B,C and D. At Week 1 we will collect A,B and C. At Week 2 we will collect A,B and C. At week 3 we will collect A,B,C and D. (and so on )
Pet Peeves 3) No study design illustration 4) A sample size calculation for an outcome that is not primary (or secondary) or that has no connection to the study question(s) 5) Unclear connection between the study design, study question(s) and analytic plan
Deal Breakers 1) An inability to determine the study design 2) A study design that cannot address the study question(s) 3) A study design that cannot be completed in the allotted time 4) Ethical issues. Is your study design ethical? 5) No sample size justification (for certain studies this is a deal breaker)