Department of Social Development Performance Report Analysis - 2nd Quarter 2023/2024

Presenting the departmental performance for the 2nd quarter of the 2023/24 fiscal year, focusing on care and service to older persons, services to persons with disabilities, HIV and AIDS initiatives, and child care and protection. The report highlights desired outcomes in enhancing quality of life, promoting independence, reducing risky behaviors, and addressing food insecurity through various programs and interventions.

• Social Development
• Performance Report
• Older Persons
• Disabilities Services
• HIV and AIDS
• Child Care
• Community Support

con_p Follow

Uploaded on Nov 16, 2024 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Presentation Transcript

1. GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2023/2024 2nd QUARTER PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE: ANNEXURE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AUDIT COMMITTEE SESSION 2023 1

2. Table Of Contents PART D: ANNEXURES 2

3. Purpose To present departmental performance for the 2nd Quarter of 2023/24 FY. 3

4. Part D: Annexures Table Of Contents Summary of Non-Financial Performance for the 2nd Quarter 4

5. Desired Outcomes: Care And Service To Older Persons Community-based care and support services have enhanced the length and quality of life of older persons, improved resilience to health conditions affecting older persons such as frailty, chronic illness and diseases, dementia, diabetes and heart diseases. Older persons are able to remain within their communities for longer periods without requiring specialised care. The Department render active aging programmes as part of the community based care and support programme are aimed at promoting healthy lifestyles for older persons The provision of residential facilities for older persons is a response to the needs and rights of older persons unable to live independently in their communities as well as ensuring their safety and security. 5

6. Desired Outcomes: Services To Persons With Disabilities Protective workshops have improved the quality of life of persons with disabilities by increasing access to economic opportunities and improving skills .This increases the independence of persons with disabilities. 6

7. Desired Outcomes: HIV And AIDS The provision of food parcels and daily meals reduce food insecurity and malnutrition; this in turn has reduced the engagement in risky behaviour by children which include transactional sex and dropping out of school; also; reduces hunger among infected and affected people. The HIV prevention programmes (Social Behavior Change Interventions) are about empowerment of communities with information which improves their resilience to deal with social problems they may face. EPWP initiatives are aimed at drawing significant numbers of unemployed youth into productive work, in a manner that will enable them to gain skills and increase their capacity to earn income when they exit the programme. 7

8. Desired Outcomes: Child Care And Protection By placing children in CYCCs and in foster care the department has reduced their vulnerability to abuse; neglect and exploitation Foster care children receive all the necessary and parental care from the foster parents. 8

9. Desired Outcomes: Restorative Services Social Crime Prevention programmes reduced vulnerability of women, children, youth, elderly, persons with disabilities, violence and abuse through addressing risk factors, strengthening protective factors, and increasing resilience and coping skills. Diversion programme for children in conflict with the law is restorative by nature and afford the child to be accountable for his or her actions. Furthermore, children who could have been in jail (adult correctional facilities) and be vulnerable to abuse by hardened criminals are kept in secure care facilities Women in shelters have had improved access to economic opportunities and empowerment programmes such as income generating programmes, welfare to work programme. This has led to improved self-confidence and less dependence on abusive partners The prevention and awareness of substance result in reduction in the use of substances and beneficiaries who completed substance inpatient treatment services benefit from after-care programme to ensure they maintain sobriety or abstinence and some are linked to economic opportunities such as skills development and entrepreneurship programme. 9

10. Desired Outcomes: Poverty Alleviation And Sustainable Livelihoods Provision of dignity packs and school uniform contribute towards good results as children attended school more regularly, performed better and openly participated in the classrooms and extra mural activities. The improvement of household food and nutrition deals with the immediate and visible effects of poverty, as provision of food parcels and daily meals reduce food insecurity and malnutrition. Welfare to work programme to ensure the upliftment of youth to enable them to exit the welfare system. Social cooperatives are intended to bring in the element of social cohesion and play an increasing significant role in helping people to find solutions on how to cooperate out of poverty by tapping their own resources, knowledge and strengths. 10

11. Desired Outcome: Youth Development Youth with skills are able to penetrate the labour market, and those with entrepreneurship skills are able to start and sustain their small businesses and also absorb other youth. This happen especially in the townships. 11

12. Desired Outcomes: Women Empowerment In an effort to reduce dependency on social grants, the department is empowering women on child support grants to become members of cooperatives, as well as strengthening access to skills development. Victim/s of GBV are linked to economic opportunities and activities through cooperatives and NPOs where they participate in various programmes including income generating 12

13. Rating Categories The performance for the Department is disaggregated according to the threshold represented by the following ratings categories and definitions: Rating Symbol Rating Category Value Achieved 100% and greater Not Achieved: Good progress 76% - 99% Not Achieved: Fair progress 51% - 75% Not Achieved: Poor Progress 26% - 50% Not Achieved: Very Poor Progress Less than 26% Not targeted for the Q No quarterly targets set for the quarter under review. 13

14. Overview Of Q2 Non-Financial Performance Achieved (100% and greater) Good Progress (greater than 75% Fair Progress (51% - 75%) Poor Progress (26% - Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) 0 Not Targeted 50%) PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION 4 1 1 1 3 PROG 1: ADMINISTRATION 40.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 0.00% 30.00% PROGRAMME 2: SOCIAL WELFARE SERVICES 0 5 2 1 1 0 PROG 2: SOCIAL WELFARE SERVICES 0.00% 55.56% 22.22% 11.11% 11.11% 0.00% PROGRAMME 3: CHILDREN & FAMILIES 10 0 2 0 0 0 PROG 3: CHILDREN & FAMILIES 83.33% 0.00% 16.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PROGRAMME 4: RESTORATIVE SERVICES 14 2 1 0 0 0 PROG 4: RESTORATIVE SERVICES 82.35% 11.76% 5.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PROGRAMME 5: DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH 16 3 2 0 3 1 PROG5: DEVELOPMENT & RESEARCH 64.00% 12.00% 8.00% 0.00% 12.00% 4.00% OVERALL DEPT PERFORMANCE 44 11 8 2 4 4 OVERALL DEPT PERFORMANCE 60.27% 15.07% 10.96% 2.74% 5.48% 5.48% 14

15. Overview Of Q2 Non-Financial Performance: Prog 1 Achieved (100% and greater) Good Progress (greater than 75% Poor Progress (26% - 50%) Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) Not Targeted Fair Progress (51% - 75%) PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION 1.2.1 Human Resources Management 0 0 1 0 0 3 1.2.1 Human Resources Management 0% 0% 25% 0% 0% 75% 1.2.2 Supply Chain Management 1 1 0 1 0 0 1.2.2 Supply Chain Management 33% 33% 0% 33% 0% 0% 1.2.3 Financial Management 3 0 0 0 0 0 1.2.3 Financial Management 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Total Indicators 4 1 1 1 0 3 % Indicators 40% 10% 10% 10% 0% 30% 15

16. Overview Of Q2 Non-Financial Performance: Prog 2 Achieved (100% and greater) Good Progress (greater than 75% Poor Progress (26% - 50%) Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) Not Targeted Fair Progress (51% - 75%) PROGRAMME 2: SOCIAL WELFARE SERVICES 2.2 Services to Older Persons 0 1 1 0 0 0 2.2 Services to Older Persons 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2.3 Services to the Persons with Disabilities 0 2 0 0 0 0 2.3 Services to the Persons with Disabilities 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.4 HIV and AIDS 0 2 1 1 1 0 2.4 HIV and AIDS 0% 40% 20% 20% 20% 0% Total Indicators 0 5 2 1 1 0 % Indicators 0% 56% 22% 11% 11% 0% 16

17. Overview Of Q2 Non-Financial Performance: Prog 3 Achieved (100% and greater) Good Progress (greater than 75% Poor Progress (26% - 50%) Very Poor Progress (Less Not Targeted Fair Progress (51% - 75%) than 25%) PROGRAMME 3: CHILDREN AND FAMILIES 3.2 Care and Services to Families 5 0 0 0 0 0 3.2 Care and Services to Families 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.3 Child Care and Protection 3 0 1 0 0 0 3.3 Child Care and Protection 75% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 3.4 Child and Youth Care Centres 2 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 Child and Youth Care Centres 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.5 Community-Based Care Services for children 0 0 1 0 0 0 3.5 Community-Based Care Services for children 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% Total Indicators 10 0 2 0 0 0 % Indicators 83% 0% 17% 0% 0% 0% 17

18. Overview Of Q2 Non-Financial Performance: Prog 4 PROGRAMME 4: RESTORATIVE SERVICES Achieved (100% and greater) Good Progress (greater than 75% Poor Progress (26% - 50%) Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) Not Targeted Fair Progress (51% - 75%) 4.2 Crime Prevention and support 2 0 1 0 0 0 4.2 Crime Prevention and support 67% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 4.3 Victim empowerment 7 1 0 0 0 0 4.3 Victim empowerment 88% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4.4 Substance Abuse, Prevention and Rehab 5 1 0 0 0 0 4.4 Substance Abuse, Prevention and Rehab 83% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% Total Indicators 14 2 1 0 0 0 % Indicators 82% 12% 6% 0% 0% 0% 18

19. Overview Of Q2 Non-Financial Performance: Prog 5 PROGRAMME 5: DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH Achieved (100% and greater) Good Progress (greater than 75% Fair Progress (51% - 75%) Poor Progress (26% - 50%) Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) Not Targeted 5.2 Community Mobilisation 1 0 0 0 0 0 5.2 Community Mobilisation 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5.3 Institutional capacity building and support for NPOs 5.3 Institutional capacity building and support for NPOs 5.4 Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Livelihoods 1 0 0 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5 2 2 0 2 1 5.4 Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Livelihoods 41.67% 16.67% 16.67% 0.00% 16.67% 8.33% 5.5 Community Based Research and Planning 2 0 0 0 0 0 5.5 Community Based Research and Planning 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5.6 Youth development 1 1 0 0 0 0 5.6 Youth development 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5.7 Women development 2 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 Women development 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5.8 Population Policy Promotion 4 0 0 0 1 0 5.8 Population Policy Promotion 80.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.00% 0.00% Total Indicators 16 3 2 0 3 1 % Indicators 64.00% 12.00% 8.00% 0.00% 12.00% 4.00% 19

20. No Planned Performance Performance Indictor Quarter 2 Target Quarter 2 Actual Reason for Deviation 0 0 Comment: Not targeted in the quarter under review. Number of people participating in internship programmes 0 0 Comment: Not targeted in the quarter under review. Number of learners on learnership programmes. 0 0 Comment: Not targeted in the quarter under review. Number of new bursars participating in external bursary programmes 0 0 Comment: Not targeted in the quarter under review. Number of school uniform packs distributed 20

21. Overview Of Q2 YTD Non-Financial Performance Achieved (100% and greater) Good Progress (greater than 75% Fair Progress (51% - 75%) Poor Progress (26% - 50%) Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) Not Targeted PROG 1: ADMINISTRATION 4 1 2 0 3 0 PROG 1: ADMINISTRATION 40% 10% 20% 0% 30% 0% PROG 2: SOCIAL WELFARE SERVICES 0 6 2 1 0 0 PROG 2: SOCIAL WELFARE SERVICES 0% 67% 22% 11% 0% 0% PROG 3: CHILDREN AND FAMILIES 5 2 4 1 0 0 PROG 3: CHILDREN AND FAMILIES 42% 17% 33% 8% 0% 0% PROG 4: RESTORATIVE SERVICES 6 3 5 3 0 0 PROG 4: RESTORATIVE SERVICES 35% 18% 29% 18% 0% 0% PROG 5: DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH 1 4 10 5 5 0 PROG 5: DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH 4% 16% 40% 20% 20% 0% OVERALL PERFORMANCE 16 16 23 10 8 0 OVERALL PERFORMANCE 22% 22% 32% 14% 11% 0% 21

22. Overview Of Q2 YTD Weighted Performance Performance Grid Consolidate rating performance grid Score 5 4 3 2 1 Count 16 16 23 10 8 73 5 Total 80 64 69 20 8 241 365 66% Achieved (100% and greater) Good Progress (greater than 75% Fair Progress (51% - 75%) Poor Progress (26% - 50%) Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) Total Maximum score Performance per pillar 22

23. Overview Of Q2 YTD Weighted Performance: Prog 1 Prog 1 Consolidate rating performance grid Score Count Total Achieved (100% and greater) 5 4 20 Good Progress (greater than 75% 4 1 4 Fair Progress (51% - 75%) 3 2 6 Poor Progress (26% - 50%) 2 0 0 Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) 1 3 3 Total Maximum score Performance per pillar 10 5 33 50 66% 23

24. Overview Of Q2 YTD Weighted Performance: Prog 2 Prog 2 Consolidate rating performance grid Score Count Total Achieved (100% and greater) 5 0 0 Good Progress (greater than 75% 4 6 24 Fair Progress (51% - 75%) 3 2 6 Poor Progress (26% - 50%) 2 1 2 Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) 1 0 0 Total Maximum score Performance per pillar 9 5 32 45 71% 24

25. Overview Of Q2 YTD Weighted Performance: Prog 3 Prog 3 Consolidate rating performance grid Score Count Total Achieved (100% and greater) 5 5 25 Good Progress (greater than 75% 4 2 8 Fair Progress (51% - 75%) 3 4 12 Poor Progress (26% - 50%) 2 1 2 Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) 1 0 0 Total Maximum score Performance per pillar 12 5 47 60 78% 25

26. Overview Of Q2 YTD Weighted Performance: Prog 4 Prog 4 Consolidate rating performance grid Score Count Total Achieved (100% and greater) 5 6 30 Good Progress (greater than 75% 4 3 12 Fair Progress (51% - 75%) 3 5 15 Poor Progress (26% - 50%) 2 3 6 Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) 1 0 0 Total Maximum score Performance per pillar 17 5 63 85 74% 26

27. Overview Of Q2 YTD Weighted Performance: Prog 5 Prog 5 Consolidate rating performance grid Score Count Total Achieved (100% and greater) 5 1 5 Good Progress (greater than 75% 4 4 16 Fair Progress (51% - 75%) 3 10 30 Poor Progress (26% - 50%) 2 5 10 Very Poor Progress (Less than 25%) 1 5 5 Total Maximum score Performance per pillar 25 5 66 125 53% 27