Analyzing Telecom Network Cost in East Africa

 
 
 
EXPERT LEVEL TRAINING ON
TELECOM NETWORK COST
MODELLING
FOR THE HIPSSA REGIONS
 
Arusha
15-19 July, 2013
Christopher Kemei, ITU Expert
1
 
 
 
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
s
 
1
5
/
1
6
:
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
 
b
y
 
c
o
u
n
t
r
y
 
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
E
a
s
t
e
r
n
 
&
 
S
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
 
A
f
r
i
c
a
 
S
u
b
-
R
e
g
i
o
n
3
Review of cost-based regulation in …
Analytical framework
4
Regional overview
5
Scores can range from 1 to 4; higher scores represent more
progress towards effective regulated cost-orientation
Cross-country comparison
6
Scores can range from 6 to 24; higher scores represent more
progress towards effective regulated cost-orientation
Eastern & Southern Africa Sub-Region - Overall
In almost the entire sub-region the obtaining
legislative framework broadly provides for cost
oriented tariff regulatory framework. 
However the instruments for the implementation of
the broad legal framework need to be enhanced
There is also need for harmonization in view of the
diverse nature of the frameworks
There is also the need for skill enhancement
There is also the need for the adoption modern
costing methodologies and the adoption of modern
tariff  regulatory processes including transparency
7
Botswana - summary
8
Botswana - comments
The Legal framework in Botswana provides for cost
accounting based on forward looking incremental
costs as the methodology for the determination of
termination rates.
The LRIC cost model developed by consultants is
used when a tariff review is due. The model is
however not published.
Operators with SMP have both retail and wholesale
prices subject to control
9
Would the representatives from Botswana like
to add any comments of their own?
Djibouti - summary
10
Djibouti - comments
Djibouti did not participate in the HIPSSA data
collection survey therefore there was insufficient data
for the assessment.
However online research indicates as follows:
That the law provides for an interconnection framework
based on the principle of reasonable cost allocation.
That there is only one operators providing both fixed and
mobile services
That tariff regulations forbids tariff that are below costs.
11
Would the representatives from Djibouti like to
add any comments of their own?
Eritrea - summary
12
Eritrea - comments
Eritrea did not participate in the HIPSSA data
collection survey therefore there was insufficient data
for the assessment.
However online research indicated as follows:
The law provides for the establishment of a framework for
tariff formulation (calculation).
There is no NRA in place
The Ministry of Transport and Communications is vested
with the regulatory authority of the communications sector
13
Would the representatives from Eritrea like to
add any comments of their own?
Ethiopia - summary
14
Ethiopia - comments
Council of Ministers Regulations No. 47/1999,
provides for a framework for cost modelling.
Aim to attract and sustain investment
Prices theoretically to be based on efficient operator
incremental cost
Work on cost modelling was to be started in 2012
Single incumbent operator (fixed and mobile) so
arguably cost-based regulation is not relevant.
Cost accounting system is not fully implemented
15
Would the representatives from Ethiopia like
to add any comments of their own?
Kenya - summary
16
Kenya - comments
The sector legislation in Kenya provides for the Legal
framework for regulating tariffs based on efficiency
and economy
A cost model (pure LRIC) is in place but is not
publicly available. Individual operators given their
modules
The depreciation method used is Annuity
17
Would the representatives from Kenya like to
add any comments of their own?
Lesotho - summary
18
Lesotho - comments
Insufficient data provided through the HIPSSA
questionnaire
Cost accounting not mandated due to lack of
appropriate legal framework.
There is a planned review of the law
No cost model in place.
19
Would the representatives from Lesotho like to
add any comments of their own?
Malawi - summary
20
Malawi - comments
Cost accounting not imposed in Malawi due to lack of
legal framework and skills
There is a planned review of the Law
Malawi operates a Sender Keeps All
Cost model does not exist
Challenges in data collection
21
Would the representatives from Malawi like to
add any comments of their own?
Mauritius - summary
22
Mauritius - comments
The Information and Communication Technologies
Act 2001, Act 44/2001 provides for a framework for
regulating tariffs based on
.
Interconnection rates are computed based on
historical costs using the FDC methodology
The regulator (ICTA) issues regular directives on
interconnection rates referred to as the
Interconnection Usage Charges (IUC).
Migration to a LRIC model is under consideration 
23
Would the representatives from Mauritius like
to add any comments of their own?
Namibia - summary
24
Namibia - comments
Cost accounting in Namibia is not implemented as
the cost accounting regulations provided for in the
Act are yet to be developed.
There is no cost model in place.
There is also insufficient skills
Plans are underway to have a consultant assist in the
development of a cost model.
25
Would the representatives from Namibia like
to add any comments of their own?
Rwanda - summary
26
Rwanda - comments
The sector legislation, Law No. 44/2001 of
30/11/2001, provides for a framework for derivation of
tariffs.
The regulator (RURA) is mandated to regulate tariffs,
for dominant operators (with SMP), based on
objective and cost based criteria.
However no cost accounting is imposed as the
dominant player is yet to be determined
27
Would the representatives from Rwanda like
to add any comments of their own?
Seychelles - summary
28
Seychelles - comments
The sector legislation, the Broadcasting and
Telecommunication Act, 2000 mandates the Minister
in charge of ICT to regulate tariffs.
Interconnection rates are required to be based on
incremental costs (additional cost accruing).
The Department of Information Communications
Technology in the Office of the Vice President is
mandated to among others regulate tariffs based on
incremental cost accounting principles.
29
Would the representatives from Seychelles like
to add any comments of their own?
South Africa - summary
30
South Africa - comments
The Legal framework in South Africa provides for
cost accounting obligations to operators with SMPs.
Cost accounting separation guidelines are under
development
A Top down costing approaches based on fully
distributed costing is used. In this approach data
extracted from accounting separation reports and
traffic figures submitted by SMP operators are to be
used. There is no specific cost model in use.
31
Would the representatives from South Africa
like to add any comments of their own?
Sudan - summary
32
Sudan - comments
Sudan did not participate in the HIPSSA data
collection survey.
However online research indicates as follows:
That the Telecommunication Act 2001 mandates the
regulator to approve the methods and costing of
telecommunication services.
The National Telecom Corporation (NTC) as the regulator is
therefore mandated to regulate tariffs including the
methodology of costing of services
33
Would the representatives from Sudan like to
add any comments of their own?
Swaziland - summary
34
Swaziland - comments
Cost accounting not mandated due to lack of
appropriate legal framework.
No cost model in place
There is no independent regulatory body as the
incumbent operator also performs regulatory
functions.
35
Would the representatives from Swaziland like
to add any comments of their own?
Tanzania - summary
36
Tanzania - comments
The ICT sector legislation in Tanzania, the Electronic
and Postal Communications Act, 2010, gives broad
principles that guide operators in setting tariffs
The Tariff Regulations, 2005, provide for cost
oriented tariffs. 
The regulator, Tanzania Communications Regulatory
Authority (TCRA) is mandated to ensure the
application of cost oriented tariffs
No cost model is in use presently (although LRIC
models were previously developed)
37
Would the representatives from Tanzania like
to add any comments of their own?
Uganda - summary
38
Uganda - comments
The sector legislation, Uganda Communications Act
Chapter 106, provides for a framework for tariffs
setting principles which include cost orientation and
causality.
A cost model based on LRIC was under development
The model is not publicly available
The depreciation method applied is the Straight-line
39
Would the representatives from Uganda like to
add any comments of their own?
Zambia - summary
40
Zambia - comments
The Legal framework provides for cost accounting
obligations to operators with SMPs
Bespoke Hybrid cost model developed by consultant
is used when tariffs are reviewed
Data gathered in specific request. There is resistance
by operators to give data.
Cost model not published for confidential reasons
41
Would the representatives from Zambia like to
add any comments of their own?
Zimbabwe - summary
42
Zimbabwe - comments
The Legal framework provides for cost accounting
obligations to operators.
Cost accounting is implemented using tariff proposal
guidelines.
Presently uses COSITU Model
In the process of developing a new system based on
forward looking costing methodologies for wholesale
and retail services.
43
Would the representatives from Zimbabwe like
to add any comments of their own?
Conclusions
Good progress in
establishing the legal basis
for cost-orientation
Cost modelling work at least
started in most countries
Too much reliance on
accounting approaches
(historic costs; straight line
depreciation)
Distinct lack of transparency
in both methodology used
and resulting models.
Lack of skills and resources
a widespread issue
44
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This expert-level training workshop conducted in Arusha in 2013 delved into the country-by-country analysis of telecom network cost modeling in the East Africa region. The workshop covered topics such as regulatory frameworks, transparency, skills and resources, cost accounting, depreciation methods, and cost modeling. Detailed insights were provided on the regional overview and cross-country comparisons, with a focus on progressing towards effective regulated cost-orientation.

  • Telecom network
  • Cost modeling
  • East Africa
  • Training workshop
  • Regulatory framework

Uploaded on Sep 13, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region EXPERT LEVEL TRAINING ON TELECOM NETWORK COST MODELLING FOR THE HIPSSA REGIONS Arusha 15-19 July, 2013 Christopher Kemei, ITU Expert 1

  2. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Sessions 15/16: Country by country analysis in the Eastern & Southern Africa Sub- Region

  3. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Review of cost-based regulation in Botswana Djibouti Eritrea Ethiopia Kenya Lesotho Malawi Mauritius Namibia Rwanda Seychelles South Africa Sudan Swaziland Tanzania Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe 3

  4. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Analytical framework SCORE 1 2 3 4 A) Cost orientation framework Required by Law & Licence None Required by Licence Required by Law No costing methodology or models published Metholdogy / process and cost models published Methodology / process published Cost models published B) Transparency Requires some enhancement C) Skills and resources Poor Adequate Excellent Specified, implemented and audited D) Cost accounting and auditing Specified but not implemented Specified and implemented None E) Depreciation methods Tilted annuity or economic None specified Straight-line Annuity Top-down (e.g. historic, FAC) Bottom-up or hybrid (e.g. current, LRIC) F) Cost modelling None Benchmarks 4

  5. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Regional overview Scores can range from 1 to 4; higher scores represent more progress towards effective regulated cost-orientation 5

  6. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Cross-country comparison Scores can range from 6 to 24; higher scores represent more progress towards effective regulated cost-orientation 6

  7. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Eastern & Southern Africa Sub-Region - Overall In almost the entire sub-region the obtaining legislative framework broadly provides for cost oriented tariff regulatory framework. However the instruments for the implementation of the broad legal framework need to be enhanced There is also need for harmonization in view of the diverse nature of the frameworks There is also the need for skill enhancement There is also the need for the adoption modern costing methodologies and the adoption of modern tariff regulatory processes including transparency 7

  8. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Botswana - summary 8

  9. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Botswana - comments The Legal framework in Botswana provides for cost accounting based on forward looking incremental costs as the methodology for the determination of termination rates. The LRIC cost model developed by consultants is used when a tariff review is due. The model is however not published. Operators with SMP have both retail and wholesale prices subject to control Would the representatives from Botswana like to add any comments of their own? 9

  10. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Djibouti - summary 10

  11. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Djibouti - comments Djibouti did not participate in the HIPSSA data collection survey therefore there was insufficient data for the assessment. However online research indicates as follows: That the law provides for an interconnection framework based on the principle of reasonable cost allocation. That there is only one operators providing both fixed and mobile services That tariff regulations forbids tariff that are below costs. Would the representatives from Djibouti like to add any comments of their own? 11

  12. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Eritrea - summary 12

  13. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Eritrea - comments Eritrea did not participate in the HIPSSA data collection survey therefore there was insufficient data for the assessment. However online research indicated as follows: The law provides for the establishment of a framework for tariff formulation (calculation). There is no NRA in place The Ministry of Transport and Communications is vested with the regulatory authority of the communications sector Would the representatives from Eritrea like to add any comments of their own? 13

  14. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Ethiopia - summary 14

  15. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Ethiopia - comments Council of Ministers Regulations No. 47/1999, provides for a framework for cost modelling. Aim to attract and sustain investment Prices theoretically to be based on efficient operator incremental cost Work on cost modelling was to be started in 2012 Single incumbent operator (fixed and mobile) so arguably cost-based regulation is not relevant. Cost accounting system is not fully implemented Would the representatives from Ethiopia like to add any comments of their own? 15

  16. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Kenya - summary 16

  17. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Kenya - comments The sector legislation in Kenya provides for the Legal framework for regulating tariffs based on efficiency and economy A cost model (pure LRIC) is in place but is not publicly available. Individual operators given their modules The depreciation method used is Annuity Would the representatives from Kenya like to add any comments of their own? 17

  18. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Lesotho - summary 18

  19. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Lesotho - comments Insufficient data provided through the HIPSSA questionnaire Cost accounting not mandated due to lack of appropriate legal framework. There is a planned review of the law No cost model in place. Would the representatives from Lesotho like to add any comments of their own? 19

  20. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Malawi - summary 20

  21. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Malawi - comments Cost accounting not imposed in Malawi due to lack of legal framework and skills There is a planned review of the Law Malawi operates a Sender Keeps All Cost model does not exist Challenges in data collection Would the representatives from Malawi like to add any comments of their own? 21

  22. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Mauritius - summary 22

  23. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Mauritius - comments The Information and Communication Technologies Act 2001, Act 44/2001 provides for a framework for regulating tariffs based on. Interconnection rates are computed based on historical costs using the FDC methodology The regulator (ICTA) issues regular directives on interconnection rates referred to as the Interconnection Usage Charges (IUC). Migration to a LRIC model is under consideration Would the representatives from Mauritius like to add any comments of their own? 23

  24. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Namibia - summary 24

  25. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Namibia - comments Cost accounting in Namibia is not implemented as the cost accounting regulations provided for in the Act are yet to be developed. There is no cost model in place. There is also insufficient skills Plans are underway to have a consultant assist in the development of a cost model. Would the representatives from Namibia like to add any comments of their own? 25

  26. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Rwanda - summary 26

  27. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Rwanda - comments The sector legislation, Law No. 44/2001 of 30/11/2001, provides for a framework for derivation of tariffs. The regulator (RURA) is mandated to regulate tariffs, for dominant operators (with SMP), based on objective and cost based criteria. However no cost accounting is imposed as the dominant player is yet to be determined Would the representatives from Rwanda like to add any comments of their own? 27

  28. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Seychelles - summary 28

  29. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Seychelles - comments The sector legislation, the Broadcasting and Telecommunication Act, 2000 mandates the Minister in charge of ICT to regulate tariffs. Interconnection rates are required to be based on incremental costs (additional cost accruing). The Department of Information Communications Technology in the Office of the Vice President is mandated to among others regulate tariffs based on incremental cost accounting principles. Would the representatives from Seychelles like to add any comments of their own? 29

  30. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region South Africa - summary 30

  31. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region South Africa - comments The Legal framework in South Africa provides for cost accounting obligations to operators with SMPs. Cost accounting separation guidelines are under development A Top down costing approaches based on fully distributed costing is used. In this approach data extracted from accounting separation reports and traffic figures submitted by SMP operators are to be used. There is no specific cost model in use. Would the representatives from South Africa like to add any comments of their own? 31

  32. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Sudan - summary 32

  33. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Sudan - comments Sudan did not participate in the HIPSSA data collection survey. However online research indicates as follows: That the Telecommunication Act 2001 mandates the regulator to approve the methods and costing of telecommunication services. The National Telecom Corporation (NTC) as the regulator is therefore mandated to regulate tariffs including the methodology of costing of services Would the representatives from Sudan like to add any comments of their own? 33

  34. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Swaziland - summary 34

  35. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Swaziland - comments Cost accounting not mandated due to lack of appropriate legal framework. No cost model in place There is no independent regulatory body as the incumbent operator also performs regulatory functions. Would the representatives from Swaziland like to add any comments of their own? 35

  36. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Tanzania - summary 36

  37. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Tanzania - comments The ICT sector legislation in Tanzania, the Electronic and Postal Communications Act, 2010, gives broad principles that guide operators in setting tariffs The Tariff Regulations, 2005, provide for cost oriented tariffs. The regulator, Tanzania Communications Regulatory Authority (TCRA) is mandated to ensure the application of cost oriented tariffs No cost model is in use presently (although LRIC models were previously developed) Would the representatives from Tanzania like to add any comments of their own? 37

  38. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Uganda - summary 38

  39. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Uganda - comments The sector legislation, Uganda Communications Act Chapter 106, provides for a framework for tariffs setting principles which include cost orientation and causality. A cost model based on LRIC was under development The model is not publicly available The depreciation method applied is the Straight-line Would the representatives from Uganda like to add any comments of their own? 39

  40. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Zambia - summary 40

  41. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Zambia - comments The Legal framework provides for cost accounting obligations to operators with SMPs Bespoke Hybrid cost model developed by consultant is used when tariffs are reviewed Data gathered in specific request. There is resistance by operators to give data. Cost model not published for confidential reasons Would the representatives from Zambia like to add any comments of their own? 41

  42. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Zimbabwe - summary 42

  43. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Zimbabwe - comments The Legal framework provides for cost accounting obligations to operators. Cost accounting is implemented using tariff proposal guidelines. Presently uses COSITU Model In the process of developing a new system based on forward looking costing methodologies for wholesale and retail services. Would the representatives from Zimbabwe like to add any comments of their own? 43

  44. HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 15/16: Country by country analysis in the East Africa Region Conclusions Good progress in establishing the legal basis for cost-orientation Cost modelling work at least started in most countries Too much reliance on accounting approaches (historic costs; straight line depreciation) Distinct lack of transparency in both methodology used and resulting models. Lack of skills and resources a widespread issue 44

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#