Prior: Art. 66(b)(1): Appeals by Accused – A Court of Criminal Appeals shall have jurisdiction of a timely appeal from the judgment of a court -martial , entered into the record under section 860c of this title (article 60c), as follows:
The content outlines amendments introduced in the FY23 NDAA regarding appeals by accused individuals in court-martial cases and modifications to court-martial findings and sentences. It details the expansion of jurisdiction for Court of Criminal Appeals, the powers granted to the Judge Advocate Gene
2 views • 12 slides
Understanding the Binding Force of Supreme Court Judgments on Direct Tax
Landmark judgments of the Supreme Court regarding direct tax laws are discussed in detail, emphasizing the binding nature of Supreme Court judgments on all courts in India. The concept of precedence, acceptance or rejection of petitions for special leave to appeal, and the significance of Supreme Co
0 views • 36 slides
Comprehensive Overview of Yavapai County Superior Court Divorce Processes
This content provides detailed information on the divorce processes in Yavapai County Superior Court, including guides, services, and profiles of the presiding judges. It covers alternative dispute resolution services, legal counsel, and insights into the court's workings. The visual elements highli
1 views • 71 slides
Supreme Court Rejects Petitions Against EVM Use In Elections
Supreme Court Rejects Petitions Against EVM Use In Elections\\nNew Delhi: \\nThe Supreme Court on Friday dismissed two writ petitions: namely, apprehensions over 19 lakhs missing EVMs and another petition to use ballot paper to conduct elections while reposing its faith in the EVMs.\\nAdjudicating t
1 views • 4 slides
Supreme Court Raps SBI For Not Sharing Complete Data On Electoral Bonds
Supreme Court Raps SBI For Not Sharing \"Complete Data\" On Electoral Bonds\n\nThe Supreme Court today came down hard on the State Bank of India for not sharing the complete data on electoral bonds, a scheme that allowed individuals and businesses to donate anonymously to political parties. The cour
2 views • 4 slides
Court Rebuked Tamil Nadu Collectors for not attend Meeting
The Supreme Court criticized Tamil Nadu district collectors for not attending the meeting with the Enforcement Directorate (ED) as ordered. The court emphasized the importance of obeying orders and respecting the law and the Constitution. The collectors have been given another opportunity to meet wi
5 views • 4 slides
Understanding Recent Judgments and Rulings on GST Issues
Dive into the latest judgments and rulings regarding GST issues, focusing on topics such as Input Tax Credit discrepancies, supplier obligations, and High Court verdicts. Explore real-life cases like Suncraft Energy Ltd. in Calcutta High Court, analyzing repercussions and legal perspectives. Gain in
2 views • 16 slides
Kerala High Court Upholds Divorce by Mutual Consent Ruling
Kerala High Court Upholds Divorce by Mutual Consent Ruling\nBackground of the Case\nKerala High Court ruled that the Family Court was justified in granting a divorce by mutual consent, even though the wife later withdrew her consent. The case involved an appeal by the wife challenging the Family Cou
0 views • 4 slides
Advisory Jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India
Most countries grant their apex courts original and appellate jurisdiction, but the Indian Constitution includes advisory jurisdiction for the Supreme Court. Article 143 allows the President to seek the Court's opinion on important public matters. The Court advises the President, although it's non-b
2 views • 31 slides
Progress Report on Suspended Constitutional Court Orders - Portfolio Committee Update
Progress report on suspended Constitutional Court orders related to various cases such as Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v. Prince, Sonke Gender Justice NPC v. President of South Africa, and more. Updates on bills, amendments, and plans presented by the Portfolio Committee on Jus
0 views • 9 slides
The Role of a Court Clerk in Manitoba
Court clerks play a vital role in the judicial system of Manitoba, assisting in court proceedings, maintaining order in the courtroom, recording decisions accurately, and handling sensitive evidence. They are responsible for various duties such as monitoring court proceedings, preparing dockets, han
0 views • 16 slides
Overview of Calcutta High Court's Jurisdiction
Established in 1862, Calcutta High Court is the oldest high court in India with jurisdiction over West Bengal and the Andaman & Nicobar Islands. It has 72 sanctioned judges. The court's jurisdiction includes civil, criminal, admiralty, and matrimonial matters. It exercises original and appellate jur
0 views • 46 slides
Different Types of Land Related Cases Flow Chart in Various Courts
Explore the flow chart depicting various types of land-related cases in different courts, from land disputes in civil court to appeals in district court and high court, all the way up to special leave petitions and curative petitions at the Supreme Court. The chart outlines the progression of cases
0 views • 9 slides
Essential Responsibilities and Management in Judicial Court System
Explore the vital aspects of maintaining judicial records, court management, judge responsibilities, and court work division in the judicial system. Learn about the skill sets required for effective court management, essential duties of a judge, and the administrative functions involved in the judic
0 views • 50 slides
Analysis of Constitutional Court Judgment Implications
This analysis delves into the implications of the Constitutional Court judgment on the Electoral Amendment Act, focusing on two court challenges, three judgments rendered, and the effects on contestants and candidate nominations. The background, court challenges, judgments, and their implications ar
0 views • 17 slides
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Marbury v. Madison & McCulloch v. Maryland
Marbury v. Madison (1803) and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) are two pivotal cases in Supreme Court history. Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, giving the Court the power to declare laws unconstitutional. McCulloch v. Maryland upheld federal supremacy over state laws. These cases exemplif
1 views • 14 slides
Overview of Summary Court Advocacy and Procedures
Introduction to the key aspects of summary court advocacy, including types of cases handled, basic protocols, courtroom etiquette, advocacy tips, and the importance of preparation and knowledge of relevant laws. The guide covers court procedures, dress code, opening and closing court protocols, and
0 views • 31 slides
Understanding Key Legal Terms in Marbury v. Madison Case
Explore essential vocabulary related to the landmark court case Marbury v. Madison, including terms like Judicial, Commission, Jurisdiction, Landmark Case, Precedent, and Writ of Mandamus. Test your knowledge with fill-in-the-blank exercises that relate to legal concepts and historical rulings by th
7 views • 8 slides
Appellate Decisions Impacting Law Enforcement: Summary of Key Cases and Legal Updates
Explore significant appellate decisions affecting law enforcement officers between June 1, 2015, and June 1, 2016, including key rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court, Virginia Supreme Court, and Virginia Court of Appeals. Dive into topics such as the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, crimes against persons
0 views • 201 slides
CBP Rulings Online: Explore Classification Decisions for Imports
Importers can access past classification rulings by CBP in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) to aid in classifying new and innovative products. Reviewing CBP decisions is valuable, especially for complex items like submersible ROVs used in the oil and gas industry. By checking historical rulings,
1 views • 4 slides
The Boundaries of Investment Arbitration: Crossroads of Trade and Human Rights Law
This material delves into the overlapping realms of investment arbitration, trade law, and European human rights law in investor-state disputes. It examines the use of ECtHR and WTO references in arbitration rulings, the nuances of citation choices, the appeal of juridical rulings, and the comparati
0 views • 18 slides
Overview of Court Management System in 17th Judicial Circuit Court of Florida
This content provides an in-depth overview of the Court Management System (CMS) utilized by the 17th Judicial Circuit Court of Florida. It covers how to log in to the system, familiarization with the main menu and submenus, and an overview of the menu tabs such as Calendar, Docket, Workbench, Admin,
0 views • 7 slides
Conroe Municipal Court Overview
Conroe Municipal Court, along with the Police Department Annex, handles cases issued by various law enforcement agencies. The court staff assists the public with their citations, and the court has seen an increase in fines and collections over the years. Initiatives like the Omni Base Collection and
1 views • 11 slides
Eighth Judicial District Specialty Court Programs in Clark County
Eighth Judicial District Specialty Court Programs in Clark County serve 1200-1500 residents annually with various programs such as Substance Abuse Treatment, Adult Drug Court, DUI Court, Juvenile Drug Court, and more. Established in 1993, these programs aim to improve public safety, reduce criminal
1 views • 10 slides
Evolution of the European Court of Human Rights: Towards a Constitutional Court?
The article explores whether the European Court of Human Rights is transitioning into a constitutional court. It discusses the Conventionality principle, in abstracto claims, and the current approach of the ECtHR, focusing on individual vs. societal interests. The examination of cases like Klass v.
1 views • 18 slides
Impact of Self-Assessment on Court Effectiveness in Drug Court Programs
Using self-assessment to impact the effectiveness of drug court programs is crucial for ensuring fair and consistent behavior modification. This approach enhances visibility, ensures accountability, and identifies areas for improvement. Success in drug court programs requires a thorough evaluation p
0 views • 24 slides
Is the Evolution of the European Court of Human Rights towards a Constitutional Court?
The article explores whether the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is transforming into a constitutional court. It delves into the concept of in abstracto claims and the Conventionality principle, analyzing cases that have allowed individuals to claim violations without direct application. The
0 views • 18 slides
Appellate Decisions for Law Enforcement Officers - Selected Cases Summary
This collection highlights key appellate decisions relevant to law enforcement officers, focusing on cases from the U.S. Supreme Court, Virginia Supreme Court, and Virginia Court of Appeals. The cases discussed include rulings on search warrants related to cell phones, magnetic media, marijuana odor
0 views • 61 slides
Understanding Lacrosse Fouls: Rulings and Penalties Explained
This information provides clarity on simultaneous fouls in lacrosse, detailing proper rulings and penalty time assignments for various scenarios involving player infractions. Examples include cases of pushing, slashing, tripping, and technical fouls, with a focus on understanding how penalties are s
0 views • 24 slides
Open Records and Requests Process Overview
This presentation provides valuable information on the Advanced Public Information Act, open records letter rulings issued between 2001-2017, withdrawing requests for rulings, requesting previous determinations, and procedural obligations under Section 552.301. It covers reasons for withdrawal, comm
0 views • 35 slides
Key Decisions on Criminal and Immigration Law by the U.S. Supreme Court 2020-2021 Term
This summary covers two significant cases from the 2020-2021 term of the United States Supreme Court. The first case, Edwards v. Vannoy, discusses the retroactive application of the Ramos jury-unanimity rule on federal collateral review. The second case, Jones v. Mississippi, addresses the sentencin
0 views • 23 slides
Privacy Cases and Damages: European Court of Human Rights Rulings
The presentation explores the calculation of damages in privacy cases by analyzing the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. It delves into the right to privacy as outlined in the European Convention on Human Rights and discusses the living instrument doctrine, various articles under the
0 views • 55 slides
Understanding Unexplained Deemed Income Sections 68, 69, 69A, and 69B
Explore the provisions of sections 68, 69, 69A, and 69B relating to unexplained income, cash credits, investments, and undisclosed amounts in books. Learn about the treatment of sums credited without explanation and recent legal rulings related to share application money. Relevant Supreme Court and
0 views • 31 slides
Land Use Case Law Update - Key Rulings and Facts of Murr v. Wisconsin
Key rulings and facts from the Murr v. Wisconsin case, including discussions on the Lot Combination Rule in Wisconsin, the property ownership by the Murrs along the St. Croix River, and the regulatory background leading to the case. Important points such as the unit of measurement in takings and its
0 views • 133 slides
Innovative Online Learning for Drug Court Professionals
Center for Court Innovation has introduced a new National Drug Court Online Learning System aimed at assisting drug court professionals. This system offers free access to web-based training, expert video lessons, virtual site visits to drug treatment courts, practitioner interviews, and a resource l
0 views • 8 slides
Overview of Georgia Court System
Detailed exploration of the Georgia court system, including the dual court system in the U.S., Supreme Court of Georgia jurisdiction, Court of Appeals jurisdiction, Chatham County Courthouse, and various courts within Chatham County. It covers civil and criminal cases handled by different courts, ju
0 views • 20 slides
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Supreme Court
In the 1960s, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a pivotal legislation that prohibited discrimination in public accommodations. This act represented a significant shift in focus towards minority rights. The Supreme Court's past rulings on the Civil Rights Act of 1875 influenced Congress t
0 views • 24 slides
Understanding the U.S. Court System: Jurisprudence and Structure
Law enforcement officers play a crucial role in the criminal justice system by understanding criminal jurisprudence and the court system's structure. This includes knowledge of different court levels, jurisdiction, and the adjudication process. The duality of courts, such as adult vs. juvenile court
0 views • 43 slides
Housing Court Advice Clinic Volunteer Training Highlights
Explore an insightful housing court advice clinic volunteer training program covering legal aspects of eviction laws, scenarios, court procedures, and defenses. Delve into topics like housing court basics, eviction reasons, defenses, important laws, rules, and grounds for eviction. Gain valuable adv
0 views • 36 slides
Landmark Case: Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) and Its Impact on Marriage Equality
Ohio couple's struggle for recognition of their out-of-state marriage due to a discriminatory law led to the significant Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). This case overturned Ohio's ban on same-sex marriage, setting a precedent for marriage equality nationwide. The involvement of inte
0 views • 11 slides