The Semantic Argument for the Existence of God - International Conference Insights
Explore the Semantic Argument and its implications for the existence of God as presented by Emanuel Rutten at the International Proofs of God's Existence Conference. The lecture delves into universal properties, formal versus non-formal properties, and the likelihood of God's existence based on thes
0 views • 14 slides
Actions Emanating from the Evaluation of the Governance Reform
The evaluation of the governance reform within the WMO aimed to assess its alignment with strategic objectives, effectiveness in responding to societal needs, coordination efficiency, decision-making process, agility, and more. Evaluation criteria included relevance, design validity, effectiveness,
2 views • 13 slides
Coherence and Cohesion
Cohesion and coherence play crucial roles in academic writing by ensuring logical flow and connection between ideas. Cohesion involves linking sentences using devices like conjunctions, pronouns, and repetition, while coherence focuses on organizing ideas into paragraphs that logically develop the a
0 views • 13 slides
Introduction to 1st Order Predicate Logic in Logical Thinking
Explore the limitations of propositional logic and the enhanced expressive power of 1st order predicate logic (PL1). Understand how PL1 allows for analyzing the structure of atomic propositions and proving arguments that depend on these structures. Through examples and valid argument schemata, delve
1 views • 26 slides
Universal Evaluation Framework: Simplifying Evaluation Processes
This session introduces the Universal Evaluation Framework (UEF) developed for evaluating QAA Scotland Enhancement Themes. Participants learn key evaluation questions, evidence capture, and the Theory of Change to enhance evaluation confidence. The QAA Scotland Evaluation Odyssey details historical
4 views • 14 slides
Implementing Blind Evaluation Pilot in HORIZON EUROPE: Key Facts and Process
HORIZON EUROPE is conducting a pilot on Blind Evaluation in the 2023-2024 work program to address biases in the research and innovation evaluation process. The pilot aims to assess the feasibility of blind evaluations in ensuring fairness and mitigating potential biases towards well-known organizati
9 views • 9 slides
Descartes' Cosmological Argument and Existence Inquiry
Descartes presents a cosmological argument questioning the existence of anything, focusing on what causes his own existence. He explores different aspects such as perfection, dependency, and the idea of God as a necessary cause for existence. Challenges about the nature of continued existence are al
0 views • 17 slides
The Five Parts of a Classical Argument
The classical argument is composed of five main parts: Introduction, Narration, Confirmation, Refutation and Concession, and Summation. Each part plays a crucial role in presenting a well-structured and persuasive argument, with devices and strategies such as diction, syntax, and figurative language
0 views • 6 slides
Developmental Evaluation for Better Decision-Making
Delve into the realm of developmental evaluation, focusing on its purpose, principles, and application in practice. Understand how developmental evaluation emphasizes real-time data collection for informed decision-making in complex systems. Learn about key principles such as developmental purpose,
1 views • 25 slides
Year 5 English Home Learning - Spelling and Balanced Argument Activities
Explore Year 5 English home learning activities for the week, including a spelling lesson using Oxford Owl, practicing challenging words, and planning a balanced argument on whether mobile phones should be allowed in school. Enhance your spelling skills and critical thinking through engaging tasks a
1 views • 20 slides
Enhancing Evaluation Capabilities in Mongolia for Agenda 2030
The Mongolian Evaluation Network in collaboration with UNDP is working to integrate the 2030 Agenda into national strategies and plans, establish institutional coordination mechanisms, align budgets, and enhance data monitoring systems. Key stakeholders including government agencies, NGOs, and inter
0 views • 9 slides
The Key Elements of an Argument
An argument is an intellectual process that involves a series of connected statements to establish the validity of a proposition. This process typically includes elements such as a hook, claim, support with reasons and evidence, and counterclaims with concessions and refutations. Each element plays
0 views • 13 slides
Preparing for Oral Argument in the Eleventh Circuit: Essential Tips
Understand the process of oral arguments in the Eleventh Circuit, including when to request oral argument, FRAP 34 guidelines, and how to handle the notice of oral argument. Get insights on making the most of oral argument opportunities and potentially shaping circuit law.
1 views • 32 slides
Indirect Proofs: Contradiction and Contraposition Examples
Indirect proofs offer a roundabout approach to proving statements, with argument by contradiction and argument by contraposition being the main techniques. Argument by contradiction involves supposing the statement is false and deriving a contradiction, while argument by contraposition relies on the
2 views • 18 slides
Valid and Invalid Arguments in Mathematics and Logic
In mathematics and logic, determining the validity of an argument depends on its form rather than its content. An argument is considered valid if the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. This determination involves analyzing the abstract form of the argument, constructing truth tables t
0 views • 32 slides
Evaluation in Education
Evaluation in education is a comprehensive term that encompasses measurement, testing, and qualitative examination of student behavior. It involves both quantitative and qualitative descriptions, along with value judgments. Differentiating from mere measurement, evaluation provides a deeper analysis
0 views • 28 slides
Should Students Have Homework? Crafting a Persuasive Argument
Crafting a persuasive argument on the topic of whether students should have homework, this piece presents a well-structured approach for expressing an opinion effectively. It guides the reader through forming an introduction with a clear position, developing supporting points in body paragraphs, and
1 views • 10 slides
Sustainable Evaluation Systems Workshop Summary
Workshop on Sustainable Evaluation Systems by Stephen Porter at the NEC Conference focused on defining evaluation systems, addressing their failures, and emphasizing the importance of quality, use, and networks in achieving sustainability. Participants engaged in activities such as bingo card introd
0 views • 38 slides
Subject-Object Asymmetries in Zazaki Argument Ellipsis
Many languages allow argument ellipsis (AE), where an argument can be omitted for sloppy or quantificational interpretations. Subject-object asymmetries arise in languages due to subject-verb agreement. This study presents evidence from Zazaki, a Northwestern Iranian language, challenging the anti-a
0 views • 28 slides
Creating a Persuasive Multimedia Argument
Harness the power of multimedia, following a comprehensive process similar to Ken Burns, to build a compelling argument by understanding the research question, conducting thorough research, scripting the issue with data-backed answers, organizing information effectively, incorporating additional mat
0 views • 12 slides
Impact and Evaluation Toolkit for Churches and Christian Charities
This toolkit aims to equip churches and Christian charities engaged in small-scale social action projects to think about impact, measure impact, choose data tools, reflect on evaluation data, and use it effectively. It covers principles of evaluation, setting objectives, selecting indicators, storyt
1 views • 34 slides
Overview of Monitoring and Evaluation in the GEF
The Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module focuses on promoting accountability and learning within the Global Environment Facility (GEF) through monitoring and evaluation activities. The GEF Independent Evaluation Office plays a crucial role in assessing results, effectiveness, and performance of
0 views • 25 slides
The Kalam Argument in the Cosmological Debate
The Kalam Argument, a form of the Cosmological Argument, asserts that everything with existence has a cause, including the universe. Developed by thinkers like al-Kindi, al-Ghazali, and William Lane Craig, it aims to prove that God was the initial cause of the universe. This argument suggests that t
0 views • 17 slides
Argument Structure and Diagramming in Critical Reasoning
Understanding the two types of argument structures - atomic and complex, with examples and diagrams. Learn how argument diagrams visually represent the structure of an argument, identify significant units like premises and conclusions, and distinguish main conclusions from sub-conclusions. Dive into
1 views • 10 slides
Anselm's Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
Anselm's Ontological Argument posits that the greatest possible being, referred to as God, must exist in reality because existing in reality is greater than existing only in thought. This argument centers on the concept of necessary vs. contingent beings and the idea that the greatest being cannot e
0 views • 32 slides
Mastering the Art of Argument in Essay Writing
Embrace the challenges of essay writing by understanding the essence of crafting a strong argument. Learn how to structure your thoughts logically, present evidence convincingly, and engage your readers effectively. Discover the importance of argument in various fields of life and the vital role it
0 views • 20 slides
Developing an Evaluation Work Plan for Effective Program Assessment
This presentation by Amy D. Andrade from San Jose State University focuses on developing an Evaluation Work Plan to identify responsibilities and timelines. It covers topics such as Evaluation Coaching Support, Webinar Outlines, Logic Model, Inputs-Outputs-Outcomes, Two Approaches to Evaluation, Pro
0 views • 29 slides
Analyzing Hume's Critique of the Design Argument by Michael Lacewing
The design argument contends that the intricate order in the universe suggests a designer. Michael Lacewing delves into Hume's objections to this argument, highlighting how the analogy between human-made objects and the universe falls short in establishing a similar cause. Hume questions the logic o
0 views • 10 slides
Evaluation Synthesis in Changing Contexts: Enhancing Knowledge for Development Effectiveness
Evaluation synthesis is crucial for promoting learning, reflection, and decision-making in development work. This process involves bringing together diverse knowledge sources to generate strategic insights and facilitate wider use of evaluation findings. The Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD
0 views • 20 slides
Evaluation of FME Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities
The mid-term evaluation process of FME Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities involves self-evaluation, partner evaluation, and panel evaluation. The procedure includes scientific review, evaluation by scholars, and innovation assessment. Key documents like self-reports, progress reports, and
1 views • 20 slides
Overview of Regular Evaluation 2017 Findings in Estonia
In the Regular Evaluation 2017, efforts were made to maximize the benefits of evaluation outcomes for various stakeholders in Estonia such as the state, society, and institutions. The evaluation focused on a range of actions including preparing legislation, finding experts, creating self-report form
0 views • 6 slides
Using Toulmin's Schema to Plan Effective Arguments
Explore how Carmen applies Toulmin's schema to craft a compelling argument about the benefits of girls playing first-person-shooter video games. Her reasoning, grounded in personal experiences and societal perceptions, demonstrates the intricate planning required to support each claim effectively. B
0 views • 10 slides
Unveiling Persuasive Strategies in Atticus' Closing Argument
Explore the comprehensive analysis of persuasive strategies employed by Atticus in his closing argument, including ethos, pathos, logos, and linguistic devices. Delve into the intricacies of sender-receiver relationship, message content, emotional appeals, logical reasoning, and language choices.
0 views • 6 slides
Innovations in Succinct Two-Message Argument Systems
Discover the advancements in compilers for succinct two-message argument systems, exploring concepts like verification of work, interactive proofs, and encryption. Key topics covered include the compiler process, results obtained with secure FHE, and applications in verifying exhaustive search like
0 views • 6 slides
Tips for Effective Synthesis Essays
Avoid common pitfalls in synthesis essays by ensuring sources are credible, not relying too heavily on quoting, and truly integrating sources into your argument. Learn to synthesize information effectively to enhance the strength of your argument and showcase your understanding of the topic.
0 views • 36 slides
Comprehensive Guide to Training Evaluation Methods
This detailed guide covers the aim of evaluation, evaluation methods, techniques of evaluation, types of evaluation (formative, process, outcome, impact), and the significance of formative and process evaluation in assessing training effectiveness. Learn about the key principles and practices involv
1 views • 45 slides
Combatting Bullying in Schools: A Persuasive Argument for Change
Discussing the damaging effects of bullying in schools, this article presents a compelling argument against this behavior. Highlighting the need for action, it delves into the emotional impact on students, emphasizing the urgency of addressing bullying in educational settings.
0 views • 36 slides
SDSU's Writing Placement Assessment (WPA)
SDSU's GWAR, an argument-based Writing Placement Assessment, requires students to write an essay analyzing a given argument. Scores range from 2-10, with different score bands dictating course requirements. Achieving a perfect score is subjective, emphasizing clear and concise argument analysis. Som
0 views • 35 slides
Ontological Argument for God's Existence and Challenges
The ontological argument posits that a being than which nothing greater can be conceived must exist in reality, not just in the mind. Critics challenge this argument, citing issues with defining God and debating whether existence can be a characteristic. Gaunilo and Kant present criticisms focusing
0 views • 30 slides
Different Versions of the Ontological Argument
This content delves into various versions of the ontological argument, including Descartes' and Kant's perspectives. Descartes sought to prove God's existence through reason alone, emphasizing the innate conception of a supremely perfect being. The challenges posed by Kant and Malcolm to this argume
0 views • 24 slides