Insights on Korean Peninsula Issues and US National Security
This content delves into various critical questions on the Korean Peninsula, including implications for US national security, dealing with North Korea, enhancing American leadership in Asia, the strength of South Korea's military, potential geopolitical dynamics, and alliance considerations. The analysis covers topics like imposing restrictions on companies linked to North Korea, diplomatic strategies towards China, South Korea's stance on North Korea's nuclear assets, potential shifts in regional alliances, and internal political scenarios in South Korea.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
ICAS Polling XIII: The Korean Peninsula Issues and US National Security 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Q1. Would you suppose that it would be a good idea to impose restrictions on certain companies, corporations and their executives for their malign activities with NK? Q2. Would you suppose that strengthening the US's commitment and resolve for diplomacy, defense, development and democracy would enhance American leadership in Asia vis- a-vis the rise of China? Q3. Would you suppose that the incumbent administration of SK may quietly consider the nuclear and missile arsenals of NK a significant national asset of the Korean Peninsula? Q4. Would you suppose that a "normal" Japan would enhance the strategic goal of the US in the Northeast Asia? Q5. Would you suppose that President Moon's "peace" would be achievable in the Korean Peninsula without "justice" being secured? ICAS ICAS Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither Poll
ICAS Polling XIII: The Korean Peninsula Issues and US National Security 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Q6. Would you suppose that the SK military in toto (i.e., arsenals, leadership, man power, morale, training, who is enemy?, will to fight) is a credible and strong enough match to the NK military as a whole at this juncture? Q7. Would you be surprised if President Moon's "peace" vision in the Korean Peninsula would include an "OpCon transition" and, subsequently, dismantling of the UNC (United Nations Command)? Q8. Would you be surprised if a fast evolving geopolitical dynamics in the Northeast Asia might engender circumstances leading to a potential collapse of the "Founding Principles" promulgated in the Constitution of SK? Q9. Would you suppose that SK ought to join the QUAD - a presumptive security alliance among Australia, Japan, India and the US in the Indo-Pacific Theatre - as a committed partner of the US- SK Alliance? Q10. Would you suppose that China would come to defend SK in a contingency when NK attacks SK? Q11. Would you suppose that the Blue House of SK may have turned into a Red house? Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither ICAS ICAS Poll
Q1. Would you suppose that it would be a good idea to impose restrictions on certain companies, corporations and their executives for their malign activities with NK? 2.9% 2.9% 94.3% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q2. Would you suppose that strengthening the US's commitment and resolve for diplomacy, defense, development and democracy would enhance American leadership in Asia vis-a-vis the rise of China? 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q3. Would you suppose that the incumbent administration of SK may quietly consider the nuclear and missile arsenals of NK a significant national asset of the Korean Peninsula? 8.6% 45.7% 45.7% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q4. Would you suppose that a "normal" Japan would enhance the strategic goal of the US in the Northeast Asia? 0.0% 17.1% 82.9% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q5. Would you suppose that President Moon's "peace" would be achievable in the Korean Peninsula without "justice" being secured? 8.6% 8.6% 82.9% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q6. Would you suppose that the SK military in toto (i.e., arsenals, leadership, man power, morale, training, who is enemy?, will to fight) is a credible and strong enough match to the NK military as a whole at this juncture? 0.0% 42.9% 57.1% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q7. Would you be surprised if President Moon's "peace" vision in the Korean Peninsula would include an "OpCon transition" and, subsequently, dismantling of the UNC (United Nations Command)? 2.9% 22.9% 74.3% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q8. Would you be surprised if a fast evolving geopolitical dynamics in the Northeast Asia might engender circumstances leading to a potential collapse of the "Founding Principles" promulgated in the Constitution of SK? 2.9% 45.7% 51.4% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q9. Would you suppose that SK ought to join the QUAD - a presumptive security alliance among Australia, Japan, India and the US in the Indo-Pacific Theatre - as a committed partner of the US-SK Alliance? 0.0% 5.7% 94.3% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q10. Would you suppose that China would come to defend SK in a contingency when NK attacks SK? 2.9% 11.4% 85.7% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
Q11. Would you suppose that the Blue House of SK may have turned into a Red house? 5.7% 28.6% 65.7% Yes No Declined/Maybe/Neither
