The Napa Valley Experience in Protecting Napa Valley

The Napa Valley, renowned for its wine, has secured protection worldwide in various jurisdictions. Experience ranging from challenges in China to refusals in Switzerland, Chile, and Vietnam sheds light on the efforts needed to safeguard this acclaimed region.

• Napa Valley
• Wine
• Protection
• Jurisdictions
• Challenges

osek879 Follow

Uploaded on Sep 14, 2024 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Presentation Transcript

1. The Napa Valley Experience in Protecting NAPA VALLEY Presented by: J. Scott Gerien, Esq. Outside Counsel, Napa Valley Vintners

2. Napa Valley Most acclaimed, profitable, well-known wine appellation in the United States American Viticultural Area (U.S. Appellation of Origin) Geographical Certification Mark Registration, Napa Valley Vintners Registrant

3. Worldwide Protection for NAPA VALLEY

4. Jurisdictions of Protection for NAPA VALLEY Australia (CM) Brazil (GI) Canada (GI) China (GI and CM) EU (GI) India (GI) Israel (CM) New Zealand (CM) Norway (CM) Singapore (CM) Taiwan (CM) Thailand (GI) Turkey (CM) U.S. (CM) GI = Geographical Indication Registration CM = Certification Mark Registration

5. China Experience Could not register as certification mark until U.S. certification mark registration issued Napa Valley first foreign wine GI registered in China by AQSIQ $100k+ in costs, travel, attorneys fees, expert fees Seven years Challenges of being first

6. Switzerland Experience Madrid extension of certification mark to CH Treated as equivalent to Swiss guarantee mark Refused, geographic terms descriptive, not registerable without acquired distinctiveness evidence Potential appeal to Federal Supreme Court Potential path through Canton system for recognizing wine appellations

7. Chile Experience Refusal of both GI and Certification Mark Apps GI refused for failure to demonstrate sufficient connection between product characteristics and region, expert report required Certification mark refused because Napa Valley was found to be geographically descriptive

8. Vietnam Experience GI application filed nearly 10 years ago Refused during TPP negotiations on basis U.S. needed to provide some equivalent concession No action taken during pendency of TPP, NOIP said would not issue until TPP signed Unclear what will happen now given Trump administration position on TPP

9. Russia Experience AOC application is still pending, has been refused at examination stage and Rospatent Board of Appeal Basis is AVA not evidence of appellation, certification mark not evidence of appellation, and two things are contradictory NVV intends to appeal to IP Court

10. Multilateral System NVV supports Lisbon, but it is beyond control of NVV Multilateral system for registration of geographical indications for wine per TRIPS Madrid-Protocol type system INTA Proposal for Multilateral System http://www.inta.org/Advocacy/Documents/INTAProp osalforMultilateralGIRegister.pdf

11. Thank you! J. Scott Gerien Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty sgerien@dpf-law.com Outside Counsel to Napa Valley Vintners