Brigade Commander and Staff Selection Process Decision Briefing

In the decision briefing for the selection process of APS JROTC Brigade Commander and Staff, the purpose is to determine the best process that meets the needs, constraints, and preferences. The plan is to implement a standardized nomination and evaluation process in the selection of Brigade Commander and Staff. The current selection process is ad hoc without eligibility requirements, causing challenges in identifying and evaluating cadets consistently. It aims to establish a more effective and structured selection process.

• Selection Process
• Decision Briefing
• Brigade Commander
• Staff
• APS JROTC

elo_cal Follow

Uploaded on Sep 29, 2024 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Presentation Transcript

1. BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF SELECTION PROCESS BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF SELECTION PROCESS DECISION BRIEFING DECISION BRIEFING

2. PURPOSE PURPOSE TO GAIN A DECISION ON THE BEST PROCESS FOR TO GAIN A DECISION ON THE BEST PROCESS FOR THE SELECTION OF APS JROTC BRIGADE THE SELECTION OF APS JROTC BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF COMMANDER AND STAFF

3. TO DETERMINE THE BEST BRIGADE AND STAFF TO DETERMINE THE BEST BRIGADE AND STAFF SELECTION PROCESS THAT MEETS THE DAI S SELECTION PROCESS THAT MEETS THE DAI S NEEDS, CONSTRAINTS, AND PREFERENCE NEEDS, CONSTRAINTS, AND PREFERENCE

4. IMPLEMENT A STANDARDIZED IMPLEMENT A STANDARDIZED NOMINATION NOMINATION AND EVALUATION AND EVALUATION PROCESS IN SELECTION OF PROCESS IN SELECTION OF BRIGADE BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF COMMANDER AND STAFF

5. BACKGROUND INFO FACTS ON THE PROBLEM DISCUSSION COURSES OF ACTION ANALYSIS OF COA S COMPARISON OF COA S CONCLUSION RESTATED RECOMMENDATION DECISION BACKGROUND INFO FACTS ON THE PROBLEM DISCUSSION COURSES OF ACTION ANALYSIS OF COA S COMPARISON OF COA S CONCLUSION RESTATED RECOMMENDATION DECISION

6. PRESENT SELECTION PROCESS IS AD HOC PRESENT SELECTION PROCESS IS AD HOC CADETS ARE IDENTIFIED DURING CURRENT SCHOOL YEAR CADETS ARE IDENTIFIED DURING CURRENT SCHOOL YEAR GROUP SETTING GROUP SETTING FOR BOTH AREAS OF EVALUATION FOR BOTH AREAS OF EVALUATION ALL CADETS NOT EVALUATED THE SAME DAY ALL CADETS NOT EVALUATED THE SAME DAY TIED IN WITH SYA SELECTION TIED IN WITH SYA SELECTION

7. NO ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS NO ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ALL UNITS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE ALL UNITS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE CADETS NOT EVALUATED THE SAME DAY CADETS NOT EVALUATED THE SAME DAY ONLY TWO PHASES EVALUATED ONLY TWO PHASES EVALUATED

8. DAI VALUES HIS BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF DAI VALUES HIS BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF BRIGADE STAFF WILL BE UTILIZED BRIGADE STAFF WILL BE UTILIZED ALL SCHOOLS WILL PARTICIPATE ALL SCHOOLS WILL PARTICIPATE SAI S AND CADETS WILL EMBRACE THE PROCESS SAI S AND CADETS WILL EMBRACE THE PROCESS

9. COA 1: CONTINUE WITH LAST YEARS PROCEDURE COA 1: CONTINUE WITH LAST YEAR S PROCEDURE COA 2: IMPLEMENT A STANDARDIZED NOMINATION COA 2: IMPLEMENT A STANDARDIZED NOMINATION AND SELECTION PROCESS AND SELECTION PROCESS COA 3: DO NOT HAVE A BRIGADE COMMANDER AND COA 3: DO NOT HAVE A BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF STAFF

10. TIME TIME AND CADRE REQUIRED AND CADRE REQUIRED TO CONDUCT TO CONDUCT EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS (NOMINEES STRESSED EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS (NOMINEES) ) STRESSED EVALUATION (COMFORT DURING PROCESS) EVALUATION (COMFORT DURING PROCESS) ASSIGNED ONLY TO POSITION COMPETED FOR ASSIGNED ONLY TO POSITION COMPETED FOR

11. COA 1: CONTINUE WITH LAST YEARS PROCEDURE ADVANTAGES LESS CADRE REQUIRED TO CONDUCT LESS COA 1: CONTINUE WITH LAST YEAR S PROCEDURE ADVANTAGES LESS CADRE REQUIRED TO CONDUCT LESS STRESS ON STRESS ON PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS BEING IN A GROUP SETTING BEING IN A GROUP SETTING DISADVANTAGES MORE TIME NOMINEES IDENTIFIED COMPETING SCHOOL YEAR LESS STRESS ON PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS DO NOT KNOW THE POSITION THEY WILL BE ASSIGNED DISADVANTAGES MORE TIME TO CONDUCT NOMINEES IDENTIFIED COMPETING SCHOOL YEAR LESS STRESS ON PARTICIPANTS AND RANDOM PARTICIPANTS DO NOT KNOW THE POSITION THEY WILL BE ASSIGNED TO CONDUCT AND RANDOM ANSWERING ANSWERING

12. COA 2: IMPLEMENT A STANDARDIZED NOMINATION COA 2: IMPLEMENT A STANDARDIZED NOMINATION AND SELECTION PROCESS AND SELECTION PROCESS ADVANTAGES LESS TIME REQUIRED TO CONDUCT PARTICIPANTS INDETIFIED PREVIOUS SCHOOL YEAR STRESSED EVAUATION OF DECISION MAKING AND THINKING SKILLS (INDIVIDUAL SETTING) KNOW WHAT POSITION YOU WILL BE ASSIGNED TO ADVANTAGES LESS TIME REQUIRED TO CONDUCT PARTICIPANTS INDETIFIED PREVIOUS SCHOOL YEAR STRESSED EVAUATION OF DECISION MAKING AND THINKING SKILLS (INDIVIDUAL SETTING) KNOW WHAT POSITION YOU WILL BE ASSIGNED TO DISADVANTAGES MORE CADRE REQUIRED TO CONDUCT PREVIOUS SCHOOL YEAR PARTICIPANT MAY NOT QUALIFY DISADVANTAGES MORE CADRE REQUIRED TO CONDUCT PREVIOUS SCHOOL YEAR PARTICIPANT MAY NOT QUALIFY

13. COA #2 a standardized selection process Less time required. Individual interviews, Group setting for inspection. More cadre required COA #2 COA #1 with last year s procedure COA #1 Continue Continue with last year s procedure Implement selection process Implement a standardized More time required. Group setting for interviews and inspection. Less cadre required Time and date is scheduled with SYA Time and date is scheduled ahead of time Random questioning answers. Nominee may not be proficient in the position No random answering. Nominee would demonstrate their proficiency in the position Decision making and critical thinking skills under stressful situation is not evaluated Stress added to the individual reflects decision making and critical thinking skills May not have the Knowledge of position assigned to Know the position competing for

14. TOTAL TOTAL ASSIGNED TO COMPETED POSITION ONLY ASSIGNED TO COMPETED POSITION ONLY COURSE OF ACTION COURSE OF ACTION TIME AND CADRE REQUIRED TIME AND CADRE REQUIRED IDENTIFY NOMINEES EARLY IDENTIFY NOMINEES EARLY STRESSED EVALUATION STRESSED EVALUATION 1 Continue with last year s procedure 2 Implement a standardize selection process 1= Least Effective 2 2 2 2 8 2 3 3 3 11 2= Somewhat Effective 3=Most Effective

15. COA 2 is clearly the best procedure to use to select the APS brigade commander and staff. Although more cadre staff is required to execute, it contribute favorably to the best and most qualified individual being selected.

16. IMPLEMENT A PROCESS THAT WILL IMPLEMENT A PROCESS THAT WILL STANDARDIZED NOMINATION AND STANDARDIZED NOMINATION AND SELECTION OF BRIGADE COMMANDER SELECTION OF BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF AND STAFF

17. Poor execution can render the most brilliant Poor execution can render the most brilliant concept null and void, but the most concept null and void, but the most magnificent execution can rarely offset magnificent execution can rarely offset the deadweight of a flawed concept. the deadweight of a flawed concept. GEN W.E. GEN W.E. Depuy Depuy, USA, Retired , USA, Retired

18. BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF SELECTION PROCESS BRIGADE COMMANDER AND STAFF SELECTION PROCESS DECISION BRIEFING DECISION BRIEFING