Writing a Winning Research Fellowship Proposal: Tips from NSF Graduate

Slide Note
Embed
Share

Learn valuable insights on crafting a successful fellowship proposal for research funding from the renowned Dr. David W. Mazyck, a Professor of Environmental Engineering Sciences. Discover why applying for the NSF Research Fellowship is beneficial, key strategies to stand out during the review process, and essential criteria for demonstrating Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts. Get ready to refine your proposal writing skills and increase your chances of securing funding!


Uploaded on Sep 21, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NSF GRADUATE How to write a winning fellowship RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP Dr. David W. Mazyck Professor Environmental Engineering Sciences

  2. Only 5 minutes to convince a tired reviewer, who s not an expert in your field, that your proposal is worth funding.

  3. WHY SHOULD YOU APPLY? Fully funded by a nicely sized stipend Develops skills in communicating your research Develops skills planning a series of experiments Provides understanding as to where the gaps in knowledge are in your field Makes writing your dissertation proposal a LOT easier

  4. NSF funds the researcher, not the research -Former NSF Reviewer Translation: They look at your potential to be a researcher Limited data OK! First-year graduate student OK! Highly encourage submitting in senior year Change your research topic OK!

  5. THE REVIEW PROCESS Each application has 3 reviewers Given your essays, transcripts, letters of recommendation, and application forms Rated based on Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Review Criteria listed for each on NSF s website

  6. STAND OUT! STAND OUT! Clearly organized easy to find key information Title the background, plan, methods, intellectual merit, broader impacts Use bold, key information Goals, hypothesis, broader impacts bold, italics, and underline for Use pictures! Worth 1000 words Schematics explain a lot while taking up little room

  7. DIRECTLY FROM RATING SHEET: Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts Ability to plan/conduct research To work as a member of team as well as independently To interpret and communicate research findings Integrate research and education to all levels, broad context Encourage diversity, broaden opportunities in science/research Enhance scientific understanding Benefit society

  8. INTELLECTUAL MERIT INTELLECTUAL MERIT Research/Internship experience 7 QUESTIONS 1. What did you do? 2. What did you learn? 3. Did you work in a team? 4. Did you conduct independent work? 5. Did you mentor anyone during the work? 6. Did you publish or disseminate? 7. Did anything fail where you had to overcome any adversity?

  9. BROADER IMPACTS BROADER IMPACTS (PERSONAL) Mentor undergrad and graduate students Assistance in lab, help them develop posters EXAMPLES Be a guest lecturer for your college/department or local community colleges Work with summer camps that tour campus and lead lab activities and lectures that explain your research Incorporate interdisciplinary studies to widen the impact

  10. BROADER IMPACTS BROADER IMPACTS (RESEARCH) Develop teaching materials regarding your research Work with a professor for a specific class EXAMPLES Demonstrate link between your research and how it benefits society Specific examples: health benefits, social aid, economic advantage Publish results! Be specific Results will be disseminated in the literature Present at conferences! Be specific

  11. GETTING STARTED Understand what application materials application materials are required Set a timeline timeline for accomplishing small tasks one at a time Start early! Different disciplines have different deadlines Keep NSF s rating sheet essays rating sheet close by when writing your Give copies of essays to professors, peers, friends, family, etc., to proofread proofread as many people as possible!

  12. GETTING STARTED (CONTD) Read Read and Read Important in order to know where the knowledge gaps need to be filled in!

  13. KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE!

  14. REQUIRED MATERIALS: Personal Statement/Future Goals What sets you apart? (Distance traveled) Examples of leadership, teamwork, outreach Use these examples to support future plans Why should they fund you specifically? How will receiving the fellowship contribute to your career goals? Show your passion!

  15. REQUIRED MATERIALS: Previous Research MAGIC 7 (Intellectual Merit) questions answered here. How did you get to where you are? Tell a story of how you developed your passion, skills as a researcher, a student, research interest Examples of teamwork and independent work List achievements, valuable contributions, dissemination of results List all applicable experiences

  16. REQUIRED MATERIALS: Proposed Research Background, Objectives, Methods, Intellectual Merit, Broader Impact, References. SHORT introduction and background only to show why your work is significant Make sure plan is feasible (time, resources ) How will your research contribute to the big picture outside of academia Novelty? Impact? Contingency NO JARGON!

  17. REQUIRED MATERIALS: Letters of Recommendation Who to ask? Research advisor (past and present) Industry/internship if supervisor has a PhD. If not, please see next page. New to UF? 2:1 vs. 1:2 Aunt Ginny? No! Does title matter? YES! University Pedigree MIT is viewed positively Dean, Department Chair, Professor

  18. REQUIRED MATERIALS: Letters of Recommendation What should they say? Potential to conduct research is outstanding Intellectual Merit of research Novelty Impact on the field Broader Impacts Application to the field Incorporation of underrepresented students Illegal to comment on your GPA without your permission

  19. FOLLOW THE RULES!!!! Standard 8.5" x 11" page size 12-point, Times New Roman font or Computer Modem (LaTeX) font 10-point font may be used for references, footnotes, figure captions and text within figures 1" margins on all sides Single spaced (approximately 5 lines per inch) or greater line spacing. Applicants should not use line spacing options such as exactly 12 point, that are less than single spaced. Failure to comply fully with the above requirements will result in the application being Failure to comply fully with the above requirements will result in the application being returned without review. returned without review.

  20. COMMON POSITIVE REVIEWS Demonstrates ability to plan and conduct research Well written proposal with clear hypothesis Potential to have a real impact Publications and presentations show effective communication Original research idea Demonstrates leadership ability Shows desire and ability to communicate science through outreach activities

  21. COMMON NEGATIVE REVIEWS Benefit to society not well expressed Methods and research plan are not clearly explained Unclear of the significance of this work No mention of how research will be disseminated to the public Limited research experience Research did not result in any presentations or scientific publications Lacks Broader Impacts Lacks Broader Impacts

  22. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES http://ufdc.ufl.edu/ufirgrants/all UF s grant repository of winning applications http://guides.uflib.ufl.edu/ UF s videos/slides of past grant workshops http://www.alexhunterlang.com/ Essay examples http://www.rachelcsmith.com/ Essay examples

Related


More Related Content