Writing a Scientific Proposal

1
Writing a Scientific Proposal
 
T
a
l
l
e
r
:
 
E
s
c
r
i
t
u
r
a
 
d
e
 
P
r
o
p
u
e
s
t
a
s
 
d
e
 
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
c
i
ó
n
P
a
n
a
m
á
 
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
 
M
a
y
o
 
 
2
0
1
0
M
a
r
i
a
 
E
l
e
n
a
 
P
e
ñ
a
r
a
n
d
a
,
 
P
h
D
Sustainable Sciences Institute
San Francisco, California, USA
mariaelena@ssilink.org
 
2
A
 
s
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
 
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
m
u
s
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
e
 
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
l
y
 
a
n
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
v
e
 
a
c
t
i
o
n
 
p
l
a
n
 
u
s
i
n
g
a
 
c
o
n
c
i
s
e
 
a
n
d
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
 
 
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
The Mayfield Handbook of Technical & Scientific Writing
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
3
T
h
e
 
m
a
i
n
 
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
i
s
 
t
o
 
b
e
 
f
i
n
a
n
c
e
d
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
 
d
o
 
n
o
t
 
g
e
t
 
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
 
d
u
e
 
t
o
I
n
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
 
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
 
(
n
o
t
 
c
l
e
a
r
 
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
)
P
o
o
r
 
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
 
(
b
a
d
l
y
 
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
)
P
o
o
r
 
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
 
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
 
L
a
c
k
 
o
f
 
p
e
r
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
e
4
R
e
p
o
r
t
 
i
n
 
a
 
p
r
e
c
i
s
e
 
a
n
d
 
c
o
n
c
i
s
e
 
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
 
i
s
 
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
 
,
 
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
v
e
 
a
n
d
 
p
e
r
t
i
n
e
n
t
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
 
i
s
 
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
 
- With the proposed 
methodology
 
- With the proposed 
budget
 (no more, no less)
-
 
W
i
t
h
 
t
h
e
 
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
 
h
i
s
t
o
r
y
,
 
g
o
o
d
 
t
e
a
m
,
 
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
d
a
t
a
,
 
l
o
g
i
s
t
i
c
s
P
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
 
m
u
s
t
 
b
e
 
c
o
h
e
r
e
n
t
 
a
n
d
 
l
o
g
i
c
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
 
5
H
o
w
 
d
o
 
y
o
u
 
n
a
r
r
o
w
 
d
o
w
n
 
y
o
u
r
 
t
h
e
m
e
?
Laboratory research / previous experience
Discussion with peers
Detected research needs on the subject: 
Preliminary
data
?
Recent publications, new ideas, hypothesis, working
with a good team
Project grants and calls for 
priorities
 / financing agencies
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
 
SELECTING YOUR THEME
6
D
O
N
T
 
B
E
 
T
O
O
 
A
M
B
I
T
I
O
U
S
!
 
 
 
Y
o
u
 
m
u
s
t
 
b
e
 
r
e
a
l
i
s
t
i
c
 
a
b
o
u
t
 
b
e
i
n
g
 
a
b
l
e
 
t
o
 
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
 
a
 
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
t
h
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
g
r
a
n
t
 
t
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
 
a
n
d
 
h
a
v
i
n
g
 
t
h
e
 
r
i
g
h
t
 
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
s
 
t
o
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
 
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Must 
interest
 you, it will be your working topic for a long time
Realistic
 and ready-to-use objectives
Have a 
clear methodology 
and a well-defined product
Be in accord with your 
academic background
Possess objective 
indicators
 (Scientific method)
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
 
SELECTING YOUR THEME
7
D
E
F
I
N
I
N
G
 
T
H
E
 
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
H
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
i
s
 
t
e
s
t
example: "The quality of coffee will be enhanced by using
endogenous organisms in
 the 
fermentation
 of 
Arabica coffee "
M
e
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
example: "Introduce space remote sensing as a monitoring and
management tool for coffee plantations"
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
 
t
o
 
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
 
a
n
 
a
p
p
l
i
e
d
 
h
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
i
s
example:  "Investigate the role of seedling containers in the plant
vigor of coffee grown in the nursery"
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
SELECTING YOUR THEME
8
Starting is the hardest part…
…but write your ideas down -- get something on paper
and don
t worry about grammar or spelling
Begin to identify your key references
Begin to identify your key references
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
Write a preliminary draft - this does not have to be perfect!
 
STARTING TO WRITE
9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O
u
t
l
i
n
e
 
t
h
e
 
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
 
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
 
i
n
 
a
 
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
 
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
    Question / Hypothesis
Objective(s)
Variables
Methods
Analysis
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
 
STARTING TO WRITE
10
AGENCY GUIDELINES
11
The title and the abstract are the first
sections read by the reviewers make them
attractive!!
The final title and the abstract are 
the last
sections you should write
, make them
interesting with new possible findings.
Begin with a 
working title
 but continue to
adapt it as you refine your ideas,
objectives, impact, etc.
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
AGENCY GUIDELINES
12
 
 
 
 
 
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
 
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
 
 
(
u
p
 
t
o
 
1
0
 
p
a
g
e
s
,
 
p
o
l
i
c
e
 
1
2
 
p
t
.
)
:
  - Table of contents
  - Project novelty and contribution to the subject
  - Rationale (with justification and references)
  - Proposed work (detail methodology) 
  - Expected results 
  - Impact of result to the scientific and technical advance of the
 
country 
  - Demonstrate project feasibility at the scientific, technical and
 
logistic levels (objectives vs methodology)
  - Bibliographic references (latest literature review)
  - Specific considerations (if any)
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
13
The evaluators are experts on the research area,
not necessarily specialists in the exact theme you
are proposing research
Help them to read:
  
- Provide a 
logical sequence
  
- Use 
clear, efficient and concise 
language
Convince them:
  
- 
Articulate 
feasibility, relevance
, and coherency
Respect the indications in the application form:
  
- Pay attention to content guidelines, 
  
 
restrictions, space allocations, budget limits
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
INTRODUCTIO
N
 
14
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
FRAME OF REFERENCE
PROBLEM - HYPOTHESIS
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
 
C
O
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
 
/
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
 
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
 
15
 
BROAD EXPECTED RESULTS
 - Goal
 
REFERENCE FRAMEWORK
 
Theoretical background of the topic
 
Problem background in the literature
 
PROBLEM
 
Problem identification / previous data
 
Define the project hypothesis
T
h
e
r
e
 
i
s
 
a
 
n
o
v
e
l
t
y
 
a
n
d
 
s
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
 
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
?
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
 
C
O
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
 
/
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
GENERAL OBJECTIVE:
INTRODUCTION
16
-
 
B
r
o
a
d
 
i
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
,
 
b
u
t
 
r
e
a
l
i
s
t
i
c
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
 
(
f
i
n
a
l
 
r
e
s
u
l
t
)
,
 
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
 
m
u
s
t
 
c
l
e
a
r
l
y
 
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
 
a
 
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
 
s
t
e
p
Example: "Augmentation among key players through all-inclusive and
participatory form of education (project PAKAPE)"
 
  
Specific objectives (objectives)
Quantifiable results and on a specific time for the project
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
:
 
"
R
e
v
i
e
w
 
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
 
P
A
K
A
P
E
 
w
i
t
h
 
e
d
u
c
a
t
o
r
s
 
a
n
d
 
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
 
"
:
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
 
C
O
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
 
/
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
General 
Objective
INTRODUCTION
17
 
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
background– problem identification
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
 
C
O
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
 
/
 
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
 
INTRODUCTION
18
First paragraph
-
General
-
 
Informs the reader why the subject is important:
Informs the reader why the subject is important:
“There is a great demand worldwide for good quality
“There is a great demand worldwide for good quality
coffee production.  Some of the best quality coffee is
coffee production.  Some of the best quality coffee is
produced in small village farms"   
produced in small village farms"   
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
background– problem identification
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
 
C
O
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
 
/
 
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
INTRODUCTION
19
Relationship with other studies
:
Background and importance
Background and importance
Summary of critical findings
Summary of critical findings
Critical review of results
Critical review of results
Approach contradictions
Approach contradictions
Do not forget your own work
Do not forget your own work
Include papers of your reviewers (if known)
Include papers of your reviewers (if known)
Mention your sources - annexes
Mention your sources - annexes
Arrive in a logical way to the problem
Arrive in a logical way to the problem
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
background– problem identification
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
C
O
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
 
/
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
 
INTRODUCTION
20
Known
: General-Y is very important (references)
(Y=good quality coffee production) 
Unknown
: Specific summary Y is not very well
characterized in X (references)
(X=small villages)
Question
: Therefore we propose to characterize Y in
the case of X that occurs in N number of cases during
the U period (references)
Methodological approach
: To do this we will measure
Y using the Q method (references)
G
 S
Q
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
INTRODUCTION
Background
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
 
C
O
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
 
/
 
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
 
A
21
- Concrete measures, quali / quantitative to respond the
- Concrete measures, quali / quantitative to respond the
question expressed on the hypothesis
question expressed on the hypothesis
- Direct the activities of the proposed work
- Direct the activities of the proposed work
- Guide the evaluation of fulfilled goals
- Guide the evaluation of fulfilled goals
- List your specific objectives as a chronological sequence
- List your specific objectives as a chronological sequence
or  logical flow
or  logical flow
    
    
Objective 1:
Objective 1:
    
    
Objective 2:
Objective 2:
    
    
Objective 3:
Objective 3:
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
 
C
O
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
 
/
 
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
INTRODUCTION
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES (OBJECTIVES):
22
Problem relevance
- Why research 
is important 
and why research must be done?
- 
Document the need
, indicate the statistical data that supports
your case, provide examples
- Why your research is 
different
 to what has been done up to
today?
- Which are 
the innovation 
and sanitary/ social/ ecological, etc,
opportunity ?
- Which is the innovation and the 
international, regional
,
national, local opportunity?
- Offer hope to reviewers, how your project will 
make a
difference?
- How will you contribute to 
solve the problem
?
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
P
R
R
O
O
J
J
E
E
C
C
T
T
 
 
J
J
U
U
S
S
T
T
I
I
F
F
I
I
C
C
A
A
T
T
I
I
O
O
N
N
JUSTIFICATION
23
U
U
s
s
e
e
 
 
o
o
f
f
 
 
f
f
i
i
g
g
u
u
r
r
e
e
s
s
 
 
a
a
n
n
d
d
 
 
m
m
a
a
p
p
s
s
- 
ONLY if they contribute to the justification (i.e.
ONLY if they contribute to the justification (i.e.
incidence curve) or in the proposed work (i.e.
incidence curve) or in the proposed work (i.e.
map)
map)
- Few (one or two) to avoid large paragraphs
- Few (one or two) to avoid large paragraphs
- Must be self-explicative and simple
- Must be self-explicative and simple
- 
- 
Avoid tables or figures previously published
Avoid tables or figures previously published
,
,
redirect to the concerned bibliographic reference
redirect to the concerned bibliographic reference
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
JUSTIFICATION
24
 
Parallel activities for each objective
Parallel activities for each objective
Only for the proposed objectives
Only for the proposed objectives
- Could be divided by chapters
- Could be divided by chapters
-  Depends of the type of proposal: 
-  Depends of the type of proposal: 
pilot, training,
pilot, training,
intervention and follow-up, validation, sensibility, specificity.
intervention and follow-up, validation, sensibility, specificity.
- Include references and annexes (
- Include references and annexes (
tools – surveys, etc.) 
tools – surveys, etc.) 
-
-
 
 
I
I
n
n
v
v
o
o
l
l
v
v
e
e
 
 
a
a
n
n
 
 
s
s
t
t
a
a
t
t
i
i
s
s
t
t
i
i
c
c
i
i
a
a
n
n
 
 
o
o
n
n
 
 
t
t
h
h
e
e
 
 
p
p
r
r
o
o
p
p
o
o
s
s
a
a
l
l
,
,
 
 
d
d
e
e
v
v
e
e
l
l
o
o
p
p
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
a
a
n
n
d
d
 
 
a
a
n
n
a
a
l
l
y
y
s
s
i
i
s
s
 
 
p
p
h
h
a
a
s
s
e
e
s
s
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
P
r
r
o
o
p
p
o
o
s
s
e
e
d
d
 
 
w
w
o
o
r
r
k
k
BODY OF WORK
25
D
D
e
e
f
f
i
i
n
n
i
i
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
s
s
 
 
a
a
n
n
d
d
 
 
b
b
a
a
c
c
k
k
g
g
r
r
o
o
u
u
n
n
d
d
:
:
 
 
area /population-sample, epidemiological design, independent
area /population-sample, epidemiological design, independent
variables, dependent variables, intervention (you can include
variables, dependent variables, intervention (you can include
maps or figures)
maps or figures)
 
Activities
:
 (
specific objectives)
 1 (
Specific objective 
1)
   
1.a. 
Activity/experiment 1
Activity/experiment 1
    1.b. 
Activity/experiment 2
Activity/experiment 2
    1.c. 
Activity/experiment 3
Activity/experiment 3
 
2 (
Specific objective
 2)
   2.a. Specific Objective
   2.b. Specific Objective
 3 (
Specific Objective
 3)
 
etc.
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
P
r
r
o
o
p
p
o
o
s
s
e
e
d
d
 
 
w
w
o
o
r
r
k
k
BODY OF WORK
26
For each activity, why is your method the best?
  
Only
 include the activities related
the proposed    objectives
  Give small details:
-methodology, who and when?
-controls
-instruments to use
-information to collect
-analysis of data
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
P
P
r
r
o
o
p
p
o
o
s
s
e
e
d
d
 
 
w
w
o
o
r
r
k
k
ACTIVITIES
BODY OF WORK
27
Parallel activities for each objective
Could be divided on chapters
 Depends on the type of proposal: pilot, training,
intervention-follow-up, validation, sensibility, specificity.
Include references and annexes (tools – surveys, etc.)
Involve an statistician
 on the proposal, development and
analysis phases
Methodology of collection and information analysis
Methodology of collection and information analysis
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
P
r
r
o
o
p
p
o
o
s
s
e
e
d
d
 
 
w
w
o
o
r
r
k
k
 
BODY OF WORK
28
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
 
(
S
u
b
t
i
t
l
e
 
o
r
 
t
h
e
 
f
i
r
s
t
 
s
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
p
a
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
"Space Remote Sensing"
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
 
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
 
(
r
e
s
t
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
p
a
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
)
The method consists of xxx developed by Drs...(ref)
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
 
 
 
 
 
 
P
P
r
r
o
o
p
p
o
o
s
s
e
e
d
d
 
 
w
w
o
o
r
r
k
k
 
M
E
T
H
O
D
S
BODY OF WORK
29
-You can reference a previous paper
related to the methods you will use, but be
specific.
  
NOT CLEAR
 
“The method already described will
be used (9)"
 
 
BETTER 
“Space Remote sensing (
described by,
ref) will be used to monitor...."
           
-Describe briefly the protocol
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
P
P
r
r
o
o
p
p
o
o
s
s
e
e
d
d
 
 
w
w
o
o
r
r
k
k
M
ETHODS: References
 
BODY OF WORK
30
-List precisely the expected results at the
-List precisely the expected results at the
end of the project for each activity and
end of the project for each activity and
their global impact (implementation of
their global impact (implementation of
management strategies for pests
management strategies for pests
and   diseases will increase the
and   diseases will increase the
sustainability of coffee production by.....)
sustainability of coffee production by.....)
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
E
X
P
E
C
T
E
D
 
R
E
S
U
L
T
S
 
-
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
e
 
t
h
e
n
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
s
a
m
e
 
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
 aims and activities
RESULTS
31
-
Knowledge  and abilities acquired
Knowledge  and abilities acquired
-
Technology developed / incorporated
Technology developed / incorporated
-
Human resources formation
Human resources formation
-
Diffusion and publications
Diffusion and publications
-
Transference (explained in methods)
Transference (explained in methods)
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
I
m
p
a
c
t
Baseline (pre) and expected (post)
Baseline (pre) and expected (post)
COUNTRY / REGION / INSTITUTION
RESULTS
32
Academic and experiment background in the
subject from the candidate, the team, and the
institution
Location, infrastructure and adequate equipment
Logistics of access to primary and secondary
data
Time and budget consistent with objectives,
    infrastructure and logistics
Institutional administrative capacity,
   other funding sources confluent
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
,
 
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
 
a
n
d
 
l
o
g
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
OTHER SUPPORT
33
LIMITATIONS - WEAKNESSES
 
-Scientific, technical, logistics 
-Of probability, from particular to general
 
Sequential activities: if one of the first fails
 
It uses a single device throughout the country: if it breaks
 
If extraordinary rains as in previous year
 
If social instability in the region, alternative region
 
If periodic costs and inflation rate soars
 
If a giant meteorite hits the world noting matters
                              
MITIGATE POSSIBLE DIFFICULTIES:
Only feasible and more likely difficulties
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
,
 
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
 
a
n
d
 
l
o
g
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
LIMITATIONS
34
 According format of scientific publications
 
Only relevant
, logical number: 10 to 30
 Check with the text that is listed or missing
 Reviewers : international - regional - local
 
Own references 
and from 
possible reviewers
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
 
C
O
N
S
I
D
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
Ethical, environmental, intellectual property, regional, etc.
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
S
REFERENCES
35
-Timeline, in the same order and numbering
of the activities by stage and by month
-If more than one institution is involved,
clarify what each one is doing
Include analysis, reporting and monitoring
(at least as often as requested by agency)
Show that you are familiar with the
methods.
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
C
R
O
N
O
G
R
A
M
TIME LINE
36
Cover letter or letter of intent
Annexes:
- Letters of recommendation
- Letters from collaborators
- Resume of researchers (proposed function)
- Instruments (ex. surveys) or protocols
- Ethical committee
- Partnerships
- Codification manuals
Additional information
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
ATTACHMENTS
37
QUALITY
QUALITY
Creativity
Originality
Potential for discovery
COHERENT
Logic / Racional
Background of the group
Literature support
Clarity
 
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
EVALUATION CRITERIA
RELEVANCE
PERTINENCE
COST-EFECTIVITY
                
                
38
H
H
o
o
w
w
 
 
p
p
r
r
o
o
p
p
o
o
s
s
a
a
l
l
s
s
 
 
a
a
r
r
e
e
 
 
e
e
v
v
a
a
l
l
u
u
a
a
t
t
e
e
d
d
1.
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
:
 
d
o
e
s
 
t
h
e
 
s
t
u
d
y
 
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
 
a
n
 
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
?
 
H
o
w
 
w
i
l
l
 
s
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
 
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
 
b
e
 
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
d
?
2.
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
:
 
a
r
e
 
d
e
s
i
g
n
 
a
n
d
 
m
e
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
 
w
e
l
l
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
 
a
n
d
 
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
?
 
A
r
e
 
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
 
a
r
e
a
s
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
?
3.
I
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
:
 
a
r
e
 
t
h
e
r
e
 
n
o
v
e
l
 
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
 
o
r
 
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
e
s
?
4.
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
o
r
:
 
i
s
 
t
h
e
 
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
o
r
 
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
l
y
 
t
r
a
i
n
e
d
?
5.
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
:
 
d
o
 
t
h
e
 
s
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
 
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
 
t
o
 
t
h
e
 
p
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
 
o
f
 
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
?
 
A
r
e
 
t
h
e
r
e
u
n
i
q
u
e
 
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
s
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
 
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
?
O
v
e
r
a
l
l
 
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
 
&
 
S
c
o
r
e
 
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
 
i
m
p
a
c
t
 
o
n
 
t
h
e
 
f
i
e
l
d
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
EVALUATION CRITERIA
39
H
H
o
o
w
w
 
 
n
n
o
o
t
t
 
 
t
t
o
o
 
 
b
b
e
e
 
 
a
a
c
c
c
c
e
e
p
p
t
t
e
e
d
d
1.
Illegible proposal
2.
Not persuasive
3.
Untidy presentation
4.
Unclear
5.
Vague
6.
Lack of planning
7.
Budget problems
8.
Omission of supplemental materials
9.
Weak recommendations
10.
Lack of compliance with deadline
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
EVALUATION CRITERIA
40
Get feedback
Get feedback
Present your work orally, formally or informally
- It reveals gaps
- Receive suggestions
- Re-write
Re-read the guidelines
Re-read the guidelines
Review the checklist one last time
Review the checklist one last time
SEND IT IN TIME WITH ALL THE ATTACHMENTS!
SEND IT IN TIME WITH ALL THE ATTACHMENTS!
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
41
Received financing!
The work is just beginning
Be aware of reporting requirements
Most agencies do not send additional funds until your
mid term report is received
Many agencies ask for interim and final reports
 
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
ACCEPTED
42
Keep trying!
- No Do not give up – you are in good company
-
It is not uncommon to be rejected (is a learning
process)
-
- Modify the proposal as the recommendations received
and send it again
- Sometimes you must send the proposal on several
occasions or to different agencies
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
 
W
r
i
t
i
n
g
 
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Sustainable
Sciences
Institute
Did not received funding
NOT ACCEPTED
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Develop your skills in crafting effective scientific proposals with this workshop led by Dr. Maria Elena Pearanda from the Sustainable Sciences Institute in San Francisco. Dive into key elements of proposal writing and enhance your ability to communicate research ideas persuasively.

  • Workshop
  • Proposal Writing
  • Research
  • Skills Development
  • Scientific Communication

Uploaded on Mar 09, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Writing a Scientific Proposal Taller: Escritura de Propuestas de Investigaci n Panam | Mayo 2010 Maria Elena Pe aranda, PhD Sustainable Sciences Institute San Francisco, California, USA mariaelena@ssilink.org 1

  2. A scientific proposal must communicate efficiently an innovative action plan using a concise and specific language The Mayfield Handbook of Technical & Scientific Writing 2 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  3. The main objective of the proposal is to be financed $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Proposals do not get approved due to Inadequate concepts (not clear understanding) Poor presentation (badly written) Poor comprehension of the selection process Lack of persistence 3 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  4. Report in a precise and concise language Research is important , innovative and pertinent Research is feasible - With the proposed methodology - With the proposed budget (no more, no less) - With the personal history, good team, preliminary data, logistics Presentation must be coherent and logic 4 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  5. SELECTING YOUR THEME How do you narrow down your theme? Laboratory research / previous experience Discussion with peers Detected research needs on the subject: Preliminary data? Recent publications, new ideas, hypothesis, working with a good team Project grants and calls for priorities / financing agencies 5 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  6. SELECTING YOUR THEME DON T BE TOO AMBITIOUS! You must be realistic about being able to complete a project within the grant timeframe and having the right contacts to establish collaborations Must interest you, it will be your working topic for a long time Realistic and ready-to-use objectives Have a clear methodology and a well-defined product Be in accord with your academic background Possess objective indicators (Scientific method) 6 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  7. SELECTING YOUR THEME DEFINING THE PROJECT Hypothesis test example: "The quality of coffee will be enhanced by using endogenous organisms in the fermentation of Arabica coffee " Methodological example: "Introduce space remote sensing as a monitoring and management tool for coffee plantations" Descriptive to generate an applied hypothesis example: "Investigate the role of seedling containers in the plant vigor of coffee grown in the nursery" 7 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  8. STARTING TO WRITE Write a preliminary draft - this does not have to be perfect! Starting is the hardest part but write your ideas down -- get something on paper and don t worry about grammar or spelling Begin to identify your key references 8 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  9. STARTING TO WRITE Outline the research activities in a logical sequence Question / Hypothesis Objective(s) Variables Methods Analysis 9 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  10. AGENCY GUIDELINES 10

  11. AGENCY GUIDELINES The title and the abstract are the first sections read by the reviewers make them attractive!! The final title and the abstract are the last sections you should write, make them interesting with new possible findings. Begin with a working title but continue to adapt it as you refine your ideas, objectives, impact, etc. 11 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  12. Technical description (up to 10 pages, police 12 pt.): - Table of contents - Project novelty and contribution to the subject - Rationale (with justification and references) - Proposed work (detail methodology) - Expected results - Impact of result to the scientific and technical advance of the country - Demonstrate project feasibility at the scientific, technical and logistic levels (objectives vs methodology) - Bibliographic references (latest literature review) - Specific considerations (if any) 12 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  13. INTRODUCTION The evaluators are experts on the research area, not necessarily specialists in the exact theme you are proposing research Help them to read: - Provide a logical sequence - Use clear, efficient and concise language Convince them: - Articulate feasibility, relevance, and coherency Respect the indications in the application form: - Pay attention to content guidelines, restrictions, space allocations, budget limits 13 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  14. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION /INTRODUCTION GENERAL OBJECTIVE FRAME OF REFERENCE PROBLEM - HYPOTHESIS SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES 14 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  15. INTRODUCTION ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION /INTRODUCTION GENERAL OBJECTIVE: BROAD EXPECTED RESULTS - Goal REFERENCE FRAMEWORK Theoretical background of the topic Problem background in the literature PROBLEM Problem identification / previous data Define the project hypothesis There is a novelty and scientific opportunity? 15 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  16. INTRODUCTION ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION /INTRODUCTION General Objective - Broad intention, but realistic of the project (final result), specific objectives must clearly describe a project step Example: "Augmentation among key players through all-inclusive and participatory form of education (project PAKAPE)" Specific objectives (objectives) Quantifiable results and on a specific time for the project Example: "Review project PAKAPE with educators and members of the community " : 16 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  17. INTRODUCTION ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION / INTRODUCTION background problem identification General Specific 17 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  18. INTRODUCTION ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION / INTRODUCTION background problem identification First paragraph -General - Informs the reader why the subject is important: There is a great demand worldwide for good quality coffee production. Some of the best quality coffee is produced in small village farms" 18 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  19. INTRODUCTION ORIGINALCONTRIBUTION /INTRODUCTION background problem identification Relationship with other studies: Background and importance Summary of critical findings Critical review of results Approach contradictions Do not forget your own work Include papers of your reviewers (if known) Mention your sources - annexes Arrive in a logical way to the problem 19 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  20. INTRODUCTION ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION / INTRODUCTION Background Known: General-Y is very important (references) (Y=good quality coffee production) G S Q A Unknown: Specific summary Y is not very well characterized in X (references) (X=small villages) Question: Therefore we propose to characterize Y in the case of X that occurs in N number of cases during the U period (references) Methodological approach: To do this we will measure Y using the Q method (references) Proposal Writing Workshop Institute 20 Sustainable Sciences

  21. INTRODUCTION ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION / INTRODUCTION SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES (OBJECTIVES): - Concrete measures, quali / quantitative to respond the question expressed on the hypothesis - Direct the activities of the proposed work - Guide the evaluation of fulfilled goals - List your specific objectives as a chronological sequence or logical flow Objective 1: Objective 2: Objective 3: 21 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  22. JUSTIFICATION PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Problem relevance - Why research is important and why research must be done? - Document the need, indicate the statistical data that supports your case, provide examples - Why your research is different to what has been done up to today? - Which are the innovation and sanitary/ social/ ecological, etc, opportunity ? - Which is the innovation and the international, regional, national, local opportunity? - Offer hope to reviewers, how your project will make a difference? - How will you contribute to solve the problem? 22 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  23. JUSTIFICATION Use of figures and maps - ONLY if they contribute to the justification (i.e. incidence curve) or in the proposed work (i.e. map) - Few (one or two) to avoid large paragraphs - Must be self-explicative and simple - Avoid tables or figures previously published, redirect to the concerned bibliographic reference 23 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  24. BODY OF WORK Proposed work Parallel activities for each objective Only for the proposed objectives - Could be divided by chapters - Depends of the type of proposal: pilot, training, intervention and follow-up, validation, sensibility, specificity. - Include references and annexes (tools surveys, etc.) - Involve an statistician on the proposal, development and analysis phases 24 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  25. BODY OF WORK Proposed work Definitions and background: area /population-sample, epidemiological design, independent variables, dependent variables, intervention (you can include maps or figures) Activities: (specific objectives) 1 (Specific objective 1) 1.a. Activity/experiment 1 1.b. Activity/experiment 2 1.c. Activity/experiment 3 2 (Specific objective 2) 2.a. Specific Objective 2.b. Specific Objective 3 (Specific Objective 3) etc. 25 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  26. BODY OF WORK Proposed work ACTIVITIES For each activity, why is your method the best? Only include the activities related the proposed objectives Give small details: -methodology, who and when? -controls -instruments to use -information to collect -analysis of data 26 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  27. BODY OF WORK Proposed work Parallel activities for each objective Could be divided on chapters Depends on the type of proposal: pilot, training, intervention-follow-up, validation, sensibility, specificity. Include references and annexes (tools surveys, etc.) Involve an statistician on the proposal, development and analysis phases Methodology of collection and information analysis 27 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  28. BODY OF WORK Proposed work METHODS General (Subtitle or the first sentence in the paragraph "Space Remote Sensing" Specific details (rest of the paragraph) The method consists of xxx developed by Drs...(ref) 28 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  29. BODY OF WORK Proposed work METHODS: References -You can reference a previous paper related to the methods you will use, but be specific. NOT CLEAR The method already described will be used (9)" BETTER Space Remote sensing (described by, ref) will be used to monitor...." -Describe briefly the protocol 29 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  30. RESULTS EXPECTED RESULTS -List precisely the expected results at the end of the project for each activity and their global impact (implementation of management strategies for pests and diseases will increase the sustainability of coffee production by.....) -Organize then in the same sequence of the aims and activities 30 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  31. RESULTS Impact Baseline (pre) and expected (post) COUNTRY / REGION / INSTITUTION - Knowledge and abilities acquired - Technology developed / incorporated - Human resources formation - Diffusion and publications - Transference (explained in methods) 31 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  32. OTHER SUPPORT Scientific, technical and logistical feasibility of the project Academic and experiment background in the subject from the candidate, the team, and the institution Location, infrastructure and adequate equipment Logistics of access to primary and secondary data Time and budget consistent with objectives, infrastructure and logistics Institutional administrative capacity, other funding sources confluent 32 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  33. LIMITATIONS Scientific, technical and logistical feasibility of the project LIMITATIONS - WEAKNESSES -Scientific, technical, logistics -Of probability, from particular to general Sequential activities: if one of the first fails It uses a single device throughout the country: if it breaks If extraordinary rains as in previous year If social instability in the region, alternative region If periodic costs and inflation rate soars If a giant meteorite hits the world noting matters MITIGATE POSSIBLE DIFFICULTIES: Only feasible and more likely difficulties 33 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  34. REFERENCES REFERENCES According format of scientific publications Only relevant, logical number: 10 to 30 Check with the text that is listed or missing Reviewers : international - regional - local Own references and from possible reviewers SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Ethical, environmental, intellectual property, regional, etc. 34 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  35. TIME LINE CRONOGRAM -Timeline, in the same order and numbering of the activities by stage and by month -If more than one institution is involved, clarify what each one is doing Include analysis, reporting and monitoring (at least as often as requested by agency) Show that you are familiar with the methods. Sustainable Sciences Institute 35 Proposal Writing Workshop

  36. ATTACHMENTS Additional information Cover letter or letter of intent Annexes: - Letters of recommendation - Letters from collaborators - Resume of researchers (proposed function) - Instruments (ex. surveys) or protocols - Ethical committee - Partnerships - Codification manuals 36 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  37. EVALUATION CRITERIA QUALITY Creativity Originality Potential for discovery RELEVANCE PERTINENCE COHERENT Logic / Racional Background of the group Literature support Clarity COST-EFECTIVITY 37 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  38. EVALUATION CRITERIA How proposals are evaluated 1. Significance: does the study address an important problem? How will scientific knowledge be advanced? 2. Approach: are design and methodology well- developed and appropriate? Are problem areas address? 3. Innovation: are there novel concepts or approaches? 4. Investigator: is the investigator appropriately trained? 5. Environmental: do the scientific environment contribute to the probability of success? Are there unique features of the scientific environment? Overall Evaluation & Score reflects impact on the field 38 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  39. EVALUATION CRITERIA How not to be accepted Illegible proposal Not persuasive Untidy presentation Unclear Vague Lack of planning Budget problems Omission of supplemental materials Weak recommendations 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Lack of compliance with deadline 39 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  40. Get feedback Present your work orally, formally or informally - It reveals gaps - Receive suggestions - Re-write Re-read the guidelines Review the checklist one last time SEND IT IN TIME WITH ALL THE ATTACHMENTS! 40 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  41. ACCEPTED Received financing! The work is just beginning Be aware of reporting requirements Most agencies do not send additional funds until your mid term report is received Many agencies ask for interim and final reports 41 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

  42. NOT ACCEPTED Did not received funding Keep trying! - No Do not give up you are in good company - It is not uncommon to be rejected (is a learning process) - - Modify the proposal as the recommendations received and send it again - Sometimes you must send the proposal on several occasions or to different agencies 42 Sustainable Sciences Institute Proposal Writing Workshop

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#