Thriving Community-Led Fisheries Governance

Successful Community Governance
Systems in the Small-Scale Fishing
Sector & Communities Rights to their
Natural Resources relating to Fisheries
Legal Resources Centre
2 May 2023
Step 1:
Understand
the SSF sector
This was what the policy process entailed at
a high level (community specific
assessments were still required).
Unfortunately, the regulations became the
‘blueprint’ (not the MLRA itself) –
contradictory to the policy; little attempt to
understand the context, eg the existing
governance structures, how communities
organise, the role of fishing in family and
community relations.
Build on existing strengths and cater for
existing weaknesses rather than starting
from scratch.
Step 2:
Understanding legal
framework:
constitutional and
customary rights.
Constitution recognises customary fishing
rights (
Gongqose
) as pre-existing: this has
not been understood and pursued
anywhere else.
It means that the regulation of customary
rights must be a constitutionally compliant
limitation.
Policy (and court case) identified
constitutional basis for recognition of the
sector: food security, equality, freedom of
culture and trade, gender equality.
It is entirely different to commercial and
recreational sectors – but treated as
extensions (for example in allocations)
Step 3.
Creating
appropriate
frameworks
for different
contexts.
One size fits all – no understanding of the context
Co-ops – corporate structure with a pro forma
‘constitution’. Idea was to not repeat the failures of
the land sector.
But there is no magic in the structure itself.
Structures that don’t fit local realities will fail.
No capacity, no support. Often governing a group of
individuals rather than a ‘community’.
Impact is worse than in the land sector: local
fisheries governance has every day impact on food
security, access, etc.
 
Step 5. Assessment…….(should not delay
implementation of the MLRA)
Two further
thoughts
Co-management is fundamental: we have
not properly understood or implemented
this at all.
Marine Spatial Planning: deadline for
comments on plans is next Tuesday, but no
fishers have been notified……..
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore successful community governance systems in small-scale fishing. Emphasize understanding legal frameworks, creating appropriate structures, and optimizing co-management practices. Address challenges and promote inclusive decision-making for sustainable fisheries management.

  • Community
  • Fisheries
  • Governance
  • Legal Frameworks
  • Co-Management

Uploaded on Dec 23, 2023 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Successful Community Governance Systems in the Small-Scale Fishing Sector & Communities Rights to their Natural Resources relating to Fisheries Legal Resources Centre 2 May 2023

  2. This was what the policy process entailed at a high level (community specific assessments were still required). Unfortunately, the regulations became the blueprint (not the MLRA itself) contradictory to the policy; little attempt to understand the context, eg the existing governance structures, how communities organise, the role of fishing in family and community relations. Build on existing strengths and cater for existing weaknesses rather than starting from scratch. Step 1: Understand the SSF sector

  3. Constitution recognises customary fishing rights (Gongqose) as pre-existing: this has not been understood and pursued anywhere else. It means that the regulation of customary rights must be a constitutionally compliant limitation. Policy (and court case) identified constitutional basis for recognition of the sector: food security, equality, freedom of culture and trade, gender equality. It is entirely different to commercial and recreational sectors but treated as extensions (for example in allocations) Step 2: Understanding legal framework: constitutional and customary rights.

  4. Step 3. Creating appropriate frameworks for different contexts. One size fits all no understanding of the context Co-ops corporate structure with a pro forma constitution . Idea was to not repeat the failures of the land sector. But there is no magic in the structure itself. Structures that don t fit local realities will fail. No capacity, no support. Often governing a group of individuals rather than a community . Impact is worse than in the land sector: local fisheries governance has every day impact on food security, access, etc. Step 5. Assessment .(should not delay implementation of the MLRA)

  5. Co-management is fundamental: we have not properly understood or implemented this at all. Marine Spatial Planning: deadline for comments on plans is next Tuesday, but no fishers have been notified .. Two further thoughts

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#