The Role of Citizens Oversight Committee in Education

THE ROLE OF THE
CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT
COMMITTEE
Presented by:
Valerie Pitts
Superintendent
PROPOSITION 39
REQUIREMENTS
1.
 
Citizen Oversight Committee
2.
 
Uses of Bond Proceeds
3.
 
Audit Requirements
4.
 
New Cause of Action
CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT
COMMITTEE (“COC”)
What Is Scope of COC Authority?
Who Should Serve on COC?
What Technical Assistance Must Be
Provided to COC?
What Information Does the COC
Need?
What are Legal Requirements for
COC Members and Meetings?
SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY
Roles and Responsibilities
The Board of Trustees
The Citizens’ Oversight Committee
Staff
SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES:
Evaluates school facilities needs
Approves additions or alterations to
existing buildings
Determines when new facilities are
needed
Selects and acquires sites
Determines the method of financing
SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (cont’d):
Approves selection of architects and
engineers
Authorizes projects for bid
Awards contracts for design and
construction
Approves change orders to construction
contracts
Accepts completed facilities projects
SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (cont’d):
For a Prop. 39 Bond:
 
Places bond measure on ballot
Appoints COC
Establishes guidelines for the COC
Approves bond program project list and
an implementation plan
SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (cont’d):
Shall ensure Prop. 39 expenditures are for
listed projects:
 
Construction, rehabilitation, or
 
replacement of school facilities
Furniture and equipment
Acquisition or lease of real property
SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (cont’d):
For a Prop. 39 Bond, Board must
evaluate:
 
Safety
Class size reduction
Information technology
SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY
DIRECTIVE FOR COC:
Review annual performance audit
Review annual financial audit
Inspection of school facilities and
grounds to ensure expenditures are for
listed projects
Annual and final reports to Board of
Trustees on findings
SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY
COC RESPONSIBILITIES:
Review District efforts to maximize bond
revenues through implementation of cost
containment measures
Professional fees
Site preparation
Joint use of facilities
Design efficiencies
Reusable facilities plans
SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY
COC RESPONSIBILITIES (cont’d.):
Provide an annual progress report to the
Board of Trustees and the public
Provide a final report to the Board of
Trustees and the public at the completion
of all projects
Review deferred maintenance reports and
plans
SELECTION OF COC MEMBERS
Appointed by the Board of Trustees
Within 60 days of certification of 
 
  
election
Required by Proposition 39
SELECTION OF COC MEMBERS
Represent the following
Business organization
Taxpayers organization
Senior citizens organization
Parents and Guardians
Parents active in support of the District,
such as a member of a PTA or School
Site Council
SELECTION OF COC MEMBERS
(cont’d.)
Serve for 2-year term with maximum
two consecutive terms
Shall 
not
 include:
Any District employee or official
Any District vendor, contractor, or
consultant
Any person with a conflict of interest
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO COC
Internet information posting
Brown Act agendas and minutes
Professional advice
Financial and progress reports
Audits
COC LEGAL COMPLIANCE
Brown Act compliance
Conflicts of Interest
Form 700
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Purposes:
To keep the public informed of the
actions, debates and views of locally
elected representatives; and
To provide the procedural framework
for local legislators to meet, debate,
act, and listen collectively to their
constituents
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Act applies to:
A “member of the legislative body of a local agency”
(Gov. Code Section 54952.1)
Commission
Committee
Board or other Body
whether
Permanent or Temporary
Decision-making or Advisory
Established by charter, ordinance, resolution, or
formal action of the Board (Gov. Code Section
54952)
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Meetings:
Any congregation of a majority of members of a
legislative body at the same time and place to
hear, discuss, or deliberate upon any item that
is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the
legislative body; or
Any use of direct communication, personal
intermediaries, or technological devices that is
employed by a majority of the members of the
legislative body to develop a collective
concurrence
   
 
 
   (Gov. Code Section 54952.2)
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Meetings specifically exclude:
Telephone conversations between a member
and “any other person” (including another
member);
Appearance of majority at a general conference
open to the public involving a discussion of
broad issues and attended by a broad spectrum
of officials from a variety of governmental
agencies;
Attendance at open and publicized meetings,
organized to address a topic of local concern by
a person or organization other than the local
agency;
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Meetings specifically exclude (cont’d):
Social or ceremonial occasions;
Attendance by a majority at open and
noticed meetings of another body of the
same local agency or any other agency;
Attendance by a majority at an open
and noticed meeting of the board, if
members of the committee attend only
as observers
(Gov. Code Section 54952.2)
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
“Direct communication, personal
intermediaries, or technological
devices” include:
Telephone, electronic mail, facsimile,
internet;
Communication through an
intermediary
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Common scenarios of which to be
aware:
E-mail messages in which majority is
copied;
Consecutive conversations through
intermediary to poll the committee;
Telephone conference calls involving a
majority of the committee;
Internet chat rooms
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Agenda Posting
By staff
Exceptions to Agenda Requirements:
Emergency (majority vote);
Need to take immediate action arose after
agenda posted (2/3 vote, unanimous if less
than 2/3 of committee present);
Responding to questions;
Asking for clarification;
Making a brief announcement of report of
activity
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Meeting Location
Meeting place must be within District
boundaries, with limited exceptions that are
not applicable (Gov. Code Section 54954);
Meeting place must be accessible to public
(nondiscriminatory, accessible to disabled,
no payment or purchase required);
Teleconferencing must be from a publicly
accessible location; a quorum must be
within District boundaries
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Public Rights
Any person attending may videotape
unless disruptive;
Public may comment on agenda items
before or during consideration of the
item;
Time must be set aside for public
comment on any other matters under
the committee’s jurisdiction;
The committee may place reasonable
time limitations on particular topics or
speakers;
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Public Rights
Any person may criticize the policies,
procedures, programs, or services of the
District;
The public may also criticize committee or
Board members or District employees;
The committee need not permit comments
or conduct that disrupts the meeting;
Penal Code Section 403 prohibits acts that
disturb or break up a lawful assembly or
meeting
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Public Rights
McMahon v. Albany S.D. (2002) 104
Cal.App.4
th
 1275:
“His conduct of dumping gallons of
garbage on the floor of a schoolroom
during a school board meeting was
sufficient to support an arrest for
disturbing a public meeting and was not
speech protected by the First
Amendment.”
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Closed Session
Probably does not apply to the
committee
BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE
Liability for Violations
Misdemeanor liability exists if there
is “intent to deprive public”
Public can sue to stop violation of
Brown Act
Agency must be given opportunity
to cure
Nullification of action taken in
violation
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Four areas of the law control conflicts of
interest of California public officials:
The California Political Reform Act of
1974 (Gov. Code Section 87100, et
seq., “CPRA”)
Gov. Code Section 1080, et. seq.
Common Law Conflict of Interest
Gov. Code Section 1126, et. Seq.
(“Incompatible Offices”)
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The CPRA
Public officials/employees may
not participate in making, or in
any way attempt to use their
official position to influence, a
governmental decision in which
they know or have reason to
know they have an economic
interest
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The CPRA
To determine whether a conflict of
interest exists under CPRA, five
questions must be asked:
 
 
Is a public official involved?
 
 
Does the official have a statutory
 
defined economic interest?
Is the official making, participating in
the making of, or using his or her
official position to influence the
making of a governmental decision?
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The CPRA 
(cont’d.)
 
Is it reasonably foreseeable 
  
  
that the decision could 
    
  
materially affect the official’s 
 
  
economic interest?
 Will the effect of the decision on
 
the public official’s economic
 
interest be distinguishable from
 
its effect on the public generally?
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The CPRA
If the question to all of the
foregoing questions is “yes,” a
conflict of interest exists and
the conflicted individual may
need to resign from the
committee
 Transactions must be analyzed on
 
a case-by-case basis pursuant to
 
regulations of the Fair Political
 
Practices Commission (“FPPC”)
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Gov. Code Section 1090
Prohibits public officials/
employees from participating in
the process by which a contract is
developed, negotiated, or
executed if the official or
employee has a financial interest
in the contract
These contracts are void and
cannot be enforced (Gov. Code
Section 1092)
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Gov. Code Section 1090
Section 1090 also prohibits board
members and employees from selling
goods or services to their school district
Section 1090 does not define when an
official is financially interested in a
contract; however, courts have applied the
prohibition to include a broad range of
interests
Section 1090, 
et. seq
., enumerates certain
“remote” and “non-interests” that, once
disclosed, do not prevent an officer from
participating in the making of a contract
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Common Law (Case Law)
Prohibits public officials/employees from
placing themselves in a position in which they
might be tempted by their own private interest
to disregard the interests of the public
The common law conflict of interest doctrine
also prohibits conflicts that create the
appearance or impression of impropriety
Public officers and employees should avoid
interactions or dealings that might suggest
that their actions are not in the best interest of
the public
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Common Law (Case Law)
The common law conflict of interest
doctrine applies even where a decision
might otherwise appear to benefit the
District
Underlying all conflict of interest
provisions is the maxim that a person
cannot simultaneously serve two
masters
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Gov. Code Section 1126
(“Incompatible Offices”)
Prohibits public officials/employees
from engaging in any employment,
activity, or enterprise for
compensation that is inconsistent,
incompatible, in conflict with, or
inimical to their duties as public
officials/employees.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Reporting
Annual Report of Economic
Interests
In order to identify and avoid potential
conflicts of interest, the CPRA requires
that designated public officials disclose
interests that could impact their decision-
making by filing a Statement of Economic
Interest, Form 700
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Form 700
Your Duty to File a Form 700 Statement
of Economic Interest
District policy and state law identify public
officials who must file a Form 700
Those public officials must disclose certain
assets and income
Certain types of gifts, honoraria and loans
are prohibited
Filers may not accept gifts totaling more
than $390 in a calendar year from a single
source
USES OF BOND PROCEEDS
What are permissible uses
of Proposition 39 bond
funds?
USES OF BOND PROCEEDS
Construction, rehabilitation or replacement of
school facilities
Furniture and equipment
Acquisition or lease of real property
Limited to project list adopted by Board
before the election
Ballot measure is like a contract with the voters
Projects need not be listed on short ballot
measure
Incorporate projects in Implementation Plan
USES OF BOND PROCEEDS
For a Proposition 39 bond, what
constitutes the list all bond-
funded projects?
The 75-word ballot measure
does not 
have to list all bond-
funded projects
USES OF BOND PROCEEDS
The Board can satisfy the Prop.
39 constitutional accountability
requirements by preparing and
making available the required
project list
Committee for Responsible School Expansion v.
Hermosa Beach City School District (2006) 142
Cal.App.4
th
 1178
USES OF BOND PROCEEDS
The Board can satisfy Prop. 39 accountability
requirements by stating in the bond
measure:
It evaluated safety, class size reduction,
and information technology
It will perform required audits
The types of projects it will perform
Foothill-DeAnza Community College District v.
Emerich (2007) 158 Cal.App.4
th
 11
USES OF BOND PROCEEDS
In developing list of projects, Board must
evaluate:
Safety
Class size reduction
Information technology
Proceeds may be used for some salaries,
but 
not
 for:
Teacher or administrator salaries
Other operating expenses
USES OF BOND PROCEEDS
Proposition 39 bond funds may pay:
District employee salaries to the extent
employees are engaged in construction-
related projects
Bond issuance and preparation costs
Costs incidental, but directly related, to
bond-funded projects
Community Advocates for Responsible Education v.
San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District 
(May 26,
2006) 139 Cal. App. 4
th
 1356, affirming 87 Ops. Cal.
Atty. Gen. 157 (2004)
AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
Annual independent audits
Fiscal
Performance
Auditor selection
NEW CAUSE OF ACTION
To restrain and prevent
expenditure of funds
Failure to comply with Prop. 39
expenditure limits or to appoint a
COC
By any citizen liable to pay the
tax
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the essential aspects of Citizens Oversight Committee (COC) in education, including their authority, responsibilities, and interaction with the Board of Trustees. Learn about the requirements, technical assistance, and information necessary for effective COC functioning as mandated by Proposition 39. Gain insights into the COC's role in evaluating school facilities, approving projects, ensuring expenditures alignment, and more.

  • Citizens Oversight Committee
  • Education
  • Authority
  • Responsibilities
  • Proposition 39

Uploaded on Oct 05, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE ROLE OF THE CITIZENS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Presented by: Valerie Pitts Superintendent

  2. PROPOSITION 39 REQUIREMENTS 1. Citizen Oversight Committee 2. Uses of Bond Proceeds 3. Audit Requirements 4. New Cause of Action

  3. CITIZENS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE ( COC ) What Is Scope of COC Authority? Who Should Serve on COC? What Technical Assistance Must Be Provided to COC? What Information Does the COC Need? What are Legal Requirements for COC Members and Meetings?

  4. SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY Roles and Responsibilities The Board of Trustees The Citizens Oversight Committee Staff

  5. SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES: Evaluates school facilities needs Approves additions or alterations to existing buildings Determines when new facilities are needed Selects and acquires sites Determines the method of financing

  6. SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (cont d): Approves selection of architects and engineers Authorizes projects for bid Awards contracts for design and construction Approves change orders to construction contracts Accepts completed facilities projects

  7. SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (cont d): For a Prop. 39 Bond: Places bond measure on ballot Appoints COC Establishes guidelines for the COC Approves bond program project list and an implementation plan

  8. SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (cont d): Shall ensure Prop. 39 expenditures are for listed projects: Construction, rehabilitation, or replacement of school facilities Furniture and equipment Acquisition or lease of real property

  9. SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (cont d): For a Prop. 39 Bond, Board must evaluate: Safety Class size reduction Information technology

  10. SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY DIRECTIVE FOR COC: Review annual performance audit Review annual financial audit Inspection of school facilities and grounds to ensure expenditures are for listed projects Annual and final reports to Board of Trustees on findings

  11. SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY COC RESPONSIBILITIES: Review District efforts to maximize bond revenues through implementation of cost containment measures Professional fees Site preparation Joint use of facilities Design efficiencies Reusable facilities plans

  12. SCOPE OF COC AUTHORITY COC RESPONSIBILITIES (cont d.): Provide an annual progress report to the Board of Trustees and the public Provide a final report to the Board of Trustees and the public at the completion of all projects Review deferred maintenance reports and plans

  13. SELECTION OF COC MEMBERS Appointed by the Board of Trustees Within 60 days of certification of election Required by Proposition 39

  14. SELECTION OF COC MEMBERS Represent the following Business organization Taxpayers organization Senior citizens organization Parents and Guardians Parents active in support of the District, such as a member of a PTA or School Site Council

  15. SELECTION OF COC MEMBERS (cont d.) Serve for 2-year term with maximum two consecutive terms Shall not include: Any District employee or official Any District vendor, contractor, or consultant Any person with a conflict of interest

  16. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO COC Internet information posting Brown Act agendas and minutes Professional advice Financial and progress reports Audits

  17. COC LEGAL COMPLIANCE Brown Act compliance Conflicts of Interest Form 700

  18. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Purposes: To keep the public informed of the actions, debates and views of locally elected representatives; and To provide the procedural framework for local legislators to meet, debate, act, and listen collectively to their constituents

  19. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Act applies to: A member of the legislative body of a local agency (Gov. Code Section 54952.1) Commission Committee Board or other Body whether Permanent or Temporary Decision-making or Advisory Established by charter, ordinance, resolution, or formal action of the Board (Gov. Code Section 54952)

  20. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Meetings: Any congregation of a majority of members of a legislative body at the same time and place to hear, discuss, or deliberate upon any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body; or Any use of direct communication, personal intermediaries, or technological devices that is employed by a majority of the members of the legislative body to develop a collective concurrence (Gov. Code Section 54952.2)

  21. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Meetings specifically exclude: Telephone conversations between a member and any other person (including another member); Appearance of majority at a general conference open to the public involving a discussion of broad issues and attended by a broad spectrum of officials from a variety of governmental agencies; Attendance at open and publicized meetings, organized to address a topic of local concern by a person or organization other than the local agency;

  22. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Meetings specifically exclude (cont d): Social or ceremonial occasions; Attendance by a majority at open and noticed meetings of another body of the same local agency or any other agency; Attendance by a majority at an open and noticed meeting of the board, if members of the committee attend only as observers (Gov. Code Section 54952.2)

  23. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Direct communication, personal intermediaries, or technological devices include: Telephone, electronic mail, facsimile, internet; Communication through an intermediary

  24. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Common scenarios of which to be aware: E-mail messages in which majority is copied; Consecutive conversations through intermediary to poll the committee; Telephone conference calls involving a majority of the committee; Internet chat rooms

  25. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Agenda Posting By staff Exceptions to Agenda Requirements: Emergency (majority vote); Need to take immediate action arose after agenda posted (2/3 vote, unanimous if less than 2/3 of committee present); Responding to questions; Asking for clarification; Making a brief announcement of report of activity

  26. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Meeting Location Meeting place must be within District boundaries, with limited exceptions that are not applicable (Gov. Code Section 54954); Meeting place must be accessible to public (nondiscriminatory, accessible to disabled, no payment or purchase required); Teleconferencing must be from a publicly accessible location; a quorum must be within District boundaries

  27. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Public Rights Any person attending may videotape unless disruptive; Public may comment on agenda items before or during consideration of the item; Time must be set aside for public comment on any other matters under the committee s jurisdiction; The committee may place reasonable time limitations on particular topics or speakers;

  28. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Public Rights Any person may criticize the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the District; The public may also criticize committee or Board members or District employees; The committee need not permit comments or conduct that disrupts the meeting; Penal Code Section 403 prohibits acts that disturb or break up a lawful assembly or meeting

  29. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Public Rights McMahon v. Albany S.D. (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th1275: His conduct of dumping gallons of garbage on the floor of a schoolroom during a school board meeting was sufficient to support an arrest for disturbing a public meeting and was not speech protected by the First Amendment.

  30. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Closed Session Probably does not apply to the committee

  31. BROWN ACT COMPLIANCE Liability for Violations Misdemeanor liability exists if there is intent to deprive public Public can sue to stop violation of Brown Act Agency must be given opportunity to cure Nullification of action taken in violation

  32. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Four areas of the law control conflicts of interest of California public officials: The California Political Reform Act of 1974 (Gov. Code Section 87100, et seq., CPRA ) Gov. Code Section 1080, et. seq. Common Law Conflict of Interest Gov. Code Section 1126, et. Seq. ( Incompatible Offices )

  33. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The CPRA Public officials/employees may not participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence, a governmental decision in which they know or have reason to know they have an economic interest

  34. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The CPRA To determine whether a conflict of interest exists under CPRA, five questions must be asked: Is a public official involved? Does the official have a statutory defined economic interest? Is the official making, participating in the making of, or using his or her official position to influence the making of a governmental decision?

  35. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The CPRA (cont d.) Is it reasonably foreseeable that the decision could materially affect the official s economic interest? Will the effect of the decision on the public official s economic interest be distinguishable from its effect on the public generally?

  36. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The CPRA If the question to all of the foregoing questions is yes, a conflict of interest exists and the conflicted individual may need to resign from the committee Transactions must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis pursuant to regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission ( FPPC )

  37. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Gov. Code Section 1090 Prohibits public officials/ employees from participating in the process by which a contract is developed, negotiated, or executed if the official or employee has a financial interest in the contract These contracts are void and cannot be enforced (Gov. Code Section 1092)

  38. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Gov. Code Section 1090 Section 1090 also prohibits board members and employees from selling goods or services to their school district Section 1090 does not define when an official is financially interested in a contract; however, courts have applied the prohibition to include a broad range of interests Section 1090, et. seq., enumerates certain remote and non-interests that, once disclosed, do not prevent an officer from participating in the making of a contract

  39. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The Common Law (Case Law) Prohibits public officials/employees from placing themselves in a position in which they might be tempted by their own private interest to disregard the interests of the public The common law conflict of interest doctrine also prohibits conflicts that create the appearance or impression of impropriety Public officers and employees should avoid interactions or dealings that might suggest that their actions are not in the best interest of the public

  40. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The Common Law (Case Law) The common law conflict of interest doctrine applies even where a decision might otherwise appear to benefit the District Underlying all conflict of interest provisions is the maxim that a person cannot simultaneously serve two masters

  41. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Gov. Code Section 1126 ( Incompatible Offices ) Prohibits public officials/employees from engaging in any employment, activity, or enterprise for compensation that is inconsistent, incompatible, in conflict with, or inimical to their duties as public officials/employees.

  42. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Reporting Annual Report of Economic Interests In order to identify and avoid potential conflicts of interest, the CPRA requires that designated public officials disclose interests that could impact their decision- making by filing a Statement of Economic Interest, Form 700

  43. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Form 700 Your Duty to File a Form 700 Statement of Economic Interest District policy and state law identify public officials who must file a Form 700 Those public officials must disclose certain assets and income Certain types of gifts, honoraria and loans are prohibited Filers may not accept gifts totaling more than $390 in a calendar year from a single source

  44. USES OF BOND PROCEEDS What are permissible uses of Proposition 39 bond funds?

  45. USES OF BOND PROCEEDS Construction, rehabilitation or replacement of school facilities Furniture and equipment Acquisition or lease of real property Limited to project list adopted by Board before the election Ballot measure is like a contract with the voters Projects need not be listed on short ballot measure Incorporate projects in Implementation Plan

  46. USES OF BOND PROCEEDS For a Proposition 39 bond, what constitutes the list all bond- funded projects? The 75-word ballot measure does not have to list all bond- funded projects

  47. USES OF BOND PROCEEDS The Board can satisfy the Prop. 39 constitutional accountability requirements by preparing and making available the required project list Committee for Responsible School Expansion v. Hermosa Beach City School District (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th1178

  48. USES OF BOND PROCEEDS The Board can satisfy Prop. 39 accountability requirements by stating in the bond measure: It evaluated safety, class size reduction, and information technology It will perform required audits The types of projects it will perform Foothill-DeAnza Community College District v. Emerich (2007) 158 Cal.App.4th11

  49. USES OF BOND PROCEEDS In developing list of projects, Board must evaluate: Safety Class size reduction Information technology Proceeds may be used for some salaries, but not for: Teacher or administrator salaries Other operating expenses

  50. USES OF BOND PROCEEDS Proposition 39 bond funds may pay: District employee salaries to the extent employees are engaged in construction- related projects Bond issuance and preparation costs Costs incidental, but directly related, to bond-funded projects Community Advocates for Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District (May 26, 2006) 139 Cal. App. 4th1356, affirming 87 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 157 (2004)

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#