The Food-Energy-Water Nexus and Climate Change Impacts

 
CLEWS Country Module
 
1. The food-energy-water nexus and sustainable development
2. The need for integrated planning: case studies
3. The CLEWS modelling approach
4. CLEWS case studies
5. Hands-on exercises with CLEWS
 
3. The CLEWS modelling approach
CLEWS
Energy for fertilizer production
Energy required for field
preparation and harvest
Biomass for biofuel production
and other energy uses
Climate
 
Greenhouse
gas emissions
 
Precipitation
temperature
Water for biofuel crops (rain-fed and
irrigated)
Water needs for food, feed and fibre
crops (rain-fed and irrigated)
Energy for water processing and treatment
Energy for water pumping
Energy for desalination
Water available for hydropower
Water for power plant cooling
Water for (bio-) fuel processing
Quantifies
the
food-
energy-
water
nexus
Adding climate allows
assessment of  policy
robustness to climate change
 
Residential
 
Electricity and
 
heat
 
25.3%
 
Other 
en
ergy
 
9.9%
 
Industry
 
18.1%
 
Waste
 
2.9%
 
Transport
 
14.2%
 
6.5%
 
Agriculture,
 forestry
and other land use
 
23.1%
Global emissions by sector
Greenhouse gas emissions and
the food-energy-water nexus
 
Greenhouse gas emissions
from electricity generation
Climate change and the food-energy-water nexus
 
Climate change is often said to “manifest through water”
More frequent extreme weather events (e.g., more droughts and
floods)
Shifting precipitation patterns
Potential for major impacts on agriculture
Impact on energy infrastructure
Sea level rise has dramatic consequences for land use
Global mean temperature prospects
 
CLEWS
 
Time horizon is typically one or more decades
Intended for longer term assessments and studies
Scenario-based analysis
Explores alternatives, risks and uncertainties through scenarios and sensitivity
analysis
Assesses the role of technology and technological change
Tests policies and measures
Flexible
Model user chooses system boundaries
Model user chooses level of detail
Model user chooses geographical coverage
 
 
 
 
Identifying and quantifying
interlinkages among sectors
Identifying robust relationships (i.e.,
impacts/relationships that are true
for a wide range of
conditions/assumptions)
Identifying key risks
(impacts/relationships that are true
under certain circumstances)
Exploring technology and policy
alternatives to
Mitigate unwanted outcomes (minimize
impact of trade-offs)
Realize co-benefits (maximize synergies)
CLEWs
 
Implementing a CLEWS assessment
 
Implementing a CLEWS assessment, cont’d
 
Examples of modelling tools
CLEWS
 
Climate
AEZ
Emissions
Integrated
assessment
Water management modelling
W
a
t
e
r
 
q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
W
a
t
e
r
 
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
S
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
i
t
y
 
o
f
 
f
l
o
w
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
 
 
 
 
 
Water management model: critical questions
 
How to allocate water to competing uses?
How to best operate water infrastructure (e.g., dams, diversion works)?
How water allocation, operation rules and constraints should adjust to new
management directives?
How to jointly manage water for irrigation and energy requirements?
 
The water model
 
Required model inputs include:
Definition of all catchment areas
Real climatic data: rainfall, minimum
and maximum temperature, humidity...
All main rivers and reservoirs plus
stream flow data and reservoir levels
Modelling of existing
canals/distribution systems
Using GIS: land cover classes to
calculate evapotranspiration
Water demand data (urban and
agricultural) according to national
statistics and population density
 
The energy model
 
Used to represent physical flows, capacities and energy balances through an
energy system
Accounting models: 
Can be used to assess the impacts of predetermined
pathways for development, e.g., LEAP, MAED
Simulation models:
 Represent decisions of actors within the system
Potential for replacing existing technologies with low-carbon, more efficient or cost
effective alternatives
Optimization models: 
Can be used to maximize benefits; or minimize
costs, 
e.g
. OSeMOSYS, MESSAGE, MARKAL
Technology learning rates, resource availability, technical limitations, vintage of
infrastructures, penetration rates, environmental criteria, costs, etc. directly affect
the optimal system design.
Energy system model: critical questions
 
What are the investment requirements in generation and network
infrastructure and their timing to meet electricity demand and when?
How can energy security be enhanced?
What is the cost of expanding modern energy services?
What technologies and fuels grant the lowest cost, most reliable energy
mix?
What is the scope for producing biofuels and generating electricity form
large-scale solar photovoltaic parks or wind farms?
What are the water requirements—e.g., water for cooling, hydropower,
irrigation of biofuels?
What pollutants are emitted and in what quantities?
The land-use model
 
Inputs
Climate data
Detailed soil map and data from soil profiles
Slopes and marginal land
GIS data for land cover
Irrigated areas
Output
Grid map showing optimal crops, and
potential water use and yield, plus a crop
calendar
 
A
E
Z
A
G
R
O
-
E
C
O
L
O
G
I
C
A
L
 
Z
O
N
I
N
G
 
 
Agro-ecological modelling
 
Geospatially based analysis of agricultural
output to assess:
What is the potential yield of a range of
crops in each region?
What are the water requirements for each
crop in each modelled sector?
How do different climate scenarios affect
crop yield?
Quantification of input requirements to
achieve a certain level of yield.
 
Example: rainfall pattern and water demand by crop
 
Agro-ecological modelling
 
Climate representation
 
Climate is defined by the major assumptions in land-use, water
management and energy systems models.
Apparent need for consistency—e.g., greenhouse gas emissions limits
versus long-term estimates for air temperature and precipitation
Accounting of greenhouse gas emissions
Temperature and precipitation affecting agricultural production
Solar insolation affecting photovoltaic and concentrated solar power
generation
Precipitation affecting hydropower and water irrigation demand,
quantifying seasonality of availability
Interlinkages between effects across sectors are highlighted
 
Optimization in the integrated CLEWs tool
 
Representation of the physical system (i.e., “bottom up”)
Technologies are described by their technical and economic characteristics
Full value chains (e.g., well-to-wheel or field-to-fork)
Web of interconnected value chains
Meets consumer demands
Balance of supply and demand
Clears each commodity market in every value chain
Identifies cost-effective strategies subject to constraints
Configures system to find deployment and utilization patterns that meet
demands at lowest possible cost
 
CLEWS
 
Inputs
Demand curves
Technology performance
Technology cost (capital, operation
and management)
Commodity cost (extraction cost,
import cost)
Cost of capital
Emissions intensity
Constraints (environmental,
regulatory, policy, market, etc. )
 
Outputs
Investment (physical units and cost)
Total production capacity
Operating costs
Asset utilization
Output (physical units)
Fuel expenditures
Emissions
Shadow prices
Integrated CLEWS optimization tool
 
Concluding remarks
 
A flexible modelling tool to quantitatively
assess the food-energy-water nexus in the
context of climate change
Integrated entry point to inform
sustainable development policies,
including related to the 2030 Agenda and
Paris Agreement
Retains sector relevance while providing an
integrated assessment
Can contribute to institutional coordination
for integrated policy formulation
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the intricate relationship between food, energy, water, and climate change through the CLEWS modelling approach. Discover how greenhouse gas emissions, sector-wise contributions, and implications on agriculture and energy infrastructure. Gain insights into assessing policy robustness to climate change and the potential impacts on global mean temperature and land use.

  • Food-Energy-Water
  • Climate Change
  • CLEWS Modelling
  • Sustainability
  • Nexus Approach

Uploaded on Sep 10, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CLEWS Country Module 1. The food-energy-water nexus and sustainable development 2. The need for integrated planning: case studies 3. The CLEWS modelling approach 4. CLEWS case studies 5. Hands-on exercises with CLEWS

  2. 3. The CLEWS modelling approach

  3. Adding climate allows assessment of policy robustness to climate change CLEWS quantifying the FEW-NEXUS Energy model Energy for fertilizer production Energy required for field preparation and harvest Biomass for biofuel production and other energy uses Energy for water processing and treatment Energy for water pumping Energy for desalination Water available for hydropower Water for power plant cooling Water for (bio-) fuel processing Greenhouse gas emissions Quantifies the food- energy- water nexus Climate Water model Land use model Precipitation temperature Water for biofuel crops (rain-fed and irrigated) Water needs for food, feed and fibre crops (rain-fed and irrigated)

  4. Greenhouse gas emissions and the food-energy-water nexus Global emissions by sector 2.1% 3.2% Agriculture, forestry and other land use 23.1% Energy Electricity and heat 25.3% 12.2% Industry Agriculture 13.8% Residential 6.5% Land-use change & forestry Other energy 9.9% 64.4% 4.3% Waste Transport 14.2% Int'l bunkers Industry 18.1% Waste 2.9%

  5. Greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation 1200 1791 Emissions (g CO2-eq/kW h) 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Coal Gas CCS Biomass Geothermal Solar PV Solar CSP Wind Median value Nuclear Hydro Overall range Interquartile range

  6. Climate change and the food-energy-water nexus Climate change is often said to manifest through water More frequent extreme weather events (e.g., more droughts and floods) Shifting precipitation patterns Potential for major impacts on agriculture Impact on energy infrastructure Sea level rise has dramatic consequences for land use Global mean temperature prospects

  7. CLEWS Time horizon is typically one or more decades Intended for longer term assessments and studies Scenario-based analysis Explores alternatives, risks and uncertainties through scenarios and sensitivity analysis Assesses the role of technology and technological change Tests policies and measures Flexible Model user chooses system boundaries Model user chooses level of detail Model user chooses geographical coverage

  8. Implementing a CLEWS assessment Current state and historical trends Main stress points Sectoral policies, plans, strategies Systems profiling Interlinkages among sectors Pressure points within and among sectors Focus on the nexus analysis Data availability Pre-nexus assessment Model development sector models to fully integrated models Model calibration Soft-linking of model inputs and/or outputs in the case of sector models Scenario design and development Model development

  9. Implementing a CLEWS assessment, contd Analysis and interpretation of results Revise inputs/assumptions Conduct additional model runs (iterations) Analysis Report on the quantification of the impacts of sectoral interactions Suggestion of strategies and pathways towards sustainability Inform policymaking

  10. Integrated assessment CLEWS Energy quantifying the FEW-NEXUS Water Land - Food AEZ Climate EMISSIONS EMISSIONS Emissions

  11. Water management modelling Water for energy Water for nature Water for agriculture Water quantity Water quality Seasonality of flow Regulation Domestic water Water for navigation Water for recreation Water for industry

  12. Water management model: critical questions How to allocate water to competing uses? How to best operate water infrastructure (e.g., dams, diversion works)? How water allocation, operation rules and constraints should adjust to new management directives? How to jointly manage water for irrigation and energy requirements?

  13. The water model Required model inputs include: Definition of all catchment areas Real climatic data: rainfall, minimum and maximum temperature, humidity... All main rivers and reservoirs plus stream flow data and reservoir levels Modelling of existing canals/distribution systems Using GIS: land cover classes to calculate evapotranspiration Water demand data (urban and agricultural) according to national statistics and population density

  14. The energy model Used to represent physical flows, capacities and energy balances through an energy system Accounting models: Can be used to assess the impacts of predetermined pathways for development, e.g., LEAP, MAED Simulation models: Represent decisions of actors within the system Potential for replacing existing technologies with low-carbon, more efficient or cost effective alternatives Optimization models: Can be used to maximize benefits; or minimize costs, e.g. OSeMOSYS, MESSAGE, MARKAL Technology learning rates, resource availability, technical limitations, vintage of infrastructures, penetration rates, environmental criteria, costs, etc. directly affect the optimal system design.

  15. Energy system model: critical questions What are the investment requirements in generation and network infrastructure and their timing to meet electricity demand and when? How can energy security be enhanced? What is the cost of expanding modern energy services? What technologies and fuels grant the lowest cost, most reliable energy mix? What is the scope for producing biofuels and generating electricity form large-scale solar photovoltaic parks or wind farms? What are the water requirements e.g., water for cooling, hydropower, irrigation of biofuels? What pollutants are emitted and in what quantities?

  16. The land-use model AEZ AEZ AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONING Inputs Climate data Detailed soil map and data from soil profiles Slopes and marginal land GIS data for land cover Irrigated areas Output Grid map showing optimal crops, and potential water use and yield, plus a crop calendar

  17. Agro-ecological modelling Geospatially based analysis of agricultural output to assess: What is the potential yield of a range of crops in each region? What are the water requirements for each crop in each modelled sector? How do different climate scenarios affect crop yield? Quantification of input requirements to achieve a certain level of yield.

  18. Agro-ecological modelling Example: rainfall pattern and water demand by crop

  19. Climate representation Climate is defined by the major assumptions in land-use, water management and energy systems models. Apparent need for consistency e.g., greenhouse gas emissions limits versus long-term estimates for air temperature and precipitation Accounting of greenhouse gas emissions Temperature and precipitation affecting agricultural production Solar insolation affecting photovoltaic and concentrated solar power generation Precipitation affecting hydropower and water irrigation demand, quantifying seasonality of availability Interlinkages between effects across sectors are highlighted

  20. Optimization in the integrated CLEWs tool Representation of the physical system (i.e., bottom up ) Technologies are described by their technical and economic characteristics Full value chains (e.g., well-to-wheel or field-to-fork) Web of interconnected value chains Meets consumer demands Balance of supply and demand Clears each commodity market in every value chain Identifies cost-effective strategies subject to constraints Configures system to find deployment and utilization patterns that meet demands at lowest possible cost

  21. CLEWS

  22. Integrated CLEWS optimization tool Inputs Outputs Demand curves Technology performance Technology cost (capital, operation and management) Commodity cost (extraction cost, import cost) Cost of capital Emissions intensity Constraints (environmental, regulatory, policy, market, etc. ) Investment (physical units and cost) Total production capacity Operating costs Asset utilization Output (physical units) Fuel expenditures Emissions Shadow prices

  23. Concluding remarks A flexible modelling tool to quantitatively assess the food-energy-water nexus in the context of climate change Integrated entry point to inform sustainable development policies, including related to the 2030 Agenda and Paris Agreement Retains sector relevance while providing an integrated assessment Can contribute to institutional coordination for integrated policy formulation

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#