Tensions in Political Analysis: Lessons from Cambodia and the Pacific

 
CONFLICT,
POLITICS,
INSTITUTIONS
 
Tensions in analysis, and lessons from
Cambodia and the Pacific
 
David Craig and Doug Porter
 
Normative/ Instrumental
Critical
Positive
 
ESID: 
‘What kind of politics can help
secure inclusive development, and how
can these be promoted
?
‘…an ‘
adapted political settlements 
approach that draws in important
insights from the broader realms of
political theory, and particularly from
more critical approaches
 
TENSIONS IN
POLITICAL AND
INSTITUTIONAL
ANALYSIS OF
POST CONFLICT
ARRANGEMENTS
 
Whether the political settlement/
economy that matters is structurally
antecedent and super-ordinant
 
to the
pacting and its institutionalisation
Or whether the pacting and its
institutionalisation can constitute a real
rupture, and generate 
subsequent,
predictable 
change in the basic political
settlement via incentivised agency
Temporal questions, but also related
to scale, agency and limits of impact
(layering)
The wider question of whether
instrumentalisation is possible
ESID (and us) wanting to work across
these tensions
 
BASIC
CLEAVAGES IN
ANALYSIS:
POLITICAL
ECONOMY AND
INSTITUTIONAL
APPROACHES
 
Khan
: elites and rents; institutional
formality and informality
Slater
: ‘infrastructural grasp’ of elites,
and the basic nature of the pact
(protection and provisioning), stable vs
fragmented outcomes
Hickey
: political settlement 
and
 open
access orders, located within 
wider
critical accounts
  of hegemony, political
economy
 
COMBINING
POLITICAL
ECONOMY AND
INSTITUTIONAL
PERSPECTIVES
IN POSITIVE/
CRITICAL
ANALYSIS?
 
MID-LEVEL
POLITICAL-
INSTITUTIONAL
CAPABILITIES
ANALYSIS
Basic structuration
meets NI:
Capabilities (‘grasp
and reach’) and
agency
Pacting context:
protection and
provisioning
(Critical) political
settlement/
economic context
 
A 25 year retrospect of a decentralisation / local
development programme: ‘Seila’
‘Poverty reduction and environmental
protection through good governance’
How the program’s modalities were 
translated
into Cambodian contexts
How the programme was 
co-opted, adapted
and imitated
 by enrolled political actors trying
to settle politics
Protection and provisioning contexts;
Comparative grasp and reach of modalities and
resources
How 
‘multi-hat wearing
’ actors (local and
international) were enrolled by neoliberal
contracting modalities and wider assemblages
Longer term 
institutional layering 
issues:
something which tried to coordinate but ended
up 
layering/ evading
 
WINNING THE
PEACE IN
CAMBODIA:
MIDLEVEL
LOGICS OF
TRANSLATION,
EVASION,
LAYERING,
HYBRIDITY
 
NOT YOUR
TYPICAL
NATION STATE
 
SEGMENTARY
SOCIETIES
 
THE SOLOMONS IN
CONFLICT
 
INTERVENTION: RAMSI
 
Geopolitics and the 
primacy of
provisioning
Ethnic cleavage, 
clientage
 and
transactionalisation of pacts
Institutional 
co-production, evasion and
layering
 
THREE MID-LEVEL
LOGICS OF POST
CONFLICT
INSTITUTIONAL
CAPABILITY IN
SOLOMON
ISLANDS
 
Dispersed constituencies, central
political pacts
Weak party/ pact enrolment
: dissolution
of governments through  confidence
votes
Urban primacy, central and local rents
Weak modality reach
: enormous
problems in provisioning, and in
expressing political agency through
government machineries
 
POLITICAL-
INSTITUTIONAL
CAPABILITY
LOGIC 1:
GEOPOLITICS
AND THE
PRIMACY OF
PROVISIONING
 
Problems of elite cohesion, 
protection
and concessionary provision
Clientage, security and elite -
provisioning
Cash nexus transactions seeking
enrolement 
across the ethnic divide
The transactionalisation and
monetisation of elite political economic
pacts
 
POLITICAL-
INSTITUTIONAL
CAPABILITY LOGIC 2:
ETHNIC CLEAVAGE
AND THE
TRANSACTIONAL-
ISATION OF PACTS
 
Co-production
: massive international
presence in security, justice, health and
education, public finance
Political agency/ enrolment eroded in
mainstream public provision and
resourcing
Channelling resources into modalities
where they can be used to enrol
political support: Constituency
Development Funds
Ongoing raiding of co-produced budgets
for new layered capabilities
 
POLITICAL-
INSTITUTIONAL
CAPABILITY
LOGIC 3:
CO-
PRODUCTION
AND LAYERING
 
Institutional outcomes are not set in stone
by political economy (but retrospect will
show that political economy contained
many, many clues, especially as to 
pre-
disposing institutional capabilities
)
Outcomes emerge, intended and
unintended, over time, and in a range of
temporal relations of 
capability
reinforcement or corrosion, evasion and
adaptation
Layering
 
can and does produce surprising
results over time: fragmentation, but also
hybridity and 
places for ‘multi-hat
wearers’ and political actors  to hide,
adapt , learn, reform
 
SUPERORDINANT
STRUCTURE VS
INTERVENTION
AGENCY?
NOVEL
STRUCTURATIONS
VIA INSTITUTIONAL
LAYERING
 
 
 
The politics/ political economy that
matters is antecedent to the pacting
and its institutionalisation
Macro/ deterministic focus on
The nature of the (political)
economy, the nature and scale of
production, the kinds of rents
available
Macro focus on the nature of
Political and economic  geography,
scale, ethnic divisions, political and
economic elites and their alliances
 
1. POLITICAL
ECONOMY AS
ANTECEDENT
 
Whether the pacting and its
institutionalisation can constitute a real
rupture, a reforming moving, a change in
the basic political settlement
Classic Historical Institutional
analysis of critical juncture, path
dependency, cycles of return
New Institutional analyses of
incentives, transactions, rational
acting, open and restricted access
orders
Instrumentalised political
approaches: social accountability,
g7+ New Deal pactings, imagined
sequencings
 
2. INSTITUTIONAL
CHANGE AND HOW
IT HAPPENS
SUBSEQUENT 
TO
INTERVENTION
 
Analytic framings that can work across different levels of scale and temporal
framings
up to and down from political economy  and its timeframes
down into everyday institutional/ modality arrangements and their
transformational outcomes in intervention timeframes, and from there back
up into political economy
Mid level logics, placed in locations, that combine political economy and
institutional processes
Empirical and other engagement with programmes on the ground, especially in
post conflict subnational governance/ justice
 
OUR
ANALYSIS
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the nuances of political and institutional analysis post-conflict, examining the intertwined dynamics of political settlements, economies, and institutional arrangements. Discover the complexities of structural antecedents, pacting, and instrumentalization, alongside insights from political economy and critical perspectives. Delve into mid-level capabilities analysis and examine the quest for peace in Cambodia through translation, evasion, and layering strategies.

  • Political Analysis
  • Conflict Resolution
  • Institutional Arrangements
  • Political Economy
  • Post-Conflict

Uploaded on Sep 22, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CONFLICT, POLITICS, INSTITUTIONS Tensions in analysis, and lessons from Cambodia and the Pacific David Craig and Doug Porter

  2. TENSIONS IN POLITICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF POST CONFLICT ARRANGEMENTS Normative/ Instrumental Critical Positive ESID: What kind of politics can help secure inclusive development, and how can these be promoted? an adapted political settlements approach that draws in important insights from the broader realms of political theory, and particularly from more critical approaches

  3. BASIC CLEAVAGES IN ANALYSIS: Whether the political settlement/ economy that matters is structurally antecedent and super-ordinantto the pacting and its institutionalisation Or whether the pacting and its institutionalisation can constitute a real rupture, and generate subsequent, predictable change in the basic political settlement via incentivised agency Temporal questions, but also related to scale, agency and limits of impact (layering) The wider question of whether instrumentalisationis possible ESID (and us) wanting to work across these tensions POLITICAL ECONOMY AND INSTITUTIONAL APPROACHES

  4. COMBINING POLITICAL ECONOMY AND INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES IN POSITIVE/ CRITICAL ANALYSIS? Khan: elites and rents; institutional formality and informality Slater: infrastructural grasp of elites, and the basic nature of the pact (protection and provisioning), stable vs fragmented outcomes Hickey: political settlement andopen access orders, located within wider critical accounts of hegemony, political economy

  5. MID-LEVEL POLITICAL- INSTITUTIONAL CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS Basic structuration meets NI: Capabilities ( grasp and reach ) and agency Pacting context: protection and provisioning (Critical) political settlement/ economic context modalities/ rules/ executive function roles/ rents/ resources/ finances enrolments/ relationships/ political agency

  6. WINNING THE PEACE IN CAMBODIA: MIDLEVEL LOGICS OF TRANSLATION, EVASION, LAYERING, HYBRIDITY A 25 year retrospect of a decentralisation / local development programme: Seila Poverty reduction and environmental protection through good governance How the program s modalities were translated into Cambodian contexts How the programme was co-opted, adapted and imitated by enrolled political actors trying to settle politics Protection and provisioning contexts; Comparative grasp and reach of modalities and resources How multi-hat wearing actors (local and international) were enrolled by neoliberal contracting modalities and wider assemblages Longer term institutional layering issues: something which tried to coordinate but ended up layering/ evading

  7. NOT YOUR TYPICAL NATION STATE

  8. SEGMENTARY SOCIETIES

  9. THE SOLOMONS IN CONFLICT

  10. INTERVENTION: RAMSI

  11. THREE MID-LEVEL LOGICS OF POST CONFLICT INSTITUTIONAL CAPABILITY IN SOLOMON ISLANDS Geopolitics and the primacy of provisioning Ethnic cleavage, clientage and transactionalisation of pacts Institutional co-production, evasion and layering

  12. POLITICAL- INSTITUTIONAL CAPABILITY LOGIC 1: Dispersed constituencies, central political pacts Weak party/ pact enrolment: dissolution of governments through confidence votes Urban primacy, central and local rents Weak modality reach: enormous problems in provisioning, and in expressing political agency through government machineries GEOPOLITICS AND THE PRIMACY OF PROVISIONING

  13. POLITICAL- INSTITUTIONAL CAPABILITY LOGIC 2: Problems of elite cohesion, protection and concessionary provision Clientage, security and elite - provisioning Cash nexus transactions seeking enrolement across the ethnic divide The transactionalisation and monetisation of elite political economic pacts ETHNIC CLEAVAGE AND THE TRANSACTIONAL- ISATION OF PACTS

  14. Co-production: massive international presence in security, justice, health and education, public finance Political agency/ enrolment eroded in mainstream public provision and resourcing Channelling resources into modalities where they can be used to enrol political support: Constituency Development Funds Ongoing raiding of co-produced budgets for new layered capabilities POLITICAL- INSTITUTIONAL CAPABILITY LOGIC 3: CO- PRODUCTION AND LAYERING

  15. SUPERORDINANT STRUCTURE VS INTERVENTION AGENCY? Institutional outcomes are not set in stone by political economy (but retrospect will show that political economy contained many, many clues, especially as to pre- disposing institutional capabilities) Outcomes emerge, intended and unintended, over time, and in a range of temporal relations of capability reinforcement or corrosion, evasion and adaptation Layeringcan and does produce surprising results over time: fragmentation, but also hybridity and places for multi-hat wearers and political actors to hide, adapt , learn, reform NOVEL STRUCTURATIONS VIA INSTITUTIONAL LAYERING

  16. 1. POLITICAL ECONOMY AS ANTECEDENT The politics/ political economy that matters is antecedent to the pacting and its institutionalisation Macro/ deterministic focus on The nature of the (political) economy, the nature and scale of production, the kinds of rents available Macro focus on the nature of Political and economic geography, scale, ethnic divisions, political and economic elites and their alliances

  17. 2. INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE AND HOW IT HAPPENS SUBSEQUENT TO INTERVENTION Whether the pacting and its institutionalisation can constitute a real rupture, a reforming moving, a change in the basic political settlement Classic Historical Institutional analysis of critical juncture, path dependency, cycles of return New Institutional analyses of incentives, transactions, rational acting, open and restricted access orders Instrumentalisedpolitical approaches: social accountability, g7+ New Deal pactings, imagined sequencings

  18. OUR ANALYSIS Analytic framings that can work across different levels of scale and temporal framings up to and down from political economy and its timeframes down into everyday institutional/ modality arrangements and their transformational outcomes in intervention timeframes, and from there back up into political economy Mid level logics, placed in locations, that combine political economy and institutional processes Empirical and other engagement with programmes on the ground, especially in post conflict subnational governance/ justice

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#