Study of Optical Scatterers Within Coating Layers of Gravitational Wave Detector Mirrors

Study of Optical Scatterers
within Coating Layers of
gravitational wave detector Mirrors
L. Glover
(1,3)
, 
R. DeSalvo
(1,3)
,  B. Kells
(2)
, I.
Pinto
(3)
E. Arriaga
(1)
, E. Barragan
(1)
 E. Do
(1)
, C. Fajardo
(1)
, M. Goff
(1)
,
J. Patel
(1)
, T. Sadecki
(2)
, R. Savage
(2)
, E. Villarama
(1)
1
Related doc: 
LIGO-G1600431 
1 – Cal State LA
2 – LIGO
3 – Uni. Sannio
LIGO-G1601982.
Gravitational Wave detectors’
mirror thermal noise
Dielectric coatings on mirrors present  an anomalously low
quality factor 10
4
-10
5
 as compared to >10
9
 for Q-factor for
the fused silica substrate.
This dissipation is responsible for most of the thermal
noise of mirrors of all gravitational wave detectors.
Mechanical dissipation in coatings is 
the single most
important limit for the detection range of Gravitational
waves
Nobody knows where these losses reside or come from.
LIGO-G1601982.
2
Brief Summary
We analyzed scattering points in photos of Advanced
LIGO mirror illuminated by 100 kW stored beams
Hundreds of thousands of progressively weaker
scatterers were observed where few were expected,
likely extending through the depths of the coating
layer stack
Probable locus of the energy losses
3
LIGO-G1601982.
Method
 
Individual scatterers were identified using
DAOPHOT an astronomer’s algorithm to
identify stars in galaxies
 
1.
Extract 
apparent amplitude and position 
of
each scatterer
2.
Subtract the identified “stars” and iterate
4
LIGO-G1601982.
Daophot Mechanism:
Point Spread Templates
5
A point spread template
is created from selected
sources within the
image.
Then it is used to search
scatterers
 Point Spread Template for an exposure time of 1.25 x 10
-4
 s
LIGO-G1601982.
Daophot Mechanism:
Problems CCD dynamic range
6
Good
Badly saturated
LIGO-G1601982.
Daophot subtraction effectiveness
Pixel amplitude histogram of original Image
Residual pixel
amplitude histogram
after scatterer
extraction
7
Most pixels restored to “dark”
pixel
Residual pixel distribution
within 
2-3 pixels FWHM 
Mostly from saturation effects
100
200
50
-50
LIGO-G1601982.
Identifying/subtracting scatterers
dots mark the place where scatterers have been excised
 “dirt” does not fit template is ignored by daophot  and
masks out real weaker scatteres
Original Photo
8
256  
256  
100
Subtracted Photo
Dark pixels
expanded pixel scale
Fluffy dirt 
ignored
LIGO-G1601982.
Number of Scatterers vs. Exposure Time
9
Number increases almost linearly with exposure
Exploring weaker and weaker scatterers
Deeper and deeper in the dielectric coating layers ! !
Exposure
                       
Scatterers (1
st
 Run)
@ 0.125 ms 
  
 
 
76
 
@ 1 ms exposure
  
624
@ 400 ms exposure
 
127,774
    
 
Scatterer count
plateaus due to
saturation.
100,000
10,000
1,000
100
LIGO-G1601982.
Apparent size: Depth in stack effect
 
There are two depth attenuation components:
1.
Attenuation of impinging light due to reflections through
depth of coating layers
2.
 
Back-reflection on front layers attenuates Scattered  light
Scattered light
detected by CCD
10
Image: Stuart Reid, Iain Martin, 2016
Back reflected
scattered light
LIGO-G1601982.
11
Scatterer light intensity distribution
@ Exposure Time = 0.0125 sec
6000
3000
1000
5000
The rapid slope of reconstructed
scatterers at low amplitude is
compatible with what expected
from the reflection curve.
Integrated CCD count
LIGO-G1601982.
How many scatterers
are actually there ?
Drop of laser light impedes detection of
scatterers below first 2-3 layers
26 layers in each HR coating
~200 scatterers /mm
2
12
LIGO-G1601982.
Origin of scatterers
 
Virtually no absorption (<0.25 ppm)
Positive or negative density (n) fluctuations
Positive = crystallites, in glasses catalyze
crystallization
Negative = large fluctuation of natural voids in
glasses
Both have dangling bonds, i.e. 
double well
potentials 
adsorbing mechanical energy
LIGO-G1601982.
13
Ongoing work
 
Two steps proposed:
 
1.
Sum coherently lower exposure images from
LIGO to mitigate saturation.
2.
Study ad-LIGO witness samples to determine
scatterer’s depth distribution through layers
and size distribution
14
LIGO-G1601982.
Lucky byproduct
Study of image to image “star”
position motion for coherent addition
of images yielded a metod to
independently detect:
Motion of stored beam within mirror
Motion of mirror w.r.t. camera.
15
LIGO-G1601982.
DAOPHOT position resolution
The scatter of the
points (standard
deviation) =
 
~11µm
 
positioning error
of “daophot”
16
Calibration 1Pixel = ~80 µm
Differential “star” position between two images
LIGO-G1601982.
Detection of mirror motion
Mirror motion
Mirror position
resolution ~ 1.3 µm
Calibration 1Pixel = ~80 µm
17
LIGO-G1601982.
Depth scatterer exploration
Study a spare witness samples to determine
the 
scatterer’s depth distribution
the
 
scatterer’s 
size distribution
 
      
 
18
LIGO-G1601982.
CCD Camera
Microscope
lens
19
X, Y Axis micropositioning
Z Axis piezo focusing
LIGO-G1601982.
20
Grid scan of Mirror
X
1
X
2
X
n
Y
1
Y
2
Y
n
Raster scan X-Y  of
microscope
frames on mirror
surface to identify
rough scatterer
position
LIGO-G1601982.
Depth of field  
  
 
0.6 µm / 
n
depth resolution of
~ 
30 nm
/ 
n
achieved from Z-scan
Wide angle-white
light illumination
allow penetration of
many layers
21
Potential depth resolution
+Z
-Z
Maximum
Luminosity
Defocused
Scatterer
Defocused
Scatterer
Focused
Scatterer
LIGO-G1601982.
Conclusions 1
A very large population of scatterers was found on
aLIGO mirrors under high-power illumination.
They contribute to large angle optical scattering,
if the observed points are the locus of mechanical
dissipation
, they 
may explain the anomalous
mechanical dissipation observed in sputtered
coatings.
The discovery is a good diagnostic tool, perhaps
indicating possible ways to reduce the Sensitivity
limitation for Gravitational Wave detectors
22
LIGO-G1601982.
Conclusions 2
Methods are being developed to monitor
1.
mirror to camera and
2.
beam to mirror
   
micro-movements
Both can be valuable diagnostic tools at
the observatory
23
LIGO-G1601982.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Analyzing scattering points within Advanced LIGO mirror coatings revealed unexpected weak scatterers, potentially influencing energy losses and thermal noise in gravitational wave detectors. Individual scatterers were identified using DAOPHOT, an algorithm originally created for astronomy, to pinpoint and extract these anomalies. The study sheds light on the critical impact of scatterers in coating layers on the performance of gravitational wave detectors.

  • Optical Scatterers
  • Gravitational Wave Detectors
  • Coating Layers
  • DAOPHOT Algorithm
  • Energy Losses

Uploaded on Oct 08, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Study of Optical Scatterers within Coating Layers of gravitational wave detector Mirrors L. Glover(1,3), R. DeSalvo(1,3), B. Kells(2), I. Pinto(3) E. Arriaga(1), E. Barragan(1)E. Do(1), C. Fajardo(1), M. Goff(1), J. Patel(1), T. Sadecki(2), R. Savage(2), E. Villarama(1) 2 LIGO 3 Uni. Sannio 1 Cal State LA Related doc: LIGO-G1600431 LIGO-G1601982. 1

  2. Gravitational Wave detectors mirror thermal noise Dielectric coatings on mirrors present an anomalously low quality factor 104-105 as compared to >109 for Q-factor for the fused silica substrate. This dissipation is responsible for most of the thermal noise of mirrors of all gravitational wave detectors. Mechanical dissipation in coatings is the single most important limit for the detection range of Gravitational waves Nobody knows where these losses reside or come from. LIGO-G1601982. 2

  3. Brief Summary We analyzed scattering points in photos of Advanced LIGO mirror illuminated by 100 kW stored beams Hundreds of thousands of progressively weaker scatterers were observed where few were expected, likely extending through the depths of the coating layer stack Probable locus of the energy losses LIGO-G1601982. 3

  4. Method Individual scatterers were identified using DAOPHOT an astronomer s algorithm to identify stars in galaxies 1. Extract apparent amplitude and position of each scatterer 2. Subtract the identified stars and iterate LIGO-G1601982. 4

  5. Daophot Mechanism: Point Spread Templates A point spread template is created from selected sources within the image. Then it is used to search scatterers Point Spread Template for an exposure time of 1.25 x 10-4 s LIGO-G1601982. 5

  6. Daophot Mechanism: Problems CCD dynamic range LIGO-G1601982. 6

  7. Daophot subtraction effectiveness Pixel amplitude histogram of original Image 200 100 Most pixels restored to dark pixel Residual pixel amplitude histogram after scatterer extraction Residual pixel distribution within 2-3 pixels FWHM Mostly from saturation effects -50 50 LIGO-G1601982. 7

  8. Identifying/subtracting scatterers Subtracted Photo Original Photo Fluffy dirt ignored 256 100 expanded pixel scale Dark pixels 256 dots mark the place where scatterers have been excised dirt does not fit template is ignored by daophot and masks out real weaker scatteres LIGO-G1601982. 8

  9. Number of Scatterers vs. Exposure Time Exposure @ 0.125 ms @ 1 ms exposure @ 400 ms exposure Scatterers (1st Run) 76 624 127,774 100,000 10,000 Scatterer count plateaus due to saturation. 1,000 100 Number increases almost linearly with exposure Exploring weaker and weaker scatterers Deeper and deeper in the dielectric coating layers ! ! LIGO-G1601982. 9

  10. Apparent size: Depth in stack effect There are two depth attenuation components: 1. Attenuation of impinging light due to reflections through depth of coating layers 2. Back-reflection on front layers attenuates Scattered light Image: Stuart Reid, Iain Martin, 2016 Scattered light detected by CCD Back reflected scattered light LIGO-G1601982. 10

  11. Scatterer light intensity distribution @ Exposure Time = 0.0125 sec The rapid slope of reconstructed scatterers at low amplitude is compatible with what expected from the reflection curve. 6000 3000 Integrated CCD count LIGO-G1601982. 11

  12. How many scatterers are actually there ? Drop of laser light impedes detection of scatterers below first 2-3 layers 26 layers in each HR coating ~200 scatterers /mm2 LIGO-G1601982. 12

  13. Origin of scatterers Virtually no absorption (<0.25 ppm) Positive or negative density (n) fluctuations Positive = crystallites, in glasses catalyze crystallization Negative = large fluctuation of natural voids in glasses Both have dangling bonds, i.e. double well potentials adsorbing mechanical energy LIGO-G1601982. 13

  14. Ongoing work Two steps proposed: 1. Sum coherently lower exposure images from LIGO to mitigate saturation. 2. Study ad-LIGO witness samples to determine scatterer s depth distribution through layers and size distribution LIGO-G1601982. 14

  15. Lucky byproduct Study of image to image star position motion for coherent addition of images yielded a metod to independently detect: Motion of stored beam within mirror Motion of mirror w.r.t. camera. LIGO-G1601982. 15

  16. DAOPHOT position resolution Differential star position between two images The scatter of the points (standard deviation) = ~11 m positioning error of daophot Calibration 1Pixel = ~80 m LIGO-G1601982. 16

  17. Detection of mirror motion Mirror motion Mirror position resolution ~ 1.3 m Calibration 1Pixel = ~80 m LIGO-G1601982. 17

  18. Depth scatterer exploration Study a spare witness samples to determine the scatterer s depth distribution the scatterer s size distribution LIGO-G1601982. 18

  19. X, Y Axis micropositioning CCD Camera Z Axis piezo focusing White light LED 50% Reflector @ 45 1 3 2 Microscope lens AdLIGO Multi-Layered Mirror LIGO-G1601982. 19

  20. Grid scan of Mirror X1 X2 Xn Raster scan X-Y of microscope frames on mirror surface to identify rough scatterer position Y1 Y2 Defocused Scatterers Yn LIGO-G1601982. 20

  21. Potential depth resolution Depth of field 0.6 m / n depth resolution of ~ 30 nm/ n achieved from Z-scan Wide angle-white light illumination allow penetration of many layers Focused Scatterer Defocused Scatterer Defocused Scatterer Maximum Luminosity +Z -Z LIGO-G1601982. 21

  22. Conclusions 1 A very large population of scatterers was found on aLIGO mirrors under high-power illumination. They contribute to large angle optical scattering, if the observed points are the locus of mechanical dissipation, they may explain the anomalous mechanical dissipation observed in sputtered coatings. The discovery is a good diagnostic tool, perhaps indicating possible ways to reduce the Sensitivity limitation for Gravitational Wave detectors LIGO-G1601982. 22

  23. Conclusions 2 Methods are being developed to monitor 1. mirror to camera and 2. beam to mirror micro-movements Both can be valuable diagnostic tools at the observatory LIGO-G1601982. 23

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#