Gravitational Quantum States of Antihydrogen

GRANIT 2014
Gravitational Quantum States of
Antihydrogen
A. Voronin, V. Nesvizhevsky, P.Froelich
O.Dalkarov, E.Kupriyanova
Plan of the talk
Gravitational states of antihydrogen: Is it
possible?
How can we get gravitational mass out of
gravitational states?
Properties of gravitational states
Spectroscopy, interference and time
-
spatial
resolution of gravitational states
Gravitational quantum states?
State of motion of a quantum particle, which is localized near reflecting surface 
 in a gravitational field of the Earth.
Collimator
Absorber/Scatterer
Bottom mirror
s
Neutron 
detector
~10-12 cm
First Observation: Gravitational States of Neutrons
Nesvizhevsky et al. Nature 415, 297 (2002)
Anti-
Vibrational
Feet
Inclinometers
Ultra Cold Neutrons
Slit Height
Measurement
 Count rates at ILL turbine: ~1/s to 1/h
 Effective (vertical) temperature of neutrons is ~20 nK
 Background suppression is a factor of ~10
8
-10
9
 Parallelism of the bottom mirror and the absorber/scatterer is ~10
-6
 
GRANIT SPECTROMETER
Gravitational states of 
Antihydrogen
:
 Seems Impossible? Quantum Reflection!
0.1cm

%
1cm

%
10cm

%
0.1cm


%
1cm


%
1
0
cm


%
10 
m

%
10 
m

%
Red- silica, 
black- gold
G. Dufour
A. Gérardin
R. Guérout
A. Lambrecht
V. V. Nesvizhevsky
S.
Reynaud
,  
A. Yu. Voronin
 
Phys. Rev. A 87, 012901 (2013)
0.01cm

%
0.01cm

%
Gravitational states of 
antihydrogen
Quantum reflection is about 97% - it works like a
reflecting wall
Effects of surface
 
Hierarchy of scales                  : gravity and
surface-atom interaction are factorized
Annihilation in the bulk of the wall: short –
range atom-wall interactions are washed out
Small annihilation width of gravitational
states: compromise between long life-time
and observation
Correction by Casimir-Polder potential + annihilation 
Gravitational states and Gravitational mass
 
Gravitational states are all about energy and spatial scales
Methods of observation
 
Spectroscopy: induced transition between
gravitational states
Interference: temporal and spatial oscillations
of annihilation signal of superposition of
gravitational states
Time and spatial resolution of free-fall events:
mapping of momentum distribution of
gravitational state into time-of-fall or spatial
distribution
Spectroscopy- to induce transitions
between gravitational states with
alternating magnetic field
E
Developed for neutrons by V. Nesvizhevsky, S. Baessler, G. Pignol,
 
K. Protassov, A.Voronin
Antihydrogen in Magnetic Field
 
Center-of-mass fall
 
Coulomb
 
HF splitting
 
 Field-magnetic
moment
interaction
E
B
a
b
c
d
F=0, M=0
F=1, M=-1
F=1, M=0
F=1, M=1
 
Effective Stark-effect
Possible scheme of flow-throw
experiment
v
1-source of ultracold antihydrogen, 2-mirror, 3- absorber, 4- magnetic field,
5-  detector
B
Transition probability
Time of observation t=0.1 s
Transition probability as a function of frequency. Transition 1->5
EP and gravitational mass
 
PRECISION
Interference of gravitational states
 
 
Time and Spatial Resolving of
Gravitational States
Momentum distribution of gravitational state can be mapped into measurable 
time or spatial distribution
H=10cm
Mapping of momentum distribution
 
 
 
 
 
1  state
velocity distribution
 
Time-of –fall distribution  H= 10 cm
 
Spatial distribution time-of-flight  T=0.1s
2 state
 
Phase monitoring
 
B
Conclusions
Gravitational states
 
of Antihydrogen: simplest
bound antimatter quantum system,
determined by gravity. Effects of surface are
canceled out.
Gravitational states of Antihydrogen-
metastable  and long-living, easy to study due
to annihilation signal
Gravitational states- a way to precision
measurement of the gravitational mass M
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The research delves into the intriguing realm of gravitational quantum states of antihydrogen, posing questions about the feasibility of gravitational mass extraction from these states. Through topics like spectroscopy, interference, and time-spatial resolution, the study sheds light on the properties and quantum reflection phenomena of antihydrogen states in a gravitational field. The effects of surface interactions, Casimir-Polder potential corrections, and annihilation are explored, offering insights into the behavior and challenges in observing gravitational states.

  • Quantum States
  • Antihydrogen
  • Gravitational Physics
  • Quantum Reflection
  • Casimir-Polder

Uploaded on Aug 28, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GRANIT 2014 Gravitational Quantum States of Antihydrogen A. Voronin, V. Nesvizhevsky, P.Froelich O.Dalkarov, E.Kupriyanova

  2. Plan of the talk Gravitational states of antihydrogen: Is it possible? How can we get gravitational mass out of gravitational states? Properties of gravitational states Spectroscopy, interference and time-spatial resolution of gravitational states

  3. Gravitational quantum states? State of motion of a quantum particle, which is localized near reflecting surface in a gravitational field of the Earth. 2 d dx + = = F( ) 0, (0) F 0 x x ( ) Ai x 2 n E, peV 2.7 1.4 Z, m 13.7 24.0

  4. Gravitational states of Antihydrogen: Seems Impossible? Quantum Reflection! 10 m = % Red- silica, black- gold 0.01cm = % 10 m = % 0.01cm = % 0.1cm = % 0.1cm = % 1cm = % 1cm = % 10cm = % 10cm = % G. Dufour, A. G rardin, R. Gu rout, A. Lambrecht, V. V. Nesvizhevsky, S. Reynaud, A. Yu. Voronin Phys. Rev. A 87, 012901 (2013)

  5. Gravitational states of antihydrogen Quantum reflection is about 97% - it works like a reflecting wall 2 2 d + = ( ) z 0 Mgz E 2 2 d + + = 2 ( ) z ( ) z 0 2 V Mgz E m dz CP 2 2 m dz (0) '(0) a = 0.005 i CP l = ( ) 0 E, peV g = ( ) z Ai( / )/ |Ai'( )| z l g n n a 2.7 2/3 0.005 1 CP l 3 1 2 (2 ) n n 4 g 1.4 Z, m 13.7 24.0

  6. Effects of surface Hierarchy of scales : gravity and surface-atom interaction are factorized Annihilation in the bulk of the wall: short range atom-wall interactions are washed out Small annihilation width of gravitational states: compromise between long life-time and observation | | l a g CP

  7. Correction by Casimir-Polder potential + annihilation Mgz 2 d dx + = (x) 0 x z V(z) n 2 l | |/ a 0.005 (0) '(0) a = 0.005 i CP l 0 g Correction by Casimir-Polder and annihilation: = + = + / a l = n n g ( Re / ) 2 Im / a l a l 0 0 n n g g l = = g 0.1 s 2 Im 2 Im a Mg a g All states have equal shift and lifetime~0.1s No surface effects in transition frequiencies

  8. Gravitational states and Gravitational mass = = = Classical: 2 / mz Mg z g T H g 2 2 2 d d dx + = + = Quantum: ( ) z 0 F( ) 0 Mgz E x x n 2 2 2 m dz 2 2 2 2 M g m = = -12 -6 = =0.61 10 eV; 5.87 10 l m 3 3 g g 2 2 Mmg 1 l = = = (z) ( / / ) E z l x F z l E n g n g n g n g g 2 2 l 2 H g = = g 2; m M = = = g or T M m 2 g g l gl g g g Gravitational states are all about energy and spatial scales

  9. Methods of observation Spectroscopy: induced transition between gravitational states Interference: temporal and spatial oscillations of annihilation signal of superposition of gravitational states Time and spatial resolution of free-fall events: mapping of momentum distribution of gravitational state into time-of-fall or spatial distribution

  10. Spectroscopy- to induce transitions between gravitational states with alternating magnetic field Developed for neutrons by V. Nesvizhevsky, S. Baessler, G. Pignol, K. Protassov, A.Voronin E Z, m 13.7 24.0

  11. Antihydrogen in Magnetic Field Effective Stark-effect HF splitting Coulomb Center-of-mass fall Field-magnetic moment interaction E d F=1, M=1 F=1, M=0 c b F=1, M=-1 a F=0, M=0 B

  12. Possible scheme of flow-throw experiment B 5 3 4 Hd 1 Ha v 2 L 1-source of ultracold antihydrogen, 2-mirror, 3- absorber, 4- magnetic field, 5- detector 1 / , 15 , 25 a d v m s H m H = = = , 10 , 10 / , 30 m B Gs Gs m L cm 0

  13. Transition probability 2 ik 1 2 t = + 2 2 ik 2 2 sin ( )exp( t) P ik + 2 ik 2 2 + 3 g ( ) l = B p ik 2 ( ) z z k i P 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Hz 800 820 840 860 Transition probability as a function of frequency. Transition 1->5 Time of observation t=0.1 s

  14. EP and gravitational mass 2 2 2 M g m -12 = =0.61 10 eV 3 g 2 2 2 2 3 ik 2 M g m m ( ) = = M 3 ( ) ik k i 3 2 2 g k i 3 ik 2 = = M m M 3 2 ( ) g k i PRECISION 3 N = 2 ; 10 N H 2 H 3 10 1 5

  15. Interference of gravitational states N = C i i = 1 i * ( , ) z t dz ( , ) z t dz i d d = * ( , ) j z t ( , ) z t ( , ) z t 2 m dF dz E E ( ) = ) 1 cos( exp( ) = t t 12 2 1 1 0.1s 12 12 dN dt 20 15 10 5 t, ms 20 40 60 80 100

  16. Time and Spatial Resolving of Gravitational States Momentum distribution of gravitational state can be mapped into measurable time or spatial distribution P 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Ha m s 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 P 0.0020 0.0015 0.0010 0.0005 H=10cm m 0.010 0.005 0.005 0.010

  17. Mapping of momentum distribution 1 = / ipz ( , ) z t ( , , ') G p t p F p dpdp ( ') ' e 0 2 it m = + 2 2 2 2 ( , , ') G p t p exp ( /3) ( ') p Mgpt M g t p Mgt p 2 2 m t gt m t 3 2 2 2 it M g imz + = + ( , ) z t ( ); ( ) e F p Mgt p z 2 2 t m 0 0 0 2 m t = 2 2 | ( , )| z t | ( )| F k 0 = = 1)z : ( ), ( 2 / g z z k mg t t t 0 0 0 0 ) m z z = = = 2) / : t t L v k 0 0 t 0

  18. P P 0.5 0.35 0.30 ( ) n k 0.4 = 0.25 l 0.3 g 0.20 n 0.15 0.2 0.10 0.1 0.05 m s m s 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 velocity distribution 1 state 2 state P P 0.0020 0.0014 0.0012 0.0015 0.0010 0.0010 0.0008 0.0006 0.0005 0.0004 ms 141 142 143 144 145 ms 141 142 143 144 145 Time-of fall distribution H= 10 cm P P 0.0014 0.0020 0.0012 0.0010 0.0015 0.0008 0.0010 0.0006 0.0004 0.0005 0.0002 m m 0.010 0.005 0.005 0.010 0.010 0.005 0.005 0.010 Spatial distribution time-of-flight T=0.1s

  19. Phase monitoring = + ( ) Exp i t 1 21 2 P P 0.0030 0.0020 0.0025 0.0015 0.0020 0.0010 0.0015 0.0010 0.0005 0.0005 ms ms 141 142 143 144 145 141 142 143 144 145 t = 0 = 0.0019 t s P P 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 ms ms 141 142 143 144 145 141 142 143 144 145 = = 0.0014 0.0029 t s t s

  20. P 0.0030 0.0025 0.0020 0.0015 0.0010 0.0005 ms 141 142 143 144 145 B 3 4 1 Ha 2

  21. Conclusions Gravitational states of Antihydrogen: simplest bound antimatter quantum system, determined by gravity. Effects of surface are canceled out. Gravitational states of Antihydrogen- metastable and long-living, easy to study due to annihilation signal Gravitational states- a way to precision measurement of the gravitational mass M

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#