Strategies for Effective Social Influence and Compliance in Persuasion

 
PERSUASION
SOCIAL INFLUENCE
&
COMPLIANCE GAINING
 
Robert H. Gass & John S. Seiter
 
CHAPTER 11
 
Sequential Persuasion
 
PREGIVING
 
Favors and gifts create a sense
of indebtedness.
Returning favors is culturally
universal.
Beware of unfair exchanges.
example: a male buys a
female three drinks in a bar.
Does she “owe” him anything
in return?
 
Explanations for pregiving’s
effectiveness
Liking
Physical attraction
Perceived ulterior motives
Gratitude
Impression management
Internalized social norm; norm
of reciprocity
 
PREGIVING EXAMPLES
 
Befriending your neighbor
Ned fixes Earl’s sprinkler, then
asks to borrow Earl’s
lawnmower.
Political favors
Campaign contributions buy
access to a politician, if not
votes.
Panhandling tour guides
Panhandlers volunteer
directions to tourists, then ask
for a tip.
 
Pregiving in sales
A company gives important clients
free tickets to a ball game.
Wedding and baby showers
Obligation to give an equivalent
gift—social exchange theory
 
FOOT IN THE DOOR
 
A person who agrees to a small, initial
request is more likely to comply with a
subsequent larger request.
Freedman & Fraser’s (1966) classic study
initial request:
 housewives were
asked to display a small sign in their
window that read “Be a safe driver.”
follow-up request:
 housewives were
later asked to display a large billboard
that read “Drive Carefully” in the
front yard.
results:
 17% of the “control”
housewives complied, compared to
76% of the FITD housewives.
 
 Inked Pixels/Shutterstock.com
 
FITD EXPLANATIONS
 
Bem’s 
self-perception theory
: People make self-
attributions based on their own behavior.
Gorassini & Olson: Self perception is not the
only explanation for the FITD.
The requestee may consider whether others
would reject the request.
activating relevant attitudes is important
(“you are so thoughtful.” “You are so
generous.”)
 
KEYS TO THE FITD STRATEGY
 
Size of the 1
st
 request
Must be small enough to ensure
compliance, but not so small as to
appear trivial.
Prosocial requests
The strategy works best with
prosocial causes.
External incentives
There should be 
no
 external
inducements such as payment or
rewards.
Who makes the request
The 1
st
 and 2
nd
 requests need 
not
 be
made by the same requester.
 
Social labeling
Positive labels help activate
relevant attitudes.
Preference for consistency
People with a high need for
consistency are more
susceptible.
Self concept clarity
People with high self-clarity are
more susceptible.
 
THE DOOR IN THE FACE
 
A person is presented with an initial, large request
which she/he is inclined to reject.
The person thereby becomes more likely to acquiesce
to a second, more reasonable request.
Cialdini & Ascani’s (1976) study:
initial request:
 college dorm residents were asked
to donate one unit of blood every two months for a
period of three years.
follow-up request:
 dorm residents were asked to
give blood once, the next day.
results:
 compliance for the DITF group was 49%,
versus 31% for the control group.
 
sirtravelalot/Shutterstock.com
 
DITF EXPLANATIONS
 
perceptual contrast effect
The 2nd request seems much
more reasonable by
comparison.
self-presentation
The target doesn’t want to be
perceived negatively by others.
reciprocal concessions
The target perceives he/she is
engaged in a bargaining
situation.
 
legitimacy explanation
Concessions imply the request
is genuine
guilt-based explanation
The target feels guilty for not
being helpful.
social responsibility position
We comply based on our own,
internal standards
 
KEYS TO THE DITF STRATEGY
 
Size of the initial request
The 1
st
 request must be large
enough to be rejected, but not
ludicrous.
Type of Compliance Sought
The strategy works best with
prosocial causes.
No Time Delay
The  2
nd
 request must follow
right after the 1
st
.
 
Who makes the request
The 1
st
 and 2
nd
 requests
must be made by the 
same
requester.
Size of the follow-up request
The 2
nd
 request must be
unambiguously smaller than
the 1
st
.
 
SWEETENING THE DEAL
 
But wait, there’s more…”
The “that’s not all strategy”
sweetens the deal.
Free extras add perceived value
to an offer.
“Order now, and I’ll throw in…”
Often combined with the scarcity
principle.
“The first 20 callers will also
receive…”
Effectiveness is based on
reciprocity
 and 
contrasting
 
THE LOW BALL TECHNIQUE
 
The low ball technique
Lowballing involves making an offer that
sounds too good to be true.
There are, however, hidden “strings”
attached.
Once the consumer is psychologically
committed, it is hard to back out.
zero down car sales
A credit card has a low interest rate, but
only for a few months.
fine print in a low airfare ad
(“restrictions may apply”)
Effectiveness is based on 
psychological
commitment
 and 
unfulfilled obligations
 
 pongsakorn chaina/Shutterstock.com;
Francois Poirier/Shutterstock.com
 
BAIT & SWITCH TECHNIQUE
 
Bait & Switch
An offer is made that seems too good
to be true.
When the consumer tries to buy the
low-priced item, the item is no longer
available.
A different, more expensive item is
offered instead
“Sorry, we’re out of your size, but…”
“That model is actually a piece of junk.
For just a bit more, you can get…”
“Would you like to upgrade that
ticket?”
 
 nuvolanevicata/Shutterstock.com
 
OTHER STRATEGIES
 
Disrupt-then-reframe: “It’s only 500
pennies!”
Pique technique: “Can you lend me
$1.47?”
Legitimizing paltry contributions:
“Even a penny will help.”
Evoking freedom: “Feel free to say
no…”
Fear-then-relief: riding an
emotional roller coaster
 
 zimmytws/Shutterstock.com
Slide Note
Embed
Share

In "Persuasion, Social Influence & Compliance Gaining" by Robert H. Gass and John S. Seiter, Chapter 11 explores sequential persuasion tactics such as pregiving and the foot-in-the-door technique. Pregiving, where favors or gifts create a sense of indebtedness, is effective due to factors like liking, physical attraction, and reciprocity norms. The foot-in-the-door method capitalizes on initial small requests leading to larger compliance. Understanding strategies like these can enhance one's ability to influence others effectively.

  • Social influence
  • Compliance gaining
  • Persuasion tactics
  • Sequential persuasion
  • Pregiving

Uploaded on Sep 26, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PERSUASION SOCIAL INFLUENCE & COMPLIANCE GAINING Robert H. Gass & John S. Seiter

  2. CHAPTER 11 Sequential Persuasion

  3. PREGIVING Favors and gifts create a sense of indebtedness. Explanations for pregiving s effectiveness Liking Physical attraction Perceived ulterior motives Gratitude Impression management Internalized social norm; norm of reciprocity Returning favors is culturally universal. Beware of unfair exchanges. example: a male buys a female three drinks in a bar. Does she owe him anything in return?

  4. PREGIVING EXAMPLES Befriending your neighbor Ned fixes Earl s sprinkler, then asks to borrow Earl s lawnmower. Pregiving in sales A company gives important clients free tickets to a ball game. Wedding and baby showers Obligation to give an equivalent gift social exchange theory Political favors Campaign contributions buy access to a politician, if not votes. Panhandling tour guides Panhandlers volunteer directions to tourists, then ask for a tip.

  5. FOOT IN THE DOOR A person who agrees to a small, initial request is more likely to comply with a subsequent larger request. Freedman & Fraser s (1966) classic study initial request: housewives were asked to display a small sign in their window that read Be a safe driver. follow-up request: housewives were later asked to display a large billboard that read Drive Carefully in the front yard. results: 17% of the control housewives complied, compared to 76% of the FITD housewives. Inked Pixels/Shutterstock.com

  6. FITD EXPLANATIONS Bem s self-perception theory: People make self- attributions based on their own behavior. Gorassini & Olson: Self perception is not the only explanation for the FITD. The requestee may consider whether others would reject the request. activating relevant attitudes is important ( you are so thoughtful. You are so generous. )

  7. KEYS TO THE FITD STRATEGY Size of the 1st request Must be small enough to ensure compliance, but not so small as to appear trivial. Prosocial requests The strategy works best with prosocial causes. External incentives There should be no external inducements such as payment or rewards. Who makes the request The 1st and 2nd requests need not be made by the same requester. Social labeling Positive labels help activate relevant attitudes. Preference for consistency People with a high need for consistency are more susceptible. Self concept clarity People with high self-clarity are more susceptible.

  8. THE DOOR IN THE FACE A person is presented with an initial, large request which she/he is inclined to reject. The person thereby becomes more likely to acquiesce to a second, more reasonable request. Cialdini & Ascani s (1976) study: initial request: college dorm residents were asked to donate one unit of blood every two months for a period of three years. follow-up request: dorm residents were asked to give blood once, the next day. results: compliance for the DITF group was 49%, versus 31% for the control group. sirtravelalot/Shutterstock.com

  9. DITF EXPLANATIONS perceptual contrast effect The 2nd request seems much more reasonable by comparison. legitimacy explanation Concessions imply the request is genuine guilt-based explanation The target feels guilty for not being helpful. self-presentation The target doesn t want to be perceived negatively by others. social responsibility position We comply based on our own, internal standards reciprocal concessions The target perceives he/she is engaged in a bargaining situation.

  10. KEYS TO THE DITF STRATEGY Size of the initial request The 1st request must be large enough to be rejected, but not ludicrous. Who makes the request The 1st and 2nd requests must be made by the same requester. Type of Compliance Sought The strategy works best with prosocial causes. Size of the follow-up request The 2nd request must be unambiguously smaller than the 1st. No Time Delay The 2nd request must follow right after the 1st.

  11. SWEETENING THE DEAL But wait, there s more The that s not all strategy sweetens the deal. Free extras add perceived value to an offer. Order now, and I ll throw in Often combined with the scarcity principle. The first 20 callers will also receive Effectiveness is based on reciprocity and contrasting But wait! There s more

  12. THE LOW BALL TECHNIQUE The low ball technique Lowballing involves making an offer that sounds too good to be true. There are, however, hidden strings attached. Once the consumer is psychologically committed, it is hard to back out. zero down car sales A credit card has a low interest rate, but only for a few months. fine print in a low airfare ad ( restrictions may apply ) Effectiveness is based on psychological commitment and unfulfilled obligations pongsakorn chaina/Shutterstock.com; Francois Poirier/Shutterstock.com

  13. BAIT & SWITCH TECHNIQUE Bait & Switch An offer is made that seems too good to be true. When the consumer tries to buy the low-priced item, the item is no longer available. A different, more expensive item is offered instead Sorry, we re out of your size, but That model is actually a piece of junk. For just a bit more, you can get Would you like to upgrade that ticket? nuvolanevicata/Shutterstock.com

  14. OTHER STRATEGIES Disrupt-then-reframe: It s only 500 pennies! Pique technique: Can you lend me $1.47? Legitimizing paltry contributions: Even a penny will help. Evoking freedom: Feel free to say no zimmytws/Shutterstock.com Fear-then-relief: riding an emotional roller coaster

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#