Shared Instructional Leadership in Danish Schools

undefined
Shared Instructional Leadership in Practice - Danish
School Leaders between Egalitarian Culture and
Accountability Pressures
Ronni Laursen, Sedat Gümüs & Alan Walker 16.
November, 2023
UCEA
 
Aim of the Study
 
We aim to explore how principals
work with shared instructional
leadership in Danish primary and
lower secondary public schools
 
By doing that 
we target that the
study contributes to the ongoing
dialogue about shared
instructional leadership’s
potential in diverse cultural
settings.
 
The Danish Context
 
78% of Danish children enrolled in the public school
system
Includes primary and lower secondary schooling
Optional grade 10 available
Three levels of governance
Parliament designs and adopts education
legislation
98 municipalities responsible for running schools
Principals have the autonomy to build unique
culture
 
The Danish Context: Culture and Leadership
Expectations
 
Danish culture values equality, autonomy, and work-
life balance
Community, trust, and transparency are
valued in relationships
Danish schools have a flat organizational structure
Principals prioritize democratic participation
and staff and student well-being
High levels of trust and transparency in
decision-making
 
Recent education reforms have challenged traditional
roles
Increased emphasis on decentralization,
accountability, and student achievement
 
Theory and
Background:
Instructional
Leadership
 
Defining the school mission
Principal's role in establishing school's core purpose
Collaboration with staff to focus on student achievement
Communicating academic progress goals to stakeholders
Managing the instructional program
Principal's responsibility for coordinating and controlling
instruction and curriculum
Requires expertise in teaching and learning
Debate on focus on control instead of development of
teaching staff
Creating a positive school climate
Rising student achievement through culture of continuous
improvement
Incentives to support improvement culture
Principal modeling relevant values and practices
 
Theory and
Background:
Shared
Instructional
Leadership
 
Shared instructional leadership responds to
criticism of top-down approach
Empowered teachers influence
achievement of organizational goals
Collaboration between leaders and
teachers to improve student achievement
Builds on ideas from transformational,
distributed, and instructional leadership
Communicates clear instructional vision
Instructional expertise situated across
school's social and situational context
Four key elements: shared visions, focus on
instruction, monitoring of progress, broad
collaboration
Participatory structures and processes
 
Data and Methods
 
18 Interviews
Conducted in three selected schools during
the 2021-2022 academic year
Semi-structured format
Questions about background information,
governance, student achievement, school
culture, and leadership
Document analysis of 12 policy documents
Comprehensive reports on leadership,
culture, and learning
Smaller leaflets explaining schools'
approach to learning, teaching, and data
collection
Review of schools' websites
Focus on how documents articulated
schools' visions, particularly in the context
of learning and school culture
 
Data and Methods: Analysis
 
First Round of Coding
Comparing and analyzing data from interviews
Comprehensive review of transcripts
Development of preliminary data overview
Second Round of Coding
Theoretical scrutiny of initial codes
Focus on leadership practices intertwined with teaching
and learning
Generation of preliminary categories of leadership
practices
Final Stage
Review of codes
Focused and systematic analysis of data
Aggregation of data analysis into coherent clusters
 
Three Major
Findings
 
1)
Inside the engine room
2)
Reflection as a Means of
Professional
Development
3)
The Need for
Collaboration
Inside the Engine Room
The teachers are the experts in
teaching, and therefore we [the
leadership team] let them
perform the teaching which is
best suited to their case.
(Principal at School 1)
Well, they don't do that [supervise daily
teaching practices], though. But I'm not
sure if it's a good idea either. I mean,
because... If it's been 25 years since
they were last in the classroom, then
what help can they provide me with?
 
Reflection as a Means of Professional Development
We [the school leadership team] have then set a
requirement that they [teachers] must
accommodate - a team meeting must schedule 45
minutes for reflections on their teaching practice.
And then, we work in learning circles by saying,
‘What kind of data do we have difficulty with
here?’ Then we reflect and encourage the
respective employees that reflect on his/her
practice to try to come up with ideas for solving
the problems. (Principal at School 1)
 
The Need for
Collaboration
I would like to see stronger
collaboration in our teams, where
you share the vision and become a
little better at saying this is actually
our professional approach instead
of leaving that responsibility to the
individual teacher. So, my vision is
that no matter who starts in our
school, I can ensure they get the
best possible course. That is, it is
not luck if you just got Carl as a
teacher or Sofie as a teacher.
(Principal at School 2)
 
Conclusion
 
Shared Instructional Leadership in Danish Schools
Leaders influenced by accountability policies for student learning outcomes
Similar structures despite variation in socio-economic composition and exam grades
Responsibility shared with middle leaders and key teachers
Egalitarian culture
Behind-the-Scenes Leadership
Organizes teacher practices towards student learning outcomes
Shared responsibility in organized process
Feedback informs leader decisions
Professional Development
Organized in teams for reflection
 
Time for Comments,
Feedback and
Questions
 
Ronni@ikl.aau.dk
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This study delves into how principals implement shared instructional leadership in Danish primary and lower secondary public schools, aiming to enhance dialogue on its potential in diverse cultural contexts. The Danish educational landscape, emphasizing autonomy and democratic participation, poses challenges amidst accountability pressures. Principals play a crucial role in defining school missions, promoting student achievement, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement through effective instructional leadership strategies.

  • Instructional Leadership
  • Danish Schools
  • Educational Culture
  • Accountability Pressures
  • Student Achievement

Uploaded on Mar 26, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Shared Instructional Leadership in Practice - Danish School Leaders between Egalitarian Culture and Accountability Pressures Ronni Laursen, Sedat G m s & Alan Walker 16. November, 2023 UCEA

  2. Aim of the Study We aim to explore how principals work with shared instructional leadership in Danish primary and lower secondary public schools By doing that we target that the study contributes to the ongoing dialogue about shared instructional leadership s potential in diverse cultural settings.

  3. The Danish Context 78% of Danish children enrolled in the public school system Includes primary and lower secondary schooling Optional grade 10 available Three levels of governance Parliament designs and adopts education legislation 98 municipalities responsible for running schools Principals have the autonomy to build unique culture

  4. The Danish Context: Culture and Leadership Expectations Danish culture values equality, autonomy, and work- life balance Community, trust, and transparency are valued in relationships Danish schools have a flat organizational structure Principals prioritize democratic participation and staff and student well-being High levels of trust and transparency in decision-making Recent education reforms have challenged traditional roles Increased emphasis on decentralization, accountability, and student achievement

  5. Defining the school mission Principal's role in establishing school's core purpose Collaboration with staff to focus on student achievement Communicating academic progress goals to stakeholders Theory and Background: Instructional Leadership Managing the instructional program Principal's responsibility for coordinating and controlling instruction and curriculum Requires expertise in teaching and learning Debate on focus on control instead of development of teaching staff Creating a positive school climate Rising student achievement through culture of continuous improvement Incentives to support improvement culture Principal modeling relevant values and practices

  6. Shared instructional leadership responds to criticism of top-down approach Empowered teachers influence achievement of organizational goals Collaboration between leaders and teachers to improve student achievement Theory and Background: Shared Instructional Leadership Builds on ideas from transformational, distributed, and instructional leadership Communicates clear instructional vision Instructional expertise situated across school's social and situational context Four key elements: shared visions, focus on instruction, monitoring of progress, broad collaboration Participatory structures and processes

  7. Data and Methods 18 Interviews Conducted in three selected schools during the 2021-2022 academic year Semi-structured format Questions about background information, governance, student achievement, school culture, and leadership Document analysis of 12 policy documents Comprehensive reports on leadership, culture, and learning Smaller leaflets explaining schools' approach to learning, teaching, and data collection Review of schools' websites Focus on how documents articulated schools' visions, particularly in the context of learning and school culture

  8. Data and Methods: Analysis First Round of Coding Comparing and analyzing data from interviews Comprehensive review of transcripts Development of preliminary data overview Second Round of Coding Theoretical scrutiny of initial codes Focus on leadership practices intertwined with teaching and learning Generation of preliminary categories of leadership practices Final Stage Review of codes Focused and systematic analysis of data Aggregation of data analysis into coherent clusters

  9. Three Major Findings 1) Inside the engine room 2) Reflection as a Means of Professional Development 3) The Need for Collaboration

  10. Inside the Engine Room The teachers are the experts in Well, they don't do that [supervise daily teaching, and therefore we [the teaching practices], though. But I'm not leadership sure if it's a good idea either. I mean, team] let them perform the teaching which is because... If it's been 25 years since best they were last in the classroom, then suited to their case. (Principal at School 1) what help can they provide me with?

  11. Reflection as a Means of Professional Development We [the school leadership team] have then set a requirement that they [teachers] must accommodate - a team meeting must schedule 45 minutes for reflections on their teaching practice. And then, we work in learning circles by saying, What kind of data do we have difficulty with here? Then we reflect and encourage the respective employees that reflect on his/her practice to try to come up with ideas for solving the problems. (Principal at School 1)

  12. The Need for Collaboration I collaboration in our teams, where you share the vision and become a little better at saying this is actually our professional approach instead of leaving that responsibility to the individual teacher. So, my vision is that no matter who starts in our school, I can ensure they get the best possible course. That is, it is not luck if you just got Carl as a teacher or Sofie as a teacher. (Principal at School 2) would like to see stronger

  13. Conclusion Shared Instructional Leadership in Danish Schools Leaders influenced by accountability policies for student learning outcomes Similar structures despite variation in socio-economic composition and exam grades Responsibility shared with middle leaders and key teachers Egalitarian culture Behind-the-Scenes Leadership Organizes teacher practices towards student learning outcomes Shared responsibility in organized process Feedback informs leader decisions Professional Development Organized in teams for reflection

  14. Time for Comments, Feedback and Questions Ronni@ikl.aau.dk

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#