Review Committee Meeting Highlights and Budget Overview

undefined
 
Review Committee
 
FEBRUARY 21,2018
Agenda
 
Review the charge for the committee
Revisit assumptions of the budget context
Elements of the remediation plan (currently under discussion)
Process for making decisions going forward
Vacancies
New Positions
Salary increments
 
Article V from CCNY Governance Plan
 
Article V
The Review Committee
The Review Committee, which shall be the Personnel and Budget Committee of the College, shall consist of: the
Provost/Academic Vice President as Chairman
; the Deputy Provost; the Deans of the several Schools and the full Deans of
the College of Liberal Arts and Science; the Vice Presidents; the Vice Provost; the Dean of the School of General Studies;
the Chief Librarian. The Chairman of the Faculty Committee on Personnel Matters and the Chairman of the Executive
Committee of the Faculty Senate shall be members ex officio, with vote. The Deputy Provost shall sit with voice and without
vote, and in absence of the Academic Vice President, shall chair the meeting. The Chief Librarian shall not be present
during personnel actions. The functions of the Committee 
shall be to advise the President with respect to:
a. recommendation for appointments and reappointments;
b. recommendation for the conferring of tenure;
c. recommendation for promotions in rank;
d. personnel recommendations, policies and procedures; and
e
. proposals and policies having budgetary implications.
Budget Context
 
FY18 Deficit Negotiation with CUNY
Need to present a rationale/plan going forward for multiple years
Multiple elements to the plan:  All funds budget, new sources of revenue,
etc
In current discussion with CUNY on key features
We need to put forth cuts as well as growth projections;   new tuition
revenue helps
Assumptions of Remediation Plan
 
First stage of identification of deficit:  August 2018   DEFICIT BASED ON
March 31 Census of Positions;  “pause” instituted
Attrition projected at 445k for the year, carried forward
Financial plan adds additional projected savings of 600k, carried forward
Total assumption:  1.045 million not replaced
Actual Hiring FY 2018
 
Plan requires us to maintain freeze on 1.045 million in positions
Also added 661 k of new faculty hires in August (in process at freeze)
Approved 1.972 million of additional critical hires
If we had a total freeze, more like 3.678 million realized—but at other costs
So how to we balance critical hires going forward given attrition is
unplanned?
Criteria Used to Date
 
Loss of grant funding
Area of critical need/revenue generation
Retention
Area of promising investment
Near budget-neutrality or less than full replacement
Other?
Other Issues
 
HEO Screening Process:  Financial considerations one of many issues for
new appointments or filling vacancies
Self nomination of HEO’s for increments and reclassifications (on union
agenda)
Salaries above base under the new contract
Raises for promoted faculty
Additional Assumptions of
Remediation Plan
 
Premium fees of 500 UG and 250 Grad begin in Grove 2019= $3 million
Premium fees of 500 UG and 250 Grad begin in Arch 2019=318 k
DISCUSSION
 
Facing decisions now, what are best/most useful criteria for
Replacement
Entirely new positions?
 
Are there temporary policies that can help
Replacement of HEO positions at lower level
Mandated cost savings over budgeted line
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The Review Committee meeting held on February 21, 2018, discussed various crucial topics including reviewing the committee's charge, exploring budget assumptions, evaluating the remediation plan, decision-making processes, vacancies, new positions, and salary increments. The Committee, as outlined in the CCNY Governance Plan, advises the President on personnel matters, policies, and budgetary proposals. Additionally, the meeting addressed the FY18 budget deficit, negotiations with CUNY, and projections related to deficit identification and hiring plans for the year.

  • Review Committee
  • Budget Overview
  • CCNY Governance Plan
  • Meeting Highlights
  • Decision Making

Uploaded on Sep 17, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Review Committee FEBRUARY 21,2018

  2. Agenda Review the charge for the committee Revisit assumptions of the budget context Elements of the remediation plan (currently under discussion) Process for making decisions going forward Vacancies New Positions Salary increments

  3. Article V from CCNY Governance Plan Article V The Review Committee The Review Committee, which shall be the Personnel and Budget Committee of the College, shall consist of: the Provost/Academic Vice President as Chairman; the Deputy Provost; the Deans of the several Schools and the full Deans of the College of Liberal Arts and Science; the Vice Presidents; the Vice Provost; the Dean of the School of General Studies; the Chief Librarian. The Chairman of the Faculty Committee on Personnel Matters and the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate shall be members ex officio, with vote. The Deputy Provost shall sit with voice and without vote, and in absence of the Academic Vice President, shall chair the meeting. The Chief Librarian shall not be present during personnel actions. The functions of the Committee shall be to advise the President with respect to: a. recommendation for appointments and reappointments; b. recommendation for the conferring of tenure; c. recommendation for promotions in rank; d. personnel recommendations, policies and procedures; and e. proposals and policies having budgetary implications.

  4. Budget Context FY18 Deficit Negotiation with CUNY Need to present a rationale/plan going forward for multiple years Multiple elements to the plan: All funds budget, new sources of revenue, etc In current discussion with CUNY on key features We need to put forth cuts as well as growth projections; new tuition revenue helps

  5. Assumptions of Remediation Plan First stage of identification of deficit: August 2018 DEFICIT BASED ON March 31 Census of Positions; pause instituted Attrition projected at 445k for the year, carried forward Financial plan adds additional projected savings of 600k, carried forward Total assumption: 1.045 million not replaced

  6. Actual Hiring FY 2018 Plan requires us to maintain freeze on 1.045 million in positions Also added 661 k of new faculty hires in August (in process at freeze) Approved 1.972 million of additional critical hires If we had a total freeze, more like 3.678 million realized but at other costs So how to we balance critical hires going forward given attrition is unplanned?

  7. Criteria Used to Date Loss of grant funding Area of critical need/revenue generation Retention Area of promising investment Near budget-neutrality or less than full replacement Other?

  8. Other Issues HEO Screening Process: Financial considerations one of many issues for new appointments or filling vacancies Self nomination of HEO s for increments and reclassifications (on union agenda) Salaries above base under the new contract Raises for promoted faculty

  9. Additional Assumptions of Remediation Plan Premium fees of 500 UG and 250 Grad begin in Grove 2019= $3 million Premium fees of 500 UG and 250 Grad begin in Arch 2019=318 k

  10. DISCUSSION Facing decisions now, what are best/most useful criteria for Replacement Entirely new positions? Are there temporary policies that can help Replacement of HEO positions at lower level Mandated cost savings over budgeted line

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#