Review and Appeal Process in Scotland Deanery - Overview and Guidelines

 
Aims and
Content
 
Importance and Value of Reviews and Appeals
Overview of Review and Overview of Appeal
 
Review Process and Outcomes
 
Appeal Process
Preparation before – Evidence pack preparation
(guidance) and timelines
On the day – Panel membership, Appeal Format and
Attendance
Post Appeal Process
 
Removal of NTN (without ARCP) Appeal Process
 
 
Review and
Appeals
 
Gold Guide 8 regulated process
Standard Operating Procedure developed
by Scotland Deanery
Information available on Scotland Deanery
website
 
 
Is an opportunity for deanery to learn and
amend processes if appropriate
High stakes for trainees and is stressful for
them
Deanery representatives (TPDs/ FPDs/
APGDs /ADs) unusual event
 
Right to
review and
appeal
 
Trainee can appeal the decision resulting from an ARCP
panel
Trainee can appeal the decision to withdraw their
NTN/training contract (withdrawal without ARCP e.g. GMC
sanctions)
All applications for appeal involve a review
Only certain ARCP outcomes can proceed to formal appeal
panel (3, 4, 7.3 or 10.2, removal of NTN/training contract)
Trainees are notified of their right to appeal at the face to
face meeting after their ARCP.  Important that face to face
meetings go ahead
 
Review
Overview –
undertaken
for all
requests
 
The original ARCP panel that issued an unsatisfactory
outcome, return to that decision, to reconsider whether it
was appropriate.
NEW PROCESS FOR FOUNDATION (replaces FSD review
process)
 
“The Review must take into account the representations of
the trainee asking for the Review and any other
information, including additional relevant evidence,
whether it formed part of the original considerations or has
been freshly submitted” (GG 4.161).
 
A trainee in receipt of an outcome 2, 7.2 or 10.1 has the
right to Review only (GG 4.165).
 
 
Appeal Overview
 
The decision of the original ARCP panel is considered by a different panel. An Appeal takes
into account the information/evidence available at the time the original outcome was
issued 
alongside newly submitted evidence relevant to the Appeal 
and the
representations of the trainee making the Appeal request. (GG 4.162)
 
Applicable for trainee in receipt of an outcome 3, 4, 7.3 or 10.2  (GG 4.166-4.179)
 
A Review will be conducted as a preliminary part of the process.
 
Review Process
 
Trainee must be submit an application in writing within 10 working days from date of face to face meeting –
arcp.appeals@nes.scot.nhs.uk
A Deanery Appeal Team (DAT) case manager will be allocated to the trainee and will liaise with the trainee
and all panel members to ensure a consistent and fair process
Trainee completes a Review Request form detailing their reasons
Trainees should submit written evidence to support their request for an appeal.
New information for an appeal might include new evidence of mitigating circumstances not available to
the ARCP panel.
New information would not normally include competences/capabilities or evidence from assessments
acquired after the date of the ARCP subject to appeal (GG 4.162)
The DAT case manager will liaise with the Chair of the original panel to arrange the Review within 15 working
days (approx.) of original outcome
 
Review Outcomes
 
Original panel reviews the information in trainee’s request.
Panel chair provides written response to trainee either upholding original decision or overturning the decision –
giving clear reasons for either outcome and specifically responding to the grounds for Review listed by the trainee in
their Review Request form.
 
Review process now applies to foundation hence FPDs and APGD Foundation may be involved in Reviews
 
 
The panel should not impose an increased sanction on the trainee.
In circumstances where new information has come to light that may inform a decision to increase the sanction, these
issues will be brought to the attention of the Lead Dean Director. (4.177)
 
Review Outcomes
 
Appeal
Process
 
 
The DAT case manager will organise a new panel for the
Appeal
Preparation before panel
Deanery evidence pack prepared by Deanery
representative (FPD/TPD/APGD)  - guidance is available
Trainee also provides evidence if they wish
 
On the day
Panel membership
Format - TPD/FPD or original Chair of the ARCP panel are
expect to attend as the Deanery representative detailing
why the original panel came to their decision
 
Outcome
 
Evidence Pack
 
As a FPD/TPD what evidence am I required to
supply?
 
The Appeal panel are not able to view the trainee e-portfolio of the trainee (they
do not have access rights nor would they all know where to find information)
Consider what the panel will need to make a decision bearing in mind that the
panel have no prior knowledge of the trainee
Working with your administrator, you should provide a narrative summary of the
trainee’s training to date and attach associated evidence (a checklist of
documentation is provided for you)
You should include a response to trainee’s reason for appeal request
The evidence will be reviewed by LDD and further information may be required
 
Summary Form
 
Check List
 
Appeal Panel
Membership
 
Chair  - LDD
College Representative/Foundation School Director or
Foundation PD from another foundation school
Trainee Representative from another specialty
Lay Representative
For Core and Specialty: Consultant: ES/TPD/APGD from
trainee’s specialty, but different training region
For Core and Specialty: TPD/APGD from another specialty
For Foundation: Foundation PD/APGD from different
Scottish region
 
No previous knowledge of trainee – members and
trainee confirm no conflict of interest with trainee or
deanery representative
 
Appeal Format
 
The standard format of the Appeal enables the following:
The trainee presents his/her case as to why the original ARCP outcome issued was incorrect;
The deanery representative presents the case in support of the decision making of the original ARCP panel.
Panel members will have opportunity to ask questions of trainee and deanery representative (to clarify information)
Panel discussion and decision to Uphold or Overturn
Trainee attends to receive panel decision – Appeal decision is final
 
Panel members aim to be balanced and fair – fresh set of eyes
 
The trainee can attend the deanery representative session AND the deanery representative can attend the trainee session
– observation only (although not the decision session).
 
Appeal Process  - Attendance
 
The deanery encourages the trainee to bring an accompanying person/s with them to
the Appeal for moral support (maximum of 2 persons).
a friend/colleague/family member/supporting representative from professional
body.
The trainee has the option to attend the Appeal, or they can opt to participate via
written submission only
The deanery representative 
must attend the Appeal in person 
(or virtually for virtual
panels).
A minute will be taken of the meeting and checked for factual accuracy by panel
members and trainee (trainee part only)
 
 
Post Appeal
Process
 
Trainee will receive written confirmation of
result by email
(copied to the specialty
LDD/APGD/AD(GP)/PD and Board HR
representative)
 
If an outcome is overturned, the
programme administrator will amend the
trainee’s record on Turas and the relevant
e-portfolio to show the revised outcome
only.
 
Continuous review process for
improvement
Feedback from panel members
Chair to complete significant event
analysis
 
Removal of Training Number (No ARCP)
 
The right to Appeal withdrawal of NTN /training contract/removal from
foundation programme
Very unusual circumstance
Same process as Appeal of ARCP Outcome except that no deanery
representative involvement.
LDD undertakes the review
Written submission, for Appeal panel, prepared by the LDD who removed
the training number.
 
Any Questions
email arcpappeals@nes.scot.nhs.uk
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Understanding the Review and Appeal process is crucial for trainees in the Scotland Deanery. This policy outlines the importance, procedures, and outcomes of reviews and appeals, emphasizing the opportunities for learning and improvement. Trainees have the right to appeal certain ARCP outcomes, and the process involves careful consideration of evidence and new submissions. The process aims to ensure fairness and transparency in decisions affecting trainees' progression and training contracts.

  • Scotland Deanery
  • Review and Appeal
  • Trainee
  • ARCP
  • Guidelines

Uploaded on Oct 09, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ARCP Reviews and Appeals Scotland Deanery Policy https://www.scotlanddeanery.nhs.scot/media/3926 16/covid-19-arcp-appeal-process-final2.pdf https://www.scotlanddeanery.nhs.scot/trainee- information/annual-review-of-competence- progression-arcp/appeal-your-decision/

  2. Importance and Value of Reviews and Appeals Overview of Review and Overview of Appeal Review Process and Outcomes Aims and Content Appeal Process Preparation before Evidence pack preparation (guidance) and timelines On the day Panel membership, Appeal Format and Attendance Post Appeal Process Removal of NTN (without ARCP) Appeal Process

  3. Gold Guide 8 regulated process Standard Operating Procedure developed by Scotland Deanery Information available on Scotland Deanery website Review and Appeals Is an opportunity for deanery to learn and amend processes if appropriate High stakes for trainees and is stressful for them Deanery representatives (TPDs/ FPDs/ APGDs /ADs) unusual event

  4. Trainee can appeal the decision resulting from an ARCP panel Trainee can appeal the decision to withdraw their NTN/training contract (withdrawal without ARCP e.g. GMC sanctions) All applications for appeal involve a review Only certain ARCP outcomes can proceed to formal appeal panel (3, 4, 7.3 or 10.2, removal of NTN/training contract) Trainees are notified of their right to appeal at the face to face meeting after their ARCP. Important that face to face meetings go ahead Right to review and appeal

  5. The original ARCP panel that issued an unsatisfactory outcome, return to that decision, to reconsider whether it was appropriate. NEW PROCESS FOR FOUNDATION (replaces FSD review process) Review Overview undertaken for all requests The Review must take into account the representations of the trainee asking for the Review and any other information, including additional relevant evidence, whether it formed part of the original considerations or has been freshly submitted (GG 4.161). A trainee in receipt of an outcome 2, 7.2 or 10.1 has the right to Review only (GG 4.165).

  6. Appeal Overview The decision of the original ARCP panel is considered by a different panel. An Appeal takes into account the information/evidence available at the time the original outcome was issued alongside newly submitted evidence relevant to the Appeal and the representations of the trainee making the Appeal request. (GG 4.162) Applicable for trainee in receipt of an outcome 3, 4, 7.3 or 10.2 (GG 4.166-4.179) A Review will be conducted as a preliminary part of the process.

  7. Review Process Trainee must be submit an application in writing within 10 working days from date of face to face meeting arcp.appeals@nes.scot.nhs.uk A Deanery Appeal Team (DAT) case manager will be allocated to the trainee and will liaise with the trainee and all panel members to ensure a consistent and fair process Trainee completes a Review Request form detailing their reasons Trainees should submit written evidence to support their request for an appeal. New information for an appeal might include new evidence of mitigating circumstances not available to the ARCP panel. New information would not normally include competences/capabilities or evidence from assessments acquired after the date of the ARCP subject to appeal (GG 4.162) The DAT case manager will liaise with the Chair of the original panel to arrange the Review within 15 working days (approx.) of original outcome

  8. Review Outcomes Original panel reviews the information in trainee s request. Panel chair provides written response to trainee either upholding original decision or overturning the decision giving clear reasons for either outcome and specifically responding to the grounds for Review listed by the trainee in their Review Request form. Review process now applies to foundation hence FPDs and APGD Foundation may be involved in Reviews The panel should not impose an increased sanction on the trainee. In circumstances where new information has come to light that may inform a decision to increase the sanction, these issues will be brought to the attention of the Lead Dean Director. (4.177)

  9. Review Outcomes Original ARCP Outcome Potential overturned/amended Review Outcome Potential for further Appeal Request 2, 10.1, 7.2 1, 7.1, 10.1 (for 2 only) Panel decision is final, no furtherappeal process 3 1, 2, 10.1, 10.2, 6 If original outcome is upheld, trainee has the right to request an Appeal 4 1, 2, 10.1, 10.2, 3, 6 If original outcome is upheld, trainee has the right to request an Appeal 7.3 7.1, 7.2 If original outcome is upheld, trainee has the right to request an Appeal 10.2 1, 10.1 If original outcome is upheld, trainee has the right to request an Appeal

  10. The DAT case manager will organise a new panel for the Appeal Preparation before panel Deanery evidence pack prepared by Deanery representative (FPD/TPD/APGD) - guidance is available Trainee also provides evidence if they wish Appeal Process On the day Panel membership Format - TPD/FPD or original Chair of the ARCP panel are expect to attend as the Deanery representative detailing why the original panel came to their decision Outcome

  11. Evidence pack contains information from trainee and the deanery representative Critical to the success of the appeal it is the only written information the panel have access to Evidence Pack Deanery evidence is prepared by deanery representative (FPD/TPD/APGD/AD) and training programme administrator. Signed off by specialty LDD before going to panel 5 days before appeal Note the panel do not have access to the trainee portfolio

  12. As a FPD/TPD what evidence am I required to supply? The Appeal panel are not able to view the trainee e-portfolio of the trainee (they do not have access rights nor would they all know where to find information) Consider what the panel will need to make a decision bearing in mind that the panel have no prior knowledge of the trainee Working with your administrator, you should provide a narrative summary of the trainee s training to date and attach associated evidence (a checklist of documentation is provided for you) You should include a response to trainee s reason for appeal request The evidence will be reviewed by LDD and further information may be required

  13. Summary Form DATE ACTIVITY OUTCOME EVIDENCE DOCUMENTS (Training programme administrator to assist compiling) e.g. Copy of ARCP form/ Report Complete in chronological order e.g. ARCP / Occupational health attendance e.g. OUTCOME 4/ summary of occupational health report recommendations

  14. Check List Information Included Y/N **ARCP outcomes including full details of recent and previous satisfactory/unsatisfactory outcomes OHS reports including appointments attended/not attended if known and the discussion details if applicable offering support to recommendations if any made Evidence provided for recent ARCP which was used to decide the outcome Ie. Educational Supervisor/Clinical Supervisor reports E-portfolio evidence Ie. WPBA/MSF etc Trainee support ie PSU/other steps taken to support during any difficulties Details of meetings with trainee where trainee non-progression was discussed Ie. meeting details/early discussions when trainee was advised of possible adverse outcome Any other relevant communication e-mails between TPD and trainee deemed relevant for Appeal Evidence of engagement/non engagement/lack of insight/poor conduct/behaviours etc

  15. Chair - LDD College Representative/Foundation School Director or Foundation PD from another foundation school Trainee Representative from another specialty Lay Representative For Core and Specialty: Consultant: ES/TPD/APGD from trainee s specialty, but different training region For Core and Specialty: TPD/APGD from another specialty For Foundation: Foundation PD/APGD from different Scottish region Appeal Panel Membership No previous knowledge of trainee members and trainee confirm no conflict of interest with trainee or deanery representative

  16. Appeal Format The standard format of the Appeal enables the following: The trainee presents his/her case as to why the original ARCP outcome issued was incorrect; The deanery representative presents the case in support of the decision making of the original ARCP panel. Panel members will have opportunity to ask questions of trainee and deanery representative (to clarify information) Panel discussion and decision to Uphold or Overturn Trainee attends to receive panel decision Appeal decision is final Panel members aim to be balanced and fair fresh set of eyes The trainee can attend the deanery representative session AND the deanery representative can attend the trainee session observation only (although not the decision session).

  17. Appeal Process - Attendance The deanery encourages the trainee to bring an accompanying person/s with them to the Appeal for moral support (maximum of 2 persons). a friend/colleague/family member/supporting representative from professional body. The trainee has the option to attend the Appeal, or they can opt to participate via written submission only The deanery representative must attend the Appeal in person (or virtually for virtual panels). A minute will be taken of the meeting and checked for factual accuracy by panel members and trainee (trainee part only)

  18. Trainee will receive written confirmation of result by email (copied to the specialty LDD/APGD/AD(GP)/PD and Board HR representative) If an outcome is overturned, the programme administrator will amend the trainee s record on Turas and the relevant e-portfolio to show the revised outcome only. Post Appeal Process Continuous review process for improvement Feedback from panel members Chair to complete significant event analysis

  19. Removal of Training Number (No ARCP) The right to Appeal withdrawal of NTN /training contract/removal from foundation programme Very unusual circumstance Same process as Appeal of ARCP Outcome except that no deanery representative involvement. LDD undertakes the review Written submission, for Appeal panel, prepared by the LDD who removed the training number.

  20. Any Questions email arcpappeals@nes.scot.nhs.uk

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#