Propositions: Methodological Perspectives and Argument Structure

 
Propositions
 
Methodological Perspectives
 
Concept of Argument Structure
 
A Description of States of Affairs
(A Basic Element of Sentence Meaning)
 
 
 
 Lucas 
argument
 ….. told 
relation/function
 ….. Nicholas 
argument
 ….. a lie 
argument
  
      F
x
 (a,b) 
 tell (Lucas, a lie, Nicholas)*
 
Such formulae often delete verb endings, articles and other grammatical elements (Saeed,
2009:14)
  
      
F
x
 (a,b) 
 tell (Lucas, lie, Nicholas)
 
Speaker’s attitude determines Grammatical Representation
1.
Lucas told Nicholas a lie. (declarative – stating information)
2.
Did Lucas tell Nicholas a lie? (interrogative – asking for information)
3.
Tell Nicholas a lie! (imperative – command)
 
Types of Proposition
(based on characteristics of relation of verb)
 
(1)
There are two main types of prepositions – 
event proposition
 and 
state
proposition
.
(2)
The event proposition has 
EVENT
 as the central concept: 
action 
(run, hit,
eat, and swim), 
experience 
(smell, see, hear, think, and covet), or 
process
(freeze, boil, melt).
(3)
The event proposition consists of at least 
a central EVENT
 concept and and
additional THING 
concept, eg. 
The boys ran
.
(4)
The state proposition will have a 
THING 
or 
ATTRIBUTE
 as s central concept.
(5)
The state proposition consists of 
THING
 and 
ATTRIBUTE
 which are related the
one to the other by state relation
.
(6)
The state proposition has two main parts: 
the topic
 (the CONCEPT being
talked about), and 
the comment
 (the THING or ATTRIBUTE being used to
describe or identify the topic plus the state relation)
 
Event Proposition
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
             
(Adapted from Larson, 1984:213)
 
State Proposition
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
             
(Adapted from Larson, 1984:213)
 
Proposition
 
most often takes the form of a clause or simple sentences in the grammatical
structure but not always. It may be encoded in a variety of forms (Larson,
1984:207)
 
Exercises 1
 
Give 5 (five) clauses or simple sentences for each type of proposition.
 
For example:
The book is Peter’s
(1)
The topic: 
the book
(2)
The comment/the central concept: 
Peter
 by the relation of 
ownership
(3)
Meaning of 
the book is Peter’s
: The book is owned by Peter or The book
belongs to Peter.
 
The
various
kinds of
relation in
State
Proposition
 
Exercises 2
 
1.
Give 5 (five) clauses or simple sentences portray state proposition.
2.
Analyze each based on the topic and central concept to see the relation.
3.
Determine the meaning of each.
 
For example:
John smiles
(1)
EVENT:  
smile
(2)
The additional THING: 
John
(3)
Meaning of 
John smiled
: John experienced the phenomenon of 
smiling
(presenting the look regarding amusement or ridicule)
 
Verbs and Thematic Role Grids
 
Verbs have particular requirements for their thematic roles (Saeed, 2009: 160)
 
eg.
   
Gina raised the car with a jack.
 
(1)
This sentence identifies three entities: (1) Gina; (2) the car; and (3) a jack.
(2)
These entities are related by the action, 
raise
.
(3)
The sentence portrays these entities in specific roles:
 
       (a) 
Gina
 is the entity responsible for 
initiating
 and 
carrying out the action
,
       (b) 
the car 
is 
acted upon 
and has its 
position changed by the action
,and
       (c) 
a jack 
is 
the means 
by which Gina is able to cause the action.
 
(4)
Such roles have a number of labels in semantics, including: participant roles (Allan 1986), deep
semantic cases (Fillmore 1968), semantic roles (Givón 1990), thematic relations (Gruber 1976,
Jackendoff 1972) and thematic roles (Dowty 1986, 1989, 1991, Jackendoff 1990).
(5)
Given its wide usage in recent work, we will use the last term here: 
thematic roles
.
 
A List of
Thematic
Roles
 
Agent: the initiator of some action, capable of acting with volition, eg. 
David
 cooked the
rashers.
Patient: the entity undergoing the effect of some action, often undergoing some change
in state, e.g. Enda cut back 
these bushes
.
Theme: the entity which is moved by an action, or whose location is described, e.g.
Roberto passed 
the ball 
wide.
Experiencer: the entity which is aware of the action or state described by the predicate
but which is not in control of the action or state, e.g. 
Kevin 
felt ill.
Beneficiary: the entity for whose benefit the action was performed, e.g. Robert filled in the
form for 
his grandmother
.
Instrument: the means by which an action is performed or something comes about, e.g.
She cleaned the wound with 
an antiseptic wipe
.
Location: the place in which something is situated or takes place, e.g. The monster was
hiding 
under the bed
.
Goal: the entity towards which something moves, either literally or metaphorically e.g.
Sheila handed her license 
to the policeman
 or Pat told the joke 
to his friends
.
Source: the entity from which something moves, either literally or metaphorically e.g. The
plane came back 
from Kinshasa
 or We got the idea 
from a French magazine
.
Stimulus: the entity causing an effect (usually psychological) in the experiencer, e.g. John
didn’t like 
the cool breeze
.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercises 3
 
1.
Give 5 (five) clauses or simple sentences portray event proposition.
2.
Analyze each based on event as a central concept and additional THING.
3.
Identify the thematic role for each additional THING constructing the
propositions.
4.
Determine the meaning.
 
Proposition
 
most 
often takes the form of a clause or simple sentences in the grammatical
structure but 
not always
. It may be encoded in a variety of forms (Larson,
1984:207)
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the concept of argument structure, propositions, and states of affairs within sentence meaning. Learn about different types of propositions based on verb relations and delve into event and state propositions. Understand how propositions can take various grammatical forms and their significance in communication.

  • Propositions
  • Argument Structure
  • Sentence Meaning
  • Verb Relations
  • Event Proposition
  • State Proposition

Uploaded on Sep 13, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Propositions Methodological Perspectives

  2. Concept of Argument Structure Subject Argument Complement Proposition Relation/Function Verb

  3. A Description of States of Affairs (A Basic Element of Sentence Meaning) Lucas argument .. told relation/function .. Nicholas argument .. a lie argument Fx (a,b) tell (Lucas, a lie, Nicholas)* Such formulae often delete verb endings, articles and other grammatical elements (Saeed, 2009:14) Fx (a,b) tell (Lucas, lie, Nicholas) Speaker s attitude determines Grammatical Representation 1. Lucas told Nicholas a lie. (declarative stating information) 2. Did Lucas tell Nicholas a lie? (interrogative asking for information) 3. Tell Nicholas a lie! (imperative command)

  4. Types of Proposition (based on characteristics of relation of verb) Action Event Experience Proposition Process State State

  5. (1) There are two main types of prepositions event proposition and state proposition. (2) The event proposition has EVENT as the central concept: action (run, hit, eat, and swim), experience (smell, see, hear, think, and covet), or process (freeze, boil, melt). (3) The event proposition consists of at least a central EVENT concept and and additional THING concept, eg. The boys ran. (4) The state proposition will have a THING or ATTRIBUTE as s central concept. (5) The state proposition consists of THING and ATTRIBUTE which are related the one to the other by state relation. (6) The state proposition has two main parts: the topic (the CONCEPT being talked about), and the comment (the THING or ATTRIBUTE being used to describe or identify the topic plus the state relation)

  6. Event Proposition (Adapted from Larson, 1984:213)

  7. State Proposition (Adapted from Larson, 1984:213)

  8. Proposition most often takes the form of a clause or simple sentences in the grammatical structure but not always. It may be encoded in a variety of forms (Larson, 1984:207)

  9. Exercises 1 Give 5 (five) clauses or simple sentences for each type of proposition.

  10. The topic (the CONCEPT being talked about) State Proposition The comment (the THING or ATTRIBUTE being used to describe or identify the topic plus the state relation) For example: The book is Peter s (1) The topic: the book (2) The comment/the central concept: Peter by the relation of ownership (3) Meaning of the book is Peter s: The book is owned by Peter or The book belongs to Peter.

  11. The various kinds of relation in State Proposition

  12. Exercises 2 1. Give 5 (five) clauses or simple sentences portray state proposition. 2. Analyze each based on the topic and central concept to see the relation. 3. Determine the meaning of each.

  13. EVENT (the Central concept) Event Proposition Additional THING For example: John smiles (1) EVENT: smile (2) The additional THING: John (3) Meaning of John smiled: John experienced the phenomenon of smiling (presenting the look regarding amusement or ridicule)

  14. Verbs and Thematic Role Grids Verbs have particular requirements for their thematic roles (Saeed, 2009: 160) eg. Gina raised the car with a jack. (1) This sentence identifies three entities: (1) Gina; (2) the car; and (3) a jack. (2) These entities are related by the action, raise. (3) The sentence portrays these entities in specific roles: (a) Gina is the entity responsible for initiating and carrying out the action, (b) the car is acted upon and has its position changed by the action,and (c) a jack is the means by which Gina is able to cause the action. (4) Such roles have a number of labels in semantics, including: participant roles (Allan 1986), deep semantic cases (Fillmore 1968), semantic roles (Giv n 1990), thematic relations (Gruber 1976, Jackendoff 1972) and thematic roles (Dowty 1986, 1989, 1991, Jackendoff 1990). (5) Given its wide usage in recent work, we will use the last term here: thematic roles.

  15. Thematic Roles Agent Patient A List of Thematic Roles Theme (Saeed, 2009:153-154) Experiencer Beneficiary Instrument Location Goal Source Stimulus

  16. Agent: the initiator of some action, capable of acting with volition, eg. David cooked the rashers. Patient: the entity undergoing the effect of some action, often undergoing some change in state, e.g. Enda cut back these bushes. Theme: the entity which is moved by an action, or whose location is described, e.g. Roberto passed the ball wide. Experiencer: the entity which is aware of the action or state described by the predicate but which is not in control of the action or state, e.g. Kevin felt ill. Beneficiary: the entity for whose benefit the action was performed, e.g. Robert filled in the form for his grandmother. Instrument: the means by which an action is performed or something comes about, e.g. She cleaned the wound with an antiseptic wipe. Location: the place in which something is situated or takes place, e.g. The monster was hiding under the bed. Goal: the entity towards which something moves, either literally or metaphorically e.g. Sheila handed her license to the policeman or Pat told the joke to his friends. Source: the entity from which something moves, either literally or metaphorically e.g. The plane came back from Kinshasa or We got the idea from a French magazine. Stimulus: the entity causing an effect (usually psychological) in the experiencer, e.g. John didn t like the cool breeze.

  17. Exercises 3 1. Give 5 (five) clauses or simple sentences portray event proposition. 2. Analyze each based on event as a central concept and additional THING. 3. Identify the thematic role for each additional THING constructing the propositions. 4. Determine the meaning.

  18. Proposition most often takes the form of a clause or simple sentences in the grammatical structure but not always. It may be encoded in a variety of forms (Larson, 1984:207)

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#