Peritoneal Pearls in Imaging: Case Study Analysis

 
PERITONEAL PEARLS
 
DEEPAK M PAI
Y ELTINAY
SCUNTHORPE GENERAL HOSPITAL
 
HISTORY
 
45 years old male had CT KUB with h/o
haematuria
No renal stones but incidental lesions were
identified with-in the anterior peritoneal
cavity
There were about seven of them and
measured between 9 mm and 22 mm.
They were round to oval in shape and no
calcification identified
 
NON-CONTRAST CT KUB
 
FURTHER SIMILAR FINDINGS
 
History contd…
 
Nature and significance of these were
uncertain at the time of reporting CT and
hence MRI with liver protocol was
recommended
 
FAT SUPPRESSED T2W AXIAL IMAGES
 
FAT SUPPRESSED T2W AXIAL IMAGES
 
T1W AXIAL IMAGES
 
POST-GADOLINIUM IMAGES
 
INTERPRETATION
 
It was not clear as these were not enhancing
and had no consistent signal characters from
all of them.
Any idea?
 
BASIC PRINCIPLES
 
As basic principle in image interpretation, we
started digging into the previous imaging
studies.
Patient had CT abdomen and MRCP five years
earlier
 
CT 5 YEARS EARLIER SHOWING NO SUCH FINDINGS
 
MRCP 5 YEARS EARLIER
 
 
Patient had gall stones before and we could
not find gall bladder on the current CT and MR
and hence presumed cholecystectomy in
between.
We thought we should check the histology of
cholecystectomy specimen
 
HISTOLOGY REPORT
 
Gall bladder measuring 115 mm received and
was opened at the fundus.
No calculi. Features of chronic cholecystitis.
 
DIAGNOSIS
 
Spilled calculi in the peritoneal cavity during
lap cholecystectomy
Surgical notes confirmed the same
 
 
SPILLED GALLSTONES
 
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common
surgical procedure
Accidental opening of gall bladder is a relatively
frequent incident(15-40%)
Spillage of gall stones into the peritoneal cavity
can occur in 16-66% of perforated GB
Complications caused by intraperitoneal gall
stones are infrequent but can be serious
Frequent sites of spillage are right
hypochondrium(41%) and pelvis(33%)
 
 
Risk factors for complications are infected bile,
pigment stones, male, perihepatic location,
>15 stones, size >1.5 cm
Time period from spillage to complications
varies but average is 5.5 months but can take
up to 20 years
Abscess is the most common complication
Anterior abdominal wall and sub hepatic
space are the commonest sites for abscess
 
 
Other rare complications are
Fistulas
Adhesions
Intestinal perforations
Intestinal obstruction
Intrahepatic abscess
Spontaneous liver bleed
Obstructive jaundice
Non-infectious collections
 
BEWARE
 
They can mimic peritoneal metastases in
asymptomatic patients and in staging CTs if
they are not calcified(as in this case)
If there is h/o cholecystectomy then the
possibility of spilled calculi has to be
considered
 
LEARNING POINTS
 
Any nonspecific findings around the liver and
upper abdomen with h/o cholecystectomy
should make you think of spilled gall stones
Complications related to spilled gallstones are
varied and can be seen up to 20 years after
surgery
Reporting Radiologist has a major role in
diagnosing them and bring it to the attention
of clinicians
 
THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND
ATTENTION
Slide Note
Embed
Share

A 45-year-old male presented with incidental lesions in the anterior peritoneal cavity during a CT scan for haematuria. These lesions, measuring between 9 mm and 22 mm, were non-enhancing and lacked consistent signal characteristics. Further imaging with MRI was recommended for better evaluation. By comparing with previous imaging studies, including CT and MRCP from five years earlier, the nature and significance of these findings were to be elucidated.

  • Peritoneal Pearls
  • Imaging
  • Case Study
  • Radiology
  • MRI Evaluation

Uploaded on Sep 14, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PERITONEAL PEARLS DEEPAK M PAI Y ELTINAY SCUNTHORPE GENERAL HOSPITAL

  2. HISTORY 45 years old male had CT KUB with h/o haematuria No renal stones but incidental lesions were identified with-in the anterior peritoneal cavity There were about seven of them and measured between 9 mm and 22 mm. They were round to oval in shape and no calcification identified

  3. NON-CONTRAST CT KUB

  4. FURTHER SIMILAR FINDINGS

  5. History contd Nature and significance of these were uncertain at the time of reporting CT and hence MRI with liver protocol was recommended

  6. FAT SUPPRESSED T2W AXIAL IMAGES

  7. FAT SUPPRESSED T2W AXIAL IMAGES

  8. T1W AXIAL IMAGES

  9. POST-GADOLINIUM IMAGES

  10. INTERPRETATION It was not clear as these were not enhancing and had no consistent signal characters from all of them. Any idea?

  11. BASIC PRINCIPLES As basic principle in image interpretation, we started digging into the previous imaging studies. Patient had CT abdomen and MRCP five years earlier

  12. CT 5 YEARS EARLIER SHOWING NO SUCH FINDINGS

  13. MRCP 5 YEARS EARLIER

  14. Patient had gall stones before and we could not find gall bladder on the current CT and MR and hence presumed cholecystectomy in between. We thought we should check the histology of cholecystectomy specimen

  15. HISTOLOGY REPORT Gall bladder measuring 115 mm received and was opened at the fundus. No calculi. Features of chronic cholecystitis.

  16. DIAGNOSIS Spilled calculi in the peritoneal cavity during lap cholecystectomy Surgical notes confirmed the same

  17. SPILLED GALLSTONES Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common surgical procedure Accidental opening of gall bladder is a relatively frequent incident(15-40%) Spillage of gall stones into the peritoneal cavity can occur in 16-66% of perforated GB Complications caused by intraperitoneal gall stones are infrequent but can be serious Frequent sites of spillage are right hypochondrium(41%) and pelvis(33%)

  18. Risk factors for complications are infected bile, pigment stones, male, perihepatic location, >15 stones, size >1.5 cm Time period from spillage to complications varies but average is 5.5 months but can take up to 20 years Abscess is the most common complication Anterior abdominal wall and sub hepatic space are the commonest sites for abscess

  19. Other rare complications are Fistulas Adhesions Intestinal perforations Intestinal obstruction Intrahepatic abscess Spontaneous liver bleed Obstructive jaundice Non-infectious collections

  20. BEWARE They can mimic peritoneal metastases in asymptomatic patients and in staging CTs if they are not calcified(as in this case) If there is h/o cholecystectomy then the possibility of spilled calculi has to be considered

  21. LEARNING POINTS Any nonspecific findings around the liver and upper abdomen with h/o cholecystectomy should make you think of spilled gall stones Complications related to spilled gallstones are varied and can be seen up to 20 years after surgery Reporting Radiologist has a major role in diagnosing them and bring it to the attention of clinicians

  22. THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#