Integrated Reservoir Characterization in Semliki Basin, Albertine Graben

undefined
 
QUANTITATIVE RES
E
RVOIR CHARACTERIZATION USING
ROCK PHYSICS, SEISMIC AND GEOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS
– EXAMPLES FROM SEMLIKI BASIN IN ALBERTINE GRABEN
 
By
Nakajigo  Joan
2016/HD13/18956U
BSc (GRM) MSc (PG)
 
Supervisors:
    Dr. John Mary Kiberu
                             Department of Geology and Petroleum Studies (Makerere University)
Dr. Simon Echegu
                             Department of Geology and Petroleum Studies (Makerere University)
                    Dr. John Vianney Tiberindwa
                             Department of Geology and Petroleum Studies (Makerere University)
                Prof. Tor Arne Johansen
                             Department of Earth Science (University of Bergen)
 
 
Presentation at  EnPe Academic Sharing Seminar In Trondheim, Norway, On  26
th
 -28
th
 February 2018
 
 
 
 
Outline of the Presentation
 
Background
Objectives of the study
Significance of the study
Methodology
Results
Challenges
 
2
 
Introduction
 
Seismic reservoir characterization is important in
hydrocarbon prospect evaluation and production.
 
There are a number of challenging problems causing
uncertainties in the prediction results due to non-
uniqueness and uncertainties in the input data.
 
 
 
3
 
Introduction
 
 To increase the prediction capability we need to reduce
the non-uniqueness by inferring geological constraints
as a part of the analysis.
 
This study couples rock physics with geological
constraints (burial history) and seismic to better
delineate the reservoir properties of the reservoir unit in
the Semliki basin with their uncertainties.
 
 
4
 
Introduction
 
Rock physics provides a link between geologic reservoir
parameters (porosity, clay content, sorting, lithology, saturation)
and seismic properties such as acoustic impedance, P-wave/S-
wave. velocity ratio 
V
P /
V
S, bulk density, and elastic moduli.
 
There are number of  rock physics models Avseth, Mukerji,
Mavko, and Dvorkin (2010); Avseth, Mukerji,  & Mavko (2005)
that are applied on particular rock type.
 
 
5
 
Introduction
 
 
Odegaard & Avseth (2004) developed rock physics templates as
a tool to evaluate lithology and pore fluid interpretation of well
logs based on  theoretical rock physics trends for different
lithologies expected in the area.
 
 Inverse rock physics modelling (IRPM) was developed by
Johansen, Jensen, Mavko & Dvorkin, (2013) to quantitatively
analyze  seismic data based on seismic inversion.
 
6
 
.
 
Semliki basin –
Albertine  Graben ,
western arm of the rift
valley.
 
exploration stage
 
Currently, a number of
fields  are identified,
drilling of appraisal
wells is being done and
approval of production
license is 
ongoing
 
Problem Statement
 
The fundamental challenge in the Semliki Basin, is lack
of a clear understanding of the distribution of various
reservoir properties such as porosity, lithology and fluid
saturation. It was evaluated that there exist traps
however, the reservoirs  have poor lateral distribution
(Heritage 2004, CNOOC, 2012).This research purposes
to use various methods to quantify the prevailing
uncertainties in this basin. Burial history combined with
RPM, IRPM and quantification of uncertainties in
relation to facies distribution using probability
distribution function (pdf) will be done for the first time
in this basin.
 
Objectives of the study
 
Main Objective
To quantify the prevailing uncertainties in the
determination of reservoir properties of the Albertine
Graben.
Specific objectives
To determine the effect of burial history on seismic
properties or signatures.
To establish the statistical relationship between reservoir
properties.
To examine uncertainties in different reservoir property
distribution.
 
Significance of the Research
 
This research will improve the overall understanding of the lateral
internal structure of the study area and increase the predictability of
several areas for well placement.
 
The use of burial history technique will allow the overall record of
important events that occur in the sedimentary basin.
 
 Rock physics modeling will aid in identification of appropriate
model for the study area which can act as an input for future studies.
 
IRPM will improve prediction of reservoir quality both well location
and inter-well regions.
This will add value to economy of Uganda by increasing new
exploration prospecting areas and adding knowledge to this young
industry.
 
10
 
Materials
 
3D  seismic volume of Semliki basin
2D seismic of Semliki basin
A suite of well logs and check shots data including their
field reports of Turaco
A suite of well logs and check shots data plus their field
reports of Kanywataba.
Softwares: ENTER, Hampson Russell, Petromod &
PELE.
 
11
12
Well logs
data
Rock Physics
modelling (RPM)
Use modelled
parameters for
burial history
analysis
Visualization
using RPT
Reservoir
properties
(porosity,
Lithology and
fluid saturation
Monte Carlo
simulation
Seismic
inversion
pdfs
Seismic
inversion
Forward RPM
Litho cube
Porosity cube
Fluid cube
IRPM
Bayesian
classificatio
n
 
(1)
 
(2)
 
(3)
Seismic
data
RESULTS
 
Constant cement model
 
 data vs model for Turaco 2
 
Turaco 3
 
RESULTS
 
The modelled parameters of Constant Cement
model  (bulk modulus, shear modulus,
temperature, lithology among other) were
used to determine;
Compaction state or phase,
Burial depth and
Amount of uplift.
 
 
.
 
Prediction of seismic velocities over time for constant cement
model. The analyzed formation has started chemical compaction
 
.
 
The analyzed formation indicate  burial depth of 3500km and
an uplift of 1596km
 
Challenges
 
The data had issues in that, it would not
tally with theoretical trends hence data
quality control had to be done.
 
REFERENCE
 
Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., Mavko, G., & Dvorkin, J. (2010). Rock-physics diagnostics of
depositional texture, diagenetic alterations, and reservoir heterogeneity in high-porosity
siliciclastic sediments and rocks—A review of selected models and suggested work
flows. 
Geophysics, 75
(5), 75A31-75A47.
Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., & Mavko, G. (2005). 
Quantitative Seismic interpretation
:
Cambridge University Press.
Avseth, P., & Odegaard, E. (2004). Well log and seismic data analysis using rock
physics templates. 
First break, 22
(10), 37-43.
HeritageOil&Gas. (2004). 
Final Well Geological  Report for  Turaco –2 Block 3, Albert
Graben,  Uganda. 
Department of Geology and Petroleum Studies, Makerere University.
Johansen, T. A., Jensen, E. H, Mavko, G. & Jack Dvorkin, J. (2013). Inverse modeling
for reservoir quality prediction. 
GEOPHYSICS,
 Vol. 78 Issue (2), M1-M18. doi:
10.1190/geo2012-0215.
Yang, X., Yu, Y.,, & Dong, Y., Sun, Y.,. (2012). 
Final geological report of Kanywataba-l
well  in Kanywataba Exploration Area, Uganda
.  Department of Geology and
Petroleum Studies, Makerere University
 
 
 
 
 
Acknowledgement
 
I would like to thank the EnPe project  for
funding this research and the Nowergian
government as a whole.
undefined
 
Thank you for listening
 
.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Quantitative reservoir characterization using rock physics, seismic, and geological constraints is crucial for hydrocarbon prospect evaluation. This study by Nakajigo Joan explores the integration of these disciplines in the Semliki Basin to improve reservoir property delineation and reduce uncertainties. By combining rock physics models, geological constraints, and seismic data, the study aims to enhance reservoir prediction capabilities and minimize non-uniqueness in results. The presentation addresses the challenges, methodologies, and results of this integrated approach, highlighting the significance of coupling rock physics with geological constraints for more accurate reservoir analysis.

  • Reservoir Characterization
  • Rock Physics
  • Seismic Analysis
  • Geological Constraints
  • Semliki Basin

Uploaded on Aug 03, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. QUANTITATIVE RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION USING ROCK PHYSICS, SEISMIC AND GEOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS EXAMPLES FROM SEMLIKI BASIN IN ALBERTINE GRABEN By Nakajigo Joan 2016/HD13/18956U BSc (GRM) MSc (PG) Supervisors: Dr. John Mary Kiberu Department of Geology and Petroleum Studies (Makerere University) Dr. Simon Echegu Department of Geology and Petroleum Studies (Makerere University) Dr. John Vianney Tiberindwa Department of Geology and Petroleum Studies (Makerere University) Prof. Tor Arne Johansen Department of Earth Science (University of Bergen) Presentation at EnPe Academic Sharing Seminar In Trondheim, Norway, On 26th-28thFebruary 2018

  2. Outline of the Presentation Background Objectives of the study Significance of the study Methodology Results Challenges 2

  3. Introduction Seismic reservoir characterization is important in hydrocarbon prospect evaluation and production. There are a number of challenging problems causing uncertainties in the prediction results due to non- uniqueness and uncertainties in the input data. 3

  4. Introduction To increase the prediction capability we need to reduce the non-uniqueness by inferring geological constraints as a part of the analysis. This study couples rock physics with geological constraints (burial history) and seismic to better delineate the reservoir properties of the reservoir unit in the Semliki basin with their uncertainties. 4

  5. Introduction Rock physics provides a link between geologic reservoir parameters (porosity, clay content, sorting, lithology, saturation) and seismic properties such as acoustic impedance, P-wave/S- wave. velocity ratio VP /VS, bulk density, and elastic moduli. There are number of rock physics models Avseth, Mukerji, Mavko, and Dvorkin (2010); Avseth, Mukerji, & Mavko (2005) that are applied on particular rock type. 5

  6. Introduction Odegaard & Avseth (2004) developed rock physics templates as a tool to evaluate lithology and pore fluid interpretation of well logs based on theoretical rock physics trends for different lithologies expected in the area. Inverse rock physics modelling (IRPM) was developed by Johansen, Jensen, Mavko & Dvorkin, (2013) to quantitatively analyze seismic data based on seismic inversion. 6

  7. Semliki basin Albertine Graben , western arm of the rift valley. . exploration stage Currently, a number of fields are identified, drilling of appraisal wells is being done and approval of production license is ongoing

  8. Problem Statement The fundamental challenge in the Semliki Basin, is lack of a clear understanding of the distribution of various reservoir properties such as porosity, lithology and fluid saturation. It was evaluated that there exist traps however, the reservoirs have poor lateral distribution (Heritage 2004, CNOOC, 2012).This research purposes to use various methods to quantify the prevailing uncertainties in this basin. Burial history combined with RPM, IRPM and quantification of uncertainties in relation to facies distribution using probability distribution function (pdf) will be done for the first time in this basin.

  9. Objectives of the study Main Objective To quantify the prevailing uncertainties in the determination of reservoir properties of the Albertine Graben. Specific objectives To determine the effect of burial history on seismic properties or signatures. To establish the statistical relationship between reservoir properties. To examine uncertainties in different reservoir property distribution.

  10. Significance of the Research This research will improve the overall understanding of the lateral internal structure of the study area and increase the predictability of several areas for well placement. The use of burial history technique will allow the overall record of important events that occur in the sedimentary basin. Rock physics modeling will aid in identification of appropriate model for the study area which can act as an input for future studies. IRPM will improve prediction of reservoir quality both well location and inter-well regions. This will add value to economy of Uganda by increasing new exploration prospecting areas and adding knowledge to this young industry. 10

  11. Materials 3D seismic volume of Semliki basin 2D seismic of Semliki basin A suite of well logs and check shots data including their field reports of Turaco A suite of well logs and check shots data plus their field reports of Kanywataba. Softwares: ENTER, Hampson Russell, Petromod & PELE. 11

  12. Use modelled parameters for burial history analysis Rock Physics modelling (RPM) Visualization using RPT (1) Reservoir properties (porosity, Lithology and fluid saturation Seismic data Well logs data Litho cube Porosity cube Fluid cube Monte Carlo simulation pdfs (3) IRPM (2) Bayesian classificatio n Seismic inversion Seismic inversion 12 Forward RPM

  13. RESULTS

  14. Constant cement model

  15. data vs model for Turaco 2

  16. Turaco 3

  17. RESULTS The modelled parameters of Constant Cement model (bulk modulus, shear modulus, temperature, lithology among other) were used to determine; Compaction state or phase, Burial depth and Amount of uplift.

  18. .Prediction of seismic velocities over time for constant cement model. The analyzed formation has started chemical compaction

  19. . The analyzed formation indicate burial depth of 3500km and an uplift of 1596km

  20. Challenges The data had issues in that, it would not tally with theoretical trends hence data quality control had to be done.

  21. REFERENCE Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., Mavko, G., & Dvorkin, J. (2010). Rock-physics diagnostics of depositional texture, diagenetic alterations, and reservoir heterogeneity in high-porosity siliciclastic sediments and rocks A review of selected models and suggested work flows. Geophysics, 75(5), 75A31-75A47. Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., & Mavko, G. (2005). Quantitative Seismic interpretation: Cambridge University Press. Avseth, P., & Odegaard, E. (2004). Well log and seismic data analysis using rock physics templates. First break, 22(10), 37-43. HeritageOil&Gas. (2004). Final Well Geological Report for Turaco 2 Block 3, Albert Graben, Uganda. Department of Geology and Petroleum Studies, Makerere University. Johansen, T. A., Jensen, E. H, Mavko, G. & Jack Dvorkin, J. (2013). Inverse modeling for reservoir quality prediction. GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 78 Issue (2), M1-M18. doi: 10.1190/geo2012-0215. Yang, X., Yu, Y.,, & Dong, Y., Sun, Y.,. (2012). Final geological report of Kanywataba-l well in Kanywataba Exploration Area, Uganda. Department of Geology and Petroleum Studies, Makerere University

  22. Acknowledgement I would like to thank the EnPe project for funding this research and the Nowergian government as a whole.

  23. Thank you for listening .

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#