Indemnity: Tips and Lessons Learned
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
1
0
1
:
T
i
p
s
f
r
o
m
L
e
s
s
o
n
s
L
e
a
r
n
e
d
Rick Alimonti
Alimonti Law Offices, PC
200 Mamaroneck Ave.
Suite 304
White Plains, NY 10601
914.948.8044
rick@alony.com
Arthur J. Park
Mozley Finlayson &
Mozley Finlayson &
Loggins LLP
Loggins LLP
5605 Glenridge Drive,
5605 Glenridge Drive,
Suite 900
Suite 900
Atlanta, GA 30342
Atlanta, GA 30342
404.256.0700
404.256.0700
apark@mfllaw.com
apark@mfllaw.com
S
o
W
h
a
t
i
s
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
?
What isn’t it?
It is not a liability-shifting mechanism.
It cannot bind a non party to whom you are liable
Vis-à-vis such a non party, you remain liable, and from
their perspective, the indemnity may well be invisible.
It is not insurance and, in fact, law is underdeveloped
What is it?
A risk management tool whereby one party (indemnitor)
is answerable for the damage (and perhaps defense) of
another (indemnitee).
W
h
e
n
W
i
l
l
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
A
r
i
s
e
?
When a claim arises under
circumstances in which another party
is primarily responsible and/or
contractually responsible to indemnify
you.
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
u
a
l
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
Contract risk-management provision
Often “imposed” by party with greater
bargaining power over more dependant party.
Example:
Imposed by Port Authority on airlines and contractors
Imposed by airlines on service providers
Goal: insulate one party for damages and
defense costs “arising from” contractual
relationship with another.
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
u
a
l
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
Is there an agreement?
Signed
In Effect – not expired
Between correct parties
Superseded by another agreement
Notice provision
Voided: release, bankruptcy, etc.
T
y
p
e
s
o
f
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
Narrow form: only covers the indemnitor’s
negligence
Intermediate form: covers indemnitee’s passive
negligence and indemnitor’s negligence
Broad form: covers indemnitor’s negligence and even
the indemnitee’s own negligence
Majority view: cannot cover gross negligence or
intentional misconduct
A
n
d
C
o
m
m
o
n
E
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
The foregoing indemnity shall not apply in the
event of injuries or damage to property caused
by the reckless or wilful misconduct of the
Airline or its agents and employees
AND/OR
The foregoing indemnity shall not apply in the
event of injuries or damage to property caused
by the sole negligence of the Airline or its agents
and employees
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
1
-
F
B
O
“FBO shall
indemnify, defend
, and save harmless
owner
, and owner’s officers, agents, employees,
directors, successors and assigns, from and
against
any and all loss
, claims, demands, costs, expenses
of every nature, including reasonable attorney’s fees
(including fees to enforce this clause) arising directly
or indirectly from or in connection with the use and
operation of the aircraft by FBO,
except
when any
such claims arise from the
sole negligence of
owner
.”
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
2
-
w
h
a
t
n
o
t
t
o
d
o
“BOB hereby agrees to
indemnify, defend
and hold harmless
ADAM from and against (i) all claims, costs, expenses or damages
of any nature whatsoever (including reasonable attorney fees and
court costs) asserted against or incurred by ADAM resulting from
the use of or in any way related to any work done under authority
of the STC
by any entity other than ADAM
(or any other party
licensed or authorized by it) after the completion of the transfer of
the STC to BOB pursuant to these terms; and (ii) any claims, costs,
expenses or damages asserted by any person or agent, or employee
of BOB in performance of this Agreement, but excluding…any
claims, costs, expenses or damages which are caused by or result
from the
negligence or the fraudulent or willful misconduct of
ADAM
.”
Obstacles to Indemnity
Obstacles to Indemnity
Questions of Fact?
Questions of Fact?
Issue of party’s sole negligence or
Issue of party’s sole negligence or
reckless/wilful misconduct may form basis for
reckless/wilful misconduct may form basis for
argument that tender is “premature”.
argument that tender is “premature”.
This will be particularly so if language is not
This will be particularly so if language is not
clear on duty to defend and what triggers this
clear on duty to defend and what triggers this
duty.
duty.
L
e
g
a
l
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
G
o
v
e
r
n
i
n
g
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
Choice of law:
lex loci contractus,
most significant relationship, or
choice of law clause in the contract
Contracts of indemnification are to be strictly
construed against the indemnitee
Duty to indemnify is a question of law
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
3
Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold
harmless Airline for any and all claims, losses,
and damages (including attorneys’ fees and court
costs) arising out of or related to Contractor’s
performance of the Contract, including claims
brought by Contractor’s agents and employees.
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
4
–
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
k
w
i
t
h
a
i
r
l
i
n
e
Contractor shall
release, indemnify, defend and hold harmless
Delta…from and against
any and all claims
…which in any way
arise out of or result from any act(s) or omission(s) by Contractor
(or anyone directly or indirectly employed by Contractor or anyone
for whose acts Contractor may be liable) in the performance or
nonperformance of Services or other obligation under this
Agreement…This Section shall apply regardless of whether or not
the damage, loss or injury complained of arises out of or relates to
the negligence (whether active, passive or otherwise) of, or was
caused in part by
[Delta]. However, nothing contained in this
Section, shall be construed as a release or indemnity by Contractor
of [Delta] from or against any loss, liability or claim arising from the
sole negligence or willful misconduct
of [Delta].
W
h
e
n
d
o
e
s
d
u
t
y
t
o
i
n
d
e
m
n
i
f
y
a
t
t
a
c
h
?
Contractual Indemnity distinguished from
Insurance Policy
For Indemnity [unlike insurance], duty to defend
MAY NOT BE BROADER than duty to
indemnify
Need broad indemnity language or you may be
footing defense bill until duty to indemnify is
established.
I
n
c
i
d
e
n
t
O
c
c
u
r
s
-
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
What are circumstances?
Who are involved parties?
Who has involvement in underlying incident or
area in which it occurred?
What does the applicable document say as to
1. Indemnity?
2. Insurance?
Do you have documents to support additional
insured status?
T
r
i
g
g
e
r
i
n
g
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
:
W
h
a
t
d
o
y
o
u
d
o
,
a
n
d
h
o
w
d
o
y
o
u
k
n
o
w
?
Notice of Claim – formal or informal
The sooner you advise the party from whom you
seek the indemnity of the underlying occurrence, the
better
Put it in writing
Insurer will likely assist or handle but stay involved
At the end of the day it is you, not the insurer, that is
entitled to be indemnified
W
h
a
t
c
a
n
u
n
d
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
?
Adhesion contract – contra preferentem
Public Policy – against “free ride”
Ambiguity
Failure to include specific claims, e.g., including
claims by indemnitor’s employees – very
important
Punitive damages not subject to indemnity –
wrong party would be “punished”
T
h
e
t
e
s
t
f
o
r
b
r
o
a
d
f
o
r
m
i
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
Majority view: not against public policy
But, indemnity agreement will not be construed
to cover the indemnitee’s
own
negligence
unless
contract is clear and unequivocal
Initial presumption against broad form indemnity
Language must show a “clear intent” to
indemnify the other party’s own negligence, but
there are no “magic words”
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
5
–
b
r
o
a
d
f
o
r
m
?
“The Contractor [C.R.A.] agrees to
indemnify, defend
and hold harmless
Eastern [Air Lines],…directors,
officers, employees, agents and representatives from and
against
all claims, liability
, loss or expense, including
legal fees and court costs, arising out of or in connection
with this agreement including, but not limited to claims of
employees of Contractor, claims of employees of Eastern
and/or City, claims arising out of injury, death or property
damage, direct or consequential, to any person or
entity…The foregoing indemnification does not apply to
any claims arising out of the
gross negligence or willful
misconduct
of Eastern.”
F
a
c
t
P
a
t
t
e
r
n
–
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
M
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
i
e
s
Sally Slip
, age 45,
is employed by
On-The-Spot
Cleaners, Inc
., a contractor that cleans aircraft
interiors. On January 4, 2014, she had just
completed cleaning an aircraft when she fell at
the foot of the air stairs on a patch of black ice.
She suffered a broken arm (humerus) and a
concussion. She claims soft tissue damage,
herniated disc and inability to ever return to
work, i.e., permanent disability.
F
a
c
t
P
a
t
t
e
r
n
(
c
o
n
t
’
d
)
The aircraft she had just serviced was owned
and operated by
Excelsior Airlines
.
The accident took place on the Excelsior ramp
at Sunshine Municipal Airport in
Sunshine, New
York
. The town of Sunshine is the owner of the
airport and Excelsior’s landlord.
Excelsior is a small regional airline that contracts
with
Shovel & Salt
for snow removal on the
Excelsior ramp.
S
o
m
e
C
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
Shovel & Salt Contract:
Shovel & Salt is to perform no snow or ice
removal within 50’ of an aircraft unless
specifically requested by airline.
If airline requests such services within 50’,
Airline must indemnify Shovel & Salt against
any damages to property related to the provision
of this service.
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
Salt and Shovel contract requires snow removal
on ramp upon 2” accumulation.
According to contract, salt and sand are only
applied “on demand” from Excelsior
There is no patrol obligation in contract, but
Shovel & Salt nonetheless patrols for snow and
ice and applies melting agents and salt as it
deems appropriate.
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
Excelsior Airline Indemnity to Sunshine
Township:
Excelsior Airline agrees to indemnify and defend
township for all injury and property damage
arising out of Airline’s use of the leasehold
unless caused by the sole negligence of Sunshine
or Sunshine’s agents or employees.
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
On-the-Spot Contract with Airline
On-the-Spot is required to indemnify and
defend Airline for all claims for damages and
personal injury arising out of On-the-Spot’s
provision of services to Airline. However, the
indemnity provision in the contract does not
specifically extend to claims brought by On-the-
Spot’s own employees. The contract is silent on
this issue.
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
Shovel & Salt License with Sunshine Township:
In order to provide services to airport tenants,
Shovel & Salt has also entered into a license with
Sunshine Township requiring Shovel & Salt to
indemnify and defend Sunshine for all claims for
damages and personal injury arising out of
Shovel & Salt’s provision of services on any
airport premises.
On-the-Spot License with Township
NONE ON FILE!
H
u
r
r
a
y
!
Y
o
u
’
r
e
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
f
i
e
d
!
N
o
w
W
h
a
t
?
You are still being sued
You are still in the caption
And you may be giving away the control of your
defense
Do you care?
Yes!
Why? Company Reputation; Adverse Press; Res
Judicata; Jurisdictional Implications; Sanctions; Bad
Handling
A
f
t
e
r
t
h
e
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
i
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
e
d
:
Maintain active role
You remain a client
You may not want law firm to be doubling on
defendants (waiver of privilege?)
You will want role in defense and settlement
You may want counsel of your choosing, not
indemnifying party’s
W
h
a
t
A
b
o
u
t
a
R
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
i
g
h
t
s
Party from whom you seek indemnity reserves
rights to withdraw defense and/or decline
indemnity
In vast majority of cases reservation is not
effectuated and defense is not withdrawn
Nonetheless, you are on notice!
Counsel cannot defend you while looking to
escape indemnity – grounds for conflict
Should you demand independent counsel?
M
G
L
A
1
8
6
§
1
5
.
N
o
n
-
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
a
n
d
l
o
r
d
;
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
i
n
l
e
a
s
e
o
r
r
e
n
t
a
l
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
Any provision of a lease [in which] by the use of any words
Any provision of a lease [in which] by the use of any words
whatsoever, the effect of which is to indemnify the lessor or
whatsoever, the effect of which is to indemnify the lessor or
landlord or hold the lessor or landlord harmless . . . from
landlord or hold the lessor or landlord harmless . . . from
any or all liability to the lessee or tenant, or to any other
any or all liability to the lessee or tenant, or to any other
person, for any injury, loss, damage or liability arising from
person, for any injury, loss, damage or liability arising from
any omission, fault, negligence or other misconduct of the
any omission, fault, negligence or other misconduct of the
lessor or landlord . . . shall be deemed to be against public
lessor or landlord . . . shall be deemed to be against public
policy and void.
policy and void.
Compare: N.Y. Gen. Oblig
Compare: N.Y. Gen. Oblig
. L
. L
§ 5-322.1
§ 5-322.1
,
which is more limited
which is more limited
in scope and applies to construction, renovation, maintenance,
in scope and applies to construction, renovation, maintenance,
demolition etc. of property
demolition etc. of property
L
i
m
i
t
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
e
x
t
“
“
A covenant…in connection with…a contract or
agreement relative to the construction, alteration,
repair, or maintenance of a building…purporting to
require that one party to such contract or agreement
shall indemnify…the other party to the
contract…against liability…caused by or resulting
from the sole negligence of the indemnitee…is against
public policy and void and unenforceable.”
O.C.G.A. § 13-8-2(b)
I
n
d
e
m
n
i
t
y
’
s
C
o
u
s
i
n
:
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
I
n
s
u
r
e
d
S
t
a
t
u
s
Separate and distinct from indemnity provision
Should Implement Indemnity
Should be policed at renewal
Endorsements
Insurance Certificates
Make clear that insured status is bargained-for
provision and part of consideration
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
I
n
s
u
r
e
d
c
o
n
t
.
Also known as the duty to procure insurance
Does the insurance meet the contractual
obligations?
Limits;
Policy Period:
Are there exclusions that essentially eviscerate the
coverage required under the contract?
E
x
e
m
p
l
a
r
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
I
n
s
u
r
e
d
T
e
r
m
:
In furtherance of the preceding indemnity
In furtherance of the preceding indemnity
obligation, contractor shall procure a
obligation, contractor shall procure a
comprehensive general liability policy having
comprehensive general liability policy having
limits in the amount of $10X and $5X per
limits in the amount of $10X and $5X per
occurrence
occurrence
with no deductible or self-insured
with no deductible or self-insured
retention
retention
. Said insurance shall be primary and
. Said insurance shall be primary and
shall displace any other insurance held by the
shall displace any other insurance held by the
Airline except to the extent the above limits are
Airline except to the extent the above limits are
insufficient, in which case the Airline’s coverage
insufficient, in which case the Airline’s coverage
shall be deemed excess.
shall be deemed excess.
W
h
y
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
a
b
o
u
t
d
e
d
u
c
t
i
b
l
e
?
Actual Case
Personal injury action – passenger injured when
aircraft door shut on foot by Caterer
Caterer had [we believe] US$1 Million SIR.
Caterer accepted tender and then later rejected it as
when value revealed.
Why?
It was their own money!
Large SIR made insurance requirement somewhat
illusory
S
o
Y
o
u
’
r
e
a
n
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
I
n
s
u
r
e
d
;
N
o
w
W
h
a
t
?
Positives?
Potential to be covered to the same extent as the
named insured
Additional-Insured status may be less restrictive than
indemnity vis-à-vis public policy
Liabilities?
Likely to be bound by policy terms
Duty to cooperate
Duty of notice, etc.
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
F
l
i
g
h
t
s
Montreal Convention
Does NOT create a cause of action for
indemnification or contribution among carriers, but
also DOES NOT preclude such actions under local
laws.
See
Chubb Ins. Co. v. Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc.,
634
F.3d 1023, 1026 (9 Cir. 2011) citing
In re Air Crash at
Lexington, Ky.
, No. 5:07–CV–316, 2007 WL 2915187
(E.D.Ky. Oct. 5, 2007) (holding that the Warsaw
Convention does not preempt a local law cause of action
for apportionment among joint tortfeasors)
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
F
l
i
g
h
t
s
c
o
n
t
.
Warsaw Convention
Same as Montreal Convention re indem/contrib
See
Sompo Japan Ins., Inc. v. Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd.
,
522 F.3d 776, 785-87 (7
th
Cir. 2008) (holding that the
Warsaw Convention does not preempt the Illinois Joint
Tortfeasors Contribution Act).
SOL: The plain language of the Montreal
Convention makes clear that actions for
indemnification and contribution are not subject
to Article 35’s two-year statute of limitations.
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
T
I
P
S
–
I
N
D
E
M
N
I
T
Y
In reviewing or drafting contracts, make sure
indemnity is broad, includes indemnity and
defense
Include injuries by agents and employees of
contractors
Aim for indemnity to be triggered by allegations,
not facts, but know local law
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
T
I
P
S
–
I
N
D
E
M
N
I
T
Y
When your request for indemnity is denied:
When your request for indemnity is denied:
Continue to defend the underlying action
Continue to defend the underlying action
Decision to settle underlying claim must be reasonable
Track all expenses following denial, including those
Track all expenses following denial, including those
incurred during enforcement
incurred during enforcement
Don’t be afraid to request a reconsideration
Don’t be afraid to request a reconsideration
Options to consider
Options to consider
Sharing agreement on verdict or settlement
Sharing agreement on verdict or settlement
Tolling agreement to pursue indemnity claims
Tolling agreement to pursue indemnity claims
Pay and fight:
Pay and fight:
cross-claim, third-party complaint, or
cross-claim, third-party complaint, or
subsequent lawsuit for breach of contract
subsequent lawsuit for breach of contract
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
T
I
P
S
-
I
N
D
E
M
N
I
T
Y
Know the Chosen Law – Make sure it is
clear in contract
Be aware that contract may be subject to
different law in different areas of operation
Best to include:
Choice of Law
Forum for Disputes
Possible ADR
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
T
I
P
S
-
I
N
D
E
M
N
I
T
Y
Additional insurance provision should be co-extensive
with indemnity (unless you are looking for more
coverage)
Maintain organized and up-to-date files including
Latest executed contract
Applicable insurance policies and certificates
Tender and acceptance histories – possible “precedents” for
later use
Watch for “upstream” exposure
Circumvent the workers comp exclusion in policy
T
a
b
l
e
o
f
G
e
o
r
g
i
a
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Swissport United States, Inc.,
No. 11 Civ. 1544, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
183622 (S.D. N.Y. Dec. 27, 2012) (pre-tender expenses and interest available in Georgia)
JNJ Found. Specialists, Inc. v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
, 311 Ga. App. 269, 279 (2011) (indemnification
agreement enforceable when definite and unambiguous)
Lanier at McEver, LP v. Planners & Eng’rs Collaborative, Inc.
, 284 Ga. App. 204 (2007) (allowing
recovery of enforcement expenses)
SRG Consulting, Inc. v. Eagle Hospital Physicians, LLC
, 282 Ga. App. 842 (2006) (question of law)
Serv. Merch. Co. v. Hunter Fan Co.
, 274 Ga. App. 290 (2005) (“contract of indemnification must be
construed strictly against the indemnitee”)
Park Pride v. City of Atlanta
, 246 Ga. App. 689, 689 (2000) (broad form must be stated “expressly,
plainly, clearly and unequivocally”)
Myers v. Texaco Ref. & Mktg.
, 205 Ga. App. 292, 298 (1992) (court will “scrutinize the contract
closely [regarding] an intent to indemnify the indemnitee against his own negligence”)
Kemira, Inc. v. A-C Compressor Corp.
, 755 F. Supp. 1059 (S.D. Ga. 1991) (strict construction)
Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. C.R.A. Transportation Co., Inc.
, 167 Ga. App. 16 (1983) (example of plain
and unambiguous broad form agreement)
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp
, 350 F. Supp. 738 (N.D. Ga. 1972)
aff’d
503 F.2d 239
(5th Cir. 1974) (liability disclaimers not against public policy)
Andrews Motors Co. v. Clement
, 127 Ga. App. 745 (1972) (liability disclaimers not against public
policy)
Batson-Cook Co. v. Georgia Marble Setting Co.
, 112 Ga. App. 226 (1965) (clear intent for broad form)
Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N
S
S
h
i
f
t
i
n
g
g
e
a
r
s
t
o
…
A
p
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
m
e
n
t
Tackling the tug-of-war between pilot error,
maintenance, and mechanical defects
A
p
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
m
e
n
t
c
o
n
t
.
Negligence: Depends on the state
Pure Joint & Several Liability – 8 States
Pure Several Liability – 8 States
Variable Liability – 28 States
Hybrid and Variable Liability – 6 States
Ensure that the “deep pocket dilemma” doesn’t
harm your client
A
c
l
o
s
e
r
l
o
o
k
a
t
G
e
o
r
g
i
a
2005 Tort Reform Act replaced joint and several
liability with apportionment of damages by
percentage of liability
“in assessing percentages of fault, the trier of
fact shall consider the fault of all persons or
entities who contributed to the alleged injury or
damages, regardless of whether the person or
entity was, or could have been, named as a party
to the suit.” O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33(c).
G
e
o
r
g
i
a
c
o
n
t
.
If damages are actually apportioned by the jury,
there is no right of contribution. O.C.G.A. § 51-
12-33(b).
BUT most cases settle before reaching a jury…
And “the right of
indemnity
, express or implied,
…shall continue unabated and shall not be lost
or prejudiced by compromise and settlement of
a claim.” O.C.G.A. § 51-12-32(b).
Indemnity is a risk management tool where one party agrees to be responsible for the damages of another party. It is not a liability-shifting mechanism or insurance. Contractual indemnity provisions insulate parties from damages arising from contractual relationships. Different types of indemnity agreements exist, with common exceptions for gross negligence or intentional misconduct.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Indemnity 101: Tips from Lessons Learned Rick Alimonti Alimonti Law Offices, PC 200 Mamaroneck Ave. Suite 304 White Plains, NY 10601 914.948.8044 rick@alony.com Arthur J. Park Mozley Finlayson & Loggins LLP 5605 Glenridge Drive, Suite 900 Atlanta, GA 30342 404.256.0700 apark@mfllaw.com
So What is Indemnity? What isn t it? It is not a liability-shifting mechanism. It cannot bind a non party to whom you are liable Vis- -vis such a non party, you remain liable, and from their perspective, the indemnity may well be invisible. It is not insurance and, in fact, law is underdeveloped What is it? A risk management tool whereby one party (indemnitor) is answerable for the damage (and perhaps defense) of another (indemnitee).
When Will Indemnity Arise? When a claim arises under circumstances in which another party is primarily responsible and/or contractually responsible to indemnify you.
Contractual Indemnity Contract risk-management provision Often imposed by party with greater bargaining power over more dependant party. Example: Imposed by Port Authority on airlines and contractors Imposed by airlines on service providers Goal: insulate one party for damages and defense costs arising from contractual relationship with another.
Contractual Indemnity Is there an agreement? Signed In Effect not expired Between correct parties Superseded by another agreement Notice provision Voided: release, bankruptcy, etc.
Types of Indemnity Agreements Narrow form: only covers the indemnitor s negligence Intermediate form: covers indemnitee s passive negligence and indemnitor s negligence Broad form: covers indemnitor s negligence and even the indemnitee s own negligence Majority view: cannot cover gross negligence or intentional misconduct
And Common Exceptions The foregoing indemnity shall not apply in the event of injuries or damage to property caused by the reckless or wilful misconduct of the Airline or its agents and employees AND/OR The foregoing indemnity shall not apply in the event of injuries or damage to property caused by the sole negligence of the Airline or its agents and employees
Example 1 - FBO FBO shall indemnify, defend, and save harmless owner, and owner s officers, agents, employees, directors, successors and assigns, from and against any and all loss, claims, demands, costs, expenses of every nature, including reasonable attorney s fees (including fees to enforce this clause) arising directly or indirectly from or in connection with the use and operation of the aircraft by FBO, except when any such claims arise from the sole negligence of owner.
Example 2 - what not to do BOB hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless ADAM from and against (i) all claims, costs, expenses or damages of any nature whatsoever (including reasonable attorney fees and court costs) asserted against or incurred by ADAM resulting from the use of or in any way related to any work done under authority of the STC by any entity other than ADAM (or any other party licensed or authorized by it) after the completion of the transfer of the STC to BOB pursuant to these terms; and (ii) any claims, costs, expenses or damages asserted by any person or agent, or employee of BOB in performance of this Agreement, but excluding any claims, costs, expenses or damages which are caused by or result from the negligence or the fraudulent or willful misconduct of ADAM.
Obstacles to Indemnity Questions of Fact? Issue of party s sole negligence or reckless/wilful misconduct may form basis for argument that tender is premature . This will be particularly so if language is not clear on duty to defend and what triggers this duty.
Legal Principles Governing Indemnity Agreements Choice of law: lex loci contractus, most significant relationship, or choice of law clause in the contract Contracts of indemnification are to be strictly construed against the indemnitee Duty to indemnify is a question of law
Example 3 Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Airline for any and all claims, losses, and damages (including attorneys fees and court costs) arising out of or related to Contractor s performance of the Contract, including claims brought by Contractor s agents and employees.
Example 4 service k with airline Contractor shall release, indemnify, defend and hold harmless Delta from and against any and all claims which in any way arise out of or result from any act(s) or omission(s) by Contractor (or anyone directly or indirectly employed by Contractor or anyone for whose acts Contractor may be liable) in the performance or nonperformance of Services or other obligation under this Agreement This Section shall apply regardless of whether or not the damage, loss or injury complained of arises out of or relates to the negligence (whether active, passive or otherwise) of, or was caused in part by [Delta]. However, nothing contained in this Section, shall be construed as a release or indemnity by Contractor of [Delta] from or against any loss, liability or claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of [Delta].
When does duty to indemnify attach? Contractual Indemnity distinguished from Insurance Policy For Indemnity [unlike insurance], duty to defend MAY NOT BE BROADER than duty to indemnify Need broad indemnity language or you may be footing defense bill until duty to indemnify is established.
Incident Occurs-Investigation What are circumstances? Who are involved parties? Who has involvement in underlying incident or area in which it occurred? What does the applicable document say as to 1. Indemnity? 2. Insurance? Do you have documents to support additional insured status?
Triggering Indemnity: What do you do, and how do you know? Notice of Claim formal or informal The sooner you advise the party from whom you seek the indemnity of the underlying occurrence, the better Put it in writing Insurer will likely assist or handle but stay involved At the end of the day it is you, not the insurer, that is entitled to be indemnified
What can undermine indemnity? Adhesion contract contra preferentem Public Policy against free ride Ambiguity Failure to include specific claims, e.g., including claims by indemnitor s employees very important Punitive damages not subject to indemnity wrong party would be punished
The test for broad form indemnity Majority view: not against public policy But, indemnity agreement will not be construed to cover the indemnitee s own negligence unless contract is clear and unequivocal Initial presumption against broad form indemnity Language must show a clear intent to indemnify the other party s own negligence, but there are no magic words
Example 5 broad form? The Contractor [C.R.A.] agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Eastern [Air Lines], directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives from and against all claims, liability, loss or expense, including legal fees and court costs, arising out of or in connection with this agreement including, but not limited to claims of employees of Contractor, claims of employees of Eastern and/or City, claims arising out of injury, death or property damage, direct or consequential, to any person or entity The foregoing indemnification does not apply to any claims arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Eastern.
Fact Pattern Additional Insurance and Multiple Indemnities Sally Slip, age 45, is employed by On-The-Spot Cleaners, Inc., a contractor that cleans aircraft interiors. On January 4, 2014, she had just completed cleaning an aircraft when she fell at the foot of the air stairs on a patch of black ice. She suffered a broken arm (humerus) and a concussion. She claims soft tissue damage, herniated disc and inability to ever return to work, i.e., permanent disability.
Fact Pattern (contd) The aircraft she had just serviced was owned and operated by Excelsior Airlines. The accident took place on the Excelsior ramp at Sunshine Municipal Airport in Sunshine, New York. The town of Sunshine is the owner of the airport and Excelsior s landlord. Excelsior is a small regional airline that contracts with Shovel & Salt for snow removal on the Excelsior ramp.
Some Critical Contract Language Shovel & Salt Contract: Shovel & Salt is to perform no snow or ice removal within 50 of an aircraft unless specifically requested by airline. If airline requests such services within 50 , Airline must indemnify Shovel & Salt against any damages to property related to the provision of this service.
Contract Language Salt and Shovel contract requires snow removal on ramp upon 2 accumulation. According to contract, salt and sand are only applied on demand from Excelsior There is no patrol obligation in contract, but Shovel & Salt nonetheless patrols for snow and ice and applies melting agents and salt as it deems appropriate.
Contract Language Excelsior Airline Indemnity to Sunshine Township: Excelsior Airline agrees to indemnify and defend township for all injury and property damage arising out of Airline s use of the leasehold unless caused by the sole negligence of Sunshine or Sunshine s agents or employees.
Contract Language On-the-Spot Contract with Airline On-the-Spot is required to indemnify and defend Airline for all claims for damages and personal injury arising out of On-the-Spot s provision of services to Airline. However, the indemnity provision in the contract does not specifically extend to claims brought by On-the- Spot s own employees. The contract is silent on this issue.
Contract Language Shovel & Salt License with Sunshine Township: In order to provide services to airport tenants, Shovel & Salt has also entered into a license with Sunshine Township requiring Shovel & Salt to indemnify and defend Sunshine for all claims for damages and personal injury arising out of Shovel & Salt s provision of services on any airport premises. On-the-Spot License with Township NONE ON FILE!
Hurray! Youre Indemnified! Now What? You are still being sued You are still in the caption And you may be giving away the control of your defense Do you care? Yes! Why? Company Reputation; Adverse Press; Res Judicata; Jurisdictional Implications; Sanctions; Bad Handling
After the Indemnity is Accepted: Maintain active role You remain a client You may not want law firm to be doubling on defendants (waiver of privilege?) You will want role in defense and settlement You may want counsel of your choosing, not indemnifying party s
What About a Reservation of Rights Party from whom you seek indemnity reserves rights to withdraw defense and/or decline indemnity In vast majority of cases reservation is not effectuated and defense is not withdrawn Nonetheless, you are on notice! Counsel cannot defend you while looking to escape indemnity grounds for conflict Should you demand independent counsel?
MGLA 186 15. Non-liability of landlord; provisions in lease or rental agreement Any provision of a lease [in which] by the use of any words whatsoever, the effect of which is to indemnify the lessor or landlord or hold the lessor or landlord harmless . . . from any or all liability to the lessee or tenant, or to any other person, for any injury, loss, damage or liability arising from any omission, fault, negligence or other misconduct of the lessor or landlord . . . shall be deemed to be against public policy and void. Compare: N.Y. Gen. Oblig. L 5-322.1, which is more limited in scope and applies to construction, renovation, maintenance, demolition etc. of property
Limit in the construction context A covenant in connection with a contract or agreement relative to the construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of a building purporting to require that one party to such contract or agreement shall indemnify the other party to the contract against liability caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of the indemnitee is against public policy and void and unenforceable. O.C.G.A. 13-8-2(b)
Indemnitys Cousin: Additional Insured Status Separate and distinct from indemnity provision Should Implement Indemnity Should be policed at renewal Endorsements Insurance Certificates Make clear that insured status is bargained-for provision and part of consideration
Additional Insured cont. Also known as the duty to procure insurance Does the insurance meet the contractual obligations? Limits; Policy Period: Are there exclusions that essentially eviscerate the coverage required under the contract?
Exemplar Additional Insured Term: In furtherance of the preceding indemnity obligation, contractor shall procure a comprehensive general liability policy having limits in the amount of $10X and $5X per occurrence with no deductible or self-insured retention. Said insurance shall be primary and shall displace any other insurance held by the Airline except to the extent the above limits are insufficient, in which case the Airline s coverage shall be deemed excess.
Why the concern about deductible? Actual Case Personal injury action passenger injured when aircraft door shut on foot by Caterer Caterer had [we believe] US$1 Million SIR. Caterer accepted tender and then later rejected it as when value revealed. Why? It was their own money! Large SIR made insurance requirement somewhat illusory
So Youre an Additional Insured; Now What? Positives? Potential to be covered to the same extent as the named insured Additional-Insured status may be less restrictive than indemnity vis- -vis public policy Liabilities? Likely to be bound by policy terms Duty to cooperate Duty of notice, etc.
International Flights Montreal Convention Does NOT create a cause of action for indemnification or contribution among carriers, but also DOES NOT preclude such actions under local laws. See Chubb Ins. Co. v. Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc., 634 F.3d 1023, 1026 (9 Cir. 2011) citing In re Air Crash at Lexington, Ky., No. 5:07 CV 316, 2007 WL 2915187 (E.D.Ky. Oct. 5, 2007) (holding that the Warsaw Convention does not preempt a local law cause of action for apportionment among joint tortfeasors)
International Flights cont. Warsaw Convention Same as Montreal Convention re indem/contrib See Sompo Japan Ins., Inc. v. Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd., 522 F.3d 776, 785-87 (7thCir. 2008) (holding that the Warsaw Convention does not preempt the Illinois Joint Tortfeasors Contribution Act). SOL: The plain language of the Montreal Convention makes clear that actions for indemnification and contribution are not subject to Article 35 s two-year statute of limitations.
PRACTICE TIPS INDEMNITY In reviewing or drafting contracts, make sure indemnity is broad, includes indemnity and defense Include injuries by agents and employees of contractors Aim for indemnity to be triggered by allegations, not facts, but know local law
PRACTICE TIPS INDEMNITY When your request for indemnity is denied: Continue to defend the underlying action Decision to settle underlying claim must be reasonable Track all expenses following denial, including those incurred during enforcement Don t be afraid to request a reconsideration Options to consider Sharing agreement on verdict or settlement Tolling agreement to pursue indemnity claims Pay and fight: cross-claim, third-party complaint, or subsequent lawsuit for breach of contract
PRACTICE TIPS - INDEMNITY Know the Chosen Law Make sure it is clear in contract Be aware that contract may be subject to different law in different areas of operation Best to include: Choice of Law Forum for Disputes Possible ADR
PRACTICE TIPS - INDEMNITY Additional insurance provision should be co-extensive with indemnity (unless you are looking for more coverage) Maintain organized and up-to-date files including Latest executed contract Applicable insurance policies and certificates Tender and acceptance histories possible precedents for later use Watch for upstream exposure Circumvent the workers comp exclusion in policy
Table of Georgia Authorities Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Swissport United States, Inc., No. 11 Civ. 1544, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183622 (S.D. N.Y. Dec. 27, 2012) (pre-tender expenses and interest available in Georgia) JNJ Found. Specialists, Inc. v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 311 Ga. App. 269, 279 (2011) (indemnification agreement enforceable when definite and unambiguous) Lanier at McEver, LP v. Planners & Eng rs Collaborative, Inc., 284 Ga. App. 204 (2007) (allowing recovery of enforcement expenses) SRG Consulting, Inc. v. Eagle Hospital Physicians, LLC, 282 Ga. App. 842 (2006) (question of law) Serv. Merch. Co. v. Hunter Fan Co., 274 Ga. App. 290 (2005) ( contract of indemnification must be construed strictly against the indemnitee ) Park Pride v. City of Atlanta, 246 Ga. App. 689, 689 (2000) (broad form must be stated expressly, plainly, clearly and unequivocally ) Myers v. Texaco Ref. & Mktg., 205 Ga. App. 292, 298 (1992) (court will scrutinize the contract closely [regarding] an intent to indemnify the indemnitee against his own negligence ) Kemira, Inc. v. A-C Compressor Corp., 755 F. Supp. 1059 (S.D. Ga. 1991) (strict construction) Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. C.R.A. Transportation Co., Inc., 167 Ga. App. 16 (1983) (example of plain and unambiguous broad form agreement) Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp, 350 F. Supp. 738 (N.D. Ga. 1972) aff d 503 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1974) (liability disclaimers not against public policy) Andrews Motors Co. v. Clement, 127 Ga. App. 745 (1972) (liability disclaimers not against public policy) Batson-Cook Co. v. Georgia Marble Setting Co., 112 Ga. App. 226 (1965) (clear intent for broad form)
Shifting gears toApportionment Tackling the tug-of-war between pilot error, maintenance, and mechanical defects
Apportionment cont. Negligence: Depends on the state Pure Joint & Several Liability 8 States Pure Several Liability 8 States Variable Liability 28 States Hybrid and Variable Liability 6 States Ensure that the deep pocket dilemma doesn t harm your client
A closer look at Georgia 2005 Tort Reform Act replaced joint and several liability with apportionment of damages by percentage of liability in assessing percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider the fault of all persons or entities who contributed to the alleged injury or damages, regardless of whether the person or entity was, or could have been, named as a party to the suit. O.C.G.A. 51-12-33(c).
Georgia cont. If damages are actually apportioned by the jury, there is no right of contribution. O.C.G.A. 51- 12-33(b). BUT most cases settle before reaching a jury And the right of indemnity, express or implied, shall continue unabated and shall not be lost or prejudiced by compromise and settlement of a claim. O.C.G.A. 51-12-32(b).
