Improving Educational Outcomes in Florida Juvenile Justice Schools

 
Improving Educational
Outcomes in Florida
Juvenile Justice Schools
 
Governor Rick Scott
 
                          Secretary Christina Daly
Discussion Points
Quality Assurance Reviews of DJJ Schools
discontinued in 2009-2010
SB 850
DOE/DJJ Accountability and Program
Improvement Process
Regional Education Coordinator Positions
2
DJJ School Accountability
All DJJ Schools received on site Educational Quality Assurance reviews
once per year from The Juvenile Justice Educational Enhancement
Program (JJEEP)-funded by Florida Department of Education
Evaluation report to School District Superintendent, Principal, and
Facility Administrator
Recognize high performing DJJ schools
Provide technical assistance for low performing DJJ schools
Used peer reviews
Proviso language added stating educational reviews would occur only if
funds were available- 
reviews ended in 2009 -2010
Impetus behind the need for legislation to support the evaluation of DJJ schools
3
SB 850 Provisions
Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates:
 
Roles and Responsibilities
Cooperative Agreements
Transition Services/Process
Accountability Process
4
SB 850 Provisions
Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates:
Roles and Responsibilities-
Districts
3499
-(4) 
Educational services shall be provided at times
of the day most appropriate for the juvenile justice
program. School programming in juvenile justice
detention, prevention, day treatment, and residential
programs shall be made available by the local school
district during the juvenile justice school year, as provided
in s. 1003.01(11). In addition, students in juvenile justice
education programs shall have access to courses offered
pursuant to ss. 1002.37, 1002.45, and 1003.498.
Access to same courses and commensurate resources
(Rec. 1.1)
5
SB 850 Provisions
Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates:
Cooperative Agreements
3712
-
(14)
 
Each district school board shall negotiate a
cooperative agreement with the DJJ on the delivery of
educational services to students under the jurisdiction of
the DJJ. Such agreement must include, but is not limited
to the roles and responsibilities of each agency, including
the roles and responsibilities of contract providers.
6
SB 850 Provisions
Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates:
Transition Services/Process
3576-(10) School districts and juvenile justice education providers shall
develop individualized transition plans during  the course of a
student’s stay in a juvenile justice education program to coordinate
academic, career and technical, and secondary and postsecondary
services that assist the student in successful community
reintegration upon release. 
7
Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates
transition plan collaboration among:
personnel in the juvenile justice education
program,
reentry personnel,
personnel from the school district where the
student will  return,
the student,
the student’s family, and
DJJ personnel for committed students.
8
SB 850 Provisions
Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates:
Transition Services/Process
3602-(10)(b) For the purpose of transition planning and reentry
services, representatives from the school district and the one
stop center where the student will return shall participate as
members of the local DJJ reentry teams.
* Also known as Community Reentry Team Meetings
9
Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates:
The school district, upon return of a student from a juvenile
justice education program, must consider the individual needs
and circumstances of the student and the transition plan
recommendations when reenrolling a student in a public
school.
A local school district may not maintain a standardized policy
for all students returning from a juvenile justice program but
place students based on their needs and their performance
in the juvenile justice education program, including any
virtual education options.
10
Education Transition Planning
in SB 850
Requires school district and One Stop Center representatives
where the student will return to participate in CRTs.
Requires school districts to consider the individual needs and
circumstances of the student and the transition plan
recommendations when reenrolling the student.
Prohibits school districts from maintaining a standardized
policy requiring all students returning from DJJ programs to
attend alternative school.
Transition should always be based on students needs and
performance
11
DOE/DJJ Transition Oversight
SB 850 requires 
agency oversight and guidance 
for:
School Districts
Education Providers
Reentry Personnel
to effectively plan and implement  transition services.
Transition data 
including :
number and percentage of students who return to alternative
school, middle school, or high school upon release and
attendance rates before and after participation in juvenile justice
education program
will be 
reported to the Legislative  by February 1
st
 each year
.
Rec 2.2
12
SB 850 Section 32.
 Accountability
3400-Last paragraph in Section 31.
 
The DOE will establish and
operate directly or indirectly through a contract, a mechanism
to provide accountability measures that annually assesses and
evaluates all juvenile justice education programs using student
performance data and program performance ratings by type
of program.
13
SB 850 Section 32., Section 1003.52, Florida
Statutes
3750-(16)(a) The DOE in consultation
with the DJJ, district school boards, and
providers shall 
adopt rules 
establishing:
objective and measurable student
performance measures
 to evaluate a
student’s educational progress while
participating in a prevention, day
treatment, or residential program. 
14
SB 850
http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2014/0850/B
illText/er/PDF
Language referencing DJJ is discussed in lines
3061-3907 through sections 29-32.
Status of bill-Signed by Governor Rick Scott in
June 2014
15
Adopted Rule – February
2015
Rule Title: 
6A-6.05281
, 
Educational Programs for Students in
Department of Juvenile Justice Detention, Prevention,
Residential or Day Treatment Programs.
Updated the language to reflect current legislation passed
through Senate Bill 850 which was signed into law in June
2014.
Contains 9 sections.
Areas of emphasis include:
Detailed information on student records.
Detailed information on student assessments.
Extensive services detailing transition.
Detailed information on instruction and academic
expectations.
16
6A-1.099812
 , F.A.C.
EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF
JUVENILE JUSTICE EDUCATION PROGRAMS
JUVENILE JUSTICE EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Content of the laws
Content of the laws
Content of the rule
Content of the rule
17
Rule Authority
Rule Authority
Section 1003.52(16), F.S., 
Educational services in
Department of Juvenile Justice programs
When establishing this rule, the Department of
Education must consult with
Department of Juvenile Justice
District school boards
Providers
18
System Requirements
System Requirements
Rating must be based on objective and measurable student
performance measures that evaluate a student’s educational
progress
Limited to prevention, day treatment and residential programs
Measures must be based on appropriate outcomes for all
students in juvenile justice education programs
Must take into consideration the student’s length of stay in the
program
19
Measure Requirements
Measure Requirements
Performance measures shall include outcomes that relate to:
Student achievement of career education goals
Acquisition of employability skills
Receipt of a high school diploma or its equivalent
Grade advancement
The number of CAPE industry certifications earned
20
6A-1.099812
, F.A.C.
EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF
JUVENILE JUSTICE EDUCATION PROGRAMS
JUVENILE JUSTICE EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Content of the laws
Content of the laws
Content of the rule
Content of the rule
21
Sections of Proposed Rule 6A-
Sections of Proposed Rule 6A-
1.099812, F.A.C.
1.099812, F.A.C.
1.
Purpose of the Rule
2.
Definitions
3.
Rating Framework
4.
Rating System
5.
Procedures for Calculating Scores and
Ratings
6.
Accuracy and Representativeness of
Performance Data
22
Section 1 – Purpose
Section 1 – Purpose
The purpose of this rule is to implement the
performance rating system provided for in
Section 1003.52(16)(a) and (b), F.S., for
Department of Juvenile Justice Education
Programs.
23
Section 2 – Definitions
Section 2 – Definitions
Classification score
Common assessment
DJJ school
Designed length of stay
Eligible students
Exiting students
Learning gains
Sufficient data
Program type
24
Section 3 – Rating Framework
Section 3 – Rating Framework
Three ratings
a)
Commendable
b)
Acceptable
c)
Unsatisfactory
14-day data review period to ensure
accuracy of list of schools to be assigned a
rating
Rating only based on measures for which
there are sufficient data
25
Section 4 – 
Section 4 – 
Rating System
Up to 10 components included
All are based on a percentage calculation
Students must have been in the program for at
least 40 days to be included in a measure
Additional requirements for some components
Methodology for computation of some
components may be revised following
stakeholder input and review of simulation
data
26
1- Common Assessment
1- Common Assessment
The percentage of students who make learning
gains on the DJJ Common Assessment
Based on an exit cohort
Only includes students who were in the
program for at least 40 days
Student must have both a pre- and a post-
assessment
Learning gain means student increases a level
or maintains if already at the highest level
27
2- Learning Gains – ELA
2- Learning Gains – ELA
The percentage of students who make
learning gains on ELA assessments
Only includes students who were in the
program for at least 40 days prior to the
assessment
Learning gain measurement as defined for
traditional school grades
Data will not be available for this measure
until next year
28
3- Learning Gains - Mathematics
3- Learning Gains - Mathematics
The percentage of students who make
learning gains on Mathematics assessments
Only includes students who were in the
program for at least 40 days prior to the
assessment
Learning gain measurement as defined for
traditional school grades
Data will not be available for this measure
until next year
29
4- Attendance Rate
4- Attendance Rate
The percentage of students who showing
improvement in their attendance rate
following re-enrollment
Based on an exit cohort
Only includes students who were in the
program for at least 40 days
Must have been enrolled in school prior to
and following release from the DJJ school
Based on days attended of those enrolled
30
5- Graduation Rate
5- Graduation Rate
The percentage of students whose last school
attended was a DJJ school who graduated or
earned a GED within 5 years of entering 9
th
grade
Based on a 9
th
 grade entry cohort
Only includes students who were in the
program for at least 40 days
DJJ school must have been the last school
they attended
31
6- Certified Teachers
6- Certified Teachers
The percentage of core courses taught by
teachers certified for the subject area
Only includes core courses as identified by
the Course Code Directory
32
7- Data Integrity
7- Data Integrity
The percentage of students who have pre- and
post-test data on the common assessment
Based on an exit cohort
Only includes students who were in the
program for at least 40 days
33
8- Postsecondary Enrollment
8- Postsecondary Enrollment
The percentage of students attending
postsecondary institutions
Based on an exit cohort
Only includes students who were in the
program for at least 40 days
Only includes students with a diploma or
GED at the time of exit
Enrollment can be anytime within one year
of exit
34
9- Employment
9- Employment
The percentage of students employed
Based on an exit cohort
Only includes students who were in the
program for at least 40 days
Only includes students who were at least 16
at the time of release and not attending a
post-secondary institution
Employment can be anytime within one
year of exit
35
10- CAPE
10- CAPE
The percentage of students who earn a CAPE
Industry Certification (High School) or Digital
Learning Tools (Middle School) Certificate
Only applies to programs with a designed LOS
of 9 months or longer
Based on an exit cohort
Only includes students who were in the
program for at least 40 days
Certificate can be earned anytime within one
year of exit
36
Section 5 - Procedures for
Section 5 - Procedures for
Calculating Scores and Ratings
Calculating Scores and Ratings
Three proposed ratings include Commendable, Acceptable and
Unsatisfactory
Components will be rated on a 3-point scale
Cut points for the individual components will be approved by the
State Board following recommendations by the Commissioner
based on simulation data and input from stakeholders
Rating will be the simple average of the components with
sufficient data, rounded to the nearest whole number
If a DJJ school doesn’t have sufficient data to generate a rating
for three years in a row, the prior three years of data will be
aggregated to produce a rating
37
Section 6 – Accuracy and
Section 6 – Accuracy and
Representativeness of Data
Representativeness of Data
Superintendents shall appoint a DJJ accountability contact in
each district
Contact must work with DJJ to ensure data are accurately
reported, and that the DJJ school is appropriately classified
Describes conditions for withholding a rating or awarding an
Incomplete rating
Describes provisions for review and appeal of rating
38
Use of Outcome Data
Evaluate each Juvenile Justice School in Florida
Share outcome data with state legislature and governor
through reports
Use to determine which schools receive on-site reviews
Use to pair mentor/mentee sites for improvement
Use to showcase best practices
Share with facility treatment staff, possible use within mutual
accountability teams
Share with School Justice Partnerships
Rec 2.2
39
New Education Positions
Legislature provided DJJ funding for 4 regional educational
positions
Education Coordinators support all DJJ education programs
and transition functions
Serve on Quality Improvement reviews
Facilitate on site education review process for next school year
based on outcome data
Coordinate data review teams
40
Implementation Status
FDOE is collecting public input on proposed rule
Anticipate State Board of Education approval in January 2016
Drafting additional program improvement rule
Success
Buy in from providers and districts
Committee will review sample data prior to State Board
approval
Challenges
Time to develop rule
Concern that some measures hold DJJ schools accountable for
things outside their control
41
Contact Information
Julie Orange, 
Director of Education
850 717-2708
Julie.Orange@djj.state.fl.us
42
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This content discusses the evaluation and accountability processes in Florida's Juvenile Justice Schools, focusing on Quality Assurance Reviews, SB 850 provisions, and the need for legislative support. It highlights the roles, responsibilities, and cooperative agreements mandated by Florida Statute 1003.52 to enhance educational services for students under the DJJ jurisdiction.

  • Florida
  • Juvenile Justice
  • Education
  • Accountability
  • Legislation

Uploaded on Feb 27, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improving Educational Outcomes in Florida Juvenile Justice Schools Governor Rick Scott Secretary Christina Daly

  2. Discussion Points Quality Assurance Reviews of DJJ Schools discontinued in 2009-2010 SB 850 DOE/DJJ Accountability and Program Improvement Process 2 Regional Education Coordinator Positions

  3. DJJ School Accountability All DJJ Schools received on site Educational Quality Assurance reviews once per year from The Juvenile Justice Educational Enhancement Program (JJEEP)-funded by Florida Department of Education Evaluation report to School District Superintendent, Principal, and Facility Administrator Recognize high performing DJJ schools Provide technical assistance for low performing DJJ schools Used peer reviews Proviso language added stating educational reviews would occur only if funds were available- reviews ended in 2009 -2010 3 Impetus behind the need for legislation to support the evaluation of DJJ schools

  4. SB 850 Provisions Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates: Roles and Responsibilities Cooperative Agreements Transition Services/Process Accountability Process 4

  5. SB 850 Provisions Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates: Roles and Responsibilities-Districts 3499-(4) Educational services shall be provided at times of the day most appropriate for the juvenile justice program. School programming in juvenile justice detention, prevention, day treatment, and residential programs shall be made available by the local school district during the juvenile justice school year, as provided in s. 1003.01(11). In addition, students in juvenile justice education programs shall have access to courses offered pursuant to ss. 1002.37, 1002.45, and 1003.498. Access to same courses and commensurate resources (Rec. 1.1) 5

  6. SB 850 Provisions Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates: Cooperative Agreements 3712-(14) Each district school board shall negotiate a cooperative agreement with the DJJ on the delivery of educational services to students under the jurisdiction of the DJJ. Such agreement must include, but is not limited to the roles and responsibilities of each agency, including the roles and responsibilities of contract providers. 6

  7. SB 850 Provisions Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates: Transition Services/Process 3576-(10) School districts and juvenile justice education providers shall develop individualized transition plans during the course of a student s stay in a juvenile justice education program to coordinate academic, career and technical, and secondary and postsecondary services that assist the student in successful community reintegration upon release. 7

  8. Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates transition plan collaboration among: personnel in the juvenile justice education program, reentry personnel, personnel from the school district where the student will return, the student, the student s family, and DJJ personnel for committed students. 8

  9. SB 850 Provisions Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates: Transition Services/Process 3602-(10)(b) For the purpose of transition planning and reentry services, representatives from the school district and the one stop center where the student will return shall participate as members of the local DJJ reentry teams. * Also known as Community Reentry Team Meetings 9

  10. Florida Statute 1003.52 mandates: The school district, upon return of a student from a juvenile justice education program, must consider the individual needs and circumstances of the student and the transition plan recommendations when reenrolling a student in a public school. A local school district may not maintain a standardized policy for all students returning from a juvenile justice program but place students based on their needs and their performance in the juvenile justice education program, including any virtual education options. 10

  11. Education Transition Planning in SB 850 Requires school district and One Stop Center representatives where the student will return to participate in CRTs. Requires school districts to consider the individual needs and circumstances of the student and the transition plan recommendations when reenrolling the student. Prohibits school districts from maintaining a standardized policy requiring all students returning from DJJ programs to attend alternative school. Transition should always be based on students needs and performance 11

  12. DOE/DJJ Transition Oversight SB 850 requires agency oversight and guidance for: School Districts Education Providers Reentry Personnel to effectively plan and implement transition services. Transition data including : number and percentage of students who return to alternative school, middle school, or high school upon release and attendance rates before and after participation in juvenile justice education program will be reported to the Legislative by February 1st each year. Rec 2.2 12

  13. SB 850 Section 32. Accountability 3400-Last paragraph in Section 31. The DOE will establish and operate directly or indirectly through a contract, a mechanism to provide accountability measures that annually assesses and evaluates all juvenile justice education programs using student performance data and program performance ratings by type of program. 13

  14. SB 850 Section 32., Section 1003.52, Florida Statutes 3750-(16)(a) The DOE in consultation with the DJJ, district school boards, and providers shall adopt rules establishing: objective and measurable student performance measures to evaluate a student s educational progress while participating in a prevention, day treatment, or residential program. 14

  15. SB 850 http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2014/0850/B illText/er/PDF Language referencing DJJ is discussed in lines 3061-3907 through sections 29-32. Status of bill-Signed by Governor Rick Scott in June 2014 15

  16. Adopted Rule February 2015 Rule Title: 6A-6.05281, Educational Programs for Students in Department of Juvenile Justice Detention, Prevention, Residential or Day Treatment Programs. Updated the language to reflect current legislation passed through Senate Bill 850 which was signed into law in June 2014. Contains 9 sections. Areas of emphasis include: Detailed information on student records. Detailed information on student assessments. Extensive services detailing transition. Detailed information on instruction and academic expectations. 16

  17. 6A-1.099812, F.A.C. EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE EDUCATION PROGRAMS Content of the laws Content of the rule 17

  18. Rule Authority Section 1003.52(16), F.S., Educational services in Department of Juvenile Justice programs When establishing this rule, the Department of Education must consult with Department of Juvenile Justice District school boards Providers 18

  19. System Requirements Rating must be based on objective and measurable student performance measures that evaluate a student s educational progress Limited to prevention, day treatment and residential programs Measures must be based on appropriate outcomes for all students in juvenile justice education programs Must take into consideration the student s length of stay in the program 19

  20. Measure Requirements Performance measures shall include outcomes that relate to: Student achievement of career education goals Acquisition of employability skills Receipt of a high school diploma or its equivalent Grade advancement The number of CAPE industry certifications earned 20

  21. 6A-1.099812, F.A.C. EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE EDUCATION PROGRAMS Content of the laws Content of the rule 21

  22. Sections of Proposed Rule 6A- 1.099812, F.A.C. 1. Purpose of the Rule 2. Definitions 3. Rating Framework 4. Rating System 5. Procedures for Calculating Scores and Ratings 6. Accuracy and Representativeness of Performance Data 22

  23. Section 1 Purpose The purpose of this rule is to implement the performance rating system provided for in Section 1003.52(16)(a) and (b), F.S., for Department of Juvenile Justice Education Programs. 23

  24. Section 2 Definitions Classification score Common assessment DJJ school Designed length of stay Eligible students Exiting students Learning gains Sufficient data Program type 24

  25. Section 3 Rating Framework Three ratings a) b) c) Commendable Acceptable Unsatisfactory 14-day data review period to ensure accuracy of list of schools to be assigned a rating Rating only based on measures for which there are sufficient data 25

  26. Section 4 Rating System Up to 10 components included All are based on a percentage calculation Students must have been in the program for at least 40 days to be included in a measure Additional requirements for some components Methodology for computation of some components may be revised following stakeholder input and review of simulation data 26

  27. 1-Common Assessment The percentage of students who make learning gains on the DJJ Common Assessment Based on an exit cohort Only includes students who were in the program for at least 40 days Student must have both a pre- and a post- assessment Learning gain means student increases a level or maintains if already at the highest level 27

  28. 2-Learning Gains ELA The percentage of students who make learning gains on ELA assessments Only includes students who were in the program for at least 40 days prior to the assessment Learning gain measurement as defined for traditional school grades Data will not be available for this measure until next year 28

  29. 3-Learning Gains -Mathematics The percentage of students who make learning gains on Mathematics assessments Only includes students who were in the program for at least 40 days prior to the assessment Learning gain measurement as defined for traditional school grades Data will not be available for this measure until next year 29

  30. 4-Attendance Rate The percentage of students who showing improvement in their attendance rate following re-enrollment Based on an exit cohort Only includes students who were in the program for at least 40 days Must have been enrolled in school prior to and following release from the DJJ school Based on days attended of those enrolled 30

  31. 5-Graduation Rate The percentage of students whose last school attended was a DJJ school who graduated or earned a GED within 5 years of entering 9th grade Based on a 9th grade entry cohort Only includes students who were in the program for at least 40 days DJJ school must have been the last school they attended 31

  32. 6-Certified Teachers The percentage of core courses taught by teachers certified for the subject area Only includes core courses as identified by the Course Code Directory 32

  33. 7-Data Integrity The percentage of students who have pre- and post-test data on the common assessment Based on an exit cohort Only includes students who were in the program for at least 40 days 33

  34. 8-Postsecondary Enrollment The percentage of students attending postsecondary institutions Based on an exit cohort Only includes students who were in the program for at least 40 days Only includes students with a diploma or GED at the time of exit Enrollment can be anytime within one year of exit 34

  35. 9-Employment The percentage of students employed Based on an exit cohort Only includes students who were in the program for at least 40 days Only includes students who were at least 16 at the time of release and not attending a post-secondary institution Employment can be anytime within one year of exit 35

  36. 10-CAPE The percentage of students who earn a CAPE Industry Certification (High School) or Digital Learning Tools (Middle School) Certificate Only applies to programs with a designed LOS of 9 months or longer Based on an exit cohort Only includes students who were in the program for at least 40 days Certificate can be earned anytime within one year of exit 36

  37. Section 5 -Procedures for Calculating Scores and Ratings Three proposed ratings include Commendable, Acceptable and Unsatisfactory Components will be rated on a 3-point scale Cut points for the individual components will be approved by the State Board following recommendations by the Commissioner based on simulation data and input from stakeholders Rating will be the simple average of the components with sufficient data, rounded to the nearest whole number If a DJJ school doesn t have sufficient data to generate a rating for three years in a row, the prior three years of data will be aggregated to produce a rating 37

  38. Section 6 Accuracy and Representativeness of Data Superintendents shall appoint a DJJ accountability contact in each district Contact must work with DJJ to ensure data are accurately reported, and that the DJJ school is appropriately classified Describes conditions for withholding a rating or awarding an Incomplete rating Describes provisions for review and appeal of rating 38

  39. Use of Outcome Data Evaluate each Juvenile Justice School in Florida Share outcome data with state legislature and governor through reports Use to determine which schools receive on-site reviews Use to pair mentor/mentee sites for improvement Use to showcase best practices Share with facility treatment staff, possible use within mutual accountability teams Share with School Justice Partnerships Rec 2.2 39

  40. New Education Positions Legislature provided DJJ funding for 4 regional educational positions Education Coordinators support all DJJ education programs and transition functions Serve on Quality Improvement reviews Facilitate on site education review process for next school year based on outcome data 40 Coordinate data review teams

  41. Implementation Status FDOE is collecting public input on proposed rule Anticipate State Board of Education approval in January 2016 Drafting additional program improvement rule Success Buy in from providers and districts Committee will review sample data prior to State Board approval Challenges Time to develop rule Concern that some measures hold DJJ schools accountable for things outside their control 41

  42. Contact Information Julie Orange, Director of Education 850 717-2708 Julie.Orange@djj.state.fl.us 42

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#