Health Care Provider Quarterly Meeting Summary

Health Care Provider
Quarterly Meeting
May 13, 2020
9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m.
A
g
e
n
d
a
 
I
t
e
m
s
Welcome
Introduction of Deputy Commissioner of Legal Services
Office of Medical Advisor Update
DD and Business Process Update
Compliance and Investigations Update
Telemedicine Update
MFDR Update
Patients Medical Court Case
Q&A
Closing
Welcome
Cassie Brown, Commissioner
Division of Workers’ Compensation
Introduction of Deputy
Commissioner of Legal
Services
Kara Mace, Deputy Commissioner
Legal Services
Office of Medical
Advisor Update
Mary Landrum, Director
Health Care Business Management
Health Care
Management Update
Mary Landrum, Director
Health Care Business Management
Medical Quality Reviews
Calendar Year 2020
0 reviews initiated
includes complaint, audit, or monitoring based reviews
assigned to MQRP members for review
5 reviews concluded
 
  80% referred to Enforcement
 
  20% recommended other actions
  
(includes letters of education, referrals to medical licensing boards, and
 
closures with no action)
Source:  Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation, data as of 04/21/20
DD and Business Process
Update
Joe McElrath, Deputy Commissioner
Business Process
Compliance and
Investigations Update
Debra Knight, Deputy Commissioner
Compliance and Investigations
 
CY2020 Complaints
 
*Based on complaint data as of 5/5/2020
  
687
  
Complaints Received
  
70
 
Attendance
  
204
 
Communications
  
0
 
Fraud
  
150
 
Indemnity Benefit Delivery
  
171
 
Medical Benefit Delivery
  
48
 
Other
  
44
 
Quality of Care
 
 
 
927
 
 
Complaints Closed
  
225
 
Confirmed
  
342
  
DWC Education Complaint
  
360
 
Not Confirmed
CY2020 - Complaints
Complaint Comparison
Quarter Comparison
  
DWC Fraud
 
Fraud Definition
Per Black’s Law Dictionary:
“Fraud includes any intentional or deliberate act to
deprive another of property or money by guile,
deception, or other unfair means.”
https://www.acfe.com/fraud-101.aspx
Fraud Schemes
Types of fraud the DWC Fraud and Prosecution
teams investigate:
Billing for services not performed by attorneys and
healthcare providers.
Under reporting employees or misclassifying high risk
employees in order to obtain lower premium rates.
Working & drawing benefits.
Falsifying documents to keep from having to pay
benefits.
*Based on data received as of 4/15/2020
 
 487
 
- Fraud referrals received
 
124
 
- Fraud cases open*
 
512
 
- Fraud cases closed
 
0
 
- Fraud referrals for prosecution
CY2020 – DWC Fraud Stats
*Based on data received as of 4/15/2020
Indictments – 2
 
1 
Health Care Provider
 
1
 Injured Employee
 
CY2020 – DWC Prosecution Stats
Convictions – 2
 
1
 Employer
 
1
 Injured Employee
CY2020 – DWC Prosecution Stats
 
    Enforcement Update
Enforcement Key Initiatives
Strategies DWC Enforcement uses to improve market
compliance and case processing:
Using clear, express statutory authority for all
enforcement cases;
Informing workers’ compensation stakeholders about
compliance goals;
Partnering with Division of Workers’ Compensation
program areas to foster compliance;
Assisting the Office of the Medical Advisor;
Providing swift, appropriate actions for statutory and
rule violations.
Common Insurance Carrier
Administrative Violations
Failure to pay timely indemnity benefits;
Failure to initiate TIBS;
Failure to accurately pay TIBS;
Pursuing a private claim against an injured
employee;
Failure to investigate a claim;
Attorney fee billing violations; and
Failure to comply with MFDR or D&O order
.
Enforcement Case Status for
CY2020
Cases Pending by Subject Type
as of March 31, 2020
Cases Closed by Disposition Type
for CY2020
Cases Closed by Subject Type for
CY2020
OMA Enforcement Cases
CY 2020
 2 OMA referrals received in Enforcement
 1 OMA case concluded by Enforcement
    1 consent order/final order
    0 warning letters
    0 other action
31 OMA cases pending in Enforcement
1 OMA case pending at SOAH
Source:  Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation, data as of 04/20/20
Telemedicine Update
Matt Zurek, Deputy Commissioner
Health and Safety
Telemedicine
28 TAC §133.30
Rule applies to medical billing and reimbursement
for telemedicine and telehealth services provided
on or after September 1, 2018
A health care provider must bill for telemedicine
and telehealth services according to applicable:
 Medicare payment policies, as defined in §134.203 of
this title; and
 provisions of Chapter 133 of this title.
Emergency Rule
DWC adopted new 28 Texas Administrative Code
§167.1 on an emergency basis. The rule relates to
telemedicine and telehealth and went into effect for
physical medicine and rehab services provided on or
after April 13, 2020.
Rule allows licensed HCP’s to perform physical
medicine and rehabilitation services, and physical
therapists, occupational therapists, and speech
pathologists to bill and be reimbursed for services
currently allowed under CMS telemedicine and
telehealth billing codes.
Emergency Rule
Under Government Code §2001.034, this
emergency rule may not be in effect for more than
120 days, but may be extended 60 days.
r
T
e
l
e
m
e
d
i
c
i
n
e
 
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
DWC Telemedicine cage:
http://www.tdi.texas.gov/wc/hcprovider/telemed.html
List of covered services:
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-
Information/Telehealth/Telehealth-Codes
Adopted Rule:  (Texas Register)
https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/regviewer$ext.RegPage
?sl=R&app=1&p_dir=&p_rloc=351110&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg
=1&p_reg=351110&ti=28&pt=2&ch=133&rl=30&issue=04/2
7/2018&z_chk=
MFDR Update
Greg Arendt, Director
Medical Fee Dispute
2,120 Disputes Received Fiscal Year 2020
2,180 Disputes Closed Fiscal Year 2020
Average Days to Adjudicate a Dispute
Facility Ins. Corp. v Patients Medical
Center
, 574 S.W. 3rd 436 (Court of
Appeals, Austin, Dec. 5, 2018);
Petition for Review, pending, Case No.
19-0533.
Nick Canaday,
Special Counsel
Statement of the Case:
Provider initiated MFDR process following insurance carrier’s
partial payment of bill.
MFDR ordered additional payment. Insurance carrier requests
hearing at SOAH.
Legal Issue:
Which party carries the burden of proof in the 
de novo 
contested-
case hearing at SOAH?
Is it the health care provider that filed the initial request for
review?
Is it the party that requested a benefit review conference
and, ultimately, that the matter be docketed with SOAH?
Statement of the Case:
The health care provider is the party seeking “affirmative
relief” (in the form of reimbursement) throughout the entire
review process, despite an insurance carrier’s challenging of a
reimbursement award at any given stage within the MFDR
context.
The burden of proof should always remain with the health
care provider regardless of who prevailed in the underlying
Medical Dispute Resolution.
Q&A
 
Closing
Cassie Brown, Commissioner
Division of Workers’ Compensation
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The Health Care Provider Quarterly Meeting held on May 13, 2020, focused on important updates and discussions related to legal services, medical advisor updates, compliance, investigations, telemedicine, and more. Key presentations included introductions, updates on medical quality reviews, business processes, and complaints received in CY2020. The meeting was informative and highlighted various aspects of health care management and quality assurance.

  • Health Care
  • Provider Meeting
  • Medical Updates
  • Compliance
  • Telemedicine.

Uploaded on Sep 07, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Health Care Provider Quarterly Meeting May 13, 2020 9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. 1

  2. Agenda Items Welcome Introduction of Deputy Commissioner of Legal Services Office of Medical Advisor Update DD and Business Process Update Compliance and Investigations Update Telemedicine Update MFDR Update Patients Medical Court Case Q&A Closing 2

  3. Welcome Cassie Brown, Commissioner Division of Workers Compensation 3

  4. Introduction of Deputy Commissioner of Legal Services Kara Mace, Deputy Commissioner Legal Services 4

  5. Office of Medical Advisor Update Mary Landrum, Director Health Care Business Management 5

  6. Health Care Management Update Mary Landrum, Director Health Care Business Management 6

  7. Medical Quality Reviews Calendar Year 2020 0 reviews initiated includes complaint, audit, or monitoring based reviews assigned to MQRP members for review 5 reviews concluded 80% referred to Enforcement 20% recommended other actions (includes letters of education, referrals to medical licensing boards, and closures with no action) Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers Compensation, data as of 04/21/20 7

  8. DD and Business Process Update Joe McElrath, Deputy Commissioner Business Process 8

  9. Compliance and Investigations Update Debra Knight, Deputy Commissioner Compliance and Investigations 9

  10. CY2020 Complaints 10

  11. CY2020 - Complaints 687 204 150 171 927 Complaints Received Attendance Communications Fraud Indemnity Benefit Delivery Medical Benefit Delivery Other Quality of Care Complaints Closed Confirmed DWC Education Complaint Not Confirmed 70 0 48 44 225 342 360 *Based on complaint data as of 5/5/2020 11

  12. Quarter Comparison Complaint Comparison Feb 2020 187 Mar 2020 165 Apr 2020 89 Quarter Volume 441 Quarter Volume 714 Nov 2019 174 Dec 2019 294 Jan 2020 246 12

  13. DWC Fraud 13

  14. Fraud Definition Per Black s Law Dictionary: Fraud includes any intentional or deliberate act to deprive another of property or money by guile, deception, or other unfair means. https://www.acfe.com/fraud-101.aspx 14

  15. Fraud Schemes Types of fraud the DWC Fraud and Prosecution teams investigate: Billing for services not performed by attorneys and healthcare providers. Under reporting employees or misclassifying high risk employees in order to obtain lower premium rates. Working & drawing benefits. Falsifying documents to keep from having to pay benefits. 15

  16. CY2020 DWC Fraud Stats 487 - Fraud referrals received 124 - Fraud cases open* 512 - Fraud cases closed 0 - Fraud referrals for prosecution *Based on data received as of 4/15/2020 16

  17. CY2020 DWC Prosecution Stats Indictments 2 1 Health Care Provider 1 Injured Employee *Based on data received as of 4/15/2020 17

  18. CY2020 DWC Prosecution Stats Convictions 2 1 Employer 1 Injured Employee 18

  19. Enforcement Update 19

  20. Enforcement Key Initiatives Strategies DWC Enforcement uses to improve market compliance and case processing: Using clear, express statutory authority for all enforcement cases; Informing workers compensation stakeholders about compliance goals; Partnering with Division of Workers Compensation program areas to foster compliance; Assisting the Office of the Medical Advisor; Providing swift, appropriate actions for statutory and rule violations. 20

  21. Common Insurance Carrier Administrative Violations Failure to pay timely indemnity benefits; Failure to initiate TIBS; Failure to accurately pay TIBS; Pursuing a private claim against an injured employee; Failure to investigate a claim; Attorney fee billing violations; and Failure to comply with MFDR or D&O order. 21

  22. Enforcement Case Status for CY2020 CY 2020 Case Status 400 340 300 193 200 100 0 Closed Pending 2020 2020 Closed Closed Cases Cases Pending Cases Pending Cases Cases 193 340 22

  23. Cases Pending by Subject Type as of March 31, 2020 CY 2020 Cases Pending by Subject Type 250 215 200 150 80 100 45 50 0 Health Care Provider Insurance Carrier Other 2020 2020 Health Care Provider Health Care Provider Insurance Carrier Insurance Carrier Other Other Cases 80 215 45 23

  24. Cases Closed by Disposition Type for CY2020 CY 2020 Cases Closed by Disposition Type Health Care Provider Insurance Carrier Other 120 100 100 80 60 29 28 40 27 20 4 3 1 1 0 0 DWC Order Warning Letter Other 2020 2020 Health Care Provider Health Care Provider Insurance Carrier Insurance Carrier Other Other 1 28 0 DWC Order Warning Letter Other 4 27 3 29 100 1 24

  25. Cases Closed by Subject Type for CY2020 CY 2020 Case Status 130 140 120 100 80 60 34 29 40 20 0 Health Care Provider Insurance Carrier Other 2020 2020 Health Care Provider Health Care Provider Insurance Carrier Insurance Carrier Other Other Cases 34 130 29 25

  26. OMA Enforcement Cases CY 2020 2 OMA referrals received in Enforcement 1 OMA case concluded by Enforcement 1 consent order/final order 0 warning letters 0 other action 31 OMA cases pending in Enforcement 1 OMA case pending at SOAH Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers Compensation, data as of 04/20/20 26

  27. Telemedicine Update Matt Zurek, Deputy Commissioner Health and Safety 27

  28. Telemedicine 28 TAC 133.30 Rule applies to medical billing and reimbursement for telemedicine and telehealth services provided on or after September 1, 2018 A health care provider must bill for telemedicine and telehealth services according to applicable: Medicare payment policies, as defined in 134.203 of this title; and provisions of Chapter 133 of this title. 28

  29. Emergency Rule DWC adopted new 28 Texas Administrative Code 167.1 on an emergency basis. The rule relates to telemedicine and telehealth and went into effect for physical medicine and rehab services provided on or after April 13, 2020. Rule allows licensed HCP s to perform physical medicine and rehabilitation services, and physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech pathologists to bill and be reimbursed for services currently allowed under CMS telemedicine and telehealth billing codes. 29

  30. Emergency Rule Under Government Code 2001.034, this emergency rule may not be in effect for more than 120 days, but may be extended 60 days. 30

  31. 31

  32. 32

  33. 33

  34. r 34

  35. Telemedicine Resources Telemedicine Resources DWC Telemedicine cage: http://www.tdi.texas.gov/wc/hcprovider/telemed.html List of covered services: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General- Information/Telehealth/Telehealth-Codes Adopted Rule: (Texas Register) https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/regviewer$ext.RegPage ?sl=R&app=1&p_dir=&p_rloc=351110&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg =1&p_reg=351110&ti=28&pt=2&ch=133&rl=30&issue=04/2 7/2018&z_chk= 35

  36. MFDR Update Greg Arendt, Director Medical Fee Dispute 36

  37. 2,120 Disputes Received Fiscal Year 2020 FY 2020 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Pharmacy Division Specific Facility Non-MFDR Air Amb Professional All Other Pharmacy Division Specific Facility Non-MFDR Issues Air Ambulance Professional Services All Other Total 367 335 303 275 262 216 362 2120 37

  38. 2,180 Disputes Closed Fiscal Year 2020 Disputes Closed FY 2020 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Pharmacy Dvision Specific Facility Non-MFDR Professional All Other Pharmacy Division Specific Facility Non-MFDR Issues Professiona l Services All Other Total 523 377 348 322 259 351 2180 38

  39. Average Days to Adjudicate a Dispute Average Days 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 1023 554 289 358 174 68 81 113 39

  40. Facility Ins. Corp. v Patients Medical Center, 574 S.W. 3rd 436 (Court of Appeals, Austin, Dec. 5, 2018); Petition for Review, pending, Case No. 19-0533. Nick Canaday, Special Counsel 40

  41. Statement of the Case: Provider initiated MFDR process following insurance carrier s partial payment of bill. MFDR ordered additional payment. Insurance carrier requests hearing at SOAH. Legal Issue: Which party carries the burden of proof in the de novo contested- case hearing at SOAH? Is it the health care provider that filed the initial request for review? Is it the party that requested a benefit review conference and, ultimately, that the matter be docketed with SOAH? 41

  42. Statement of the Case: The health care provider is the party seeking affirmative relief (in the form of reimbursement) throughout the entire review process, despite an insurance carrier s challenging of a reimbursement award at any given stage within the MFDR context. The burden of proof should always remain with the health care provider regardless of who prevailed in the underlying Medical Dispute Resolution. 42

  43. Q&A 43

  44. Closing Cassie Brown, Commissioner Division of Workers Compensation 44

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#