Funders Perspective on Data Citation and Attribution

undefined
 
Data Citation and Attribution:  a Funder’s
Perspective
 
Sylvia Spengler
US National Science Foundation
 
Why NSF Cares
 
Impact measures for Congress
Demonstrated outcomes for the public
Promotes Interdisciplinary science
Cost-effective
Promotes mechanisms for career development
and contribution awareness in CV, Biosketch,
etc.
Promote different project ties through standards
use
National Science Board Subcommittee on Data
Policy
 
 
Impact of Attribution and Citation in
Data Management Plans
 
 
Review by panels and program managers in
decision to recommend for funding
 
Specific changes to Annual Reports and Final
Reports to recognize Data contributions
 
Requirement to discuss in Results of Previous
NSF Support
 
 
 
Points to Remember: NSF DMP
 
Requirements for content in Data Management
Plans can be specific to Directorates, Offices,
Divisions, Programs, or other NSF units.
 
Solicitations may have additional requirements
 
NSF Policy Office has a single, searchable
website that links to relevant guidance
documents and examples.
http://www.acpt.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp
 
Shake-down  time– not the last word – just like
Broader Impact
.
 
Responses of Others
 
Federal interagency groups on public access to publications/data;
 
Interagency group on digital data: data policy/standards;
 
University libraries in numerous roles:  software for metadata;
minimum metadata for deposit; user-generated metadata systems;
 
Education: New approaches with pipeline from community colleges
through particularly Schools of Information, Informatics;
 
Scientific societies:  Ethics and expectations for membership and
managed journals citation practices
 
 
 
What I heard
 
Citation as a ground ethic in science, “the right thing to do”
Lots of support for data citation, mechanisms, access, sharing in this group;
technology not seen as the most urgent, cultural challenges top
Every discipline/domain is distinct in academia
Citation instructions are more often ignored than not, but not seen as plagiarism to
use data.
Important to remember to address both human and non-human agents
Do not wait for the perfect solution (80/20 version)
Signs of hope from a range of individual communities
 
Dealing with granularity is key
Scientific equivalence seems an open question
 
No one wants to pay or take the time
This is not the T&P Central Committee, unfortunately
Only lawyers get the fine points but it is really important
 
It All Starts with Individuals
 
 
If you don‘t like the news, go out and make
some of your own.*
 
 
 
 
 
*Scoop Nisker, KSAN, 1968
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the perspectives of Sylvia Spengler from the US National Science Foundation on the importance of data citation and attribution. Learn about the impact measures, promotion of interdisciplinary science, and career development mechanisms endorsed by NSF. Understand the significance of attribution and citation in data management plans, along with key points to remember regarding NSF DMP requirements. Gain insights into responses from federal interagency groups, university libraries, and scientific societies regarding public access to publications/data. Delve into the cultural challenges and distinct disciplinary nuances surrounding data citation ethics and practices.

  • Funders Perspective
  • Data Citation
  • Attribution
  • NSF
  • Data Management Plans

Uploaded on Sep 28, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Data Citation and Attribution: a Funders Perspective Sylvia Spengler US National Science Foundation sspengle@nsf.gov

  2. Why NSF Cares Impact measures for Congress Demonstrated outcomes for the public Promotes Interdisciplinary science Cost-effective Promotes mechanisms for career development and contribution awareness in CV, Biosketch, etc. Promote different project ties through standards use National Science Board Subcommittee on Data Policy

  3. Impact of Attribution and Citation in Data Management Plans Review by panels and program managers in decision to recommend for funding Specific changes to Annual Reports and Final Reports to recognize Data contributions Requirement to discuss in Results of Previous NSF Support

  4. Points to Remember: NSF DMP Requirements for content in Data Management Plans can be specific to Directorates, Offices, Divisions, Programs, or other NSF units. Solicitations may have additional requirements NSF Policy Office has a single, searchable website that links to relevant guidance documents and examples. http://www.acpt.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp Shake-down time not the last word just like Broader Impact.

  5. Responses of Others Federal interagency groups on public access to publications/data; Interagency group on digital data: data policy/standards; University libraries in numerous roles: software for metadata; minimum metadata for deposit; user-generated metadata systems; Education: New approaches with pipeline from community colleges through particularly Schools of Information, Informatics; Scientific societies: Ethics and expectations for membership and managed journals citation practices

  6. What I heard Citation as a ground ethic in science, the right thing to do Lots of support for data citation, mechanisms, access, sharing in this group; technology not seen as the most urgent, cultural challenges top Every discipline/domain is distinct in academia Citation instructions are more often ignored than not, but not seen as plagiarism to use data. Important to remember to address both human and non-human agents Do not wait for the perfect solution (80/20 version) Signs of hope from a range of individual communities Dealing with granularity is key Scientific equivalence seems an open question No one wants to pay or take the time This is not the T&P Central Committee, unfortunately Only lawyers get the fine points but it is really important

  7. It All Starts with Individuals If you don t like the news, go out and make some of your own.* *Scoop Nisker, KSAN, 1968

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#